attachment
attachment
attachment

Imbalance Romberg dono towards right backwards Tandem Imbalance Fukuda > 1m Ddk affected Push forward sensation Vertigo dizziness kuch ni No migraine md history B/l mild sloping snhl Conscious fall h face down.. chlte chlte gir jaate h...and pta lg jaata h ab girne wale h Kindly provide me the full detailed analysis of VNG with pictures and MRI. AND HELP ME TO MADE THE DIAGNOSIS

Reading File
Reading File
Running Command
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching Images

VNG videonystagmography smooth pursuit saccade test interpretation

Searching Images

cerebellar ataxia gait imbalance MRI brain cerebellar atrophy

Searching Images

Dix-Hallpike test BPPV positional nystagmus VNG

Searching the Web

VNG interpretation smooth pursuit gain reduced bilateral central vestibular cerebellar 2024

Loading Image
Loading Image
Loading Image
Now I have all the data needed for a comprehensive analysis. Let me compose the full detailed report.

🧠 Complete VNG Analysis & Diagnosis

Patient: Laxmi Narayan | 75 yr/M | Date: 09-May-2026


CLINICAL SUMMARY (From Prescriptions + History)

ParameterFinding
Age/Sex75 years, Male
Chief complaintImbalance, forward push sensation, conscious falls (face down while walking β€” knows he is about to fall)
RombergFalls towards right backwards
Tandem gaitImpaired
Fukuda stepping testDeviation >1 meter
DDK (Diadochokinesis)Affected
Vertigo/DizzinessAbsent
MigraineNo history
HearingB/L mild sloping SNHL
Psychiatric RxMixed anxiety & depression (Tab Restonorm 15 LS + Tab Clonil 50 mg)
ENT Opinion (Dr. Abhay Kumar Singh)Vestibular evaluation β€” complete evaluation; Cerebellar involvement noted; Special emphasis on Vestibular system

VNG FULL ANALYSIS (Parameter by Parameter)


1. SACCADE TEST

TestRight EyeLeft EyeInterpretation
0.3 Hz H – Velocity498.35Β°/s561.86Β°/sβœ… Normal (>275Β°/s)
0.3 Hz H – Precision74.71%60.27%⚠️ Low (normal 80–134%) β€” Left eye hypometric
0.3 Hz H – Latency435.79 ms489.41 msπŸ”΄ Markedly prolonged (normal <260 ms)
0.45 Hz H – Precision68.99%54.12%πŸ”΄ Bilateral hypometria
0.45 Hz H – Latency413.33 ms401.38 msπŸ”΄ Prolonged bilaterally
0.3 Hz V – Velocity189.93Β°/s195.48Β°/s⚠️ Reduced (esp. vertical β€” cerebellar)
0.3 Hz V – Precision60.72%63.04%πŸ”΄ Bilaterally hypometric
0.45 Hz VVelocity 292/419Β°/sPrecision 83/96%Relatively preserved
Interpretation:
  • Bilaterally prolonged saccade latency β€” strongly suggests central (cerebellar/cortical frontal lobe) origin
  • Saccade velocity preserved (rules out severe brainstem/INO), but accuracy (precision) is bilaterally low, indicating cerebellar dysmetria of saccades
  • This is the hallmark of cerebellar saccadic dysfunction β€” the cerebellum (vermis, fastigial nucleus) normally corrects saccade accuracy
πŸ”‘ Key: Saccadic dysmetria (hypometria) + prolonged latency = central oculomotor dysfunction, cerebellar pattern

2. SMOOTH PURSUIT TEST

TestRightward Gain (R/L eye)Leftward Gain (R/L eye)
0.2 Hz H0.49 / 0.530.65 / 0.71
0.4 Hz H0.29 / 0.320.29 / 0.42
TestUpward GainDownward Gain
0.2 Hz V0.61 / 0.570.35 / 0.40
0.4 Hz V0.35 / 0.210.24 / 0.22
Normal smooth pursuit gain = 0.9–1.0 (at low frequencies <20Β°/s)
Interpretation:
  • Severely reduced bilateral smooth pursuit gain β€” all values well below 0.9
  • Reduction is symmetric (both eyes, both directions, both horizontal and vertical)
  • Gain drops further at higher frequencies (0.4 Hz) β€” shows central tracking failure
  • This is not peripheral β€” peripheral lesions do not cause bilateral symmetric smooth pursuit failure
  • Location: Cerebellar (paraflocculus, vestibulocerebellum), pontine nuclei, or cortical (but given DDK affected, cerebellar most likely)
πŸ”‘ Key: Bilateral symmetric smooth pursuit gain <0.5 at 0.2 Hz = Central β€” cerebellar/brainstem
SCA oculomotor pattern β€” saccadic dysmetria + impaired smooth pursuit
SCA oculomotor signature: saccadic hypermetria, fragmented smooth pursuit, central VOR changes β€” compare with this patient's hypo/dysmetric saccades and bilaterally reduced pursuit

3. OPTOKINETIC TEST (OKN)

DirectionRight Eye GainLeft Eye GainFPD
L→R (10°)0.940.79Absent
R→L (10°)1.090.97Absent
Top→Bottom0.810.9067.77° (R eye only)
Bottom→Top1.001.06299.72° (R eye only)
Interpretation:
  • Horizontal OKN gain is relatively preserved (0.79–1.09) β€” better than smooth pursuit at same speeds
  • Vertical OKN gain reduced (0.81–1.06, with absent fast phase in left eye for Topβ†’Bottom)
  • The asymmetry in vertical OKN fast phase (present only in right eye for vertical) suggests unilateral defect in the saccadic generator for vertical OKN β€” a subtle central finding
  • No OKAN (optokinetic after-nystagmus) data, but the velocity storage mechanism can be inferred as partially impaired

4. SPONTANEOUS NYSTAGMUS

ConditionH-SPVV-SPVFPDFreq
In Lightβ€”β€”β€”β€” (absent)
In Dark2.05Β°/s (R eye)β€”β€”0.58 Hz
Interpretation:
  • No spontaneous nystagmus in light (fixation suppresses it β€” normal)
  • Low-amplitude spontaneous nystagmus in dark (SPV 2.05Β°/s, amplitude 2.09Β°) in the right eye only
  • SPV >2Β°/s in dark is borderline significant β€” suggests a slight right-sided vestibular asymmetry OR a central low-grade spontaneous nystagmus
  • The fact it is absent in light (well fixation-suppressed) means it is not strongly peripheral

5. HEAD SHAKE NYSTAGMUS

H-SPV R/LV-SPV R/LFPDFrequency
High Freq Head Shake-3.49 / -3.73Β°/s4.47 / 3.46Β°/s222.94Β° / 226.19Β°2.20 / 2.19 Hz
Interpretation:
  • Post–head shake nystagmus (HSN) present with both horizontal AND vertical components
  • Horizontal component: leftward slow-phase (fast phase ~222–226Β°, i.e., toward lower-left) = subtle left-beating HSN β†’ indicates right vestibular deficit (per HSN rule: nystagmus beats away from the lesion)
  • Vertical component > horizontal β†’ this is the critical finding β€” a predominantly vertical or oblique HSN is a central sign (peripheral HSN is purely horizontal)
  • Fast phase direction ~222–226Β° = SW quadrant (left-downward) β†’ mixed horizontal + downbeat component
πŸ”‘ Central finding: Vertical/oblique head-shake nystagmus β†’ central vestibular pathology (cerebellar or brainstem)

6. HYPERVENTILATION NYSTAGMUS

H-SPV R/LV-SPVFPDFreq
Hyperventilation2.95 / 1.81Β°/s2.05Β°/s343.96Β°1.49 / 0.48 Hz
Interpretation:
  • Nystagmus provoked by hyperventilation β€” beats toward 344Β° (upper-right area)
  • Hyperventilation-induced nystagmus (HVIN) is significant if SPV >5Β°/s; here it is borderline (2.05–2.95Β°/s)
  • However, in the context of central disease, HVIN can unmask vestibular nerve or demyelinating lesions
  • Low amplitude, but directionally consistent with right vestibular asymmetry

7. GAZE TEST (With & Without Fixation)

PositionH-SPVV-SPVFPDSignificance
Center + fixationβ€”β€”β€”Normal
Left + fixationβ€”β€”β€”Normal
Right + fixationβ€”β€”β€”Normal
Up + fixationβ€”β€”β€”Normal
Down + fixation5.43Β°/s (R eye)β€”β€”Abnormal
Center – fixationβ€”β€”β€”Normal
Left – fixationβ€”β€”β€”Normal
Up – fixationH: 2.10Β°/sV: 1.72 / 1.79Β°/s315.42Β°Abnormal
Right – fixationH: -4.01 / -5.52Β°/sV: 3.35 / 2.33Β°/s221–203Β°Abnormal
Down – fixationβ€”β€”β€”Normal
Interpretation:
  • Gaze-evoked nystagmus (GEN) without fixation, especially in upgaze and rightward gaze
  • Upgaze nystagmus without fixation (SPV 1.72–2.10Β°/s, FPD 315Β° = upper-left direction) β€” upbeat component, direction-changing in different gaze positions
  • Rightward gaze nystagmus without fixation (H-SPV -4.01 to -5.52Β°/s, FPD 221Β° = leftward) β€” left-beating nystagmus on right gaze
  • Down-gaze with fixation: V-SPV 5.43Β°/s β€” present even with fixation, which is more significant
  • This pattern of direction-changing gaze-evoked nystagmus = central sign (cerebellar/brainstem)
πŸ”‘ Key: Bidirectional gaze-evoked nystagmus = central vestibular pathology. In peripheral disease, nystagmus is unidirectional and suppressed by fixation.

8. POSITIONAL TEST β€” DIX-HALLPIKE

Right Dix-Hallpike (Supine Head Ext. + Right)

H-SPV R/LV-SPV R/LFPDFreq
Supine H+R3.86 / 2.16Β°/s2.09 / 1.84Β°/s330.27Β° / 332.81Β°1.37 / 1.20 Hz
Sit H+R (recovery)β€” / 16.87Β°/s-4.55 / -2.87Β°/sβ€” / 356.28Β°0.91 / 1.50 Hz
Fast phase 328–332Β° = upper-right direction = torsional-upbeat component β†’ this is the direction expected in right posterior canal BPPV. However, the SPV is low (2–4Β°/s; typically BPPV has SPV >10Β°/s in the acute phase). The return-to-sitting SPV of 16.87Β°/s is significant.

Left Dix-Hallpike (Supine Head Ext. + Left) β€” Two recordings:

RecordingH-SPV R/LV-SPV R/LFPDFreq
First (Sit-L)-6.26 / -12.77Β°/sβ€”β€”1.32 / 1.04 Hz
Supine H+L-5.73 / -7.01Β°/s8.94 / 10.77Β°/s213.78Β° / 229.95Β°1.93 / 2.05 Hz
Second Sit-L-3.13 / -10.29Β°/s2.05 / -9.67Β°/s216.57Β° / 142.79Β°1.40 / 1.99 Hz
FPD 213–229Β° = lower-left = downbeat + torsional toward left. This is the expected direction for left posterior canal BPPV in the Hallpike-down position.
Key observations:
  • Nystagmus is present bilaterally with both right and left Dix-Hallpike
  • The frequencies are high (1.5–2 Hz) and SPVs are moderate
  • Geotropic pattern (nystagmus towards ground with both sides during roll test) + bilateral Dix-Hallpike positivity is atypical for classic BPPV
  • This could represent cupulolithiasis OR β€” more importantly β€” central positional nystagmus (which can mimic BPPV but lacks the typical latency, fatigability, and torsional specificity)
⚠️ Central positional nystagmus: No latency (appears immediately), non-fatigable, variable direction, seen in posterior fossa/cerebellar lesions
Central vs Peripheral positional nystagmus algorithm
STANDING algorithm: This patient's inability to walk independently + gaze-evoked nystagmus β†’ central pathway

9. McCLURE-PAGNINI (SUPINE ROLL) TEST

PositionH-SPV R/LV-SPV R/LFPD (L eye)Freq
Sit→Supine———Normal
Right Lateralβ€” / -12.21Β°/s3.91 / 3.65Β°/s208.38Β°0.70 / 1.21 Hz
Supine Neutral (1)β€” / -5.68Β°/s3.00 / 2.83Β°/s225.98Β°0.52 / 1.57 Hz
Left Lateralβ€” / -5.25Β°/s4.09 / 4.77Β°/s233.92Β°0.61 / 1.44 Hz
Supine Neutral (2)1.84Β°/s / β€”2.96 / 2.72Β°/s303.89Β°0.98 / 0.31 Hz
FPD consistently around 208–234Β° (lower-left direction) in multiple positions. This means the nystagmus direction is consistent across positions, not changing with laterality β€” this is a central positional nystagmus pattern, not the geotropic/ageotropic direction-changing pattern of horizontal canal BPPV.
πŸ”‘ Direction-consistent positional nystagmus across multiple positions = CENTRAL, not BPPV

10. HEAD POSITION TEST (Yaw/Pitch/Roll)

PositionH-SPVV-SPVFPDComment
Yaw Right-6.62Β°/s (R eye)β€”β€”Left-beating in right head position
Yaw Left-1.94 / +21.54Β°/s2.99 / 3.59Β°/s236.50 / 344.45Β°Strong nystagmus in left ear down
Pitch Forwardβ€”6.54 / 13.48Β°/sβ€”Vertical nystagmus on forward pitch
Pitch Backwardβ€” / -4.59Β°/s2.54Β°/s / β€”β€”Mild vertical
Roll Right-15.75 / -6.53Β°/s-3.86 / 2.50Β°/s167.87Β° / 225.55Β°Strong H+V nystagmus
Roll Leftβ€” / -0.32Β°/sβ€” / -2.05Β°/s109.38Β°Mild
Critical findings:
  • Yaw Left: L eye H-SPV 21.54Β°/s, FPD 344Β° (upper-right) β€” strong right-beating nystagmus with head turned left = right canal paresis finding OR apogeotropic horizontal canal pattern
  • Pitch Forward: V-SPV 13.48Β°/s (vertical nystagmus on head pitch) β€” anterior/posterior canal pathology or central
  • Roll Right: H-SPV -15.75Β°/s, FPD 167–225Β° β€” strongest positional response throughout the test

11. SUBJECTIVE VISUAL VERTICAL (SVV)

TrialDeviationDirection
Clockwise0Β°Normal
Anticlockwise-14Β° (Left)Clockwise
Blank Background0Β°Normal
Interpretation:
  • SVV tilted -14Β° in one condition β€” significant deviation (normal ≀2.5Β°)
  • SVV tilt indicates otolith (utricle) dysfunction or central (brainstem/cerebellar) tilted internal vertical estimate
  • A 14Β° deviation is substantial β€” suggests either right otolith (utricular) dysfunction (causing leftward tilt of perceived vertical) OR β€” given all other central signs β€” a central graviceptive pathway disturbance
  • This correlates with the Romberg tilt to right and subjective push sensation
πŸ”‘ SVV deviation + push sensation = Ocular tilt reaction (OTR) spectrum β€” strongly suggests graviceptive pathway involvement (utricle β†’ inferior olive β†’ cerebellum or brainstem)

VNG SUMMARY TABLE

TestResultSignificance
SaccadesBilateral dysmetria, prolonged latencyCentral β€” cerebellar
Smooth PursuitSeverely reduced bilateral (0.29–0.65)Central β€” cerebellar/brainstem
OKNH-preserved, V-asymmetricCentral subtle
Spontaneous (dark)Low-grade right eye nystagmusMild right vestibular tone asymmetry
Head ShakeOblique/vertical HSNCentral sign
HyperventilationLow-grade HVINCentral-peripheral mixed
Gaze (no fixation)Bidirectional GEN, up+rightCentral β€” cerebellar
Gaze (down+fixation)V-SPV 5.43Β°/sAbnormal β€” central
Dix-HallpikeBilateral, moderate SPVCentral positional nystagmus
Roll testDirection-consistent nystagmusCentral, not BPPV
Head positionStrong Yaw-L + Pitch-F responseRight otolith/canal asymmetry
SVV-14Β° leftOtolith/central graviceptive

MRI RECOMMENDATIONS & EXPECTED FINDINGS

Based on this VNG pattern, the following MRI protocol is essential:

What to Order:

MRI Brain with Gadolinium β€” Focused Posterior Fossa Protocol:
  • T1 with/without contrast
  • T2/FLAIR
  • DWI (to rule out acute infarct)
  • SWI (microbleeds, vascular)
  • 3D FIESTA/CISS (inner ear, cranial nerves)
  • T2 sagittal midline (cerebellar vermis)

Expected Findings in this Patient:

Most likely:
  1. Cerebellar atrophy β€” particularly vermis and flocculonodular lobe (gait ataxia + positional nystagmus)
  2. Pontocerebellar atrophy β€” if DDK is bilateral
  3. Microangiopathic white matter changes (given age 75, hypertension risk)
MRI showing cerebellar atrophy (white arrow indicates shrunken vermis and widened sulci)
T1 sagittal MRI: This is what to expect β€” cerebellar atrophy with widened sulci (white arrow). The vermis is particularly vulnerable in pure cerebellar degeneration.
Differentials on MRI:
  • Bilateral white matter hyperintensities (vascular/Binswanger) β€” can cause central imbalance
  • Posterior fossa tumor (rare at this age β€” meningioma, ependymoma)
  • MSA-C (Multiple System Atrophy – Cerebellar type): "hot cross bun sign" in pons on T2
  • SCA (Spinocerebellar Ataxia): cerebellar >> brainstem atrophy

DIAGNOSIS

Working Diagnosis:

CENTRAL VESTIBULAR SYNDROME β€” CEREBELLAR ORIGIN

With secondary bilateral peripheral vestibular asymmetry (right > left)

Differential Diagnoses (in order of probability):

#DiagnosisSupporting Evidence
1Cerebellar Degeneration (Late-onset) β€” sporadic or vascularAge 75, DDK+, tandem gait+, bilateral smooth pursuit failure, bilateral saccadic dysmetria, central positional nystagmus, SVV tilt
2MSA-C (Multiple System Atrophy – Cerebellar)Age, progressive imbalance, autonomic features (urinary hesitancy in prescription!), no clear vestibular vertigo
3Vascular cerebellar ataxia (multi-infarct / chronic ischemia)Age 75, gradual progressive falls, bilateral SNHL
4SCA (Spinocerebellar Ataxia)Oculomotor findings similar to SCA1/SCA2/SCA3 (image above), but usually presents earlier in life
5Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH)Triad: gait apraxia (cannot lift feet) + urinary symptoms (seen in prescription) + cognition β€” MRI needed

⚠️ RED FLAG β€” Look at the Prescription:

The psychiatric prescription mentions:
  • Fear of voiding urine, hesitancy in passing urine β†’ autonomic urinary dysfunction
  • Disturbed sleep, decreased confidence β†’ autonomic/central
Urinary dysfunction + cerebellar ataxia + gait imbalance in a 75-year-old = MSA-C or NPH until proven otherwise.

CORRELATION: Clinical Signs β†’ Anatomical Localization

Clinical FindingAnatomical Correlate
Romberg + (falls backward-right)Right vestibulospinal pathway
Fukuda >1m deviationRight labyrinthine/vestibular nuclear asymmetry
Tandem gait failureCerebellar vermis / spinocerebellar tracts
DDK affectedCerebellar hemisphere (ipsilateral)
Forward push sensationGraviceptive pathway (otolith β†’ cerebellum)
Conscious falls (face-down)Severe cerebellar gait ataxia β€” "cerebellar lunges"
No vertigo/dizzinessAgainst peripheral β€” pure imbalance = cerebellar
Bilateral SNHL (sloping)Cochlear (age-related / vascular) β€” separate
SVV -14Β°Utricle or graviceptive central pathway

MANAGEMENT PLAN

Immediate:

  1. MRI Brain with gadolinium β€” posterior fossa focus (urgent)
  2. Neurology referral β€” to rule out MSA-C, NPH, SCA
  3. CT Brain if MRI not immediately available (to rule out hemorrhage/mass)

Investigations:

  • Blood: CBC, LFT, RFT, thyroid (TSH), B12, folate, HbA1c, VDRL
  • Genetic panel: SCA1/2/3/6/7 (if family history or younger onset)
  • Urodynamics / urological evaluation (given urinary symptoms)
  • VEMP (cVEMP + oVEMP) β€” to assess otolith function directly
  • vHIT β€” to assess semicircular canal VOR (not done here)

Vestibular Rehabilitation:

  • Gaze stabilization exercises (smooth pursuit + saccade retraining)
  • Balance training (static + dynamic, Cawthorne-Cooksey modified)
  • Fall prevention program β€” high priority (conscious falls, face-down)

Medication:

  • Current Restonorm (clonazepam 0.5 mg HS) β€” appropriate for anxiety + can reduce vestibular excitability at night
  • Betahistine β€” limited value in central disease but may help peripheral component
  • Vitamin D + Calcium β€” fall prevention in elderly
  • Avoid vestibular suppressants (meclizine, cinnarizine) β€” counterproductive in cerebellar disease

FINAL DIAGNOSTIC IMPRESSION

VNG IMPRESSION:
1. CENTRAL OCULOMOTOR DYSFUNCTION
   - Bilateral saccadic dysmetria with prolonged latency
   - Severely reduced bilateral smooth pursuit (cerebellar pattern)
   - Bidirectional gaze-evoked nystagmus without fixation
   
2. CENTRAL POSITIONAL NYSTAGMUS
   - Direction-consistent across positions (not BPPV)
   - Bilateral Dix-Hallpike positive (no fatigability pattern)
   
3. VERTICAL/OBLIQUE HEAD-SHAKE NYSTAGMUS
   - Indicates central vestibular pathology
   
4. OTOLITH DYSFUNCTION
   - SVV deviated -14Β° (right > left utricular)
   - Push sensation, Romberg tilt right
   
5. MILD RIGHT PERIPHERAL VESTIBULAR ASYMMETRY
   - Yaw-Left: strong right-beating nystagmus (right canal/nerve)
   - Head-Shake: horizontal component leftward (right loss)

CONCLUSION:
Central Vestibular Syndrome, cerebellar pattern
DDx: Cerebellar degeneration, MSA-C, NPH
Recommend: MRI Brain (posterior fossa), Neurology referral

βš•οΈ Clinical Note: This patient is a 75-year-old male with conscious falls (face-down, knowing he is about to fall) β€” this is classic cerebellar gait ataxia (not syncopal, not vestibular drop attacks). The complete VNG shows a consistent central cerebellar pattern. The urinary hesitancy documented by the psychiatrist is a critical additional clue pointing toward MSA-C. MRI is urgently needed.

Have you given detailed VNG analysis ?

Your credits are exhausted. Your daily credits reset tomorrow, or you can purchase a top-up for more.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.