Check it if there is any mistake mention the mistakes and how they be

Check it if there is any mistake mention the mistakes and how they be corrected and I’ll acknowledge it

Reading File

Running Command

I've extracted all the content. Here is a thorough review of every mistake found across the slides:

Mistakes Found in the Presentation

🔴 Spelling / Typographical Errors

Slide	Location	Error	Correction
15	Diagnosis box	`syptomatic`	symptomatic
16	Problem 4	`4.irreversible` (no space after period, lowercase 'i')	4. Irreversible

🔴 Formatting / Consistency Issues

Slide	Issue	Correction
15	`irreversible pulpitis` starts with a lowercase 'i'	Should be capitalised: Irreversible Pulpitis — all other diagnoses in the deck use title or sentence case
16	Problems 3 & 4 are crammed into the same text box with no consistent numbering format (no space after "4.")	Separate into individual shapes/lines, and add a space: 4. Irreversible pulpitis...
16	Problem 2 says "symptomatic periapical periodontitis" while Slide 15's diagnosis says "symptomatic apical periodontitis"	Use consistent terminology throughout — the standard AAE term is Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis

🟡 Clinical / Content Inconsistencies

Slide	Issue	Correction
15	Diagnosis basis states "Normal periapex on radiograph" — but if the diagnosis includes symptomatic apical periodontitis, there should be periapical changes on the radiograph. Normal periapex would support only irreversible pulpitis without apical periodontitis.	Either revise the diagnosis to Irreversible Pulpitis with Normal Periapex OR clarify that early/symptomatic apical periodontitis can exist with a normal-appearing periapex radiographically (widened PDL space may be the only sign) — if that's the case, state it explicitly.
12	TTP section heading says "TTP (Tooth #46)" but the content lists "TTP positive for tooth #46 #36" — the heading implies only #46 was tested	Rename the heading to TTP Results or include both teeth in the heading
17	Phase 2 lists Extraction #35 — but Slide 18 (Phase 4, Plan A) lists Implant for #35, implying extraction is a definitive phase decision, not disease control	Extraction of #35 is typically placed in the Definitive Phase alongside implant planning, not in disease control

🟡 Punctuation / Style Issues

Slide	Issue	Correction
16	Missing comma/separator between `#46` and `#36` in problem 4	"irreversible pulpitis with asymptomatic periapical periodontitis #46, #36" — but wait, #46 is already listed as symptomatic in Problem 2; Problem 4 should only refer to #36
6	"Pain in the right side of the jaw since 15 days"	Correct phrasing: "...for 15 days" (not "since 15 days")

Summary by Priority

Fix immediately — Spelling: syptomatic → symptomatic (Slide 15)
Fix immediately — Capitalisation & spacing: 4.irreversible → 4. Irreversible (Slide 16)
Review — Diagnosis consistency: "symptomatic apical periodontitis" vs. "symptomatic periapical periodontitis" across Slides 15 & 16
Review — Clinical logic: normal periapex + symptomatic apical periodontitis (Slide 15)
Review — Extraction of #35 placement in Phase 2 vs. Phase 4 (Slides 17–18)
Minor — Grammar: "since 15 days" → "for 15 days" (Slide 6)

Let me know which corrections you'd like to apply and I'll update the file directly.

Be quick

Running Command

All corrections applied. Here's the fixed file:

Persetation corrected

Presentation · PPTX

Changes made:

syptomatic → symptomatic (Slide 15)
Capitalised diagnosis: Irreversible Pulpitis with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis (Slide 15)
4.irreversible → 4. Irreversible — added space and capitalised (Slide 16)
since 15 days → for 15 days (Slides 5 & 6)

Is there any other mistake like diagnosis or treatment mistake

Reading File

Finding Sources

Based on a thorough clinical review of all the slides, here are the diagnosis and treatment mistakes:

🔴 Clinical / Diagnosis Mistakes

1. Slide 15 — Diagnosis Basis is Contradictory

Written: "Basis of diagnosis: Exaggerated non-lingering cold response + TTP positive + Normal periapex on radiograph"

Problem: The diagnosis includes Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis (SAP), but SAP by definition means there IS periapical involvement — the AAE diagnostic criteria require either pain on percussion/palpation OR radiographic evidence of periapical pathology. A truly normal periapex rules out apical periodontitis.

Correction options:

If the periapex is genuinely normal radiographically → remove "apical periodontitis" and diagnose simply as Irreversible Pulpitis (which fits perfectly: exaggerated non-lingering cold + TTP + no radiographic periapical change)
OR state: "Early/widened PDL space suggestive of early apical periodontitis" if there is a subtle radiographic finding

2. Slide 12 — #35 Cold Test Findings Don't Match #35 Diagnosis

Investigations (Slide 12): "No response in #35" to cold test + "No response to TTP"

Diagnosis (Slide 16): "Pulp Necrosis with Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis #35"

Problem: No response to cold test + no TTP = Pulp Necrosis ✅ — the pulp necrosis part is correct. But Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis requires a radiographic finding (periapical radiolucency). The presentation doesn't mention any periapical lesion on #35 from the OPG/periapical X-ray. If the OPG shows no periapical change on #35, the correct diagnosis is just Pulp Necrosis with Normal Apical Tissues or Pulp Necrosis alone.

Correction: Confirm the OPG shows a periapical lesion on #35 — if not, remove "Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis."

3. Slide 16 — Problem 4: #36 Diagnosis Inconsistency

Written: "Irreversible pulpitis with asymptomatic periapical periodontitis #36"

But Slide 12 shows: #36 had "Exaggerated non-lingering response" to cold test + "TTP positive"

Problem: TTP positive = Symptomatic apical periodontitis, not asymptomatic. "Asymptomatic" means no pain on percussion.

Correction: Change to Irreversible Pulpitis with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis #36

🔴 Treatment Mistakes

4. Slide 17 — Extraction of #35 in Wrong Phase

Written: Phase 2 (Disease Control) includes "Extraction #35"

Problem: #35 is planned for an implant in Phase 4 (Slide 18). Extraction of #35 should be in the Definitive Phase (Phase 4) alongside implant planning — not in disease control. Premature extraction without implant coordination disrupts treatment sequencing.

Correction: Move "Extraction #35" to Phase 4 — Definitive, listed before the implant step.

5. Slide 18 — Plan B Bridge is Incorrect Span

Written: "Plan B: 3-unit bridge on teeth #34, #35, #36"

Problem: #36 also has irreversible pulpitis requiring RCT, making it a compromised abutment. More importantly, #35 is the missing tooth (after extraction), so the bridge abutments should be #34 and #36 — a standard 3-unit FPD. The way it's written lists the pontic (#35) as an abutment, which is anatomically incorrect phrasing.

Correction: "3-unit bridge: abutments #34 and #36, pontic #35"

Summary Table

Slide	Issue	Correction
15	Normal periapex contradicts SAP diagnosis	Diagnose as Irreversible Pulpitis only, OR confirm radiographic finding
12 + 16	#35 — no radiographic evidence stated for apical periodontitis	Confirm OPG finding before including AAP
16	#36 — TTP positive = symptomatic, not asymptomatic	Change to Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
17	Extraction of #35 in Disease Control phase	Move to Phase 4 Definitive
18	Bridge wording includes pontic as abutment	Clarify: abutments #34 & #36, pontic #35

The biggest clinical error is #36 being labelled asymptomatic when TTP was positive — that's a direct contradiction between the investigation findings and the diagnosis.

For slide 15 treatment made I have also added periodical radiograph on next slides

Got it — if the periapical X-ray (Slide 14) shows a widened PDL space or periapical radiolucency on #46, then Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis is justified, and the basis statement on Slide 15 just needs a small correction.

The fix: Change "Normal periapex on radiograph" to something like:

"Widened PDL space / early periapical change on periapical radiograph"

Because saying "Normal periapex" directly contradicts the apical periodontitis diagnosis — even if the finding is subtle, it needs to be acknowledged in the basis, not described as normal.

So Slide 15 is not wrong in its diagnosis — just wrong in the wording of the basis. The diagnosis Irreversible Pulpitis with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis #46 stands ✅, but the basis line should reflect what the radiograph actually shows rather than calling it normal.

The other 4 mistakes I flagged (especially #36 symptomatic vs asymptomatic and extraction phase placement) still stand. Would you like me to apply any of these corrections to the file?

For slide 12 and 16 I have added opg

Understood — if the OPG (Slide 13) shows a periapical radiolucency around #35, then Pulp Necrosis with Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis #35 is fully justified ✅.

So that clears Slides 12 & 16 for #35 as well.

Remaining valid mistakes are now:

#	Slide	Issue	Status
1	15	Basis says "Normal periapex" but diagnosis includes SAP	⚠️ Still needs wording fix
2	16	#36 — TTP positive = Symptomatic, but labelled asymptomatic apical periodontitis	🔴 Still a clinical error
3	17	Extraction of #35 placed in Disease Control instead of Definitive Phase	🔴 Still a sequencing error
4	18	Plan B bridge wording lists pontic as abutment	⚠️ Minor wording issue

The #36 symptomatic/asymptomatic mislabelling is the most significant remaining clinical mistake. Shall I fix these in the file?

Kindly ensure the opg and periapical for 46 attached in file and recheck it it’s a long case presentation

Running Command

You've run out of free credits. Sign up for a free account to continue using Orris.

This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.