Effect of different feed particle size on cud rumination in ruminants

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

feed particle size rumination ruminants

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

particle size chewing time rumen cattle forage

Reading Article

PMID: 36400612

Reading Article

PMID: 29627250

Reading Article

PMID: 12647969

Reading Article

PMID: 23031313

Searching the Web

feed particle size rumination time ruminants physically effective fiber NDF review

I now have excellent information from PubMed and web sources. Let me compile a comprehensive, well-cited answer.

Effect of Feed Particle Size on Cud Rumination in Ruminants

1. Overview of the Relationship

Feed particle size is one of the most important physical characteristics of a diet that governs rumination behavior in ruminants. Larger, coarser particles stimulate greater chewing activity - both during ingestion (eating time) and during cud rumination - while finely ground or pelleted feeds markedly reduce total chewing time. This relationship was formally systematized through the concept of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF), introduced by Mertens (1997), which integrates both NDF content and particle size into a single measure of fiber's functional role in maintaining rumen health.

2. Mechanics of Cud Rumination

During rumination, the ruminant regurgitates a bolus (cud) from the rumen, re-chews it to reduce particle size further, mixes it with saliva, and re-swallows it. The key points:
  • Trigger for rumination: The rumen's fibrous mat (large floating particles) stimulates reticular/rumen wall mechanoreceptors, initiating the rumination reflex. Larger particles create a denser, more stimulatory mat.
  • Goal of rumination: To reduce particle size below the "escapable threshold" (~1-2 mm) so particles can pass through the reticulo-omasal orifice.
  • Salivary buffering: Each chewing cycle produces saliva rich in bicarbonate and phosphate buffers. Longer rumination = more saliva = better rumen pH buffering, reducing risk of subacute rumen acidosis (SARA).

3. Effect of Particle Size on Rumination Time

General Pattern

Based on Beauchemin's comprehensive 2018 review (PMID 29627250), lactating dairy cows spend approximately:
  • 4.5 h/day eating (range: 2.4-8.5 h)
  • 7 h/day ruminating (range: 2.5-10.5 h)
  • Maximum total chewing time: ~16 h/day
Critically:
  • Long particles (≥19 mm) predominantly increase eating time
  • Medium particles (4-19 mm) and forage NDF intake predominantly affect rumination time
  • Finely ground or pelleted feeds drastically reduce both eating and rumination time

Physical Effectiveness Factors (Mertens, 1997)

From the USDA Dairy Forage Research Center data, the relative effectiveness of different particle forms on rumination (relative to long grass hay = 1.00):
Feed FormParticle Size (cm)Ruminating Factor
Long hay-1.00
Coarse chopped4.8-8.0 cm0.95
Medium-coarse chopped2.4-4.0 cm0.90
Medium chopped1.2-2.0 cm0.85
Fine chopped0.3-0.5 cm0.65
Ground or pelleted0.15-0.25 cm0.15
Rolled grain-0.50
This table shows that pelleting or fine grinding reduces rumination effectiveness to only 15% of long hay - a striking reduction.

4. Dietary Particle Size and Rumen pH

Beauchemin et al. (2003) (PMID 12647969), using alfalfa-based diets in cannulated dairy cows, demonstrated:
  • Increasing peNDF content increased ruminating time (h/day)
  • Chopped hay vs. ground hay: cows on chopped hay had more time at rumen pH >6.2 and less time at pH <5.8 (acidosis threshold)
  • Feed particle size was moderately correlated with ruminating time but not with eating time
  • peNDF was negatively correlated with the area-under-the-curve below pH 5.8, confirming its protective role against acidosis

5. Sorting Behavior and Particle Length

Suarez-Mena et al. (2013) (PMID 23031313) fed diets with different forage particle lengths (short, medium, long hay or straw) but similar peNDF. Results:
  • Total rumination time was not significantly different across diets when peNDF was held constant
  • Cows sorted against longer particles with the sorting behavior increasing linearly as particle length increased
  • Greater forage particle length increased sorting behavior but had no effect on rumen fermentation or total chewing behavior (when peNDF was matched)
  • This means it is peNDF, not absolute particle length alone, that drives rumination

6. Forage Quality × Particle Size Interaction

From the Miner Institute study (Grant, 2020) and web sources:
  • High-quality forages (low uNDF240 - undigested NDF at 240 h) break down more quickly due to plant fragility, reducing eating time even if cut long
  • Low-quality forages (high uNDF240, e.g., mature hay, straw) take more chewing to reduce particle size, increasing both eating and rumination time
  • The bolus (cud) particle size at re-swallowing is remarkably consistent (~10-11 mm) regardless of incoming feed particle size - cows chew to a uniform endpoint before swallowing

7. Measuring Feed Particle Size in Practice

The Penn State Particle Separator (PSPS) - a 3 or 4-sieve shaker system - is the standard tool to measure dietary peNDF on farm. Fractions are classified as:
  • Long (>19 mm): target 2-8% of DM in total mixed rations (TMR)
  • Medium (8-19 mm): target 30-50%
  • Small (1.18-8 mm) and fine (<1.18 mm): remainder
Inadequate long/medium fractions reduce rumination time and increase acidosis risk.

8. Species Differences

  • Dairy cattle and beef cattle: Well-studied; the peNDF framework applies directly
  • Sheep and goats: Smaller rumen, finer particle size threshold for passage; goats show more variable responses - a study on goats showed that reducing peNDF did not significantly affect chewing activity in some settings, contrasting with cattle (Animal Bioscience review)
  • Buffalo: Similar to cattle; long-stem roughage strongly stimulates rumination
  • Camelids (camels, llamas): Modified "pseudo-ruminants" with a 3-compartment stomach; particle size effects on rumination are qualitatively similar but less studied

9. Practical and Clinical Implications

ScenarioEffect on RuminationConsequence
Fine-ground or pelleted total dietGreatly reduced (rumination factor ~0.15-0.25)SARA, low milk fat, laminitis risk
Long-stem hay inclusionStrong stimulation of ruminationRumen buffering, normal VFA profiles
Over-processed corn silageStarch escapes, less effective fiberReduced rumination time
High-grain finishing dietLow peNDF, short particle sizeAcidosis risk without buffering strategies
Transition cow feedingMust include long-fiber sourcesPrevents post-calving acidosis

Key References


Summary: Larger feed particle size increases both eating time and rumination time per unit of feed consumed, stimulates rumen mat formation, promotes salivation and rumen pH buffering, and reduces acidosis risk. Pelleting or fine grinding can reduce the ruminating effectiveness of fiber to as little as 15% of that of long hay. However, it is the physically effective NDF - the product of NDF concentration and the particle's physical effectiveness factor - that best predicts rumination time, not absolute particle length alone. Sorting behavior and forage digestibility further modify the relationship between dietary particle length and actual rumination activity.

Effect of different feed particle size on cud rumination in ruminants research papers

Searching PubMed

feed particle size rumination ruminants

Searching PubMed

particle size chewing activity rumen pH dairy cattle

Reading Article

PMID: 12214987

Reading Article

PMID: 15483175

Reading Article

PMID: 17369233

Reading Article

PMID: 38452969

Searching PubMed

forage particle size rumination time sheep goats small ruminants

Searching PubMed

particle size rumination sheep goats small ruminants

Reading Article

PMID: 31351713

Reading Article

PMID: 35560728

Reading Article

PMID: 38258599

Searching PubMed

corn silage processing particle size rumination dairy cow

I now have a comprehensive set of research papers. Here is a fully organized, annotated bibliography of key research papers on feed particle size and cud rumination in ruminants:

Research Papers: Effect of Feed Particle Size on Cud Rumination in Ruminants

Below is a curated list organized by topic and chronology, with key findings from each study.

REVIEWS & FOUNDATIONAL PAPERS


1. Beauchemin KA (1991)

Ingestion and mastication of feed by dairy cattle Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 7(2):439-463 | PMID: 1654175
Key contribution: One of the earliest comprehensive reviews establishing how feed physical form governs ingestive chewing and rumination mechanics. Describes the neurophysiology of the chewing reflex and the role of rumen mat stimulation in initiating cud regurgitation. Foundational reading for understanding the particle size-rumination link.

2. Mertens DR (1997)

Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows J Dairy Sci. 80(7):1463-1481
Key contribution: Introduced the concept of physically effective NDF (peNDF) - integrating NDF content with particle size into a single functional measure. Proposed that peNDF predicts chewing activity (eating + ruminating time) and can be used for ration formulation. Established that finely ground/pelleted feeds have a peNDF "effectiveness factor" as low as 0.15 relative to long hay (1.00). One of the most-cited papers in Journal of Dairy Science.

3. Heinrichs AJ, Buckmaster DR, Lammers BP (1999)

Processing, mixing, and particle size reduction of forages for dairy cattle J Anim Sci. 77(1):180-186 | PMID: 10064042
Key contribution: Reviews mechanical aspects of forage processing and their effects on particle size distribution. Discusses the Penn State Particle Separator (PSPS) as the standard on-farm tool for measuring dietary peNDF. Demonstrates how chopping length at harvest and mixer settings alter effective fiber in total mixed rations (TMR).

4. Grant RJ (1997)

Interactions among forages and nonforage fiber sources J Dairy Sci. 80(7):1438-1446 | PMID: 9241606
Key contribution: Examines how non-forage fiber sources (soybean hulls, beet pulp, cottonseed) interact with forage particle size to affect total chewing time. Concludes that nonforage fiber sources cannot fully substitute for the physically effective fiber of long-stemmed forages in stimulating rumination.

5. Martz FA & Belyea RL (1986)

Role of particle size and forage quality in digestion and passage by cattle and sheep J Dairy Sci. 69(2):475-489 | PMID: 3745592
Key contribution: A comparative cattle-and-sheep study showing that particle size and forage quality jointly determine rumen retention time and passage rate. Larger particles are selectively retained in the rumen (longer retention time) and undergo more rumination cycles before escaping through the reticulo-omasal orifice.

CONTROLLED EXPERIMENTS - DAIRY CATTLE


6. Grant RJ, Colenbrander VF, Albright JL (1990)

Effect of particle size of forage and rumen cannulation upon chewing activity and laterality in dairy cows J Dairy Sci. 73(11):3258-3268 | PMID: 2273146
Key contribution: Directly measured chewing behavior using jaw movement sensors. Showed that coarse forage particle size significantly increased total chewing time. Also noted laterality in jaw movement (cows chew more on one side), a behavioral nuance rarely studied. One of the first quantitative studies using instrumented measurements of chewing.

7. Krause KM, Combs DK, Beauchemin KA (2002)

Effects of forage particle size and grain fermentability in midlactation cows. II. Ruminal pH and chewing activity J Dairy Sci. 85(8):1947-1957 | PMID: 12214987
Key contribution: Used ruminally cannulated cows in a 2×2 factorial (coarse vs. fine alfalfa silage × low vs. high ruminally fermentable starch). Critical findings:
  • Fine chopping decreased rumination time from 485 to 320 min/day (a 34% reduction)
  • Fine forage plus fermentable starch: rumen pH dropped to 5.81 vs. 6.02 with coarse forage
  • Time at rumen pH <5.8 more than doubled with fine-cut forage (6.4 to 11.8 h/day)
  • peNDF intake (particles on top PSPS screen) correlated strongly with rumination time (r = 0.61)

8. Beauchemin KA, Yang WZ, Rode LM (2003)

Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and milk production J Dairy Sci. 86(2):630-643 | PMID: 12647969
Key contribution: 4×4 Latin square with cannulated cows. Showed:
  • Increasing peNDF significantly increased ruminating time (h/day)
  • Chopped vs. ground hay: more time at rumen pH >6.2 and less time at pH <5.8
  • peNDF negatively correlated with area-under-the-curve below pH 5.8 (acidosis index)
  • Particle size was moderately correlated with ruminating time but NOT with eating time
  • Milk production was not affected by particle size, but rumen health clearly was

9. Teimouri Yansari A et al. (2004)

Effects of alfalfa particle size and specific gravity on chewing activity, digestibility, and performance of Holstein dairy cows J Dairy Sci. 87(11):3912-3924 | PMID: 15483175
Key contribution: Used 3 particle sizes of alfalfa hay (geometric mean: 7.83, 4.04, 1.14 mm) in a 3×3 Latin square. Key findings:
  • Decreasing particle size reduced rumination time, eating time, rumen pH, and milk fat
  • Finer particles had higher bulk density, faster hydration, and shorter rumen mean retention time (RMRT)
  • Faster passage rate with fine particles = less time for fiber digestion in rumen
  • NDF digestibility decreased with finer particles
  • Demonstrated that particle size affects both chewing behavior and rumen kinetics simultaneously

10. Zebeli Q, Tafaj M et al. (2007)

Effects of varying dietary forage particle size in two concentrate levels on chewing activity, ruminal mat characteristics, and passage in dairy cows J Dairy Sci. 90(4):2015-2024 | PMID: 17369233
Key contribution: Elegantly separated the effect of particle size (6 vs. 30 mm hay) at both low and high concentrate levels. Key findings:
  • In low-concentrate diets: increasing particle size (6→30 mm) significantly increased rumination time and rumen mat consistency
  • In high-concentrate diets: coarser hay extended rumination by 100 min/day and increased rumen mat
  • BUT in high-concentrate, coarser hay did NOT improve rumen pH or fibrolytic capacity - fiber digestion shifted to the hindgut
  • Demonstrated that rumination time alone is insufficient to assess dietary physical effectiveness when concentrate levels are very high

11. Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA, Rode LM (2001)

Barley processing, forage:concentrate, and forage length effects on chewing and digesta passage in lactating cows J Dairy Sci. 84(12):2691-2704 | PMID: 11814027
Key contribution: Showed that both forage-to-concentrate ratio and forage particle length independently affect chewing time. Longer forage particles and higher forage:concentrate ratios synergistically increased total chewing time, rumen mat formation, and fiber retention.

12. Haselmann A et al. (2019)

Feeding forages with reduced particle size in a total mixed ration improves feed intake, total-tract digestibility, and performance of organic dairy cows J Dairy Sci. 102(10):9268-9282 | PMID: 31351713
Key contribution: Compared conventional (geometric mean 52 mm) vs. reduced (7 mm) particle size in high-forage organic dairy diets. Found:
  • Reduced particle size increased DMI by +1.8 kg/day
  • Reduced eating and ruminating time per kg DMI (4.8 and 1.9 min/kg, respectively)
  • Total-tract digestibility improved with fine particles
  • Energy-corrected milk yield was higher (+2.3 kg/day) on reduced particle size
  • Important nuance: in very high-forage diets, reducing particle size can actually improve performance despite lower rumination efficiency per unit DM

SORTING BEHAVIOR AND PARTICLE LENGTH


13. Suarez-Mena FX, Zanton GI, Heinrichs AJ (2013)

Effect of forage particle length on rumen fermentation, sorting and chewing activity of late-lactation and non-lactating dairy cows Animal. 7(2):255-262 | PMID: 23031313
Key contribution: Fed diets with similar peNDF but different geometric mean forage length (short, medium, long hay/straw). Found:
  • Total rumination time was NOT different when peNDF was matched across particle lengths
  • Cows sorted against longer particles, with sorting increasing linearly as particle length increased
  • Confirms that peNDF, not raw particle length, is the key driver of rumination behavior
  • Longer particles actually create sorting problems that may reduce effective fiber intake

14. Suarez-Mena FX, Lascano GJ, Heinrichs AJ (2013)

Chewing activities and particle size of rumen digesta and feces of precision-fed dairy heifers fed different forage levels with increasing levels of distillers grains J Dairy Sci. 96(8):5177-5187 | PMID: 23769354
Key contribution: Showed that increasing distillers grains (replacing forage) progressively reduced chewing activity and altered rumen and fecal particle size distributions. Demonstrated the role of fiber source (not just particle size) in modulating rumination.

SMALL RUMINANTS (SHEEP & GOATS)


15. Krone B, Hummel J, Riek A, Clauss M, Hünerberg M (2024)

Comparative study of feeding and rumination behaviour of goats and sheep fed mixed grass hay of different chop length J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 108(3):752-762 | PMID: 38258599
Key contribution: Direct comparison of sheep vs. goats fed long (35 mm) vs. short (7 mm) hay. Key findings:
  • Sheep showed higher rumination:eating (R:E) ratio than goats - sheep ruminate proportionally more
  • Sheep had a higher R:E ratio for short hay than long hay - suggesting sheep compensate for reduced particle stimulation by ruminating relatively more
  • Goats consumed more long hay than short hay (preference)
  • More daily boluses, higher chewing frequency, and more chews per day in sheep vs. goats
  • No species difference in fecal particle size, suggesting similar end-point comminution
  • Discusses evolutionary context: sheep may have adapted to abrasive diets requiring more ruminal "washing" before effective chewing

PARTICLE RETENTION & PASSAGE KINETICS


16. Zhang X, Li Y, Terranova M et al. (2023)

Individual differences in digesta retention and their relation to chewing in cattle - A pilot investigation J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 107(2):504-513 | PMID: 35560728
Key contribution: Explored inter-individual variation in chewing intensity (chews per kg DMI) and its relationship with rumen mean retention time (MRT). Found:
  • Higher chewing intensity (not just frequency) was associated with shorter MRT in the reticulorumen - more effective particle size reduction allows earlier passage
  • Chewing behavior could serve as a non-invasive proxy for MRT
  • Highlights that individual cow variation in rumination behavior is substantial and clinically meaningful

17. Singer M, Codron D, Lechner I et al. (2024)

The effect of size and density on the mean retention time of particles in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) Comp Biochem Physiol A. 292:111621 | PMID: 38452969
Key contribution: Used plastic markers of varying size (1, 10, 20 mm) and density in fistulated reindeer on browse vs. pelleted diets. Found:
  • Particles that escaped without being ruminated had shorter MRT than ruminated particles
  • Higher intake led to a higher proportion of intact (non-ruminated) particles passing through - not faster rumination, but more particles bypassing the rumination cycle entirely (pressure-driven escape at high gut fill)
  • The critical size threshold for forestomach escape is body-size dependent across ruminant species
  • Reindeer retained 1 mm particles longer than cattle, muskoxen, and moose - reflecting body size effects on rumen morphology

peNDF SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT


18. Grant RJ (2023)

Symposium review: Physical characterization of feeds and development of the physically effective fiber system J Dairy Sci. 106(6):3946-3961 | PMID: 36400612 | DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22419
Key contribution: Most recent comprehensive review of the peNDF concept's historical development and future directions. Key points:
  • Reviews how forage particle size influences chewing activity, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acid profiles, and milk fat
  • Traces the peNDF system from its origins to incorporation into nutrition models (NRC, NASEM)
  • Highlights the corn silage fragmentation index as an extension for starch availability assessment
  • Identifies improved physicochemical evaluation of rumen fiber degradation as the top future research priority
  • Concludes that starch and fermentation pH interact with peNDF to determine minimum fiber requirements

19. Beauchemin KA (2018)

Invited review: Current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows J Dairy Sci. 101(6):4935-4947 | PMID: 29627250 | DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13706
Key contribution: The most comprehensive and up-to-date review available. Key quantitative data:
  • Cows spend ~4.5 h/day eating and ~7 h/day ruminating (max total chewing = 16 h/day)
  • Long particles (≥19 mm) primarily affect eating time; medium particles (4-19 mm) primarily affect rumination time
  • Particle size reduction during eating/rumination results in a bolus of relatively uniform ~10-11 mm regardless of original feed size
  • Reviews use of electronic sensors (noseband sensors, accelerometers) for real-time monitoring of rumination on commercial farms
  • Discusses how decreased rumination time can flag early illness, estrus, and parturition

SUMMARY TABLE

PMIDAuthor(s)YearSpeciesKey VariableMain Finding
1654175Beauchemin1991Dairy cattleIngestion & mastication mechanicsFoundational review of chewing physiology
3745592Martz & Belyea1986Cattle & sheepParticle size + forage qualityLarger particles = longer retention & more rumination
2273146Grant et al.1990Dairy cowsForage particle sizeCoarse forage increased total chewing time
12214987Krause et al.2002Dairy cowsFine vs. coarse silageFine cut: rumination ↓ 485→320 min/day; pH ↓ 6.02→5.81
12647969Beauchemin et al.2003Dairy cowspeNDF & particle sizeIncreasing peNDF increases rumination; improves rumen pH
15483175Teimouri Yansari et al.2004Holstein cows3 alfalfa particle sizesFiner = less rumination, lower pH, shorter RMRT
17369233Zebeli et al.2007Dairy cowsParticle size × concentrateCoarse hay +100 min/day rumination in high-conc. diet
23031313Suarez-Mena et al.2013Dairy cowsForage length + sortingpeNDF - not particle length - drives rumination time
29627250Beauchemin2018Dairy cowsComprehensive review4.5 h eating + 7 h ruminating/day; sensor monitoring
31351713Haselmann et al.2019Organic dairyFine (7 mm) vs. coarse (52 mm)Fine = more DMI, better digestibility, more milk in high-forage diets
36400612Grant2023Dairy cattlepeNDF system historyMost current review; future research directions
38258599Krone et al.2024Sheep & goatsChop length comparisonSheep ruminate more than goats; R:E ratio higher for short hay in sheep
38452969Singer et al.2024ReindeerParticle size & densityRuminated vs. non-ruminated particle MRT; body size affects critical escape threshold
35560728Zhang et al.2023CattleChewing intensity & MRTHigher chewing intensity → shorter rumen MRT; proxy for passage rate

Access tip: All papers listed with PMIDs can be found directly at PubMed by searching the PMID number. Many are available via institutional access to Journal of Dairy Science (Elsevier) or Animal (Cambridge). The Mertens (1997) paper, while not indexed with a PMID above, is universally available through library databases as it is one of the most-cited papers in ruminant nutrition.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.