Split skin grafting

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"split thickness skin graft"[MeSH Terms]

Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
I now have comprehensive content from multiple authoritative textbooks. Let me compile a thorough, well-organized answer.

Split Skin Grafting (Split-Thickness Skin Graft - STSG)

Definition

A split-thickness skin graft (STSG) - also called a split-skin graft - consists of the full thickness of the epidermis plus a variable (partial) thickness of the dermis. It is contrasted with a full-thickness skin graft (FTSG), which includes all of the dermis.
STSGs are subdivided into:
  • Thin: 0.008-0.012 in (0.2-0.3 mm)
  • Medium: 0.012-0.016 in (0.3-0.4 mm)
  • Thick: 0.016-0.024 in (0.4-0.6 mm)
The usual harvesting thickness is 0.014-0.016 in (0.35-0.4 mm).

Historical Background

Skin grafting originated ~2500-3000 years ago with surgeons of the Hindu Tilemaker caste reconstructing amputated noses. In the 19th century, Reverdin (1869) described pinch grafting for leg ulcers; Ollier and Thiersch subsequently described thin split-thickness grafting, which is why STSGs are sometimes called "Thiersch grafts." Full-thickness grafting was described by Wolfe and Krause.
(Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5e)

Wound Healing - Graft Take

Graft survival proceeds through a defined sequence:

Phase 1: Plasmatic Imbibition (first 24 hours)

  • Fibrin glue attaches the graft to the recipient bed
  • The graft absorbs wound exudate, becoming edematous (gaining up to 40% in weight)
  • This hydration maintains graft vessel patency and nutrient supply until revascularization begins

Phase 2: Inosculation (48-72 hours)

  • Anastomoses form between recipient bed vessels and pre-existing dermal vessels in the graft
  • This process is called inosculation

Phase 3: Vascular Proliferation (days 3-7)

  • Sprouting and budding of new vessels in both graft and bed
  • Bridging phenomenon: vascular connections from vascularized areas carry nutrients across small avascular zones
  • Full circulation is restored within 4-7 days

Phase 4: Remodeling

  • Lymphatic restoration parallels blood supply recovery over the first week
  • Epidermal proliferation occurs from days 4-8 and persists for weeks
  • Sebaceous and eccrine glands may degenerate initially but can partially regenerate
(Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5e)

Donor Sites

Common donor sites include:
  • Thigh (inner upper thigh preferred - covered area)
  • Buttocks
  • Scalp - safe, does not cause alopecia; regrowth hides scarring; in men, limited to occipital and temporal regions (not sensitive to androgenic alopecia)
The donor site is infiltrated subcutaneously with physiologic saline to obtain a flat, harvestable surface, particularly over bony prominences. The skin is coated with mineral oil and kept taut by an assistant.
(Fischer's Mastery of Surgery 8e, K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology)

Harvesting Technique

  1. Measure the defect and mark the donor site
  2. Coat skin with mineral oil; apply traction with gauze or towel clamp
  3. Use an electric dermatome set at 0.2-0.3 mm (2-3 tenths of a mm), angled 45-60° to the skin
  4. Apply even pressure across the blade width; advance in a smooth, controlled movement - no jerky movements
  5. Correct harvest depth leaves light punctate bleeding (papillary dermis) with no visible fat lobules
  • Excessive bleeding or visible fat = too deep (reticular dermis) - reduce thickness
  1. After harvesting, achieve hemostasis with epinephrine-soaked gauze (1:10,000-20,000)
  2. Local buprenorphine injections can reduce postoperative donor site pain
(Fischer's Mastery of Surgery 8e)

Meshing and Expansion

To cover larger areas, the STSG can be meshed using a mesh graft device or Meek device:
  • Meshing (mesh graft device): Creates a net/lattice pattern; allows fluid to drain and surface area to expand
  • Expansion ratios: 1:1.5, 1:2, 1:3, 1:6, 1:9
  • At ratios ≥1:6, the net is too fragile for staples and requires protective allograft or xenograft coverage (Alexander technique)
  • Meek device: Cuts graft into small square fragments glued onto folded gauze; expansion ratios 1:1.1 to 1:12
"Pie-crust" technique: Simple stab incisions made with a blade or needle to prevent hematoma collection under the graft (used for smaller grafts or cosmetically sensitive areas where meshing is undesirable).
(Fischer's Mastery of Surgery 8e)

Applications / Indications

  • Large wounds (burns, traumatic skin loss, chronic ulcers)
  • Small defects of the oral cavity
  • Maxillectomy defect internal lining
  • Auricular defects (when intact perichondrium is present)
  • Free flap donor site coverage
  • Large scalp defects (when galea or periosteum are intact, or bleeding diploë is surgically exposed)
  • Congenital aural atresia repair
  • Orbital exenteration socket lining
  • Prosthetic reconstruction defects
(K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology, Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology)

STSG vs FTSG Comparison

FactorSTSGFTSG
Dermis includedPartialFull
Chance of successful takeHigherLower
Primary contractionLessMore
Secondary contractionMoreLess
Colour matchAbnormal pigmentationBetter
RobustnessLess robustMore robust
Sensory recoveryLimitedBetter
Hair folliclesAbsent (hairless)Present
Donor site healingHeals by secondary intentionPrimary closure
Key principle: Primary contraction is driven by elastin in the dermis. Secondary contraction is driven by myofibroblast activity in the wound bed. Because STSGs contain less dermis, they have less primary contraction but more secondary contraction.
(Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery)

Recipient Bed Requirements

The recipient bed must provide:
  • Good vascularity (granulation tissue, periosteum, perichondrium, peritenon, perineurium)
  • Absence of eschar or necrotic tissue
  • Low bacterial load
STSGs can tolerate less vascularity than FTSGs, so they can be placed on granulation tissue, muscle, and even marginally vascularized beds. They cannot be placed directly over bare bone (no periosteum), bare cartilage (no perichondrium), or bare tendon (no peritenon), as these lack the vascularity to support graft take.

Causes of Graft Failure

CategoryCauses
Poor graft-bed contactHematoma, seroma, shearing forces, inadequate immobilization
Poor recipient bed vascularityPrevious radiotherapy, exposed cartilage/bone/tendon, nicotine-induced vasoconstriction
InfectionCoagulase-positive Staphylococcus spp., beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp.
Host factorsDiabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, malnutrition, hypoalbuminemia, vascular disease
Technical errorsRough tissue handling, excessive diathermy, graft too small (tension), inadequate hemostasis, excess fat not trimmed, graft placed upside-down
(Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5e)

Donor Site Care

  • The donor wound heals by re-epithelialization from residual dermal appendages (hair follicles, sweat glands left behind)
  • Healing is fastest when the wound is kept moist - an occlusive semi-permeable dressing retains wound exudate in contact with the surface
  • Thicker grafts taken = less dermis remains = slower donor site healing and more scarring

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages:
  • Higher take rate than FTSG (less metabolic demand, tolerates lower vascularity)
  • Donor site heals spontaneously without surgical closure
  • Can cover large areas, especially when meshed
  • Thinner grafts have the most reliable neovascularization
Disadvantages:
  • Poor colour match, often hyperpigmented or hypopigmented
  • Poor texture
  • More secondary contraction than FTSG (functional and cosmetic problem)
  • Less robust - susceptible to trauma
  • Limited sensory recovery
  • No hair growth (lacks follicles)
  • Visible "mesh" pattern if meshed graft is used long-term
(K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology, Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology)

Systemic Factors Affecting Graft Take

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Smoking (nicotine-induced vasoconstriction)
  • Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Nutritional deficiency / hypoalbuminemia
  • Immunosuppression
  • Peripheral vascular disease

Sources: Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5e (Bolonia) | Fischer's Mastery of Surgery 8e | K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology | Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery | Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery 28e

Split skin grafting

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"split thickness skin graft"[MeSH Terms] AND outcomes

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Loading Image
Excellent - rich, comprehensive content retrieved from multiple authoritative textbooks. Here is a thorough, well-organized answer.

Split Skin Grafting (Split-Thickness Skin Graft - STSG)

Definition and Anatomy

A split-thickness skin graft (STSG) - also called a split-skin graft or Thiersch graft - consists of the full thickness of the epidermis plus a variable (partial) thickness of the dermis. It is distinct from a full-thickness skin graft (FTSG), which includes the entire dermis.
Skin graft thickness diagram showing thin, intermediate, and thick STSG layers within the dermis, contrasted with full-thickness graft
Figure: Skin graft thickness - Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology
STSGs are subdivided based on the amount of dermis included:
TypeThickness
Thin0.008-0.012 in (~0.2-0.3 mm)
Medium (intermediate)0.012-0.016 in (~0.3-0.4 mm)
Thick0.016-0.024 in (~0.4-0.6 mm)
Standard harvesting thickness is 0.014-0.016 in. Thinner grafts are metabolically less demanding and revascularize more reliably, but undergo more secondary contraction than thicker grafts.

Historical Background

Skin grafting originated ~2,500-3,000 years ago with surgeons of the Hindu Tilemaker caste, who reconstructed amputated noses using gluteal skin. Modern split-thickness grafting was developed in the 19th century - Reverdin (1869) described pinch grafting for leg ulcers, and Ollier and Thiersch subsequently described thin STSG, while Wolfe and Krause described full-thickness grafting.
(Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5e)

Stages of Graft Healing ("Graft Take")

StageTimeMechanism
Graft adherenceImmediateFibrin layer forms between graft and recipient bed
Serum imbibition (plasmatic imbibition)Up to 48 hoursGraft absorbs plasma nutrients from recipient bed capillaries; graft swells up to 40% in weight
Revascularization48 hours to 3 weeksThree concurrent processes (see below)
Remodelling3 weeks to 1 yearCollagen reorganization, increasing strength, maturation

Revascularization - Three Processes

  1. Inosculation - the cut ends of vessels in the recipient bed join directly to cut vessel ends within the graft
  2. Revascularization - ingrowth of new vessels from the bed into the graft, creating new vascular channels
  3. Neovascularization - degenerated endothelium of old cut vessels leaves behind basement membrane, which acts as a conduit for capillary bud growth
Full circulation is restored within 4-7 days. Lymphatic restoration parallels blood supply recovery over the first week. Epidermal proliferation occurs from days 4-8.
(Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology; Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5e)

Donor Sites

Preferred donor sites (covered areas favoured):
  • Inner upper thigh - most common
  • Buttocks/gluteal region
  • Scalp - safe, does not cause permanent alopecia (hair regrowth hides scarring); in men, limited to occipital and temporal regions not susceptible to androgenic alopecia
The donor site is infiltrated subcutaneously with physiologic saline to create a flat, harvestable surface (especially important over bony prominences). Skin is coated with mineral oil and kept taut by an assistant.

Harvesting Technique

  1. Measure the defect; mark and prepare the donor site
  2. Coat skin with mineral oil; apply traction with gauze or towel clamp
  3. Use an electric dermatome set at 0.2-0.3 mm (2-3 tenths of a mm), angled 45-60° to the skin surface
  4. Apply even pressure across the full blade width; use a smooth, controlled forward movement - jerks will interrupt the harvest
  5. Correct harvest depth produces light punctate bleeding (papillary dermis) with no visible fat lobules
  • Excessive bleeding or visible fat lobules = harvested too deep (reticular dermis) → reduce thickness setting
  1. Achieve donor site hemostasis with epinephrine-soaked gauze (1:10,000-20,000)
  2. Local buprenorphine injections can be given at the donor site to reduce postoperative pain
(Fischer's Mastery of Surgery 8e)

Graft Application

  • Applied dermis-side down on the wound bed
  • Fixed with staples, thrombin glue (wound bed spray), cyanoacrylate surgical glue (at skin-graft junction), or Prolene sutures (hands and face)
  • Absorbable sutures should be avoided - they promote inflammatory granulomas
  • Graft junctions should be placed perpendicular to biodynamic excisional skin tension lines while respecting aesthetic units, as junction areas are the most susceptible sites for hypertrophic scarring

Preventing Fluid Accumulation

  • "Pie-crust" technique: Stab incisions made with a blade or needle to allow fluid egress and prevent haematoma/seroma (used in non-meshed or cosmetically sensitive areas)
  • Meshing: Standard for large areas (see below)

Meshing and Expansion

To cover large surface areas (e.g. burns), the STSG can be expanded:

Mesh Graft Device

  • Creates a net/lattice pattern allowing fluid drainage and area expansion
  • Expansion ratios: 1:1.5, 1:2, 1:3, 1:6, 1:9
  • At ratios ≥1:6, the mesh is too fragile for staple fixation alone and must be protected by allograft or xenograft (Alexander technique)
  • Long-term: the mesh/net pattern remains visible - inferior cosmetic result

Meek Device

  • Cuts graft into multiple small square fragments, glued to folded gauze
  • When gauze is unfolded, fragments are regularly spaced apart
  • Expansion ratios: 1:1.1 to 1:12 (greater range than mesh device)

Alexander Technique

Used when expansion ratio ≥1:6 is needed (extensive burns). Widely meshed autograft is applied first; a perforated allograft is then layered over it and stapled. After 1-2 weeks, staples are removed. Over 3 weeks, the immune system destroys the allograft's cellular content, and autologous epidermis from the underlying autograft fragments replaces the allograft epidermis. This protects the fragile widely-expanded autograft during initial engraftment.
(Fischer's Mastery of Surgery 8e)

Indications / Applications

  • Burns - the primary indication for large STSG and meshing
  • Large traumatic skin defects
  • Chronic wounds/ulcers
  • Oral cavity defects (small)
  • Maxillectomy cheek flap defects (internal lining)
  • Auricular defects (when intact perichondrium is present)
  • Free flap donor site coverage
  • Large scalp defects (intact galea/periosteum, or bleeding diploë)
  • Congenital aural atresia repair
  • Orbital exenteration socket lining
  • Prosthetic reconstruction defect lining
(K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology; Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology)

STSG vs FTSG - Key Comparison

FactorSTSGFTSG
Dermis includedPartial (variable)Full thickness
Hair folliclesAbsent (hairless)Present
Chance of takeHigherLower
Vascular bed requirementLowerHigher
Primary contractionLessMore
Secondary contractionMoreLess
Colour matchPoor (abnormal pigmentation)Better
RobustnessLess robustMore robust
Sensory recoveryLimitedBetter (more neurilemmal sheaths)
Donor site healingSecondary intentionPrimary closure
Key principle: Primary contraction is driven by elastin in the dermis (more dermis = more primary contraction). Secondary contraction is driven by myofibroblast activity in the wound bed (less dermis = less inhibition of myofibroblasts = more secondary contraction).
(Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery)

Factors Affecting Graft Healing

Local (recipient bed) factors:

  • Vascularity of the bed
  • Presence of infection
  • Haematoma or seroma under the graft
  • Prior radiotherapy to the area

Systemic factors:

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Smoking (nicotine-induced vasoconstriction)
  • Previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • Malnutrition / hypoalbuminemia
  • Immunosuppression
  • Peripheral vascular disease

Causes of Graft Failure

CategorySpecific Causes
Poor graft-bed contactHaematoma, seroma, shearing forces, inadequate immobilization
Poor recipient bed vascularityPrior radiotherapy, exposed bare bone/cartilage/tendon, nicotine
InfectionCoagulase-positive Staphylococcus, beta-haemolytic Streptococcus, Pseudomonas spp.
Host factorsDiabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, malnutrition, hypoalbuminemia, vascular disease
Technical errorsRough handling, excessive diathermy, graft too small (tension), inadequate haemostasis, insufficient fat trimming, graft placed upside-down (commoner with STSG than FTSG)
(Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5e)

Donor Site Care

  • The donor wound heals by re-epithelialization from residual dermal appendages (hair follicles, sweat glands) retained in the dermis
  • Healing is fastest when the wound is kept moist - an occlusive semi-permeable dressing retains exudate and promotes re-epithelialization
  • Thicker graft harvested = fewer appendages remaining = slower donor site healing and increased scarring risk

Dermal Regenerative Templates (Combined Use with STSG)

When a wound bed is unsuitable for direct grafting (e.g. exposed tendon <1 cm, functional areas like hands/face/neck), dermal substitutes can be used:
  • Biological: Integra, Matriderm, Nevelia
  • Synthetic: BMT
These scaffolds are revascularized and replaced by the patient's own dermal elements, then covered with a thin STSG:
  • Mono-layer matrix: STSG applied immediately
  • Bi-layer matrix: STSG applied after 3 weeks of maturation

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages:
  • High take rate (tolerates lower vascularity than FTSG)
  • Donor site heals spontaneously (no surgical closure needed)
  • Can cover very large areas, especially when meshed
  • Thinner grafts revascularize most reliably
Disadvantages:
  • Poor colour match - abnormal pigmentation common
  • Poor texture
  • More secondary contraction (functional and cosmetic problems)
  • Less durable, susceptible to trauma
  • Limited sensory recovery
  • No hair growth
  • Visible mesh pattern with meshed grafts (long-term)

Sources: Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery | Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5e (Bolonia) | Fischer's Mastery of Surgery 8e | K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology | Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery 28e

Types of grafting

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
I now have comprehensive content from multiple authoritative sources. Here is the complete, well-structured answer.

Types of Grafting

A graft is a piece of tissue transferred from one site to another, severed from its original blood supply in the process. It is distinct from a flap, which is transferred with its vascularity intact. Grafts can be classified in two major ways: by source (biological relationship) and by tissue type (composition).

Classification 1 - By Source (Biological Relationship)

TermDefinitionImmunological Risk
AutograftTissue taken from one part of an individual and transplanted to a different site in the same personNone - no rejection
Isograft (syngeneic graft)Tissue transplanted between genetically identical individuals (identical twins; inbred animal strains)Minimal - no rejection
Allograft (homograft)Tissue transplanted between two individuals of the same species but different genetic constitutionHigh - rejection occurs
Xenograft (heterograft)Tissue transplanted between individuals of different species (e.g. pig to human)Very high - rapid rejection
Key principle: The greater the genetic disparity, the stronger the immune rejection response. Most clinical transplants are allografts. Xenografts are used as temporary biological dressings (e.g. porcine skin for burns).
(Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology; Roitt's Essential Immunology; Guyton & Hall Medical Physiology)

Classification 2 - By Tissue Type (Composition)

A. Skin Grafts

Skin grafts are the most commonly performed type of graft in surgical practice. They are classified by how much dermis is included:

1. Split-Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)

  • Contains: full epidermis + partial dermis
  • Sub-types: thin (0.008-0.012 in), medium (0.012-0.016 in), thick (0.016-0.024 in)
  • Donor site: heals spontaneously by re-epithelialization (hair follicles and sweat glands remain)
  • Can cover large areas; can be meshed to expand further
  • Undergoes more secondary contraction, poorer colour match, less robust

2. Full-Thickness Skin Graft (FTSG)

  • Contains: full epidermis + full dermis (including all adnexal structures)
  • Donor site: must be closed primarily (limited graft size)
  • Better colour match, less secondary contraction, more robust
  • Requires richer vascular bed for take
  • Common donor sites: postauricular, preauricular, upper eyelid, supraclavicular, nasolabial

STSG vs FTSG Summary

FactorSTSGFTSG
Dermis includedPartialFull
Take (survival)More reliableLess reliable
Primary contractionLessMore
Secondary contractionMoreLess
Colour matchPoorBetter
RobustnessLessMore
Sensory recoveryLimitedBetter
Hair folliclesAbsentPresent
Donor site healingSecondary intentionPrimary closure
Graft size possibleLargeLimited
(Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery)

B. Composite Grafts

  • Contain two or more different tissue types in a single graft unit
  • Examples:
  • Chondrocutaneous graft (cartilage + skin) - from auricle; used for alar rim and small ear defects
  • Septal mucosal graft (septal cartilage + mucosa) - used for eyelid reconstruction (provides structural support + mucosal lining)
  • Osteocutaneous graft (bone + skin)
  • Useful for reconstructing composite defects requiring multiple tissue layers simultaneously
  • Survival depends on rapid revascularization from all surrounding margins; size is therefore limited
(Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology)

C. Bone Grafts

Bone grafts are classified by source and structure:

By Source:

  • Autograft: Patient's own bone (gold standard). Common harvest sites: iliac crest, fibula, tibia
  • Allograft: Cadaveric bone from a bone bank; comes as cancellous, cortical, or demineralized bone matrix (DBM)
  • Vascularized bone graft: Transferred with its blood supply (e.g. free fibula flap) - most reliable for large defects

By Structure:

  • Cancellous bone graft: Spongy, highly osteogenic; rapid incorporation; used for filling defects and promoting union
  • Cortical bone graft: Dense, provides structural support; slower incorporation; used for bridging defects in long bones
  • Demineralized bone matrix (DBM): Processed allograft; removes mineral content to expose osteoinductive proteins (BMPs); potent osteoinducer

Bone Graft Properties

Graft TypeOsteogenesisOsteoconductionOsteoinductionMechanical StrengthVascularity
Autograft - bone marrow++±+--
Autograft - cancellous++++++-
Autograft - cortical++±++-
Autograft - vascularized+++++++++
Allograft - cancellous-++++-
Allograft - cortical-±±++-
Allograft - demineralized-+++++--
  • Osteogenesis: Graft contains viable cells that directly form new bone
  • Osteoconduction: Graft provides a scaffold for host bone ingrowth
  • Osteoinduction: Graft stimulates local mesenchymal cells to differentiate into osteoblasts (via BMPs)
(Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed 2026)

D. Cartilage Grafts

  • Transferred without blood supply (avascular tissue - survives by diffusion)
  • Types:
  • Septal cartilage: Nasal dorsal augmentation, tip support, spreader grafts, alar batten grafts; must leave 1-1.5 cm caudal and dorsal struts intact
  • Auricular cartilage: Harvested from the conchal bowl with minimal cosmetic deficit; similar indications to septal cartilage
  • Costal cartilage: 6th-8th ribs; used for nasal dorsal reconstruction (saddle nose), auricular reconstruction (microtia); requires balanced carving to prevent warping
  • Free cartilage graft: Cartilage with its overlying perichondrium; perichondrium aids survival
(K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology)

E. Nerve Grafts

  • A graft interposed between two cut nerve ends when primary tension-free repair is not possible
  • Acts as a scaffold for axonal regrowth
  • Gold standard donor: sural nerve (purely sensory - minimal functional deficit at donor site)
  • Autologous nerve graft is preferred; allografts are also available
  • The graft itself does not survive - it provides a conduit; Schwann cell tubes guide regenerating axons

F. Tendon Grafts

  • Used when a tendon defect is too large for direct repair
  • Graft placed through the intact tendon sheath (one-stage) or after sheath reconstruction using a silicone rod (two-stage Hunter technique)
  • Common donor tendons: palmaris longus, plantaris, toe extensors
  • The graft undergoes ligamentisation - gradual replacement by host tissue
  • Also used for ligament reconstruction (e.g. ACL reconstruction using hamstring or patellar tendon graft)

G. Fat Grafts

  • Transferred without blood supply; survives by imbibition then neovascularization
  • Used for volume restoration, contour deformity correction, and facial rejuvenation
  • High absorption/resorption rate is a limitation; over-correction is typically performed

H. Mucosal Grafts

  • Full-thickness mucosal grafts (e.g. buccal mucosa, oral mucosa)
  • Used in urethral reconstruction (hypospadias repair, urethral strictures), eyelid reconstruction
  • Buccal mucosal graft is the most commonly used mucosal graft in urology

Graft vs Flap - The Reconstructive Ladder

A key conceptual distinction:
GraftFlap
Blood supply on transferNone - severed from vasculatureIntact - transferred with its pedicle
Survival mechanismDependent on revascularization from recipient bedIndependent of recipient bed vascularity
Tissue types possibleSkin, bone, cartilage, nerve, tendon, fat, mucosaSkin, muscle, fascia, bone (composite flaps)
Requirement of recipient bedMust be well-vascularizedCan survive on poorly vascularized beds
The reconstructive ladder guides the surgeon from simplest to most complex options:
  1. Secondary intention healing
  2. Primary closure
  3. Skin graft (STSG → FTSG)
  4. Local flap
  5. Regional flap
  6. Free tissue transfer (microvascular flap)
(Mulholland and Greenfield's Surgery 7e)

Sources: Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery | Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed 2026 | Roitt's Essential Immunology | Guyton & Hall Medical Physiology | K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology | Mulholland and Greenfield's Surgery 7e | Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5e

morel levelle lesion left arm

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"Morel-Lavallee" lesion management

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading Article
Reading File
Finding Sources
Loading Image
Reading File
Finding Sources
I now have comprehensive textbook content and a 2023 review article. Let me compile the full answer.

Morel-Lavallée Lesion

Definition

A Morel-Lavallée lesion (MLL) is a closed internal degloving injury in which the skin and subcutaneous tissue are sheared away from the underlying deep fascia by a tangential (shearing) force. This creates a potential space between the hypodermis and deep fascia that fills with blood, lymphatic fluid, liquefied necrotic fat, and necrotic debris - a haemolymphatic collection.
It is a frequently missed injury and carries significant risk of infection, skin necrosis, and wound complications if not identified and treated promptly.
(Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed 2026; Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery 28e)

Mechanism of Injury

Diagram showing mechanism of Morel-Lavallée lesion - shearing force separates subcutaneous fat from deep fascia, tearing perforating arteries, veins and lymphatics, creating a haemolymphatic collection
Figure: Mechanism of injury for Morel-Lavallée lesion - shearing forces cause the mobile subcutaneous tissue to move relative to the fixed deep fascia, tearing perforating arteries (red), veins (blue), and lymphatics (green) (Bailey & Love)
A tangential/shearing force (e.g. in a road traffic collision, crush injury, or high-velocity trauma) causes the relatively mobile subcutaneous layer to slide over the relatively fixed deep fascia. This tears:
  • Perforating arteries
  • Perforating veins
  • Lymphatic channels
The resulting cavity fills with blood, lymph, and liquefied fat, forming a pseudocyst bounded by a fibrous capsule if chronic.

Common Locations

Originally described over the greater trochanter of the hip, but the term is now applied to similar lesions anywhere:
  • Thigh and lateral hip - most common (associated with pelvic fractures)
  • Pelvis / buttock
  • Knee
  • Lumbar region
  • Scapular region
  • Arm / upper limb (less common but well described)
  • Cervico-thoracic region (rare)
The left arm location in your question is an atypical but recognised site - usually from a direct blunt shearing injury to the upper arm.
Approximately 8% of patients who sustained a blow to the greater trochanter have a clinically significant MLL. Up to 46% of "closed" MLLs are culture-positive at initial debridement, indicating occult contamination.
(Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed 2026; Yang & Tang, Orthopaedic Surgery 2023 [PMID: 37526135])

Clinical Presentation

  • Soft fluctuant swelling over the affected area
  • Hypermobility of the overlying skin - skin slides freely over the deeper tissues
  • Fluid wave palpable in the subcutaneous tissue
  • Skin may appear bruised, ecchymotic, or have a violaceous discolouration
  • In early stages the lesion may be subtle and easily missed - particularly in obese patients
  • In large or chronic lesions: skin may become non-viable, showing fixed staining and thrombosis of subcutaneous veins

Associations

  • High-velocity trauma (road traffic collisions, crush injuries)
  • Pelvic fractures (especially those with shear component)
  • Acetabular fractures
  • Obesity - increases risk and size of lesion
  • Operating through an active MLL significantly increases postoperative infection rate (up to 12%)

Diagnosis

Clinical

  • High index of suspicion in any patient with appropriate mechanism plus skin hypermobility or subcutaneous fluid wave
  • May initially be missed on trauma survey

Imaging

ModalityFinding
MRIGold standard - shows fluid collection between subcutaneous fat and deep fascia; signal characteristics vary with age of collection; T2 hyperintense; may show internal debris
UltrasoundUseful bedside tool; shows anechoic or hypoechoic fluid collection with possible internal echoes; can guide aspiration
CT scanWhen large, visible as a hypodense fluid collection in the subcutaneous plane; should be specifically scrutinized on trauma CT
MRI and ultrasound are specifically recommended to confirm the diagnosis, though large lesions are often identifiable on initial CT imaging.

Classification

The Nickerson/Zielinski MRI classification (6 types based on MRI signal characteristics) is widely used to guide management:
TypeMRI CharacteristicsContents
1Hypointense T1, hyperintense T2Seroma / acute blood
2Hyperintense T1 and T2Subacute blood
3Isointense T1, hyperintense T2Chronic blood / mixed
4Heterogeneous T1 and T2Blood + necrotic fat
5Isointense T1, isointense T2 with enhancing capsulePseudocyst with organised wall
6No discrete collection - diffuse infiltrationInfiltrative/diffuse type
(Yang & Tang, Orthopaedic Surgery 2023)
A simpler classification of degloving injuries used clinically:
  1. Limited degloving with abrasion or avulsion
  2. Non-circumferential degloving
  3. Circumferential single plane degloving
  4. Circumferential multiplanar degloving
(Bailey and Love's 28e)

Management

There is no universally agreed guideline, but a size- and context-based approach is used:

Conservative / Non-operative

  • Observation with compression bandaging for small, stable lesions
  • Risk of recurrence is high with conservative management alone
  • Simple aspiration is usually ineffective (high recurrence rate)

Percutaneous Drainage (Tseng-Tornetta Technique)

For lesions amenable to minimally invasive management (best within 3 days of admission):
  1. Position patient to expose the lesion
  2. Make a 2-cm incision over the distal aspect of the lesion
  3. Make a second 2-cm incision at the superior and posterior extent
  4. Determine extent using a suction tip passed through the cavity
  5. Additional incisions as needed depending on lesion extent
  6. Send fluid for culture and sensitivity
  7. Drain haematoma with suction
  8. Use a plastic brush (canal preparation brush from joint replacement) to debride loose fat
  9. Pulsed lavage irrigation until fluid runs clear and no fat debris remains
  10. Place medium closed suction drain to drain the entire cavity
  11. Close incisions tightly
  12. Attach drain to wall suction until drainage <30 mL/24 hours (may require up to 8 days)
  13. Continue IV cephalosporin for 24 hours after drain removal
(Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed 2026 - Technique 58.1)

Open Surgical Debridement

  • For large lesions (>50 mL), infected collections, or failed percutaneous drainage
  • Collections >50 mL may be best treated surgically rather than with aspiration alone
  • Involves open debridement of the pseudocyst wall, removal of necrotic fat and fibrous capsule
  • Wound closure with suction drains or closure over negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)
  • If skin is non-viable: serial debridement until punctate dermal bleeding seen from viable tissue, followed by split-skin grafting or flap coverage

In the Context of Fractures (e.g. Pelvic/Acetabular)

  • MLL over the planned surgical field is a relative contraindication to immediate open fixation due to high infection risk
  • Preferred strategy: percutaneous decompression and debridement first, then delayed ORIF at least 24 hours after drain removal and output <30 mL/day
  • Some acetabular fractures can be treated via an anterior approach to completely avoid the lateral MLL
  • Operating through an active MLL is associated with infection rates up to 12%

Complications

ComplicationNotes
Infection / abscessMost serious - up to 46% culture positive at debridement
Skin necrosisFrom pressure and devascularization of overlying skin
RecurrenceHigh with aspiration alone
Chronic pseudocyst formationFibrous capsule enclosing persistent fluid
Postoperative wound breakdownWhen operating through an unrecognised or untreated MLL
SeromaPersistent fluid collection post-drainage

Key Points Summary

  • MLL = closed degloving from tangential shear force → haemolymphatic collection between subcutaneous fat and deep fascia
  • Frequently missed - requires active clinical suspicion
  • Hypermobile skin and fluid wave are the key clinical signs
  • MRI is the gold standard for diagnosis and characterisation; ultrasound is useful at bedside
  • Associated with pelvic fractures, especially in obese patients; also occurs in the upper limb (including the arm)
  • Treatment: observation/compression (small), percutaneous drainage with lavage (moderate, <3 days), open debridement (large, infected, failed)
  • In fracture surgery: drain before operating to avoid catastrophic infection
  • Culture collections even when "closed" - up to 46% are positive

Sources: Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed 2026 | Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery 28e | Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults 10th Ed 2025 | Yang Y & Tang TT, "The Morel-Lavallée Lesion: Review and Update on Diagnosis and Management," Orthopaedic Surgery 2023 [PMID: 37526135]
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.