Neet mds community dentistry important questions
NEET MDS community dentistry important questions topics 2024 2025
https://mdsprep.com/blog/neet-mds-how-to-prepare-for-communi…
| Index | What to Know |
|---|---|
| DMFT/DMFS | Formula, scoring, WHO criteria, Klein, Palmer & Knutson |
| PHP Index (Patient Hygiene Performance) | Podshadley & Haley, 5 tooth surfaces, scoring |
| OHI-S | Greene & Vermillion, DI-S + CI-S, scoring 0-3 |
| Russell's Periodontal Index (PI) | Scoring 0-8, reversibility |
| CPITN / BPE | WHO probe codes 0-4, sextants |
| Dean's Fluorosis Index | Very Mild/Mild/Moderate/Severe, Community Fluorosis Index |
| PDI (Periodontal Disease Index) | Ramfjord teeth (16, 21, 24, 36, 41, 44) |
| GI (Gingival Index) | Loe & Silness, 0-3 scoring |
| Plaque Index | Silness & Loe |
| TSIF (Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis) |
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Optimal water fluoride | 0.7-1.2 ppm |
| Fluorosis threshold | >1.5 ppm |
| Acute toxic fluoride dose | 5 mg/kg |
| Critical pH for caries | 5.5 |
| Chi-square df formula | (r-1)(c-1) |
| Sensitivity formula | TP/(TP+FN) |
| Specificity formula | TN/(TN+FP) |
| Herd immunity threshold | 1 - (1/R0) |
Search for recent research on water fluoridation & dental public health
water fluoridation dental caries public health
fluoride neurodevelopmental effects children
water fluoridation dental public health research 2024 2025 latest findings
PMID: 39362658
PMID: 40574418
PMID: 39172715
PMID: 42337497
Key implication for NEET MDS: The Cochrane review confirms efficacy but notes the "effect size is smaller in the modern era" - this distinction is now being tested in exams.
| Issue | Current Evidence (2024-2026) | Certainty |
|---|---|---|
| CWF reduces caries | Yes - 40-52% reduction in caries prevalence | Moderate |
| Benefit in post-toothpaste era | Yes, but effect size smaller | Low-Moderate |
| Harm to IQ at 0.7 ppm (US level) | No evidence of harm at 0.7 ppm | Moderate |
| Harm to IQ at >1.5 ppm | Associated with lower IQ in children | Moderate |
| Cessation worsens equity | Yes - vulnerable groups harmed most | Moderate |
| Fluoride varnish cost-effective | Yes | Moderate |
Bottom line: The most recent high-quality evidence (2024-2026) continues to support community water fluoridation as an effective public health intervention for caries prevention, particularly for disadvantaged populations. The neurodevelopmental concerns raised by the NTP (2024) apply to exposure levels above 1.5 mg/L - not to the 0.7 mg/L used in optimally fluoridated water supplies. Cessation of CWF, especially without replacement strategies, is associated with increased caries burden and greater health inequity.