Here is a thorough overview of the Hartmann procedure drawn from multiple surgical textbooks:
Hartmann Procedure
History & Background
The Hartmann procedure was originally described in 1923 by Henri Hartmann as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection. It replaced the older three-stage approach (initial colostomy, subsequent resection, then colostomy takedown) advocated by Lockhart Mummery and Smithwick. It quickly became the standard emergency operation for left-sided colorectal emergencies.
- Fischer's Mastery of Surgery, 8th ed.
Definition
The Hartmann procedure involves:
- Resection of the diseased segment (typically sigmoid colon/upper rectum)
- Formation of an end colostomy in the left lower quadrant
- Oversewing/closure of the rectal stump (the "Hartmann pouch"), which is left in the pelvis
No primary anastomosis is made. It is a two-stage procedure - restoration of bowel continuity (Hartmann reversal/takedown) is performed as a separate, later operation.
- Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 11th ed.
Indications
- Perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey grades 3 and 4) - the most common indication
- Left-sided obstructing colorectal cancer when primary anastomosis is unsafe
- Colorectal trauma with extensive tissue loss
- Left-sided large bowel emergencies in unstable patients or in the setting of gross contamination
Why avoid primary anastomosis in these settings?
In emergencies with generalized peritonitis, hemodynamic instability, or heavy fecal contamination, primary anastomosis carries unacceptably high risk of anastomotic leak. The Hartmann procedure offers a safer, staged approach.
- Current Surgical Therapy, 14th ed. | Sabiston Textbook of Surgery
Surgical Technique
Preoperative:
- Fluid resuscitation, IV antibiotics, DVT prophylaxis
- Stoma site marking by enterostomal therapy nurse (reduces stoma complications, improves QoL)
- Patient in lithotomy position (allows pelvic access and rectal instrumentation)
Intraoperative steps:
- Midline laparotomy - provides full exposure and allows decompression
- Retract the sigmoid medially; identify and protect the left ureter and gonadal vessels - if anatomy is unclear, dissect close to the colon to avoid ureteral injury
- Mobilize the sigmoid colon; splenic flexure mobilization is often required to ensure tension-free colostomy
- Ligate the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) - distal to the left colic branch in benign disease; high tie for malignancy
- Transect bowel at the proximal resection margin in healthy, pliable bowel
- Transect distally at the proximal rectum - leaving a short rectal stump. A useful tip: resecting only the perforated segment and leaving part of the distal sigmoid makes subsequent reversal easier as the pelvic peritoneum is not disturbed
- Close the rectal stump (Hartmann pouch) - tack it to the lateral peritoneum and mark it with nonabsorbable sutures to aid identification at reversal
- Bring proximal colon through a left lower quadrant trephine as a tension-free end colostomy
Handling the massively dilated colon:
When the colon is markedly distended, preemptive decompression can be done by inserting a Foley catheter through a small purse-string opening at the planned transection site, to evacuate air and liquid stool before handling.
- Fischer's Mastery of Surgery, 8th ed.
Hartmann Reversal (Takedown)
Reversal is a significant, planned reoperation:
- Timing: Typically >3 months after initial surgery. Waiting allows healing and facilitates identification of the Hartmann stump. Earlier reversal (<3 months) risks difficult dissection, enterotomies, and poor stump identification due to adhesions. However, very late reversal increases fibrosis and stump identification problems.
- Preoperative workup:
- Gastrografin enema or flexible endoscopy per rectum - to assess stump length, configuration, and residual sigmoid
- Bowel prep through the colostomy
- Consider ureteral stents (especially if anatomy was difficult initially)
- Surgical steps:
- Low lithotomy position
- Lyse all adhesions - small bowel adhesions to the Hartmann pouch are almost universal; typically requires adhesiolysis from ligament of Treitz to ileocecal valve
- Pass a scope or circular stapler sizer per rectum to identify the stump
- Divide/mobilize the stump
- Perform colorectal anastomosis with a circular stapler via the transanal route
- Leak test the anastomosis
Outcomes of reversal:
- Only ~44% of patients who undergo a Hartmann procedure ever undergo reversal (mean time to reversal: 7.5 months)
- Up to 50% of patients - and higher rates in the elderly - never have the colostomy reversed
- Reversal morbidity: 3-50% (mean 16.3%); mortality: 0-7.1% (mean 1%)
- Compared to closure of a loop ileostomy after primary anastomosis with proximal diversion, Hartmann reversal is associated with higher morbidity due to the extent of the original disease and operation
- Current Surgical Therapy, 14th ed. | Fischer's Mastery of Surgery, 8th ed.
Alternatives to Hartmann's Procedure
| Alternative | Notes |
|---|
| Primary anastomosis + defunctioning loop ileostomy | Preferred when feasible; reversal is easier and morbidity lower than Hartmann reversal |
| On-table colonic lavage + primary anastomosis | Used in stable patients with obstruction but no peritonitis |
| Laparoscopic lavage | For Hinchey III (purulent peritonitis) only; avoids stoma but ~6x higher recurrence rate. DILALA trial favored lavage; LOLA arm of LADIES trial stopped early due to high complications |
| Colonic stent + elective resection | For obstructing malignancy without perforation or peritonitis |
| Mucous fistula | Distal segment brought to skin rather than closed intraperitoneally; easier to identify at reversal |
Complications
- Stoma-related: Parastomal hernia (~50%), skin excoriation, retraction, prolapse, reduced quality of life
- Intraoperative: Ureteral injury, inadvertent bowel perforation (especially in distended colon)
- Reversal-related: Anastomotic leak, enterotomy during adhesiolysis, ureteral injury, wound infection
- Permanent colostomy in up to 50% of patients - a major long-term consequence
Key Teaching Points
- The Hartmann procedure is a damage control colorectal operation - it sacrifices future convenience for immediate safety
- The decision between Hartmann vs. primary anastomosis with diversion rests on patient stability, degree of contamination, and surgeon judgment
- Stoma marking preoperatively by an enterostomal nurse is strongly recommended - it reduces complications and may determine whether the patient can care for the stoma independently at home
- Marking the rectal stump with nonabsorbable sutures and/or tacking it to the lateral peritoneum facilitates identification at reversal
Recent evidence note: A 2024 meta-analysis (PMID 39607440) comparing multi-port vs. single-incision laparoscopic surgery for Hartmann reversal found both approaches are feasible, with ongoing refinement in minimally invasive reversal techniques.