Harrison's chapter 57 skin disease summary
Harrison's chapter 57 skin diseases overview approach to patient
skin disease classification morphology primary secondary lesions dermatology
eczema atopic dermatitis contact dermatitis seborrheic dermatitis treatment
psoriasis clinical features diagnosis management biologic therapy
| Type | Mechanism | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Irritant (ICD) | Non-immunologic, direct cytotoxic damage | Soaps, detergents, acids, alkalis |
| Allergic (ACD) | Type IV (delayed) hypersensitivity | Nickel, poison ivy (urushiol), latex, fragrances |
| Type | Features |
|---|---|
| Plaque (Vulgaris) | Most common (90%); well-demarcated erythematous plaques with silvery scales; extensor surfaces, scalp, lumbosacral area |
| Guttate | Small "drop-like" lesions; young adults; post-streptococcal |
| Inverse | Flexural areas (axillae, groin, inframammary); minimal scale |
| Pustular | Sterile pustules; localized (palmoplantar) or generalized (von Zumbusch — medical emergency) |
| Erythrodermic | >90% BSA; medical emergency — thermoregulation and hemodynamic instability |
| Nail psoriasis | Pitting, oil spots, onycholysis, subungual hyperkeratosis |
| Psoriatic arthritis | Occurs in ~30%; inflammatory arthropathy (DIP involvement, pencil-in-cup deformity) |
| Drug | Mechanism | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Anti-folate, anti-inflammatory | Monitor LFTs, CBC |
| Cyclosporine | Calcineurin inhibitor | Short-term; nephrotoxic |
| Acitretin | Retinoid | Teratogenic; good for pustular/erythrodermic |
| Apremilast | PDE4 inhibitor | Oral; milder disease |
| Class | Drugs |
|---|---|
| Anti-TNF | Etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab |
| Anti-IL-12/23 (p40) | Ustekinumab |
| Anti-IL-17A | Secukinumab, ixekizumab |
| Anti-IL-17RA | Brodalumab |
| Anti-IL-23 (p19) | Guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab |
| Condition | Organism | Features | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impetigo | S. aureus, S. pyogenes | Honey-colored crusted lesions; children | Mupirocin (topical); oral cephalexin or dicloxacillin |
| Folliculitis | S. aureus | Perifollicular pustules | Topical or oral antibiotics |
| Cellulitis | S. aureus, S. pyogenes | Spreading erythema, warmth, edema, no defined border | Oral/IV antibiotics based on severity |
| Erysipelas | S. pyogenes | Well-demarcated, raised erythema; facial or lower limb | Penicillin |
| Necrotizing fasciitis | Mixed or Group A Strep | Severe pain, systemic toxicity, "dishwater" drainage | Surgical debridement + broad-spectrum antibiotics |
| MRSA skin infections | S. aureus (MRSA) | Furuncles, carbuncles, abscesses | Drainage + TMP-SMX or doxycycline |
| Condition | Organism | Features | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tinea corporis | Dermatophytes | Annular, scaly plaques with central clearing | Topical azoles/terbinafine |
| Tinea pedis | Dermatophytes | Interdigital maceration, "moccasin" pattern | Topical antifungals |
| Tinea versicolor | Malassezia furfur | Hypo/hyperpigmented macules; trunk | Topical/oral azoles, selenium sulfide |
| Candidiasis | Candida spp. | Intertriginous, satellite lesions | Topical nystatin or azoles |
| Onychomycosis | Dermatophytes | Nail thickening, yellowing, subungual debris | Oral terbinafine or itraconazole |
| Condition | Organism | Features | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Herpes simplex | HSV-1, HSV-2 | Grouped vesicles on erythematous base; recurrent | Acyclovir, valacyclovir |
| Varicella-zoster (shingles) | VZV | Dermatomal vesicular eruption; post-herpetic neuralgia | Valacyclovir; steroids controversial |
| Molluscum contagiosum | Poxvirus | Umbilicated flesh-colored papules | Curettage, cantharidin; self-limited |
| Warts (verruca) | HPV | Hyperkeratotic papules; various types | Salicylic acid, cryotherapy |
| Type | Lesions |
|---|---|
| Comedonal | Open (blackheads), closed (whiteheads) |
| Inflammatory | Papules, pustules |
| Nodular/cystic | Deep nodules/cysts; risk of scarring |
| Severity | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Mild (comedonal) | Topical retinoids (tretinoin, adapalene) |
| Mild-moderate (inflammatory) | Topical retinoid + topical antibiotic (clindamycin) ± benzoyl peroxide |
| Moderate-severe | Add oral antibiotics (doxycycline, minocycline) |
| Severe/nodular | Oral isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) — most effective |
| Females | OCP, spironolactone (anti-androgen) |
Isotretinoin: Highly teratogenic (iPLEDGE program required); monitor triglycerides, LFTs; causes mucocutaneous dryness.
Enlist all papulosquamous skin disorders, bullous and other disorders in classification
papulosquamous skin disorders classification complete list Harrison's
bullous skin disorders classification vesiculobullous diseases pemphigus pemphigoid
Harrison's skin manifestations internal disease vesicular bullous pustular table classification
Harrison's table selected causes vesicular bullous skin lesions classification systemic primary
| Category | Mechanism | Key Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Papulosquamous | Epidermal hyperproliferation + scale | Psoriasis, lichen planus, tinea, mycosis fungoides |
| Intraepidermal bullous | Loss of keratinocyte adhesion (acantholysis) | Pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus |
| Subepidermal bullous | Autoimmune attack at BMZ | Bullous pemphigoid, dermatitis herpetiformis, EBA |
| Infectious bullous | Toxin-mediated or direct viral | Bullous impetigo, SSSS, HSV, VZV |
| Drug/reactive bullous | Cytotoxic T-cell epidermal destruction | SJS, TEN |
| Metabolic/systemic bullous | Porphyrin photosensitization, ischemia | PCT, diabetic bullae |
Metabolic causes of hyperpigmentation
metabolic causes hyperpigmentation skin disorders
hyperpigmentation Addison's disease hemochromatosis porphyria acanthosis nigricans metabolic endocrine
porphyria cutanea tarda hemochromatosis pellagra hyperpigmentation skin mechanism
Whipple's disease vitamin B12 deficiency folate malabsorption skin hyperpigmentation features
| Category | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Endocrinopathies | Addison's disease, Nelson syndrome, Ectopic ACTH syndrome, Hyperthyroidism |
| Metabolic | PCT, Hemochromatosis, Vit B₁₂/Folate deficiency, Pellagra, Malabsorption (incl. Whipple's) |
| Melanosis | Secondary to metastatic melanoma |
| Autoimmune | Primary biliary cholangitis, Systemic sclerosis, POEMS syndrome, Eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome |
| Drugs/Metals | Cyclophosphamide, silver (argyria), amiodarone, minocycline |
| Condition | Mechanism | Distribution | Key Clue |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT | Photoreactive porphyrins → melanocyte stimulation | Sun-exposed | Bullae + hypertrichosis + fragile skin |
| Hemochromatosis | Iron deposition → ↑ melanin production | Diffuse, bronze | Bronze skin + diabetes + cirrhosis |
| Pellagra | Niacin deficiency → impaired UV-damaged skin repair | Sun-exposed + Casal's necklace | Varnish-like scale; 3 Ds |
| Vit B₁₂ deficiency | Dysregulation of melanin synthesis | Knuckles, mucosa, nails | Megaloblastic anaemia + neurological signs |
| Folate deficiency | One-carbon metabolism disruption | Diffuse | Megaloblastic anaemia; no neuro signs |
| Whipple's / Malabsorption | Combined nutritional deficiencies | Diffuse | Diarrhoea + arthralgias + weight loss |
Role of peripheral blood smear in systemic diseases with examples of abnormal findings. Harrison's chapter 62
peripheral blood smear systemic diseases Harrison's chapter 62
abnormal red blood cell morphology blood smear findings systemic disease schistocytes spherocytes
peripheral blood smear white blood cell abnormalities leukemia lymphoma neutrophil platelet findings
blood smear rouleaux formation target cells sickle cells Howell-Jolly bodies malaria parasites findings
"Every internist should know how to examine a peripheral blood smear." — Harrison's, p. 1714
| Finding | Description | Associated Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Microcytes | Small RBCs (MCV <80 fL) | Iron deficiency anaemia, thalassaemia, anaemia of chronic disease, sideroblastic anaemia |
| Macrocytes | Large RBCs (MCV >100 fL) | Vitamin B₁₂/folate deficiency, liver disease, hypothyroidism, MDS, medications (hydroxyurea, methotrexate) |
| Megalocytes | Oval macrocytes | Megaloblastic anaemia (B₁₂/folate deficiency) |
| Anisocytosis | Variable RBC size | Non-specific; seen in mixed deficiencies, haemolytic anaemia, MDS |
| Cell | Morphology | Disease Association |
|---|---|---|
| Schistocytes | Helmet-shaped cell fragments | Microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia (MAHA): TTP, HUS, DIC, malignant hypertension, eclampsia; also prosthetic heart valves |
| Spherocytes | Round, dense, no central pallor | Hereditary spherocytosis, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA), ABO incompatibility transfusion reactions, burns |
| Sickle cells (Drepanocytes) | Elongated, crescent-shaped | Sickle cell disease (HbSS, HbSC) |
| Target cells (Codocytes) | Central density + peripheral ring ("bull's eye") | Liver disease, obstructive jaundice, thalassaemia, HbC disease, iron deficiency, post-splenectomy |
| Dacrocytes | Teardrop-shaped | Myelofibrosis (classic), severe iron deficiency, thalassaemia, haemolytic anaemia, MDS |
| Elliptocytes | Oval/elliptical | Hereditary elliptocytosis, iron deficiency, megaloblastic anaemia, thalassaemia, MDS |
| Acanthocytes | Irregular spicules (unevenly distributed) | Abetalipoproteinaemia, chronic renal disease, post-splenectomy, liver disease — irreversible |
| Echinocytes (Burr cells) | Evenly distributed spicules | Uraemia (renal failure), malnutrition, stored blood artefact — often reversible |
| Stomatocytes | Mouth-like (slit) central pallor | Hereditary stomatocytosis, liver disease (especially alcoholic), Rh-null disease |
| Rouleaux | RBCs stacked like coins | Multiple myeloma, Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia, chronic inflammation (elevated fibrinogen/globulins) |
| Finding | Description | Associated Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Hypochromia | Increased central pallor (>1/3 diameter) | Iron deficiency anaemia, thalassaemia, sideroblastic anaemia |
| Polychromasia | Blue-grey tint (reticulocytes) | Active haemolysis, haemorrhage with compensatory erythropoiesis, bone marrow recovery |
| Hyperchromia | Dense staining (spherocytes, not truly hyperchromic) | Seen with spherocytes |
| Inclusion | Stain | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Howell-Jolly bodies | Wright's stain — dark purple dots | Hyposplenism / Post-splenectomy, megaloblastic anaemia, severe haemolytic anaemia |
| Basophilic stippling | Coarse blue dots (aggregated ribosomes) | Lead poisoning, thalassaemia, MDS, sideroblastic anaemia, pyrimidine 5'-nucleotidase deficiency |
| Pappenheimer bodies | Iron-containing granules (Prussian blue +) | Sideroblastic anaemia, haemolytic anaemia, post-splenectomy |
| Heinz bodies | Denatured Hb (supravital stain only) | G6PD deficiency, unstable haemoglobinopathies, oxidant drug toxicity |
| Cabot rings | Ring/figure-8 nuclear remnants | Megaloblastic anaemia, severe dyserythropoiesis |
| Malaria parasites | Ring forms, trophozoites, gametocytes | Plasmodium spp. — species identification critical for treatment |
| Babesia | "Maltese cross" (tetrad form) | Babesiosis — Babesia microti |
| Finding | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Leukocytosis | Infection, leukaemia, steroids, stress response, malignancy |
| Leukopenia | Viral infections, bone marrow failure, SLE, drug toxicity, hypersplenism |
| Eosinophilia | Allergic/atopic disease, parasitic infections, drug reactions, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), Addison's disease, malignancy |
| Basophilia | CML (hallmark), myeloproliferative neoplasms, hypothyroidism |
| Monocytosis | TB, infective endocarditis, CMML, inflammatory bowel disease |
| Lymphocytosis | Viral infections (EBV, CMV), CLL, pertussis |
| Finding | Description | Associated Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Hypersegmented neutrophils | Neutrophil with ≥5 lobes (or single cell with ≥6 lobes) | Megaloblastic anaemia (B₁₂/folate deficiency) — classic finding |
| Left shift (bands, metamyelocytes) | Immature neutrophils in peripheral blood | Severe bacterial infection, leukaemoid reaction, CML |
| Toxic granulation | Coarse dark granules in neutrophils | Severe bacterial sepsis, inflammatory states |
| Döhle bodies | Blue cytoplasmic inclusions in neutrophils | Sepsis, burns, pregnancy, May-Hegglin anomaly |
| Pelger-Huët anomaly | Bilobed "pince-nez" neutrophils | Inherited or pseudo-Pelger-Huët in MDS — important marker |
| Blast cells | Large cells with prominent nucleoli, high N:C ratio | Acute leukaemia (AML/ALL) — medical emergency |
| Smudge (basket) cells | Fragile lymphocytes smeared on slide | CLL — pathognomonic finding |
| Atypical lymphocytes | Large, irregular, abundant cytoplasm | EBV (infectious mononucleosis), CMV, viral hepatitis |
| Auer rods | Pink needle-like cytoplasmic inclusions | AML — pathognomonic (especially AML-M3/APL) |
| Leukoerythroblastic picture | Immature WBCs + nucleated RBCs together | Myelophthisic anaemia: myelofibrosis, bone marrow infiltration (metastatic cancer, TB, lymphoma) |
| Finding | Description | Associated Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Thrombocytopenia | Decreased platelets on smear | ITP, TTP, HUS, DIC, hypersplenism, bone marrow failure, heparin-induced (HIT) |
| Thrombocytosis | Increased platelets | Essential thrombocythaemia, reactive (infection, post-splenectomy, iron deficiency) |
| Giant platelets | Platelets ≥ RBC size | Bernard-Soulier syndrome, MDS, May-Hegglin anomaly, ITP |
| Platelet clumping | Artefactual aggregation | EDTA-induced pseudothrombocytopenia — must verify with citrate tube |
| Schistocytes + thrombocytopenia | Combined finding | TTP (ADAMTS13 deficiency) / HUS / DIC — diagnostic pentad in TTP |
| Systemic Disease | Key PBS Findings |
|---|---|
| Iron deficiency anaemia | Microcytes, hypochromia, elliptocytes, target cells |
| B₁₂/Folate deficiency | Macro-ovalocytes, hypersegmented neutrophils, pancytopenia |
| Thalassaemia | Microcytes, hypochromia, target cells, basophilic stippling, nucleated RBCs |
| Sickle cell disease | Sickle cells, target cells, Howell-Jolly bodies (functional asplenia), nucleated RBCs |
| Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia | Spherocytes, polychromasia, nucleated RBCs |
| TTP / HUS | Schistocytes + thrombocytopenia + polychromasia |
| DIC | Schistocytes, thrombocytopenia, fibrin thrombi evidence |
| Malaria | Intra-RBC ring forms / trophozoites / gametocytes (species-specific morphology) |
| CLL | Lymphocytosis + smudge cells |
| CML | Left shift, basophilia, eosinophilia, all myeloid stages visible |
| AML | Blasts + Auer rods (AML-M3) |
| Multiple myeloma | Rouleaux formation, normochromic normocytic anaemia, background blue staining (hyperproteinaemia) |
| Myelofibrosis | Dacrocytes (teardrops), leukoerythroblastic picture |
| Lead poisoning | Basophilic stippling, microcytic anaemia |
| Hyposplenism/Post-splenectomy | Howell-Jolly bodies, target cells, Pappenheimer bodies, thrombocytosis |
| Liver disease | Target cells, acanthocytes, stomatocytes, macrocytes, thrombocytopenia |
| Renal failure (uraemia) | Echinocytes (burr cells), normochromic normocytic anaemia |
| MDS | Pseudo-Pelger-Huët, hypogranular neutrophils, macrocytosis, hypolobated megakaryocytes |
| G6PD deficiency | Heinz bodies (supravital stain), bite cells, polychromasia after oxidant stress |
Psuedotumor cerebri
pseudotumor cerebri idiopathic intracranial hypertension etiology pathophysiology causes
pseudotumor cerebri diagnosis criteria clinical features headache papilledema visual loss management treatment
idiopathic intracranial hypertension modified Dandy criteria lumbar puncture CSF opening pressure MRI findings empty sella
pseudotumor cerebri papilledema optic disc swelling MRI findings
The term "benign" is now discouraged because up to 25% of patients suffer permanent visual loss.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Overall incidence | ~1 per 100,000 in the general US population |
| High-risk group | Women aged 20–44 with obesity: 15–19 per 100,000 |
| Sex ratio | Almost exclusively female (F:M ≈ 9:1) |
| Peak age | Reproductive years (20s–40s) |
| Obesity | Present in >90% of affected women; strong independent risk factor |
| Paediatric IIH | Associated with obesity; higher incidence in post-pubertal adolescents than prepubertal children |
| Drug Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Tetracyclines | Tetracycline, minocycline, doxycycline |
| Vitamin A / Retinoids | Hypervitaminosis A, isotretinoin (Accutane), all-trans retinoic acid |
| Corticosteroids | Steroid withdrawal (not initiation) |
| Hormonal | OCP, levonorgestrel (Mirena IUD) |
| Others | Growth hormone, lithium, nalidixic acid, nitrofurantoin, cyclosporine |
| Symptom | Details |
|---|---|
| Headache | Most common (>90%); daily, diffuse, worse on waking, with Valsalva, positional; migraine-like in character |
| Transient visual obscurations (TVOs) | Seconds-long monocular or binocular visual greyouts, often provoked by postural change — highly characteristic |
| Pulsatile tinnitus | "Whooshing" or heartbeat-like sound in the ears — very characteristic |
| Diplopia | Usually due to unilateral or bilateral VI (abducens) nerve palsy (false localising sign of raised ICP) |
| Photophobia / Phonophobia | Common |
| Visual loss | Progressive if untreated — the most feared complication |
| Neck/back pain | From raised CSF pressure radiating down the spinal axis |
| Sign | Details |
|---|---|
| Papilledema | Cardinal sign — bilateral optic disc swelling from raised ICP; may be asymmetric |
| VI nerve palsy | Esotropia with inability to abduct the eye — false localising sign |
| Visual field defects | Enlarged blind spot (earliest); inferior nasal quadrant loss progressing to generalised constriction |
| Reduced visual acuity | Late and serious — indicates optic nerve compromise |
Note: Neurological examination is otherwise normal — no focal deficits, no altered consciousness, no meningism (which differentiates it from intracranial mass/meningitis)
"An elevated pressure, with normal cerebrospinal fluid, points by exclusion to the diagnosis of pseudotumor cerebri." — Harrison's, p. 964
| Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Empty sella | Flattening of pituitary from chronically raised ICP |
| Posterior globe flattening | Pressure transmitted to optic nerve sheath → flattens posterior sclera |
| Optic nerve sheath distension | Dilation >5 mm reflects raised ICP in perioptic subarachnoid space |
| Transverse sinus stenosis | Present in >90%; bilateral; seen on MRV |
| Vertical tortuosity of optic nerve | Undulation of the optic nerve due to raised ICP |
| Enlarged Meckel's cave / empty sella | Sign of chronic pressure elevation |

| Drug | Mechanism | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetazolamide | Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor → ↓ CSF production | 1–4 g/day | First-line; improves visual fields (IIHTT trial); monitor electrolytes, renal stones |
| Topiramate | Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor + aids weight loss | 50–200 mg/day | Second-line; useful if headache predominates |
| Furosemide | Loop diuretic → ↓ CSF production | 20–40 mg/day | Adjunctive to acetazolamide |
| Corticosteroids | ↓ Inflammation, ↓ CSF production | Short course only | Used in fulminant IIH with acute vision loss; avoid long-term (causes obesity, rebound) |
| Procedure | Indication | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CSF shunting (LP shunt or VP shunt) | Severe or progressive vision loss | Most effective for vision preservation; shunt failure/revision common (Harrison's, p. 964) |
| Optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF) | Threatened vision, especially unilateral | Protects ipsilateral optic nerve; does not address headache; less effective overall (Harrison's, p. 964) |
| Dural venous sinus stenting | Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis + high venous pressure gradient | Emerging therapy; stent placed at transverse-sigmoid sinus junction; promising results (Harrison's, p. 964) |
| Complication | Details |
|---|---|
| Permanent visual loss / blindness | Most feared; up to 25% of patients; due to optic nerve atrophy from chronic papilledema |
| Chronic daily headache | Most common long-term morbidity |
| Optic atrophy | End-stage of untreated papilledema |
| CSF rhinorrhoea | Spontaneous CSF leak through cribriform plate — associated with empty sella and high ICP |
| Shunt complications | Obstruction, infection, over-drainage (subdural hematoma) |
Suspected IIH (headache + papilledema + obese young woman)
↓
MRI Brain + MRV → exclude mass, hydrocephalus, CVT
↓
Lumbar Puncture (lateral decubitus) → elevated opening pressure + normal CSF
↓
Ophthalmology referral → grade papilledema, visual fields, OCT
↓
Mild-moderate disease Severe/rapid visual loss
↓ ↓
Weight loss + Acetazolamide Urgent shunting / ONSF / stenting
↓
Monitor visual fields every 1–3 months
↓
If no improvement → add topiramate / consider surgery
Harrison's chapter 37 dyspnea summary
Harrison's chapter 37 dyspnea pathophysiology mechanisms afferent signals
dyspnea etiology causes cardiac pulmonary evaluation diagnosis management Harrison's
dyspnea assessment MRC scale quality descriptors air hunger chest tightness work of breathing
dyspnea acute chronic differential diagnosis heart failure COPD pulmonary embolism anemia treatment
Dyspnea differs from tachypnea (increased respiratory rate) and hyperpnea (increased ventilation) — it is fundamentally a subjective perception, not an objective measurement.
| Receptor | Location | Stimulus | Sensation Produced |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral chemoreceptors | Carotid body, aortic arch | Hypoxaemia (↓PaO₂), hypercapnia, acidaemia | Air hunger |
| Central chemoreceptors | Medulla oblongata | Hypercapnia (↑PaCO₂), CSF acidosis | Air hunger / urge to breathe |
| Receptor | Location | Activated By | Sensation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stretch receptors | Lungs (airways/parenchyma) | Lung inflation/deflation | Modulates respiratory effort sensation |
| Irritant receptors | Bronchial epithelium | Chemical irritants, bronchoconstriction | Chest tightness (e.g., asthma, COPD) |
| J receptors (juxtacapillary) | Lung interstitium/alveoli | Pulmonary congestion, oedema, inflammation | Rapid, shallow breathing; dyspnea |
| Muscle spindles | Respiratory muscles, chest wall | Increased work/load (↑airway resistance, ↓compliance) | Work/effort of breathing |
| Tendon organs | Respiratory muscles | Force generation monitoring | Effort sensation |
| Descriptor | Likely Mechanism | Associated Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| "Air hunger" / "cannot get enough air" | Chemoreceptor activation (hypoxaemia, hypercapnia) | Heart failure, PE, severe anaemia, COPD exacerbation |
| "Chest tightness" | Airway mechanoreceptors (bronchoconstriction) | Asthma, COPD |
| "Increased work/effort of breathing" | Muscle spindle activation (high resistance or low compliance) | COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, chest wall deformity |
| "Cannot take a deep breath" / "unsatisfying breath" | Cortical/psychological origin | Anxiety, hyperventilation syndrome, vocal cord dysfunction |
| "Suffocating" | Mixed — severe hypoxaemia + high respiratory drive | Pulmonary oedema, severe asthma |
| Category | Causes |
|---|---|
| Cardiac | Acute decompensated heart failure (pulmonary oedema), acute MI, cardiac tamponade, acute arrhythmia |
| Pulmonary | Acute severe asthma, COPD exacerbation, pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, pneumonia |
| Upper airway | Anaphylaxis (laryngeal oedema), foreign body obstruction, epiglottitis, angioedema |
| Metabolic | Severe metabolic acidosis (DKA, lactic acidosis), sepsis |
| Neuromuscular | Guillain-Barré syndrome (acute), myasthenic crisis |
| Psychogenic | Panic attack, acute hyperventilation syndrome |
| Category | Causes |
|---|---|
| Cardiac | Heart failure (HFrEF, HFpEF), valvular heart disease, constrictive pericarditis, cardiomyopathy |
| Pulmonary | COPD, asthma, interstitial lung disease (ILD/pulmonary fibrosis), pulmonary hypertension, bronchiectasis, pleural effusion |
| Haematological | Anaemia (any cause) |
| Neuromuscular | ALS, myasthenia gravis, diaphragmatic paralysis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy |
| Deconditioning | Obesity, physical deconditioning |
| Psychogenic | Anxiety disorder, depression, chronic hyperventilation |
| Others | Thyrotoxicosis, pregnancy, ascites, kyphoscoliosis, obesity hypoventilation syndrome |
| Grade | Description |
|---|---|
| 0 | No dyspnea except with strenuous exercise |
| 1 | Dyspnea when hurrying on level ground or walking up a slight hill |
| 2 | Walks slower than people of same age on level ground due to breathlessness, or stops for breath while walking at own pace |
| 3 | Stops for breath after walking ~100 m or after a few minutes on level ground |
| 4 | Too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when dressing/undressing |
| Class | Description |
|---|---|
| I | No symptoms with ordinary activity |
| II | Symptoms with moderate exertion |
| III | Symptoms with minimal exertion |
| IV | Symptoms at rest |
| Domain | Questions |
|---|---|
| Onset | Acute (minutes) vs. subacute (days) vs. chronic (weeks/months)? |
| Timing | Nocturnal (PND, cardiac asthma)? Positional (orthopnoea → HF; platypnoea → hepatopulmonary syndrome)? |
| Triggers | Exertion, allergens, cold air, lying flat? |
| Quality | Air hunger, chest tightness, effort, unsatisfying breath? |
| Associated symptoms | Cough, wheeze, sputum, haemoptysis, chest pain, palpitations, ankle swelling, fever? |
| Risk factors | Smoking (COPD), cardiac history, DVT/PE risk factors, occupational exposures (ILD), travel (PE) |
| Medications | Beta-blockers (bronchospasm), ACE inhibitors (cough misinterpreted as dyspnea), amiodarone (pulmonary toxicity) |
| Positional Pattern | Mechanism | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Orthopnoea | ↑ venous return when supine → ↑ pulmonary congestion | Heart failure, bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis |
| Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (PND) | Reabsorption of peripheral oedema at night → pulmonary oedema | Heart failure |
| Platypnoea | Dyspnea when upright, relieved lying down | Hepatopulmonary syndrome, intracardiac shunts, orthodeoxia |
| Trepopnoea | Dyspnea in one lateral decubitus position | Unilateral lung or pleural disease |
| Finding | Suggests |
|---|---|
| Wheeze | Asthma, COPD, cardiac asthma |
| Crackles (basal) | Pulmonary oedema, ILD, pneumonia |
| Absent breath sounds | Pneumothorax, large pleural effusion |
| Elevated JVP + S3 + oedema | Heart failure |
| Barrel chest + prolonged expiration | COPD |
| Clubbing | ILD, bronchiectasis, lung cancer |
| Cyanosis | Severe hypoxaemia |
| Stridor | Upper airway obstruction |
| Kussmaul breathing | Metabolic acidosis (DKA) |
"As many as two-thirds of patients will require diagnostic testing beyond the initial clinical presentation."
| Test | What it Evaluates |
|---|---|
| Pulse oximetry | Oxygen saturation; quick screen for hypoxaemia |
| CXR | Pulmonary oedema, pneumothorax, effusion, consolidation, cardiomegaly |
| ECG | Arrhythmia, ischaemia, RV strain (PE), LV hypertrophy |
| ABG | PaO₂, PaCO₂, pH, A-a gradient; hypoxaemia type |
| CBC | Anaemia |
| BMP/CMP | Metabolic acidosis, renal function |
| BNP / NT-proBNP | Heart failure (elevated in HF; normal effectively excludes HF as cause) |
| Test | Indication |
|---|---|
| Echocardiography | Heart failure, valvular disease, pulmonary hypertension, pericardial effusion |
| Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) | Obstructive (COPD/asthma) vs. restrictive (ILD) pattern |
| CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) | Pulmonary embolism (Wells score ≥2 or high clinical suspicion) |
| HRCT chest | ILD, bronchiectasis |
| D-dimer | Exclude PE in low-probability cases |
| Troponin | ACS as cause of acute dyspnea |
| Thyroid function tests | Hyperthyroidism (↑ ventilatory drive) |
| Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) | Integrative assessment when cause remains unclear; differentiates cardiac vs. pulmonary vs. deconditioning vs. psychogenic |
Dyspnea
↓
Acute or Chronic?
↓ ↓
ACUTE CHRONIC
History + Exam History + Exam
Pulse oximetry, CXR, ECG CXR, ECG, CBC, BNP, PFTs
BNP, ABG, troponin Echocardiogram if cardiac
↓ ↓
Life-threatening first: Still unclear?
Pneumothorax → chest drain ↓
Pulmonary oedema → diuretics CPET / HRCT / CTPA /
Severe asthma → bronchodilators Subspecialty referral
PE → anticoagulation
Tamponade → pericardiocentesis
| Condition | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Heart failure | Diuretics, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors |
| COPD | Bronchodilators (LABA, LAMA), ICS, pulmonary rehabilitation, oxygen |
| Asthma | ICS, SABA for rescue, LABA, biologics (severe) |
| Pulmonary embolism | Anticoagulation (LMWH/DOAC); thrombolysis if massive PE |
| Pneumothorax | Observation (small) or chest drain (large/tension) |
| Anaemia | Iron, B₁₂, folate supplementation; transfusion if severe |
| Pulmonary fibrosis | Antifibrotics (nintedanib, pirfenidone) |
| Pulmonary hypertension | Prostacyclins, endothelin antagonists, PDE5 inhibitors |
| Intervention | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Low-dose opioids (morphine) | Most evidence-based pharmacological treatment for refractory dyspnea; reduces air hunger and ventilatory drive without significant respiratory depression at low doses |
| Supplemental oxygen | Beneficial if hypoxaemic (SpO₂ <88%); no benefit in normoxaemic patients with COPD or cancer dyspnea |
| Fan / cool air directed to face | Stimulates facial receptors (V2 branch of trigeminal nerve) → reduces dyspnea perception |
| Pulmonary rehabilitation | Improves dyspnea, exercise tolerance, quality of life in COPD/ILD |
| Anxiolytics (benzodiazepines) | Adjunctive in anxiety-related dyspnea; limited evidence as sole therapy |
| Heliox (helium-oxygen) | Reduces airway resistance; used in upper airway obstruction and severe asthma |
| Non-invasive ventilation (NIV/CPAP/BiPAP) | Acute hypercapnic COPD exacerbation, acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema |
Harrisons chapter 13 to 66 cardinal features summarised briefly
Harrison's sections cardinal manifestations chapters 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 pain fever headache chest
Harrison's cardinal manifestations table of contents chapters 21 to 40 dyspnea cough edema palpitations syncope
Harrison's table of contents section 2 cardinal manifestations symptoms chapter list
Harrison's chapters pain chest headache abdominal back limb fever chills weight loss fatigue anorexia
| Origin | Examples |
|---|---|
| Cardiac ischaemic | ACS, stable angina, vasospasm |
| Cardiac non-ischaemic | Pericarditis, myocarditis, aortic dissection |
| Pulmonary | PE, pneumothorax, plpneumonia, pleuritis |
| GI | GERD, oesophageal spasm, peptic ulcer |
| Musculoskeletal | Costochondritis, rib fracture, Tietze syndrome |
| Psychogenic | Panic disorder, anxiety |
| Feature | UMN | LMN |
|---|---|---|
| Tone | ↑ (spastic) | ↓ (flaccid) |
| Reflexes | ↑, Babinski + | ↓, absent |
| Wasting | Minimal | Prominent |
| Distribution | Pyramidal (arm extensors, leg flexors) | Segmental/focal |
| Rash Type | Key Diagnoses |
|---|---|
| Maculopapular | Viral exanthems, drug reaction, secondary syphilis, typhoid, SLE |
| Petechiae/Purpura | Meningococcaemia, DIC, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, vasculitis, ITP |
| Vesicular | Varicella, herpes zoster, HSV disseminated, enterovirus |
| Urticarial | Drug reaction, serum sickness, viral hepatitis |
| Nodular | Disseminated fungal (histoplasma, coccidioides), Janeway lesions (IE) |
| Desquamating | Toxic shock syndrome (TSS), SSSS, scarlet fever, Kawasaki |
| Type | Mechanism | Examples | Haemodynamics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distributive | Vasodilation | Septic (most common), anaphylactic, neurogenic | ↑CO, ↓SVR |
| Cardiogenic | Pump failure | MI, acute HF, myocarditis, tamponade | ↓CO, ↑SVR |
| Hypovolaemic | ↓ Preload | Haemorrhage, dehydration, burns | ↓CO, ↑SVR |
| Obstructive | Mechanical obstruction | Massive PE, tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade | ↓CO, ↑SVR |
| MCV | Type | Causes |
|---|---|---|
| Microcytic (<80) | Iron deficiency, thalassaemia, ACD, sideroblastic | Ferritin ↓ (IDA), normal/↑ (ACD) |
| Normocytic (80–100) | ACD, haemolysis, aplastic, early deficiencies, CKD | Reticulocyte count key |
| Macrocytic (>100) | B₁₂/folate deficiency (megaloblastic), liver disease, hypothyroidism, MDS | Hypersegmented neutrophils in megaloblastic |
| Ch. | Title | Core Concept |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Pain: Pathophysiology & Management | Nociception, sensitisation, WHO ladder, neuropathic pain |
| 14 | Chest Discomfort | ACS vs. non-cardiac causes; HEART score |
| 15 | Abdominal Pain | Visceral vs. parietal; localisation by quadrant; surgical emergencies |
| 16 | Headache | Migraine/tension/cluster; red flags; thunderclap = SAH |
| 17 | Back & Neck Pain | Mechanical (95%); red flags; disc herniation; cauda equina |
| 18 | Numbness & Sensory Loss | Spinothalamic vs. dorsal column; peripheral vs. central |
| 19 | Weakness & Paralysis | UMN vs. LMN vs. NMJ vs. myopathy |
| 20 | Faintness, Syncope, Vertigo | Reflex/orthostatic/cardiac syncope; BPPV/Ménière's |
| 21 | Syncope | Risk stratification; ROSE rules; cardiac vs. reflex |
| 22 | Fever | Pyrogens; fever vs. hyperthermia; FUO |
| 23 | Fever and Rash | Pattern recognition: petechiae = meningococcaemia |
| 24 | Hypothermia & Frostbite | Core temp; J waves; rewarming strategy |
| 25 | Confusion & Delirium | CAM criteria; hyperactive vs. hypoactive; treat cause |
| 26 | Dementia | AD/VaD/LBD/FTD; reversible causes (B₁₂, NPH, hypothyroid) |
| 27 | Aphasia & Focal Disorders | Broca/Wernicke/Global; neglect; apraxia |
| 28 | Sleep Disorders | OSA/narcolepsy/RLS/insomnia; CBT-I; CPAP |
| 29 | Eye Disorders | Sudden visual loss; RAPD; papilledema; CN III palsy |
| 30 | Smell, Taste & Hearing | Anosmia (COVID/Parkinson's); conductive vs. SNHL |
| 31 | Palpitations | Ectopics/SVT/AF/VT; risk-stratify for SCD |
| 32 | Hypertension | Primary vs. secondary; hypertensive emergency; stepwise Tx |
| 33 | Cardiac Arrest & SCD | BLS/ACLS; post-ROSC care; ICD prevention |
| 34 | Shock | 4 types; septic shock = distributive; vasopressors |
| 36 | Cough & Haemoptysis | Triad of chronic cough; massive haemoptysis management |
| 37 | Dyspnea | Afferent mismatch; descriptors; CPET; opioids for palliation |
| 38 | Hypoxia & Cyanosis | A-a gradient; central vs. peripheral; methaemoglobinaemia |
| 39 | Oedema | Starling forces; cardiac/renal/hepatic/lymphatic causes |
| 40 | ECG Atlas | Systematic reading; STEMI/LVH/LBBB/long QT/Brugada |
| 41 | Nausea, Vomiting & Indigestion | CTZ; antiemetics; alarm features for investigation |
| 42 | Dysphagia | Oropharyngeal vs. oesophageal; achalasia; carcinoma |
| 43 | Diarrhoea & Constipation | Acute/chronic; secretory/osmotic/inflammatory/malabsorptive |
| 44 | Weight Loss | Malignancy in 25%; cachexia; investigate systematically |
| 45 | GI Bleeding | UGIB (PUD/varices) vs. LGIB (diverticulosis); endoscopy |
| 46 | Jaundice | Pre/intra/post-hepatic; Gilbert's; MRCP/ERCP |
| 47 | Ascites & Abdominal Swelling | SAAG ≥1.1 = portal HTN; SBP; hepatorenal syndrome |
| 48 | Azotaemia & Urinary Abnormalities | Pre/intra/post-renal AKI; urinary casts; proteinuria |
| 49 | Fluid & Electrolyte Disturbances | Hypo/hypernatraemia; hypo/hyperkalaemia; acid-base |
| 50 | Acidosis & Alkalosis | AG metabolic acidosis (MUDPILES); respiratory compensation |
| 56 | Approach to Skin Disease | Primary/secondary lesions; distribution; morphology |
| 57 | Common Skin Disorders | Eczema/psoriasis/acne/infections |
| 58 | Skin Manifestations of Internal Disease | Systemic disease → skin clues |
| 59 | Immunologically Mediated Skin Diseases | Pemphigus/pemphigoid/DH |
| 60 | Cutaneous Drug Reactions | SJS/TEN/DRESS/fixed drug eruption |
| 61 | Photosensitivity | Porphyria; drug photosensitivity; photodermatoses |
| 62 | Peripheral Blood Smear | RBC/WBC/platelet morphology in systemic disease |
| 63 | Articular & Musculoskeletal Disease | Articular vs. periarticular; inflammatory vs. mechanical; synovial fluid |
| 64 | Osteoporosis | T-score; FRAX; bisphosphonates; fragility fractures |
| 65 | Approach to Neurological Disease | Localisation; history; examination; investigations |
| 66 | Neuroimaging | CT vs. MRI; DWI/FLAIR/SWI; MS/stroke/SAH patterns |
Key processes and tools in practice of evidence based medicine. Harrisons chapter 4 summary
Harrison's chapter 4 evidence based medicine clinical practice tools processes
evidence based medicine systematic review meta-analysis randomized controlled trial clinical decision making
EBM four steps formulating question searching literature critical appraisal applying evidence patient
sensitivity specificity likelihood ratio NNT NNH absolute relative risk clinical statistics diagnostic testing
"Clinical medicine is defined traditionally as a practice combining medical knowledge (including scientific evidence), intuition, and judgment in the care of patients. Evidence-based medicine updates this construct by placing much greater emphasis on the processes by which clinicians gain knowledge of the most up-to-date and relevant clinical research to determine for themselves whether medical interventions alter the disease course and improve the length or quality of life." — Harrison's, p. 269
| Element | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| P | Patient/Population | Adult with newly diagnosed AF |
| I | Intervention | Apixaban |
| C | Comparison | Warfarin |
| O | Outcome | Stroke, major bleeding, mortality |
| Resource | Description |
|---|---|
| PubMed / MEDLINE | Primary peer-reviewed literature |
| Cochrane Library | Gold standard for systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
| UpToDate / DynaMed | Point-of-care synthesised summaries |
| Clinical Practice Guidelines | Professional society recommendations (AHA, ESC, NICE, WHO) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov | Registered trials; protocol transparency |
| TRIP Database | Evidence-based clinical resources aggregator |
| Level | Study Type | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Systematic review / Meta-analysis of RCTs | Highest |
| 1b | Individual RCT (well-designed) | |
| 2a | Systematic review of cohort studies | |
| 2b | Individual cohort study | |
| 3a | Systematic review of case-control studies | |
| 3b | Individual case-control study | |
| 4 | Case series, case reports | |
| 5 | Expert opinion, mechanistic reasoning | Lowest |
| Design | Key Features | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCT | Random allocation; blinding; controls | Eliminates confounding; establishes causation | Expensive, time-consuming; may lack external validity |
| Systematic Review / Meta-analysis | Pools multiple studies statistically | High power; reduces random error | Garbage in, garbage out; heterogeneity |
| Cohort Study | Follow exposed vs. unexposed over time | Good for prognosis and rare exposures | Confounding; takes long; attrition bias |
| Case-Control | Compare diseased vs. non-diseased retrospectively | Good for rare diseases; fast; cheap | Recall bias; selection bias; no incidence |
| Cross-Sectional | Snapshot in time; prevalence data | Quick; cheap | Cannot establish causality; no temporality |
| Case Report/Series | Descriptive; individual cases | Hypothesis-generating | No control group; anecdotal |
| N-of-1 Trial | Multiple crossover within single patient | Personalised evidence | Narrow applicability |
| Bias | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Selection bias | Non-random group assignment | Allocation not concealed |
| Performance bias | Differential care between groups | Unblinded clinicians |
| Detection bias | Outcome assessment influenced by group knowledge | Unblinded outcome assessors |
| Attrition bias | Differential dropout between groups | Per-protocol vs. ITT analysis |
| Reporting bias | Selective publication/reporting of outcomes | Publication bias (positive trials more likely published) |
| Confounding | Third variable associated with both exposure and outcome | Observational studies |
| Measure | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (Sn) | TP / (TP + FN) | Ability to detect disease; high Sn → good screening test; SnNout (high sensitivity → negative result rules OUT) |
| Specificity (Sp) | TN / (TN + FP) | Ability to confirm absence; high Sp → good confirmatory test; SpPin (high specificity → positive result rules IN) |
| PPV | TP / (TP + FP) | Probability disease present given positive test; depends on prevalence |
| NPV | TN / (TN + FN) | Probability disease absent given negative test; depends on prevalence |
| Likelihood Ratio + | Sn / (1 − Sp) | LR+ >10 = strong evidence of disease |
| Likelihood Ratio − | (1 − Sn) / Sp | LR− <0.1 = strong evidence against disease |
| Pre-test probability | Clinical estimate before test | From history, exam, prevalence |
| Post-test probability | Derived using Bayes' theorem or Fagan nomogram | Pre-test probability + LR → post-test probability |
| Measure | Formula | Clinical Use |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute Risk (AR) | Events / Total in group | Baseline risk in control group |
| Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) | ARcontrol − ARtreatment | Actual reduction in risk attributable to treatment |
| Relative Risk (RR) | ARtreatment / ARcontrol | Risk in treated vs. untreated; RR <1 = benefit |
| Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) | 1 − RR = ARR / ARcontrol | % reduction in risk; can be misleading without ARR |
| Number Needed to Treat (NNT) | 1 / ARR | Number of patients treated for 1 to benefit; lower = better |
| Number Needed to Harm (NNH) | 1 / ARI (absolute risk increase) | Number treated before 1 harm occurs; higher = safer |
| Odds Ratio (OR) | (TP × TN) / (FP × FN) | Used in case-control studies; approximates RR when disease is rare |
| Hazard Ratio (HR) | Instantaneous event rate ratio | Used in survival/time-to-event analyses |
Critical teaching point: RRR is always more impressive-sounding than ARR. A drug reducing events from 2% to 1% has RRR = 50% but ARR = 1% and NNT = 100. Clinicians must focus on ARR and NNT for bedside decision-making.
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Forest plot | Displays individual study results and pooled estimate; diamond = overall effect; width = CI |
| Funnel plot | Asymmetry suggests publication bias |
| Heterogeneity (I²) | I² >50% = substantial heterogeneity; questions validity of pooling |
| Confidence interval (CI) | Range within which true effect lies 95% of the time; if CI crosses 1.0 (RR/OR/HR) or 0 (ARR) → not statistically significant |
| p-value | Probability of observing results by chance if null hypothesis true; p <0.05 = statistically significant (but does not indicate clinical significance) |
| Grade | Meaning |
|---|---|
| High | Confident that true effect is close to estimated effect (usually well-done RCTs) |
| Moderate | Moderate confidence; true effect probably close to estimate |
| Low | Limited confidence; true effect may be substantially different |
| Very Low | Very little confidence; true effect likely different from estimate |
| Score | Condition | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Score | DVT / PE | Pre-test probability |
| HEART Score | Chest pain / ACS | Risk stratification |
| CHA₂DS₂-VASc | AF | Stroke risk → anticoagulation decision |
| CURB-65 | Pneumonia | Severity → site of care |
| Glasgow Coma Scale | Consciousness | Severity of impaired consciousness |
| Child-Pugh / MELD | Liver disease | Prognosis; transplant listing |
| Framingham Risk Score | Cardiovascular | 10-year CVD risk |
| FRAX | Osteoporosis | 10-year fracture risk |
| Limitation | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Evidence gaps | Many clinical questions lack RCT evidence |
| External validity | Trial populations often differ from real patients (elderly, comorbid, polypharmacy excluded) |
| Publication bias | Positive trials more likely published; negative/null results suppressed |
| Surrogate outcomes | Many trials measure surrogate endpoints (HbA1c, BP) not patient-important outcomes (mortality, QoL) |
| Time lag | Evidence-to-practice gap averages 17 years |
| Overreliance on p-values | Statistical significance ≠ clinical significance |
| Conflicts of interest | Industry-funded trials more likely to show positive results |
| Individual variation | Average RCT results may not apply to individual patients |
Clinical Uncertainty
↓
Step 1: PICO Question
↓
Step 2: Search (PubMed, Cochrane, Guidelines)
↓
Step 3: Appraise (Study design → Bias → Statistics)
↓
Level of evidence (GRADE)
↓
NNT / ARR / LR / CI
↓
Step 4: Apply to patient
↓
Clinical expertise + Patient values
↓
Shared Decision-Making
↓
Best individualised care
Basic principles of screening. Uses and abuses of screening tests. Harrisons chapter 6 based short summary
Harrison's chapter 6 screening principles disease prevention early detection
screening test criteria validity reliability sensitivity specificity lead time bias length bias overdiagnosis
screening principles Wilson Jungner criteria disease test population benefit harm balance
lead time bias screening cancer survival mortality surrogate endpoint uses abuses overdiagnosis overtreatment
"This chapter reviews the basic principles of screening and prevention in the primary care setting." — Harrison's, p. 302
| Level | Definition | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Primary prevention | Prevent disease occurrence | Vaccination, smoking cessation, statins, folic acid in pregnancy |
| Secondary prevention | Detect disease early before symptoms | Mammography, cervical smear, colonoscopy, BP measurement |
| Tertiary prevention | Reduce impact of established disease | Cardiac rehabilitation, diabetic foot care, stroke physiotherapy |
| Quaternary prevention | Protect from overmedicalisation | Avoiding unnecessary screening, overdiagnosis, overtreatment |
| # | Criterion | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The condition should be an important health problem | Significant burden — high prevalence, morbidity, or mortality |
| 2 | There should be an accepted treatment for patients with recognised disease | No point detecting disease if no effective intervention exists |
| 3 | Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available | Healthcare infrastructure must support follow-up |
| 4 | There should be a recognisable latent or early symptomatic stage | Detectable window between onset and clinical presentation |
| 5 | There should be a suitable test or examination | The test must be acceptable, safe, valid, and reliable |
| 6 | The test should be acceptable to the population | High uptake required for programme effectiveness |
| 7 | The natural history of the condition should be adequately understood | Must know the disease's progression to interpret screening findings |
| 8 | There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients | Clear diagnostic thresholds and management pathways |
| 9 | The cost of case-finding should be economically balanced | Cost-effectiveness analysis; cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) |
| 10 | Case-finding should be a continuing process | Not a one-time event; requires periodic re-screening |
| Property | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | TP / (TP + FN) | Ability to correctly identify those WITH disease; high Sn → few false negatives; SnNout |
| Specificity | TN / (TN + FP) | Ability to correctly identify those WITHOUT disease; high Sp → few false positives; SpPin |
| PPV | TP / (TP + FP) | Probability of disease given positive test; rises with prevalence |
| NPV | TN / (TN + FN) | Probability of no disease given negative test; falls with prevalence |
Critical point: In low-prevalence screening populations, even a highly specific test generates many false positives — driving unnecessary investigations, anxiety, and harm. This is the fundamental tension in population screening.
Define target population (age, sex, risk group)
↓
Apply screening test (first-line, usually cheap/safe/sensitive)
↓
Screen-positive individuals
↓
Diagnostic confirmation (gold standard test)
↓
Treatment / intervention
↓
Outcome monitoring and programme evaluation
Without screening: Diagnosis ──────────────────► Death
← Survival time →
With screening: Diagnosis ──────────────────────────► Death
↑ (earlier)
← Longer "survival" → (same death date)
Example: If screening detects cancer 2 years earlier but treatment does not change the death date, 5-year survival improves from 0% to 100% purely due to lead time — with no actual benefit.
Slow-growing tumour: ─────────────────────────────► (long window, screen catches it)
Fast-growing tumour: ──────► (short window, screen misses it → symptomatic)
| Cancer | Magnitude |
|---|---|
| Prostate cancer (PSA) | Estimated 25–50% of screen-detected cases are overdiagnosed |
| Thyroid cancer | Epidemic of small papillary thyroid cancers detected on USS — most would never cause symptoms |
| Breast cancer (DCIS) | Ductal carcinoma in situ: not all progress to invasive cancer |
| Lung cancer (LDCT) | ~18% overdiagnosis estimated in NLST trial |
| Melanoma | Increasing incidence without proportional increase in mortality |
Named after the quote: "When the Okies left Oklahoma and moved to California, they raised the average intelligence in both states."
Example: Low-dose CT lung screening — for every 1,000 scans, ~200 abnormalities detected; vast majority are benign, leading to repeated imaging and occasional invasive procedures.
| Outcome | Validity | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Disease-specific mortality | High | Most important — does screening reduce deaths from the disease? |
| All-cause mortality | Highest | Does screening reduce total deaths? (Avoids misclassification of cause of death) |
| 5-year survival rate | Low — misleading | Profoundly affected by lead time bias and length bias; DO NOT USE to evaluate screening |
| Incidence (stage shift) | Moderate | More early-stage diagnoses is proxy for benefit but must accompany mortality reduction |
| Quality of life (QoL) | High | Overdiagnosis and overtreatment reduce QoL even if mortality unchanged |
The most important principle: A screening test must be evaluated by randomised controlled trial measuring disease-specific or all-cause mortality — not by case series or cohort studies showing improved survival.
| Dimension | Consideration |
|---|---|
| Benefit | Reduction in disease-specific mortality; early, less morbid treatment |
| Harm | False positives, overdiagnosis, overtreatment, anxiety, invasive follow-up |
| Autonomy | Informed consent; patients must understand limitations |
| Equity | Screening must reach high-risk and disadvantaged populations equally |
| Cost-effectiveness | Cost per QALY gained; opportunity cost vs. other health interventions |
| Condition | Test | Target Population | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical cancer | HPV test / Pap smear | Women 25–65 every 3–5 years | Strong — mortality ↓ |
| Breast cancer | Mammography | Women 40–74 every 1–2 years | Moderate — 20% mortality ↓; overdiagnosis significant |
| Colorectal cancer | FIT / colonoscopy / sigmoidoscopy | Age 45–75 | Strong — mortality ↓ |
| Lung cancer | Low-dose CT (LDCT) | Smokers 50–80, ≥20 pack-years | Moderate (NLST/NELSON) — 20–26% lung cancer mortality ↓ |
| AAA | Abdominal USS | Male smokers aged 65 | Strong — mortality ↓ |
| Hypertension | BP measurement | All adults every 1–2 years | Strong — stroke/CVD ↓ |
| Diabetes | Fasting glucose / HbA1c | Overweight/obese adults | Moderate |
| Osteoporosis | DEXA scan | Women ≥65, high-risk younger | Moderate — fracture ↓ |
| Prostate cancer (PSA) | PSA | Men 50–70 (controversial) | Weak — significant overdiagnosis; shared decision-making essential |
| Newborn metabolic | Heel prick (PKU, hypothyroid etc.) | All neonates | Strong |
| Uses of Screening | Abuses / Limitations |
|---|---|
| Detects disease in pre-symptomatic stage | Lead time bias falsely inflates survival |
| Enables earlier, less morbid treatment | Length bias preferentially detects indolent disease |
| Reduces disease-specific mortality (when evidence-based) | Overdiagnosis — treating pseudo-disease |
| Identifies high-risk individuals for targeted prevention | False positives → anxiety, unnecessary investigations |
| Population-level health improvement | False negatives → false reassurance |
| Cost-effective when properly designed | Volunteer/healthy screener bias in observational data |
| Guides resource allocation | Stage migration (Will Rogers) distorts statistics |
| Satisfies patient autonomy when properly consented | Medicalisation of healthy individuals |
| Overtreatment → net harm in some programmes | |
| Inequitable access may widen health disparities |
Bayes rule in diagnostic probability. Discuss tools for assessment of quality of healthcare
Bayes theorem diagnostic probability pretest posttest probability likelihood ratio clinical medicine Harrison's
quality of healthcare assessment tools measures indicators patient safety outcome process structure Donabedian
Bayes rule pretest probability sensitivity specificity positive negative predictive value Fagan nomogram clinical decision
healthcare quality improvement tools patient safety indicators benchmarking accreditation error reporting clinical audit
The Fagan nomogram version of Bayes' rule "helps us understand at a conceptual level how it estimates the posttest probability of disease... the impact of the diagnostic test result is summarized by the likelihood ratio, defined as the ratio of the probability of a given test result in a patient with disease to the probability of that result in a patient without disease." — Harrison's, p. 261
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Pre-test probability | Probability of disease before the test is applied; derived from prevalence, clinical history, examination, and risk factors |
| Post-test probability | Revised probability of disease after incorporating the test result |
| Sensitivity (Sn) | TP / (TP + FN) — probability of positive test given disease present |
| Specificity (Sp) | TN / (TN + FP) — probability of negative test given disease absent |
| Likelihood Ratio (LR) | How much a test result changes the pre-test probability |
| LR+ Value | Interpretation | Change in Probability |
|---|---|---|
| >10 | Large, often conclusive increase | +45% approx |
| 5–10 | Moderate increase | +30% approx |
| 2–5 | Small increase | +15% approx |
| 1–2 | Minimal/negligible | +0–5% |
| 1 | No diagnostic value | 0% |
| LR− Value | Interpretation | Change in Probability |
|---|---|---|
| <0.1 | Large, often conclusive decrease | −45% approx |
| 0.1–0.2 | Moderate decrease | −30% approx |
| 0.2–0.5 | Small decrease | −15% approx |
| 0.5–1 | Minimal/negligible | 0–5% |
Key insight: LRs are independent of prevalence — unlike PPV and NPV, they are properties of the test alone and can be applied to any pre-test probability using Bayesian reasoning.
Pre-test Likelihood Post-test
Probability Ratio Probability
99% ──────────── 1000 ─────────────── 99%
500
95% ──────────── 200 ──────────────── 95%
100
90% ──────────── 50 ──────────────── 90%
20
75% ──────────── 10 ──────────────── 75%
50% ──────────── 5 ──────────────── 50%
2
25% ──────────── 1 ──────────────── 25%
10% ──────────── 0.5 ──────────────── 10%
5% ──────────── 0.2 ──────────────── 5%
0.1
1% ──────────── 0.05 ─────────────── 1%
0%─────────────[Test threshold]────────[Treatment threshold]──────100%
│ │ │
Disease Test to Treat without
so unlikely further clarify testing
no test needed probability
| Zone | Action |
|---|---|
| Below test threshold | Disease unlikely enough — no testing needed |
| Between thresholds | Uncertainty zone — testing will change management |
| Above treatment threshold | Disease likely enough — treat empirically without waiting for test |
Testing is only worthwhile when the pre-test probability lies between the test and treatment thresholds — and when the test result will change clinical management.
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
| Disease prevalence | Population base rate; from epidemiological data |
| Clinical prediction rules | Wells score (DVT/PE), HEART score (ACS), Centor (strep pharyngitis) |
| History and examination | Most powerful tool; symptom typicality, risk factors, exam findings |
| Clinician gestalt | Experienced clinician's integrated impression (validated in some studies) |
| Published probability tables | Pre-test probabilities for specific symptom/sign combinations |
| Limitation | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Pre-test probability is subjective | Estimation varies between clinicians; anchoring bias |
| LRs assume test independence | Multiple sequential tests cannot simply be chained (results often correlated) |
| Spectrum bias | LRs derived from populations with different disease spectrum may not apply |
| Threshold uncertainty | Test and treatment thresholds are not always clearly defined |
| Patient values ignored | Pure Bayesian reasoning does not incorporate patient preferences for certainty |
| Continuous test results ignored | Binary positive/negative LRs lose information from continuous variables (e.g., troponin levels) |
"Donabedian has suggested that quality of care can be categorised by type of measurement into structure, process, and outcome."
"It is important to note that good structure and process do not always result in a good outcome. A patient may present with suspected MI to an institution with a catheterisation laboratory and receive recommended care including aspirin, but still die because of the infarction." — Harrison's, p. 356
| Domain | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Easy to measure; reproducible | Poor direct link to outcomes |
| Process | Reflects evidence-based care delivery; actionable | May not always correlate with outcomes |
| Outcome | Directly patient-relevant | Confounded by case mix; needs risk adjustment; delayed measurement |
| Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Clinical effectiveness | HbA1c <53 mmol/mol in diabetics, BP <140/90, statin prescription post-MI |
| Patient safety | Medication error rate, wrong-site surgery rate, falls rate per 1000 bed days |
| Patient experience | Friends and Family Test, CAHPS survey, complaints rate |
| Access/timeliness | Door-to-balloon <90 min, A&E 4-hour target, cancer 2-week wait rule |
| Efficiency | Average length of stay, readmission within 30 days, bed occupancy rate |
| Perspective | Healthcare Application |
|---|---|
| Financial | Cost per episode, budget variance, revenue cycle |
| Customer (Patient) | Patient satisfaction scores, complaints, PROMS |
| Internal processes | Waiting times, adherence to protocols, infection rates |
| Learning and growth | Staff training, turnover, innovation adoption |
PLAN
↗ ↘
ACT DO
↖ ↙
STUDY
UCL ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─
● ● ●
Mean ────────────────●────────●────●────────────
● ● ●
LCL ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─
| Tool | What it Measures |
|---|---|
| PROMs | Health outcomes from patient's perspective (pain, function, QoL) — e.g., EQ-5D, Oxford Hip Score |
| PREMs | Patient's experience of care process — e.g., communication, dignity, responsiveness |
| CAHPS | Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (USA) |
| Friends and Family Test | NHS UK: "Would you recommend this service?" |
| NPS (Net Promoter Score) | Promoters minus detractors as overall satisfaction metric |
| Tool | Type | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|
| Donabedian Triad | Framework | Categorising quality measures |
| Clinical Audit | Measurement | Gap analysis against standards |
| KPIs / Quality Indicators | Measurement | Monitoring ongoing performance |
| Balanced Scorecard | Strategic | Organisation-wide performance management |
| PDSA Cycle | Improvement | Iterative small-scale change testing |
| Root Cause Analysis | Safety | Reactive adverse event investigation |
| FMEA | Safety | Proactive risk identification |
| SPC Charts | Measurement | Trend monitoring over time |
| Benchmarking | Measurement | Comparative performance assessment |
| PROMs / PREMs | Patient-centred | Patient perspective on outcomes and experience |
| Accreditation | External review | Institutional standards compliance |
| M&M Conferences | Safety/Learning | Peer case review and learning |
| Incident Reporting | Safety | Voluntary adverse event capture |
| Six Sigma | Improvement | Defect reduction to near-zero |
| Lean | Improvement | Waste elimination and process efficiency |
| Bayesian Reasoning | Quality Improvement |
|---|---|
| Uses prior probability + new data → updated probability | Uses baseline performance + intervention → improved outcome |
| Iterative updating with each new test | Iterative PDSA cycles |
| Quantifies uncertainty explicitly | SPC charts quantify variation explicitly |
| Pre-test probability = baseline prevalence | Baseline KPI = starting performance |
| LR = the power of new information | Effect size = the power of an intervention |
| Post-test probability = revised clinical estimate | Post-intervention KPI = new performance level |