Understood! You want me to compile all the researched content from Harrison's Chapters 264 & 265 into comprehensive, well-formatted study notes. Here they are:
π« HEART FAILURE β COMPLETE STUDY NOTES
Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22nd Ed. | Chapters 264 & 265
Authors: Givertz, Desai, Mehra
CHAPTER 264: HEART FAILURE β PATHOPHYSIOLOGY & DIAGNOSIS
1. CLINICAL DEFINITIONS
| Term | Definition |
|---|
| Heart Failure (HF) | A complex clinical syndrome with symptoms/signs resulting from structural or functional impairment of ventricular filling or ejection |
| ESC Definition | Cardinal symptoms (breathlessness, ankle swelling, fatigue) Β± signs (elevated JVP, crackles, edema) due to cardiac structural/functional abnormality β elevated intracardiac pressures and/or inadequate CO |
| Pathophysiologic | Elevated cardiac filling pressure and/or inadequate peripheral Oβ delivery at rest or stress, caused by cardiac dysfunction |
| Acute HF | Rapid onset or worsening of HF symptoms; ~80% from worsening chronic HF; ~20% new-onset |
| Chronic HF | Longstanding (months-years) symptoms/signs; when episode resolves β "remission" preferred (not "stable HF") |
| Acute Pulmonary Edema | Rapidly worsening pulmonary congestion from severe elevation of left heart filling pressures |
Key point: "Heart failure" is preferred over "congestive heart failure" β not all patients have volume overload at presentation.
2. EPIDEMIOLOGY
| Metric | Figure |
|---|
| U.S. prevalence | ~6.7 million adults |
| New cases/year (U.S.) | >600,000 |
| Global prevalence | ~56.2 million |
| Prevalence age 40-49 | 1-2% |
| Prevalence age >80 | β₯10% |
| Lifetime risk | ~24% (1 in 4) |
| Projected U.S. prevalence by 2030 | 8.5 million |
| 5-year survival after diagnosis | ~50% |
| Severe HF 1-year mortality | Up to 40% |
| 30-day post-admission mortality | 8-14% |
| 1-year post-admission mortality | 26-37% |
| 5-year post-admission mortality | Up to 75% |
| U.S. HF care cost (2018) | $22.3 billion |
Racial disparities: Black > Hispanic > White > Chinese Americans for HF risk.
Gender: Men have higher age-adjusted mortality than women; but hypertension accounts for a greater population attributable risk (PAR) in women.
TABLE 264-1: Independent Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in HF
| Category | Predictors |
|---|
| Clinical | Male sex; Older age; DM; CKD; CAD; Advanced NYHA class; S3 or elevated JVP; Decreased exercise capacity; Cardiac cachexia; Depression |
| Structural | Reduced LVEF; Reduced RVEF; Increased ventricular volumes/mass; Secondary MR or TR |
| Hemodynamic | Elevated PCWP; Reduced CI; Reduced peak VOβ; Pulmonary HTN; Diastolic dysfunction |
| Biochemical | Worsening renal function; Hyponatremia; Hyperuricemia; Elevated troponin & natriuretic peptides; Elevated NE, renin, aldosterone, ET-1 |
| Electrophysiologic | Tachycardia; Wide QRS/LBBB; Atrial fibrillation; Ventricular ectopy; VT/SCD |
3. PHENOTYPES OF HEART FAILURE
The older terms "systolic HF" and "diastolic HF" have been abandoned β most patients have abnormalities in both systolic and diastolic function regardless of EF.
| Phenotype | EF | Key Features |
|---|
| HFrEF | β€40% | Well-studied; responds to RAAS/SNS antagonists, ARNI, SGLT-2i, beta-blockers |
| HFmrEF | 41-49% | Intermediate; mild systolic + diastolic features; treated like HFrEF |
| HFpEF | β₯50% | Challenging diagnosis; diastolic dysfunction, vascular stiffness, metabolic comorbidities |
| HFrecEF | Previously β€40%, now improved | Younger, nonischemic, shorter duration, smaller volumes, no fibrosis predict recovery |
HFrecEF causes: Fulminant myocarditis, takotsubo, peripartum CM, tachycardia-induced CM, chemotherapy toxicity, alcohol.
- Despite EF recovery β may remain symptomatic (diastolic dysfunction, exercise-induced PAH)
- Withdrawal of GDMT β recurrence in up to 50% within 6 months
- Prognosis: Better than both HFrEF and HFpEF
TABLE 264-2: Selected Causes of Heart Failure
HFrEF
| Acquired | Familial/Genetic |
|---|
| CAD (MI, ischemia) | Hypertrophic CM |
| Valvular disease (AR, MR) | Arrhythmogenic CM |
| Toxic (chemo, alcohol, cocaine) | Lamin/Titin gene variants |
| Infectious (Chagas, HIV) | Muscular dystrophies |
| Autoimmune (giant cell myocarditis, lupus) | Mitochondrial disease |
| Tachycardia-induced | |
HFpEF
| Condition | Condition |
|---|
| Hypertension | Amyloidosis |
| Aortic stenosis | Sarcoidosis |
| Mitral stenosis | Hemochromatosis |
| HCM | Constrictive pericarditis |
| Radiation-induced | Aging |
| Obesity | End-stage renal disease |
High-Output HF
| Cause | Cause |
|---|
| Thyrotoxicosis | Cirrhosis |
| Severe obesity | A-V shunt |
| Chronic anemia | Vitamin B deficiency (beriberi) |
| Pulmonary disease (19.8%) | Sickle cell (3.3%) |
| Sepsis (9.6%) | Myeloproliferative disease (7.9%) |
Congenital Heart Disease
- ~13.3 million globally; ~467,000 U.S. adults
- Three groups: (1) uncorrected defects with late presentation; (2) repaired defects with late valve/ventricular failure; (3) failing single-ventricle physiology
4. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
A. Progressive Disease
INDEX EVENT
(MI / Pressure-Volume Overload / Genetic / Congenital)
β
Initial β in cardiac performance
β
Compensatory mechanisms activated
(asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic for months-years)
β
Compensatory mechanisms become MALADAPTIVE
β
Ventricular Remodeling β Clinical HF
β
Neurohormonal activation (SNS + RAAS)
β
Progressive myocardial dysfunction
B. Ventricular Remodeling
| Pattern | Stimulus | Mechanism |
|---|
| Concentric hypertrophy | Pressure overload (HTN, AS) | β mass > β volume; reduces wall stress |
| Eccentric hypertrophy | Volume overload (AR, MR) | β cavity size/volume |
Changes at cellular/molecular level:
- Myocyte hypertrophy + interstitial fibrosis
- Altered calcium-handling proteins
- Re-expression of fetal gene programs (Ξ²-myosin heavy chain)
- Ξ²-adrenergic receptor desensitization
- Myocyte apoptosis (programmed cell death)
In HFpEF specifically:
- Diastolic dysfunction (impaired SR calcium uptake)
- Vascular stiffness
- Renal dysfunction + sodium avidity
- Oxidative stress / nitrosative stress
- Insulin resistance
- Inflammation from regional adiposity
- Impaired nitric oxide signaling
C. FIGURE 264-6: Remodeling Stimuli in Heart Failure
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β CHRONIC HEMODYNAMIC STIMULI β
β (Pressure overload / Volume overload / Ischemia) β
ββββββββββββββββ¦ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
ββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β β β β
Myocardial Inflammatory Signaling Neuro- Oxidative
wall stress cytokines peptides endocrine stress
ββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
βββββββββββ΄ββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
ADAPTIVE changes MALADAPTIVE changes
(initially compensatory)
β
Re-expression of FETAL contractile
+ CaΒ²βΊ-handling proteins
β impaired contraction & relaxation
β
Myocytes unable to adapt
β APOPTOSIS
β
β pump function + β wall stress
β AFTERLOAD MISMATCH
β
ββββββ VICIOUS CYCLE ββββββ
β Progressive myocardial dysfunction
D. Neurohormonal Activation
β Cardiac Output
β
"Unloading" of high-pressure baroreceptors
(LV, carotid sinus, aortic arch)
β
β Parasympathetic tone
β Efferent sympathetic tone
β
ββββ΄βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
Nonosmotic AVP release SNS activation of:
(pituitary) Heart / Kidney /
β Vasculature / Muscle
Vasoconstriction β
Free water reabsorption Renin release
β
β Angiotensin II
β Aldosterone
β
Salt/water retention
Peripheral vasoconstriction
Myocyte hypertrophy
Cell death + fibrosis
SHORT-TERM: Maintains BP and organ perfusion β
LONG-TERM: End-organ changes β MALADAPTIVE β
Clinical importance: RAAS inhibitors + beta-blockers + MRAs β attenuate/reverse remodeling β β morbidity and mortality.
E. Vasodilatory Hormones (Counterregulatory)
| Hormone | Source | Actions |
|---|
| ANP | Atria (in response to stretch/pressure) | Vasodilation, natriuresis, β renin/aldosterone |
| BNP | Ventricles (in response to stretch/pressure) | Vasodilation, natriuresis, β renin/aldosterone |
| Prostaglandins (PGE1, PGI2) | Endothelium | Vasodilation |
| Bradykinin | Kinin system | Vasodilation |
| Adrenomedullin | Multiple tissues | Vasodilation |
| Nitric oxide | Endothelium | Vasodilation |
Neprilysin inactivates natriuretic peptides and bradykinin β explains benefit of ARNI (sacubitril-valsartan).
F. Endothelin, Inflammatory Cytokines, and Oxidative Stress
Endothelin:
- Potent vasoconstrictor + growth-promoting effects
- Causes myocyte hypertrophy + interstitial fibrosis
- Important in pulmonary HTN and RV failure
- Endothelin blockade does NOT slow progression of left ventricular HF (but IS beneficial in PAH)
Inflammatory Cytokines:
- TNF-Ξ±, IL-1Ξ² - elevated in HF
- Sources: liver, gastrointestinal tract
- Role of anti-inflammatory therapies remains unproven in HF
Oxidative Stress:
- Reactive oxygen species: superoxide and peroxynitrite
- Role of antioxidant therapies remains unproven
G. Novel Biological Targets
SGLT-2 (Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2):
- Located in proximal tubule; reabsorbs ~90% of filtered glucose
- In HF contributes to: sodium/water retention, endothelial dysfunction, abnormal myocardial metabolism, impaired CaΒ²βΊ handling
- SGLT-2 inhibitors β beneficial effects on morbidity and mortality in HF (with or without diabetes)
- Mechanisms: diuretic, cardiac/vascular remodeling, anti-arrhythmic, renal, metabolic, anti-inflammatory, autophagy
cGMP Pathway:
- Downregulated in HF β contributes to endothelial dysfunction
- Oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulants enhance cGMP β beneficial myocardial and vascular effects
H. Dyssynchrony and Electrical Instability
- Up to 1/3 of HF patients have QRS prolongation
- LBBB β abnormal ventricular contraction (electrical dyssynchrony)
- CRT corrects dyssynchrony β improves contractile function, decreases MR, reverses remodeling
- Other forms of electrical instability: AF with inadequate rate control, frequent PVCs
- These arrhythmias β worsening HF via tachycardia, irregular rhythm, β wall stress, neurohormonal activation, inflammation
I. Secondary Mitral Regurgitation
Mechanisms in HFrEF:
- β contractile force β β leaflet coaptation
- Spherical ventricular shape β altered papillary muscle structure
- β mitral annulus diameter (annulus cannot contract during systole)
- Dilation of posterior LA wall β distortion of posterior mitral leaflet
Impact: Worsening regurgitant volume β progression of HF (vicious cycle)
Treatment: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (COAPT trial) in selected patients on optimal medical therapy.
J. Cardiorenal and Abdominal Interactions
Traditional view: β CO β β renal arterial perfusion β β GFR β neurohormonal activation
Contemporary view: Systemic venous congestion = equally or more important driver. Relief of venous congestion β significant improvement in renal function.
Abdominal mechanisms:
- Splanchnic veins act as blood reservoir; regulate preload via transmural pressure + SNS
- Portal vein distension β hepatorenal + splenorenal reflex β renal vasoconstriction
- β intraabdominal pressure (right HF) β correlates with renal dysfunction
- Decongestion β β abdominal compartment pressure β may improve/stabilize renal function
K. Gut Congestion, Microbiome, and Inflammation
- Elevated proinflammatory cytokines β HF disease progression
- Altered gut microbiome in HF:
- β microbial diversity β chronic inflammation + immune dysregulation
- LPS (gram-negative bacterial product) β elevated in HF due to β intestinal permeability β macrophage activation β TNF-Ξ±, IL-1, IL-6 β cardiac cachexia
- TMAO (trimethylamine N-oxide) from dietary choline/carnitine β associated with poor outcomes
- Uremic toxins (indoxyl sulfate) β role in HF with renal insufficiency
Bowel ischemia/congestion
β
Morphologic + functional intestinal changes
β
Bacterial endotoxemia
β
Proinflammatory state
β
Progressive cardiac dysfunction + cardiac cachexia
L. High-Output States
- Most HF = low/normal CO + elevated SVR
- High-output states alone rarely cause HF without underlying cardiovascular disease
- Chronic anemia β high CO when Hgb β€8 g/dL β vasodilatory metabolites, arteriolar dilation, β blood viscosity
- ESRD patients: Particularly at risk when chronic anemia + AV fistula flow compound
- Most common causes: Pulmonary disease (19.8%), severe obesity (9.9%), sepsis (9.6%), cirrhosis (8.9%), hyperthyroidism (5.5%)
5. EVALUATION β HISTORY
A. Symptoms of Congestion
LEFT HF β Pulmonary Venous Congestion
Dyspnea mechanisms:
- Pulmonary venous congestion + fluid transudation β β lung compliance, β airway resistance, hypoxemia, V/Q mismatch
- Stimulation of juxtacapillary J receptors β β ventilatory drive
- β blood flow to respiratory muscles β lactic acidosis
Spectrum (least β most severe):
Exertional dyspnea
β
Bendopnea (dyspnea when bending forward, e.g., putting on socks)
β
Orthopnea (dyspnea on lying flat; within 1-2 min; relieved by elevating head)
β
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Dyspnea (PND: awakens from sleep;
requires β₯30 min upright; Β± "cardiac asthma": wheeze/cough)
β
Dyspnea at rest
β
Acute pulmonary edema (pink, frothy sputum)
Other pulmonary manifestations:
- Cheyne-Stokes / central sleep apnea (β respiratory center sensitivity to PCOβ + prolonged circulatory time)
- Nocturnal cough
RIGHT HF β Systemic Venous Congestion
- Weight gain and lower extremity edema (initial manifestations)
- GI symptoms: abdominal bloating, anorexia, early satiety
- Right upper quadrant pain (hepatic capsule stretch) + nausea/vomiting
- Anasarca in refractory right HF; recurrent pleural effusions, ascites
TABLE 264-4: NYHA Functional Classification
| Class | Limitation | Description |
|---|
| I | None | Ordinary activity does NOT cause symptoms |
| II | Mild | Comfortable at rest; symptoms with ordinary activity (e.g., heavy packages) |
| III | Moderate | Comfortable at rest; symptoms with LESS than ordinary activity (e.g., getting dressed) |
| IV | Severe | Symptoms at rest; worsen with ANY activity |
Note: NYHA class does NOT correlate well with objective measures (LV size, EF, peak VOβ).
B. Symptoms of Reduced Perfusion
- Fatigue and weakness (especially lower extremities) β exertion or rest
- Mechanisms: β muscle blood flow, endothelial dysfunction, β SVR, skeletal muscle changes
- Mental dullness, confusion β older patients; β systemic perfusion
- Other causes of fatigue: volume depletion, hyponatremia, iron deficiency, beta-blocker effects
C. Other Symptoms
- Mood disturbances and poor sleep (dyspnea, sleep apnea)
- Nocturia (improved CO + renal perfusion supine + delayed diuresis)
- Oliguria (severe β renal blood flow; advanced HF)
D. Precipitating Factors
Identifiable in 50-90% of admissions
TABLE 264-5: Precipitating Factors in HF
| Category | Factors |
|---|
| Patient-Related | Excess exertion/stress; excess fluid/sodium intake; medication nonadherence; heavy alcohol use |
| Provider-Related | NSAIDs (salt/water retention); CCBs (negative inotropy); inadequate diuretics |
| HF-Related | Uncontrolled HTN; Myocardial ischemia/MI; Atrial or ventricular arrhythmias; Pulmonary emboli |
| Other Disease States | Systemic infection; worsening renal/hepatic failure; hyperthyroidism; untreated sleep apnea; anemia or iron deficiency |
6. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
A. General Appearance
| Severity | Findings |
|---|
| Mild-Moderate | Well-nourished, comfortable at rest; dyspnea only with exertion |
| Severe | Sitting upright; anxious, diaphoretic, dyspneic at rest; pallor or duskiness; cool extremities; peripheral cyanosis |
| Cardiac Cachexia | Edema-free weight loss >5% over 12 months (or BMI <20) + β₯3 of: β muscle strength, fatigue, anorexia, low fat-free mass, abnormal biochemistry (inflammation, anemia, low albumin) |
B. Vital Signs
| Finding | Significance |
|---|
| β HR, β BP | New-onset HF (sympathetic activation) |
| HR ideally <70-75 bpm on GDMT | Chronic HF |
| Irregular rhythm | Atrial fibrillation |
| Hypotension, narrow pulse pressure, thready pulse | Severe HF |
| Pulsus alternans | Alternating strong/weak pulse; β LV contraction in every other cycle |
| Cheyne-Stokes breathing | Advanced HF |
| Low-grade fever | Cytokine activation in severe HF |
C. Jugular Venous Pulse (JVP)
- Quantify: height of venous column above sternal angle + 5 cm = right atrial pressure
- Examine at 45Β° angle
- Normal JVP at rest (β€8 cm HβO) in mild right HF β may increase with hepatic compression
- Hepatojugular reflux: Firm RUQ pressure for 15-30 sec β positive if JVP increases
- Kussmaul's sign (JVP rises with inspiration): Severe biventricular HF, constrictive pericarditis, restrictive CM β marker of poor outcome
- Significant TR β prominent V waves and Y descents
D. Lung Examination
| Finding | Significance |
|---|
| Pulmonary rales (lung bases) | Fluid transudation into alveoli; in severe HF β throughout lungs |
| Wheezing/rhonchi | Bronchial mucosal congestion; may mimic asthma or COPD |
| Rales may be absent | Chronic HF with increased lymphatic drainage despite elevated PCWP |
| Bilateral pleural effusions | Biventricular or right HF; dullness to percussion + β breath sounds |
| Unilateral pleural effusion | Typically right-sided |
E. Cardiac Examination
| Finding | Significance |
|---|
| Apical impulse displaced down + left | Cardiac enlargement (dilated CM) |
| Sustained apical impulse | Pressure overload (AS) |
| RV heave/parasternal lift | Biventricular/severe right HF |
| S3 gallop | Volume overload + tachycardia; severe hemodynamic compromise; poor prognosis |
| S4 gallop | HFpEF due to HTN; not specific to HF |
| Holosystolic murmurs (MR, TR) | Advanced HF without structural valvular disease |
| Loud P2 | Secondary pulmonary hypertension |
F. Abdomen and Extremities
| Finding | Significance |
|---|
| Hepatomegaly | Early systemic venous congestion; pulsatile liver suggests TR |
| Cardiac cirrhosis | Longstanding congestion β congestive splenomegaly + ascites |
| Massive ascites | Consider constrictive pericarditis or primary liver failure |
| Dependent lower extremity edema | Chronic HF; symmetric, pitting |
| Anasarca | Massive generalized edema (legs, sacrum, abdominal wall) |
| Absent edema despite β JVP | Acute HF or young patients with chronic HF |
| Nonpitting edema | Consider lymphedema |
| Scleral icterus/jaundice | Severe right HF |
7. DIAGNOSIS
A. Routine Laboratories
| Finding | Interpretation |
|---|
| β BUN + Creatinine | β renal blood flow and/or β renal venous pressure; also diuretics, RAAS inhibitors |
| Proteinuria | Longstanding HTN, DM, or systemic disease |
| β LFTs (modest) | Congestive hepatomegaly β do NOT confuse with biliary disease |
| ββ LFTs + lactic acid | Cardiogenic shock / severe low output |
| Hyponatremia | Sodium restriction + diuretics + AVP-mediated water retention; negative prognostic indicator |
| Hypokalemia | Thiazide/loop diuretics; β aldosterone |
| Hyperkalemia | β GFR + RAAS inhibitors + K-sparing diuretics |
| Anemia | Not diagnostic; exacerbates HF; iron deficiency (IV iron β improved symptoms, β HF hospitalizations) |
| Hypoalbuminemia | Cardiac cirrhosis β worsens fluid accumulation |
B. Chest X-Ray
| Finding | Significance |
|---|
| β Cardiac silhouette (CTR >0.5) | Cardiomegaly |
| Upper zone venous redistribution | Early sign of acute HF |
| Kerley B lines (interlobular septal thickening) | Early elevated PCWP |
| Alveolar haziness (diffuse, downward) | Moderate-severe elevated PCWP |
| Pleural effusions | Common in biventricular HF |
C. ECG
| Finding | Implication |
|---|
| LVH + left atrial enlargement | HFpEF (HTN, AS, HCM) |
| Q waves / infarction pattern | Ischemic HF |
| Q waves + reduced QRS voltage (pseudo-infarct) | Amyloidosis |
| Conduction system disease | Sarcoid or Chagas |
| AF (up to 40% of chronic HF) | Indication for anticoagulation |
| Frequent PVCs / NSVT | Worsening HF; β risk; PVCs can cause cardiomyopathy (ablation-treatable) |
| Wide QRS / LBBB | Assess eligibility for CRT/His bundle pacing |
D. Noninvasive Imaging
2D Echocardiography + Doppler (most essential):
- LV/RV size and function; valvular morphology/function
- Detection of intracavitary thrombi and pericardial effusions
- LVEF β₯50% = normal systolic function
- Myocardial strain rate (speckle tracking): incremental prognostic value
- Doppler: estimates CO, PA pressures, valve areas, LV diastolic filling
Cardiac MRI: Gold standard for LV mass, volumes, function; identifies specific causes (amyloid, myocarditis, hemochromatosis)
Cardiac CT: Rules out pericardial disease, LV thrombus; CT coronary angiography for noninvasive exclusion of CAD
Cardiac PET: Evaluates ischemia/hibernation; determines severity of cardiac sarcoidosis
E. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET)
Indications: Heart transplant/MCS evaluation; defining cause of dyspnea
Key parameters (independent predictors of survival):
- Absolute and percent-predicted peak VOβ
- Ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCOβ slope)
F. Biomarkers
| Biomarker | Use |
|---|
| BNP / NT-proBNP | Diagnosis, prognosis, guiding GDMT dosing; higher in HFrEF than HFpEF; falsely low in obesity |
| Very low BNP/NT-proBNP | May help exclude HF as cause of dyspnea |
| Galectin-3, soluble ST2 | Approved for HF prognosis assessment |
| Cardiac troponin | Elevated β worse prognosis |
| Cystatin C | Better estimate of GFR (not influenced by muscle mass) |
Factors increasing natriuretic peptides (non-HF): Older age, female sex, CKD, AF, PE, PAH.
G. Invasive Studies
| Study | Indication |
|---|
| Pulmonary artery catheter | Hemodynamic instability; cardiogenic vs non-cardiogenic edema; diuretic-refractory HF; combined cardiorenal dysfunction |
| Simultaneous right + left heart catheterization | Distinguishes restrictive CM from constrictive pericarditis |
| Coronary angiography | Excludes ischemic HF as a potentially reversible cause |
| Left ventriculography | LV size, function, MR severity (when echo inadequate) |
| RV endomyocardial biopsy | Detection of myocarditis (lymphocytic, eosinophilic, giant cell, sarcoid); cardiac amyloidosis; chemo/immunotherapy-related LV failure; allograft rejection |
8. COMORBIDITIES
A. Diabetes Mellitus
- Prevalence in ambulatory HF: 10-40%; higher in hospitalized HF
- Mechanisms: altered myocardial substrate, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, lipotoxicity, RAAS activation, advanced glycation end products (AGEs)
- SGLT-2 inhibitors β improved renal function, QOL, β LVEF, β HF hospitalization and death
B. Sleep Apnea
- Common in HF: both OSA and CSA
- ~1/3 of HF patients with sleep-disordered breathing have CSA β β mortality
- OSA + HFrEF: CPAP β β QOL, β BP, β arrhythmias, β LVEF
- CSA: No proven therapy; treat the HF primarily
C. Obesity
- Particularly common in HFpEF; complicates volume assessment
- "Obesity paradox": Obese patients with HF have a more favorable prognosis than low/normal BMI
- Weight loss β β QOL, β exercise capacity, possible reverse remodeling
- Semaglutide (GLP-1) trials in obese HFpEF (STEP-HFpEF) β β functional capacity + QOL
D. Depression
- Independent risk factor for adverse outcomes (especially older women)
- AHA recommends screening using validated questionnaires
- SSRIs: Safe but do NOT affect natural history of HF
- Cognitive behavioral therapy and collaborative care: effects on HF morbidity/mortality require further study
TABLE 264-8: Differential Diagnosis of Heart Failure
| Symptom/Sign | Differential Diagnosis |
|---|
| Dyspnea | Chronic lung disease; PAH; Neuromuscular disease; Anemia |
| Edema | Venous insufficiency; Nephrotic syndrome; DVT; Lymphedema |
| Ascites | Hepatic cirrhosis; Portal vein thrombosis; Malignant carcinomatosis |
| Pleural effusion(s) | Chronic infection; Lung cancer; Collagen vascular disease |
| JVD | Constrictive pericarditis; Pericardial effusion; SVC syndrome |
Key differentiating clues:
- Orthopnea may occur in severe lung disease
- Cardiac asthma vs bronchial asthma: Cardiac β more diaphoresis + cyanosis
- PND from lung disease β relieved by coughing/expectoration (vs sitting upright in cardiac PND)
- Very low BNP/NT-proBNP β excludes HF as cause of dyspnea in nonobese patients
CHAPTER 265: HEART FAILURE β MANAGEMENT
1. HFpEF / HFmrEF MANAGEMENT
A. General Principles
- Clinical trials of RAAS antagonists, digoxin, beta-blockers, and neprilysin inhibitors β NOT conclusively proven to reduce mortality in HFpEF
- Variable benefits (β HF hospitalizations) with MRAs, ARBs, ARNIs β mainly in EF <60% (HFmrEF range)
- HFmrEF: Treat similar to HFrEF (same pharmacotherapy)
- True HFpEF management targets:
- Relieve congestion (diuretics - carefully; avoid excessive preload reduction)
- Control BP to guideline targets
- Maintain sinus rhythm (AF ablation may β morbidity/mortality)
- Manage comorbidities: obesity, OSA, DM, anemia, iron deficiency, CKD
- Treat myocardial ischemia
- SGLT-2 inhibitors: Now foundational therapy regardless of EF (DELIVER, EMPEROR-PRESERVED)
B. Clinical Trials in HFpEF
| Trial | Drug | Key Finding |
|---|
| CHARM-Preserved | Candesartan (ARB) | β HF hospitalizations; NO mortality reduction |
| I-PRESERVE | Irbesartan (ARB) | No difference in CV death/HF hospitalization |
| PEP-CHF | Perindopril (ACEi) | Early benefit attenuated with longer follow-up |
| TOPCAT | Spironolactone (MRA) | No improvement in primary composite; β HF hospitalizations; Americas subgroup showed CV benefit |
| ALDO-DHF | Spironolactone | β echo diastolic indices; NO β exercise capacity/QOL |
| PARADIGM-HF | Sacubitril-valsartan | HFrEF: 20% β CV death/HF hospitalization |
| PARAGON-HF | Sacubitril-valsartan | HFpEF: 13% β primary endpoint, narrowly missed significance (p=0.06); benefits in HFmrEF + women |
| DELIVER | Dapagliflozin | EF >40%: β composite CV death/HF hospitalization |
| EMPEROR-PRESERVED | Empagliflozin | HFpEF: β composite CV death/HF hospitalization |
| STEP-HFpEF | Semaglutide (GLP-1) | Obese HFpEF without DM: β functional capacity + QOL, ~12% weight loss |
| RELAX | Sildenafil (PDE-5i) | No improvement in functional capacity or QOL |
| NEAT-HFpEF | Isosorbide mononitrate | No improvement; actually β overall activity levels |
| RAPID-HF | Rate-adaptive pacing | Did NOT improve functional capacity |
C. FIGURE 265-1: HFpEF β Pathophysiologic Correlations
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β PATHOLOGY β β RISK MARKERS β
β - Hypertrophy β β - Hypertension β
β - Fibrosis/altered β β - Aging β
β collagen β β - Atherosclerosis β
β - Infarction/ischemia β β - Diabetes β
βββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββ β - Obesity β
ββββββββββ¬βββββββββ
β
GENERAL THERAPEUTIC PRINCIPLES
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β 1. Reduce congestive state (diuretics) β
β - Caution: avoid excessive β preload β
β 2. Control blood pressure β
β 3. Maintain AF sinus rhythm; prevent β
β tachycardia β
β 4. Treat myocardial ischemia β
β 5. Detect and treat sleep apnea β
β 6. Lifestyle modification (diet, exercise) β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
SPECIFIC THERAPY OUTCOMES
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β INEFFECTIVE β EFFECTIVE/PROMISING β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β ACEi/ARBs β SGLT-2 inhibitors β
β Beta-blockers β ARNIs (selected pts) β
β PDE-5 inhibitors β Aldosterone antag. β
β Nitrates (NEAT-HFpEF)β GLP-1 agonists (DM-) β
β Chronotropic pacing β Exercise training β
β Digoxin β Bariatric surgery β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ΄ββββββββββββββββββββββββ
2. ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE (ADHF)
A. General Principles
- Heterogeneous syndrome: β cardiac performance + renal dysfunction + vascular compliance alterations
- Nearly 50% readmitted within 6 months
- In-hospital mortality ~5%; 20% mortality at 1 year
- Combined CV deaths/HF hospitalization/MI/stroke/SCD: 50% at 12 months post-hospitalization
First action β Identify and address precipitating factors:
- Medication nonadherence; dietary salt indiscretion; NSAIDs/TZDs/TNF inhibitors; coronary ischemia; arrhythmias; valvular disease; systemic infection; PE
Poor prognostic markers in ADHF:
- BUN >43 mg/dL
- Systolic BP <115 mmHg
- Serum Cr >2.75 mg/dL
- Elevated natriuretic peptides + cardiac troponins
PAC (Pulmonary Artery Catheter): NOT routine. Use in: low-output HF/cardiogenic shock; diuretic-resistant; combined cardiorenal dysfunction; known/suspected PAH.
B. ADHF Phenotypes (Figure 265-2)
ADHF PRESENTATION
β
βββββββββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββββββββββ
β β
CONGESTED NOT CONGESTED
β β
βββββββ΄βββββββ β CO / Hypoperfusion
β β
NORMO/ HYPER-
TENSIVE TENSIVE
β β
Diuretics Vasodilators
PULMONARY EDEMA PHENOTYPE: LOW OUTPUT PHENOTYPE:
Severe congestion + hypoxia Hypoperfusion + end-organ
Oβ + NIV + Opiates dysfunction
Vasodilators + Diuretics Vasodilators / Inotropes
CARDIOGENIC SHOCK PHENOTYPE:
Hypotension + low CO + end-organ failure
Inotropes (catecholamines) + MCS (IABP, VAD)
C. Volume Management β IV Diuretics
- IV loop diuretics essential when oral absorption is impaired
- Bolus vs continuous infusion: No clear superiority; continuous preferred for refractory cases
- Loop diuretic refractoriness: Add thiazide (metolazone or chlorothiazide) for sequential nephron blockade β β natriuresis but ββ risk of severe hypokalemia
- ADVOR trial: Acetazolamide + loop diuretics β β decongestion but did NOT reduce HF readmissions/mortality
- Targets: β JVP; resolution of rales; resolution of peripheral edema/hepatomegaly/ascites
- Predischarge BNP/NT-proBNP: correlates strongly with post-discharge mortality + readmission
- TRANSFORM-HF: No mortality/morbidity advantage of torsemide vs furosemide
D. Cardiorenal Syndrome
- ~30% of hospitalized ADHF patients have abnormal baseline renal function
- Most have preserved cardiac output (not low flow state)
- Mechanism: Complex neurohormonal interplay + "backward failure" from β intraabdominal pressure
- Diuretics β β GFR when right-sided filling pressures remain elevated
- Inotropes or MCS: preserve renal function short-term as bridge in profound low CO
E. Ultrafiltration (Aquapheresis)
- CARRESS-HF trial: Stepped pharmacologic care vs ultrafiltration in ADHF + worsening renal failure:
- Similar weight loss (~5.5 kg) in both groups
- UF group: β serum creatinine, more adverse events (kidney failure, bleeding, catheter complications)
- Conclusion: UF NOT recommended as primary strategy; reserve for diuretic-refractory patients
TABLE 265-1: Vasoactive Therapy in ADHF
| Drug | Mechanism | Dose | Caution | Key Notes |
|---|
| INOTROPES - Use in hypotension, end-organ hypoperfusion, shock | | | | |
| Dobutamine | Ξ²-adrenergic agonist | 2-20 ΞΌg/kg/min | β myocardial Oβ demand, arrhythmia | Short-acting; less effective with beta-blockers (higher doses needed); tolerance with prolonged infusions |
| Milrinone | PDE-3 inhibitor | 0.375-0.75 ΞΌg/kg/min | Hypotension, arrhythmia | β dose in renal insufficiency; avoid bolus; EFFECTIVE with concurrent beta-blockers |
| Levosimendan | CaΒ²βΊ sensitizer + PDE-3i | 0.1 ΞΌg/kg/min (range 0.05-0.2) | Hypotension, arrhythmia | Long-acting; avoid if low BP; effective with beta-blockers; NOT approved in U.S. |
| Dopamine | DA/Ξ±/Ξ² receptor agonist | Dose-dependent | Tachyarrhythmia | Low-dose "renal dopamine" does NOT improve renal function |
| VASODILATORS - Use in pulmonary congestion with preserved BP | | | | |
| Nitroglycerin | Predominantly venodilator | 10-200 ΞΌg/min | Headache, tolerance | Most common vasodilator; often underdosed; effective at higher doses |
| Sodium Nitroprusside | Arterial + venous dilator | 0.3-5 ΞΌg/kg/min | Thiocyanate toxicity (>72h, renal insufficiency) | Requires arterial line; for adequate BP |
| Nesiritide | Recombinant BNP | 2 ΞΌg/kg bolus then 0.01 ΞΌg/kg/min | Hypotension | ASCEND-HF: no benefit; not routinely recommended |
| Serelaxin | Relaxin-2 | 30 ΞΌg/kg/day | BP >125 mmHg required | RELAX-AHF2: did NOT confirm benefit; not approved |
| Ularitide | Synthetic natriuretic peptide | 15 ng/kg/min (48h) | BP >116 mmHg; excess hypotension + β Cr | TRUE-AHF: no improvement; undercuts "acute injury hypothesis" |
| DIURETICS - First line for volume overload | | | | |
| Furosemide | Loop diuretic | 20-240 mg/day IV | Electrolyte loss | Standard; IV for severe congestion |
| Torsemide | Loop diuretic | 10-100 mg/day | Electrolyte loss | High oral bioavailability; predictably effective in gut congestion |
| Bumetanide | Loop diuretic | 0.5-6 mg/day | Electrolyte loss | Intermediate bioavailability |
| Metolazone | Thiazide adjunct | 2.5-10 mg | Severe hypokalemia | Used for loop diuretic refractoriness |
| Acetazolamide | Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor adjunct | Variable | β | Useful when alkalosis (HCOβ >27 mEq/L) |
F. Clinical Guiding Principles for ADHF
- Goal-directed: decongestion + trigger suppression + transition to longitudinal management
- Failing medical therapy β PAC for hemodynamic-guided vasoactive/inotropic titration
- Hemodynamic instability/cardiogenic shock β mechanical circulatory support
- PIONEER-HF: Predischarge initiation of sacubitril-valsartan β β NT-proBNP + lower death/HF readmission at 8 weeks
- EMPULSE: Predischarge empagliflozin β β hierarchical clinical composite at 90 days
- STRONG-HF: Intensive GDMT uptitration + frequent follow-up within 2 weeks of discharge β β death/HF readmission at 180 days
- All patients: HF self-management education before discharge; early postdischarge follow-up
3. HFrEF MANAGEMENT
Evolution of HFrEF therapy:
Renocentric era (diuretics)
β
Hemodynamic era (digoxin, inotropes)
β
Neurohormonal antagonism era (ACEi/ARBs + beta-blockers + MRAs)
β
Modern "Fantastic Four" era:
ARNI + Beta-blocker + MRA + SGLT-2i
A. Neurohormonal Antagonism
ACEIs:
- 23% reduction in mortality + 35% reduction in combined mortality/HF hospitalizations
- Recommended for ALL patients with HFrEF regardless of symptom burden
Beta-Blockers:
- Adding beta-blockers to ACEi β further 35% reduction in mortality
- NOT a class effect β only proven agents:
- Carvedilol (nonselective Ξ² + Ξ±β blocker)
- Bisoprolol (selective Ξ²β)
- Metoprolol succinate CR/XL (selective Ξ²β)
- Agents with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and bucindolol: NO survival benefit
- CIBIS III: Sequence (beta-blocker first vs ACEi first) does NOT affect outcomes β what matters is achieving optimal titrated doses of BOTH
ARBs:
- Noninferior to ACEi β suitable alternative for ACEI intolerance (cough, angioedema)
Uptitration: Every 2 weeks in stable ambulatory patients in absence of hypotension.
B. Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRAs)
Adding MRA to ACEi/ARB + beta-blocker in HFrEF (NYHA II-IV) β further β morbidity and mortality
Mechanism: Elevated aldosterone β sodium retention, electrolyte imbalance, endothelial dysfunction, myocardial fibrosis
| Agent | Key Trial | Population | Notes |
|---|
| Spironolactone | RALES | NYHA III-IV HFrEF | Most utilized; avoid if gynecomastia/sexual SE |
| Eplerenone | EPHESUS, EMPHASIS-HF | NYHA II HFrEF; post-MI LV dysfunction | Lacks antiandrogen effects; preferred if sexual side effects |
Monitor: Hyperkalemia + worsening renal function (especially CKD)
C. RAAS Therapy and Neurohormonal Escape
- Angiotensin II generated by non-ACE pathways β levels recover during long-term ACEi therapy
- Dual RAAS blockade (ACEi + ARB): β HF hospitalizations but not clearly superior to maximizing single agent
- VALIANT: ACEi + ARB at evidence-based doses β β adverse events, no added benefit
- Guidelines: Discourage ACEi + ARB + spironolactone triple combination β risk of hyperkalemia/renal dysfunction
D. Alternative Vasodilators
| Agent | Indication | Trial |
|---|
| Hydralazine + Isosorbide Dinitrate (H-ISDN) | HFrEF patients unable to tolerate RAAS therapy (CKD, hyperkalemia) | Improves survival but less than ACEi |
| Fixed-dose H-ISDN (BiDil) | Self-identified African Americans with advanced HFrEF on background ACEi + beta-blocker | A-HeFT: β survival + β HF hospitalization; adherence limited by TID dosing |
E. Novel Neurohormonal Antagonists
Sacubitril-Valsartan (ARNI):
- Combined ARB + neprilysin inhibitor
- Blockade at angiotensin receptor β ACE pathway for bradykinin breakdown intact β β angioedema risk (vs omapatrilat)
- PARADIGM-HF (8,399 HFrEF patients on GDMT):
- 20% β in CV death or HF hospitalization
- 16% β in all-cause mortality
- β QOL; β hyperkalemia + worsening renal function vs enalapril
- β symptomatic hypotension
- Contraindicated in prior history of angioedema; must wait 36 hours after last ACEi dose before starting
- Guidelines: Switch to ARNI in symptomatic HFrEF who tolerate ACEi/ARB; up-front use in de novo HF also appropriate
TABLE 265-2: Guidelines-Directed Pharmacologic Therapy and Target Doses for HFrEF
| Drug Class | Agent | Initiation Dose | Target Dose |
|---|
| ACE Inhibitors | Lisinopril | 2.5-5 mg QD | 20-35 mg QD |
| Enalapril | 2.5 mg BID | 10-20 mg BID |
| Captopril | 6.25 mg TID | 50 mg TID |
| Trandolapril | 0.5-1 mg QD | 4 mg QD |
| ARBs | Losartan | 50 mg QD | 150 mg QD |
| Valsartan | 40 mg BID | 160 mg BID |
| Candesartan | 4-8 mg QD | 32 mg QD |
| MRAs | Spironolactone | 12.5-25 mg QD | 25-50 mg QD |
| Eplerenone | 25 mg QD | 50 mg QD |
| Beta-Blockers | Metoprolol succinate CR/XL | 12.5-25 mg QD | 200 mg QD |
| Carvedilol | 3.125 mg BID | 25-50 mg BID |
| Bisoprolol | 1.25 mg QD | 10 mg QD |
| ARNI | Sacubitril-valsartan | 100 mg BID | 200 mg BID |
| SGLT-2 Inhibitors | Dapagliflozin | 10 mg QD | 10 mg QD |
| Empagliflozin | 10 mg QD | 10 mg QD |
| Sotagliflozin | 200 mg QD | 200 mg QD |
| A-V Vasodilators | H/ISDN (fixed-dose) | 37.5/20 mg QID | 75/40 mg QID |
| Novel | Vericiguat (sGC stimulator) | 2.5 mg QD | 10 mg QD |
| Omecamtiv mecarbil | 25 mg BID | Up to 50 mg BID (by plasma level) |
F. Heart Rate Modification
- Ivabradine: Selective I_f current inhibitor in SA node β β HR without affecting contractility
- SHIFT trial: NYHA II-III HFrEF, sinus rhythm, HR >70 bpm on GDMT:
- β combined CV death + HF hospitalization (proportional to degree of HR reduction)
- Indication: Symptomatic HFrEF, sinus rhythm, HR >70 bpm despite maximized beta-blocker + GDMT; also for beta-blocker intolerance
G. SGLT-2 Inhibition
- DAPA-HF: 4,744 HFrEF on GDMT β Dapagliflozin 10 mg/day β 26% β in worsening HF or CV death (consistent with and without DM)
- EMPEROR-Reduced: 3,730 HFrEF β Empagliflozin 10 mg/day β 25% β in CV death or HF hospitalization
- Now considered foundational therapy for HF alongside ARNI, beta-blockers, and MRAs
- Benefits are independent of glucose-lowering effect
H. Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase (sGC) Stimulation
- Vericiguat: Oral sGC stimulator β directly stimulates sGC AND sensitizes it to endogenous NO β enhances cGMP signaling
- VICTORIA trial: 5,050 HFrEF (NYHA II-IV, LVEF <45%, elevated NPs, worsening HF):
- 10% relative risk reduction in CV death or HF hospitalization
- Effect driven primarily by β HF hospitalization
- Role as adjunct in high-risk HFrEF with recent congestive exacerbations
I. Myosin Activation
- Omecamtiv mecarbil: Selective myosin activator
- Prolongs ventricular systole + β fractional shortening without altering force of contraction or β myocardial Oβ demand
- NOT a traditional inotrope β can be used chronically orally
- GALACTIC-HF trial: 8,256 symptomatic HFrEF (EF β€35%):
- 14% β in CV death or first HF event
- Greater benefit in more advanced HF (lower EF, higher NPs, worse symptoms)
- No effect on CV death alone; additional study required before routine adoption
J. Digoxin
- Mild inotrope; β neurohormonal activation
- DIG trial: β HF hospitalizations; NO reduction in mortality; higher mortality/hospitalizations in women
- Current role: Late-line therapy for profoundly symptomatic patients despite optimal GDMT + volume control
- Monitor drug levels; low doses sufficient; do NOT adjust for low levels
K. Oral Diuretics
- Loop diuretics (furosemide, torsemide, bumetanide) for congestive symptoms
- Frequent dose adjustments needed (variable oral absorption, fluctuating renal function)
- Minimize doses as much as possible β loop diuretics enhance neurohormonal activation
- No trial data confirming survival benefit
L. Calcium Channel Antagonists
| Type | Effect in HFrEF |
|---|
| 2nd generation (amlodipine, felodipine) | Safely lower BP; do NOT affect morbidity/mortality |
| 1st generation (verapamil, diltiazem) | Negative inotropy β may destabilize HF β AVOID |
M-T. Additional Therapies Summary
| Therapy | Evidence Summary |
|---|
| Anti-inflammatory (TNF blockers) | Infliximab/etanercept: associated with worsening HF β AVOID |
| Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) | CORONA + GISSI-HF: No improvement in HFrEF; use only if indicated for atherosclerosis |
| Anticoagulation (sinus rhythm) | WARCEF: warfarin β ischemic stroke but β major hemorrhage; aspirin supported in ischemic CM |
| Fish oil (omega-3 PUFAs) | GISSI-HF: modest benefit; low EPA inversely related to total mortality |
| Thiamine | Small studies show benefit in HFrEF; restricted to chronic HF; insufficient evidence for routine supplementation |
| Selenium | Reversible HF described; insufficient routine evidence |
| Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) | PEECH: β exercise tolerance + QOL but no β peak VOβ (placebo effect cannot be excluded) |
| Exercise/cardiac rehab | HF-ACTION: Safe; β sense of well-being; significant β peak VOβ at 12 months β recommended as adjunct |
4. MANAGEMENT OF SELECTED COMORBIDITIES
| Comorbidity | Key Evidence | Recommendation |
|---|
| Sleep apnea (OSA) | CPAP β β LVEF, β BP, β arrhythmias | Positive airway pressure therapy |
| Central sleep apnea | ASV (SERVE-HF) β β CV mortality | AVOID adaptive servo-ventilation in HFrEF + CSA |
| Anemia/iron deficiency | FAIR-HF, CONFIRM-HF: β functional capacity; HEART-FID: negative for hard endpoints | IV iron (NOT oral) β improved symptoms; consider for symptomatic iron-deficient HF |
| AF | CASTLE-AF: catheter ablation β β death/hospitalization | Catheter ablation preferred over antiarrhythmics; amiodarone and dofetilide are safe antiarrhythmics; AVOID dronedarone (β mortality in HF) |
| DM | SGLT-2i: disease-modifying; TZDs: worsen HF β AVOID | SGLT-2 inhibitors; avoid TZDs |
| Depression | SSRIs: safe but no HF outcome benefit | Screen (AHA recommends); SSRIs for depression treatment |
5. DEVICE THERAPY
A. Neuromodulation
| Device | Trial | Finding |
|---|
| Vagal nerve stimulation | INOVATE-HF | Did NOT reduce death/HF hospitalization; β functional capacity + QOL |
| Baroreflex activation | Pilot studies | Modest symptom improvement; insufficient outcome data |
B. Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM)
- Nonexcitatory electrical stimulation during absolute refractory period β augments myocardial contractile strength
- Best for: Symptomatic HFrEF, EF 25-45%, narrow QRS (not candidate for CRT)
- β symptoms + QOL; NO confirmed effect on HF hospitalization or mortality
- NOT endorsed for routine use by U.S./European guidelines
C. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
Pathophysiology of dyssynchrony:
- Wide QRS β β systolic function, β mechanical efficiency, β wall stress, β functional MR
CRT mechanism:
- Coronary sinus lead β lateral wall pacing β more synchronous ventricular contraction β reverse remodeling
| Trial | Key Finding |
|---|
| CARE-HF | First to demonstrate β all-cause mortality in HFrEF + NYHA III-IV on optimal therapy |
| RAFT / MADIT-CRT | CRT + ICD in mildly symptomatic HFrEF β disease-modifying |
Best predictors of CRT response:
- QRS >149 ms + LBBB pattern on ECG
Uncertain benefit: ADHF; predominant RBBB; AF; lateral wall scar
Evolving alternatives: His-Purkinje pacing / Left bundle branch area pacing
TABLE 265-3: ICD Implantation Principles for Primary SCD Prevention
| Principle | Details |
|---|
| Arrhythmia-SCD mismatch | SCD in HF often from progressive LVD, not focal arrhythmia substrate (except post-MI scar) |
| Diminishing returns | ICD most beneficial at EARLY HF stages; SCD incidence diminishes relative to other causes of death with advancing HF |
| Timing | Evaluate LVEF on optimal therapy (not within 40 days of MI); no benefit to ICD within 40 days of MI unless secondary prevention |
| Estimation of benefit | ICD discharge β episode of SCD; appropriate discharges β worse near-term prognosis |
Current ICD Indications in HF:
- NYHA class II-III + LVEF <35% on optimal GDMT (irrespective of etiology)
- Post-MI + optimal therapy + LVEF β€30% (even asymptomatic)
- Survivors of SCD (secondary prevention)
- Meets QRS criteria for CRT β combined CRT-D often employed
Caution:
- Terminal illness (<6 months predicted survival)
- NYHA class IV refractory to medications + not transplant candidate β risk of multiple shocks
6. SURGICAL THERAPY IN HF
A. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)
- Indicated for ischemic CM + multivessel CAD + ongoing angina + LV failure
- STICH trial (LVEF β€35%):
- Initial: No significant benefit vs medical therapy
- 10-year follow-up: CABG β β CV deaths + β death/CV hospitalization
- Viability testing did NOT predict which patients would benefit from revascularization
- REVIVED-BCIS2: PCI in ischemic LV dysfunction β No clinical benefit
B. Surgical Ventricular Restoration (SVR)
- 1,000-patient trial (CABG alone vs CABG + SVR) β No added disease-modifying effect of SVR
- LV aneurysm surgery: Still advocated for refractory HF, ventricular arrhythmias, or thromboembolic risk from akinetic segment
C. Mitral Valve Repair for Functional MR
| Trial | Finding |
|---|
| COAPT (Moderate-severe functional MR, symptomatic HFrEF) | Marked β HF hospitalizations AND mortality at 2 years |
| MITRA-FR (Similar design) | No difference in death or HF hospitalization between groups |
Discrepant results due to: differences in GDMT background, procedural success, patient selection (proportionate vs disproportionate MR severity relative to LV size)
7. CELLULAR AND GENE-BASED THERAPY
| Approach | Trial/Status | Outcome |
|---|
| Bone marrow-derived precursor cells | Multiple small trials | Generally NOT convincingly improved clinical outcomes |
| Cardiac-derived stem cells (c-kit+) | Small trials (obtained during CABG, reinfused) | β LV function β small trials, requires further study |
| Cardiosphere-derived cells | Small trials | Similar improvements β requires further study |
| Mesenchymal stem cells + LVAD weaning | Clinical trials | Disappointing results |
| SERCA2a gene transfer (CUPID) | Phase 1: initial promise; Confirmatory trial: Failed primary efficacy endpoint | Not ready for clinical use |
| Mesenchymal precursor cells (DREAM-HF) | Randomized double-blind multicenter | Primary and secondary endpoints negative |
8. DISEASE MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTIVE CARE
Discharge Planning
- ~50% of all patients readmitted within 6 months; only half readmissions for recurrent HF/CV conditions
- Begins at index hospitalization:
- Comprehensive discharge planning
- Patient + caregiver HF education (diet, fluid restrictions, daily weights, symptom recognition)
- Visiting nurses; planned follow-up
- Early postdischarge follow-up within first 2 weeks β critical; most readmissions occur in this window
Telemonitoring
| Approach | Evidence |
|---|
| Routine weight/vital signs telemonitoring | Has NOT decreased hospitalizations |
| Serial intrathoracic impedance monitoring | Has NOT improved outcomes; may enhance hospitalization rate (high alert frequency) |
| Implantable hemodynamic monitoring (CardioMEMS β CHAMPION trial) | Up to 39% β HF hospitalizations in moderately advanced HF across all EFs |
| GUIDE-HF trial | Primary analysis negative (COVID-19 confounding); pre-COVID cohort: significant β in composite endpoint |
Advanced HF and End-of-Life Care
- Regular review of disease course and end-of-life preferences
- Integrate social work, pharmacists, community-based nursing
- Seasonal influenza + periodic pneumococcal vaccines
- Shift to outpatient/hospice palliation as appropriate
- Discuss continued ICD prophylaxis near end of life (may worsen QOL and prolong dying)
- Palliative care integration β β QOL, β anxiety/depression, goal-concordant care
MASTER FLOWCHART: HF MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM
NEW PATIENT WITH HF SYMPTOMS
β
CONFIRM DIAGNOSIS: Echo + BNP/NT-proBNP + CXR + ECG
β
DETERMINE PHENOTYPE
ββββββββββ¬βββββββββ
β β β
HFrEF HFmrEF HFpEF
(β€40%) (41-49%) (β₯50%)
β
ASSESS VOLUME STATUS
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
VOLUME OVERLOADED (ADHF) STABLE/EUVOLEMIC (CHRONIC HF)
β β
ADMIT β IV DIURETICS OUTPATIENT GDMT
Identify + treat triggers Titrate every 2 weeks
Goal: decongestion (target doses)
Early GDMT initiation
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
HFrEF PHARMACOTHERAPY ("FANTASTIC FOUR"):
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
STEP 1: Start ARNI (sacubitril-valsartan) OR ACEi/ARB
STEP 2: Add Beta-blocker (carvedilol / bisoprolol / metoprolol succinate)
STEP 3: Add MRA (spironolactone / eplerenone)
STEP 4: Add SGLT-2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin / empagliflozin)
β
If LVEF <35% on optimal GDMT:
β ICD (NYHA II-III)
β CRT-D if QRS >149 ms + LBBB
β
If sinus rhythm + HR >70 bpm despite GDMT:
β Add Ivabradine
β
If NYHA II-IV + recent worsening HF + elevated NPs:
β Consider Vericiguat
β
If LVEF β€35% + advanced HF + poor functional capacity:
β Consider Omecamtiv mecarbil (investigational)
β
REFRACTORY HF (STAGE D):
β Refer for heart transplant evaluation
β Consider LVAD / MCS
β Palliative care integration
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
HFpEF MANAGEMENT:
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
STEP 1: SGLT-2 inhibitor (foundational)
STEP 2: Diuretics for congestion (cautiously)
STEP 3: Aggressive BP control
STEP 4: AF β rhythm control (ablation preferred)
STEP 5: Treat comorbidities (obesity, DM, OSA, CKD)
STEP 6: Consider ARNI (if EF <60% / HFmrEF)
STEP 7: Exercise training / cardiac rehab
QUICK REFERENCE: DRUG EFFICACY AT A GLANCE
HFrEF β PROVEN MORTALITY BENEFIT β
:
β
ACEi (lisinopril, enalapril, captopril, trandolapril)
β
ARBs (as ACEi alternative β valsartan, candesartan, losartan)
β
Beta-blockers (carvedilol, bisoprolol, metoprolol succinate ONLY)
β
MRAs (spironolactone, eplerenone)
β
ARNI (sacubitril-valsartan β PARADIGM-HF)
β
SGLT-2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin)
β
H-ISDN (if RAAS intolerant β especially Black patients)
β
ICD (LVEF <35%, NYHA II-III)
β
CRT (LBBB + QRS >149 ms + symptomatic HFrEF)
β
Catheter ablation for AF in HFrEF (CASTLE-AF)
HFrEF β SYMPTOM/HOSPITALIZATION BENEFIT ONLY β‘:
β‘ Digoxin (DIG trial β β HF hospitalizations, no mortality benefit)
β‘ Loop diuretics (symptom relief β no mortality data)
β‘ Ivabradine (HR reduction β SHIFT trial)
β‘ Vericiguat (β HF hospitalization β VICTORIA)
β‘ IV iron (β functional capacity β FAIR-HF, CONFIRM-HF)
β‘ Fish oil (modest benefit β GISSI-HF)
HARMFUL / AVOID IN HFrEF β:
β First-generation CCBs (verapamil, diltiazem) β negative inotropy
β NSAIDs β sodium retention
β Thiazolidinediones β worsen HF
β Dronedarone (ANDROMEDA β β mortality)
β Oral inotropes (vesnarinone, flosequinan β β mortality)
β Moxonidine β β mortality
β TNF-Ξ± blockers (infliximab, etanercept) β worsen HF
β Adaptive servo-ventilation (SERVE-HF β β CV mortality)
β Triple RAAS blockade (ACEi + ARB + MRA) β hyperkalemia/renal failure
Source: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22nd Edition (2025). Chapters 264 & 265 β Heart Failure: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Authors: Michael M. Givertz, Akshay Desai, Mandeep R. Mehra.