Mitral Regurgitation

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"mitral regurgitation"[MeSH Terms] AND management

Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Loading Image
Loading Image
Loading Image
Now I have comprehensive information to provide a thorough overview of Mitral Regurgitation. Let me compile this into a well-structured answer.

Mitral Regurgitation (MR)

Definition & Overview

Mitral regurgitation is systolic backflow of blood from the left ventricle (LV) into the left atrium (LA) due to failure of the mitral valve to close competently. It is one of the most common valvular lesions and results from dysfunction of any component of the mitral valve apparatus: leaflets, chordae tendineae, annulus, or papillary muscles/LV wall.

Classification

Primary (Organic/Degenerative) MR

The valve leaflets themselves are structurally abnormal.
CauseNotes
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP)~90% of primary MR in the US; myxomatous degeneration
Ruptured chordae tendineaeCommon cause of acute severe MR
Infective endocarditisLeaflet destruction
Rheumatic heart diseaseLeaflet thickening, fusion, scarring
Annular calcificationCommon in elderly
Drug-inducedPergolide, cabergoline, fenfluramine (high-dose, prolonged use)
Collagen vascular diseasee.g., Marfan, Ehlers-Danlos

Secondary (Functional) MR

The valve leaflets are structurally normal — MR arises from LV or annular pathology causing leaflet malcoaptation.
  • Dilated cardiomyopathy → papillary muscle displacement, apical tethering of leaflets
  • Ischemic LV dysfunction → papillary muscle ischemia/infarction
  • Atrial fibrillation → annular dilation causing malcoaptation
  • ~75% of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have some degree of secondary MR; severe in ~20%

Pathophysiology — Three Phases

Phase A: Acute MR

The sudden regurgitant pathway "wastes" stroke volume into the LA. The LV is volume-overloaded, using the Frank-Starling mechanism maximally. Crucially, the regurgitant pathway unloads the LV in systole (ejection into the low-impedance LA), so EF appears supranormal — yet forward stroke volume is low.
Acute MR hemodynamics: EDV 170 mL, ESV 30 mL, forward SV 70 mL, LA pressure 25 mmHg
Acute MR: EDV 170 mL, ESV 30 mL — forward SV only 70 mL; LA pressure elevated to 25 mmHg. Result: pulmonary congestion + low cardiac output.

Phase B: Chronic Compensated MR

Eccentric LV hypertrophy develops; EDV increases substantially. Enlarged LA accommodates regurgitant volume at lower pressures. Forward stroke volume returns toward normal. Patient may remain asymptomatic even with severe MR.
Chronic compensated MR: EDV 240 mL, ESV 50 mL, forward SV 95 mL, LA pressure 15 mmHg
Chronic compensated MR: EDV increases to 240 mL; eccentric hypertrophy restores forward SV to 95 mL; LA pressure normalizes to 15 mmHg.

Phase C: Chronic Decompensated MR

Contractile dysfunction emerges. ESV rises markedly, forward SV falls. LV afterload increases as the enlarged LV radius raises wall stress. EF now falls — an EF of 55–60% in severe MR may actually represent significant myocardial dysfunction.
Chronic decompensated MR: EDV 260 mL, ESV 110 mL, forward SV 65 mL, LA pressure 25 mmHg
Chronic decompensated MR: Contractile dysfunction causes ESV to rise to 110 mL; forward SV falls to 65 mL despite massive LV dilation (EDV 260 mL).
Key point: Reduced afterload occurs only in acute severe primary MR. In chronic MR, the increased LV radius returns wall stress to normal.

Clinical Features

Symptoms

  • Often asymptomatic for years during compensation
  • Exertional dyspnea and fatigue (earliest symptoms as LV function begins to decline)
  • Orthopnea, PND, and pulmonary edema (advanced disease)
  • Right-sided heart failure symptoms if pulmonary hypertension develops
  • Acute severe MR: cardiogenic shock, flash pulmonary edema

Physical Examination

FindingDetail
MurmurHolosystolic, best at apex, radiates to axilla; roughly correlates with severity but not reliable for grading
Apex beatDisplaced laterally and inferiorly (LV dilation)
S1Reduced intensity
S3 gallopPresent in severe MR — reflects rapid early filling of LV from enlarged LA; does not necessarily indicate HF
S2 splittingPhysiologically split (early A2 due to shortened LV systole)
Pulmonary HTN signsLoud P2, RV lift, signs of right HF
In acute MR: the large LA v-wave rapidly equilibrates LA and LV pressure, shortening/softening the murmur — the murmur can be deceptively soft despite severe regurgitation.
In secondary (functional) MR: the murmur may be unimpressive or even inaudible due to reduced LV contractile force.

Diagnosis

ECG

  • Left atrial enlargement (notched P wave in II, biphasic P in V1)
  • LV hypertrophy (voltage criteria)
  • Atrial fibrillation (common complication)

Chest X-Ray

  • Cardiomegaly (LV + LA enlargement)
  • Pulmonary vascular congestion in decompensated states
  • Absence of cardiomegaly suggests mild MR or acute onset

Echocardiography (Primary Investigation)

  • TTE: LV and LA size/function, valve morphology, Doppler quantification of MR severity
  • Color-flow Doppler: Identifies and semi-quantifies the regurgitant jet — but can over/underestimate severity, especially with eccentric jets
  • Quantitative methods (preferred for clinical decisions):
    • Vena contracta width
    • PISA (Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area) — regurgitant volume and effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA)
    • Pulmonary vein flow reversal (systolic flow reversal = severe MR)
  • TEE: Superior valve anatomy, leaflet pathology, surgical planning; also used intraprocedurally
  • 3D echocardiography: Pathoanatomic detail for surgical repair planning

Cardiac MRI

  • Precise quantification of regurgitant fraction when echo is inconclusive
  • Phase-contrast imaging: directly measures regurgitant volume

Cardiac Catheterization

  • Reserved for cases where non-invasive assessment is inconclusive
  • Coronary angiography if >40 years or ischemic symptoms suspected

Severity Grading (Echocardiographic)

ParameterMildModerateSevere
Vena contracta (cm)<0.30.3–0.69≥0.7
EROA (cm²)<0.20.2–0.39≥0.4
Regurgitant volume (mL)<3030–59≥60
Regurgitant fraction<30%30–49%≥50%

Management

Medical Therapy

Acute Severe MR:
  • Goal: ↑ forward cardiac output, ↓ regurgitant volume
  • Arterial vasodilators (nitroprusside): reduce SVR, preferentially increase forward flow
  • Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: if hypotension precludes vasodilators (increases diastolic pressure, reduces afterload)
  • Emergent surgical repair/replacement is often required
Chronic Symptomatic MR (inoperable patients):
  • ACE inhibitors/ARBs (e.g., lisinopril 20 mg/day): reduce LV volume, improve symptoms
  • Beta-blockers: observational benefit
  • Diuretics: relieve congestion
  • Rate/rhythm control if AF present; anticoagulation mandatory with AF
Chronic Asymptomatic MR:
  • Vasodilators have not been shown to benefit patients with normal afterload
  • Treat hypertension aggressively per guidelines
Secondary MR: Prioritize treatment of the underlying HF — GDMT (ACEI/ARB, beta-blocker, MRA, SGLT2i as appropriate)

Surgical Therapy

Indications (ACC/AHA 2020 Guidelines):
  • Symptomatic severe primary MR with any LVEF
  • Asymptomatic severe primary MR with:
    • LVEF ≤60%, or
    • LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) ≥40 mm
  • New-onset AF attributable to MR
  • Pulmonary hypertension (PASP >50 mmHg at rest)
Mitral Valve Repair vs. Replacement:
  • Repair is strongly preferred when technically feasible:
    • Preserves LV geometry and function
    • Lower operative mortality (~1%), better long-term survival
    • No need for long-term anticoagulation (unlike mechanical valve)
    • Annuloplasty ring ± leaflet/chordal procedures
  • Replacement (MVR) indicated when leaflets are fused, calcified, have shortened/fused chordae, or when durable repair is not achievable

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER) — MitraClip

TEER replicates the Alfieri stitch — joining the A2 and P2 scallops to create a double-orifice valve, reducing regurgitant orifice without annular intervention.
Indications:
  • Primary MR: prohibitive surgical risk (FDA approved)
  • Secondary MR: symptomatic severe MR despite GDMT in HFrEF patients (LVEF 20–50%, LVESD <70 mm, PASP <70 mmHg) — shown to reduce HF hospitalizations and all-cause mortality vs. medical therapy alone (COAPT trial)
Outcomes:
  • Reduction of MR to grade <2 in 84–93% of patients
  • 30-day mortality: ~5–6% in high-risk elderly cohorts
  • Significant improvement in NYHA class and QoL at 12 months

Complications

ComplicationMechanism
Atrial fibrillationLA dilation → substrate for re-entry
Pulmonary hypertensionChronic elevation in LA/pulmonary venous pressure
Right heart failureSecondary to pulmonary HTN
Infective endocarditisTurbulent flow damages endothelium
LV systolic dysfunctionChronic volume overload → decompensation
Sudden cardiac deathRare; higher risk with MVP + thickened leaflets

Prognosis

  • Severe asymptomatic MR with preserved LV function: ~10% per year risk of developing symptoms, LV dysfunction, or AF
  • Surgery before LVEF declines below 60% or LVESD exceeds 40 mm is associated with better postoperative outcomes and potentially reversible LV dysfunction
  • Once LV contractile dysfunction develops, it may not be fully reversible even after surgery

Sources: Goldman-Cecil Medicine, p. 691–697 | Braunwald's Heart Disease | Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22e | Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.