what is the protocol to give ECT....should i start with 0.8 s or 1.2 s chage and at what voltage and pulse width
ECT electroconvulsive therapy protocol charge stimulus parameters pulse width voltage 2024
electroconvulsive therapy stimulus parameters optimization
Charge (mC) = Current amplitude (A) × Pulse width (ms) × 2 × Pulse-pair frequency (Hz) × Train duration (s)
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Current amplitude | 0.8-0.9 A (fixed by device) |
| Pulse width | Brief pulse: 0.5-1.0 ms / Ultrabrief: 0.25-0.3 ms |
| Frequency | 20-80 Hz (device-dependent) |
| Train duration | 0.5-8 seconds (adjusted to set charge) |
| Total charge range | 25-576 mC (US devices capped at 504-576 mC) |
| Program | Pulse Width | Charge | % of Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| DGx / Lowest | 0.25 ms | ~25-50 mC | 5-10% |
| LOW 0.5 ms | 0.5 ms | ~50 mC | 10% |
| LOW | 0.5 ms | ~100 mC | 20% |
| INTERMIT | 1.0 ms | ~200+ mC | ~40% |
| 2x LP | 0.5 ms | ~200 mC | 40% |
| Placement | Pulse Width | Optimal Dose | Cognitive Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right unilateral | Ultrabrief (0.25-0.3 ms) | 6× seizure threshold | Lowest |
| Right unilateral | Brief (0.5-1.0 ms) | 5-6× seizure threshold | Low-moderate |
| Bifrontotemporal | Brief (0.5-1.0 ms) | 1.5-2.5× threshold (moderate suprathreshold) | Highest |
| Bifrontal | Brief (0.5-1.0 ms) | ~2-2.5× threshold | Intermediate |
this is the device used
Medicaid MEDICA UBE-409 ECT machine protocol parameters settings manual
| Parameter | Current Setting | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| SEC | 1.2 s | Train duration = 1.2 seconds |
| Hz | 140 Hz | Pulse frequency = 140 Hz |
| PW | 0.5 ms | Pulse width = 0.5 ms (brief pulse) |
| IMP | --- | Impedance not measured yet (no contact) |
| mC | 0151 mC | Calculated charge = 151 millicoulombs |
Charge (mC) = Current (A) × PW (ms) × 2 × Hz × Duration (s)
0.9 × 0.5 × 2 × 140 × 1.2 = 151.2 mC ✓ (matches the display exactly)
| Duration (SEC) | Calculated Charge | Appropriate For |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2 s | ~25 mC | Titration starting point |
| 0.4 s | ~50 mC | Low titration step |
| 0.6 s | ~76 mC | ~15% of max |
| 0.8 s | ~101 mC | ~20% range, first RUL step |
| 1.2 s | ~151 mC (current) | ~30% of max |
| 2.0 s | ~252 mC | ~50% range |
| 3.0 s | ~378 mC | ~75% range |
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Set MODE to AUTO |
| 2 | Set PW = 0.5 ms (bilateral) or 0.25-0.3 ms (RUL, if available) |
| 3 | Set Hz = 60-140 Hz |
| 4 | Start SEC at 0.2-0.4 s for titration (or ~0.8 s for age-formula bilateral start) |
| 5 | Check impedance (IMP) before treating - should show 200-3000 Ω; if "---" after applying electrodes, recheck contact |
| 6 | Press TREAT when ready |
| 7 | Observe motor seizure (cuff method) + EEG; target ≥25 s |
| 8 | If no seizure, OVERRIDE and step up SEC, repeat |
| 9 | For next sessions, compute treatment dose from seizure threshold |
we used this on 5 patients and no seizure was produced even after increasing charge duration to 1.6 s
ECT no seizure produced high seizure threshold missed seizure troubleshooting causes management
ECT 140 Hz high frequency seizure threshold effect electrode impedance contact poor
high frequency ECT above 100 Hz seizure suppression threshold effect
"Frequencies in the range of 25-60 Hz are optimal for seizure induction. Frequencies above 100 Hz are still effective but less suitable for production of long-lasting after-discharges. High-frequency stimulation has been shown to suppress ongoing ictal activity." (ECT Stimulus Parameters: Rethinking Dosage, PMC2933093)
| Issue | How to Check | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency too high (140 Hz) | See above | Reduce to 50-70 Hz |
| Impedance too high (IMP = "---") | Your display showed "---" = no valid impedance reading | Ensure good skin prep; re-apply conductive gel; press electrodes firmly before firing |
| Poor electrode contact / skin prep | Check IMP reading - should be 200-3000 Ω | Clean skin with abrasive gel, apply generous conductive medium |
| Short circuit | Excess gel bridging both electrodes across forehead | Wipe away excess gel between electrode sites |
| Electrode lead not connected | Visual check | Confirm cables are fully seated |
| Machine fault | Device self-test | Run SELF RST; consider biomedical engineering check |
| Agent | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Propofol (most common agent used) | Strongly raises seizure threshold AND shortens seizure duration | Switch to thiopentone (methohexital) or ketamine or etomidate |
| High dose of any barbiturate | Anticonvulsant effect | Use minimum effective induction dose |
| Suxamethonium (high dose) | Not a direct issue but hypercarbia from poor ventilation raises threshold | Ensure adequate oxygenation with 100% O2 |
| Factor | Effect | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Hypercarbia / poor oxygenation | Raises threshold | Hyperventilate for 60-90 seconds just before stimulus |
| Dehydration / electrolyte imbalance | Raises threshold | Correct preoperatively |
| Older age + male sex | Naturally higher threshold | Increase dose more aggressively |
| Hyperglycaemia | Raises threshold | Optimise diabetic control |
| Hypothyroidism | Raises threshold | Treat thyroid disease |
0.9 × 0.5 × 2 × 140 × 1.6 = ~202 mC
| Old Setting | New Setting | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 140 Hz | 50-70 Hz | Optimal range for seizure induction |
| 1.6 s | 2.0-3.0 s | Compensate for lower Hz to maintain/increase charge |
i will try tomorrow by changing it to 70 hz
| Duration (SEC) | Charge at 70 Hz / 0.5 ms |
|---|---|
| 0.8 s | ~50 mC |
| 1.2 s | ~76 mC |
| 2.0 s | ~126 mC |
| 3.0 s | ~189 mC |
| 4.0 s | ~252 mC |
frequency 70 hz pulse width 1 and charge duration 0.8 will be my starting point
0.9 A × 1.0 ms × 2 × 70 Hz × 0.8 s = 100.8 mC
| Step | Duration | Charge |
|---|---|---|
| Start | 0.8 s | ~101 mC |
| Step 2 | 1.2 s | ~151 mC |
| Step 3 | 1.6 s | ~202 mC |
| Step 4 | 2.0 s | ~252 mC |
| Step 5 | 3.0 s | ~378 mC |
or should i try with 0.5 only...im confused
| Parameter | Effect on Seizure Induction |
|---|---|
| 0.5 ms PW | Less charge per pulse, harder to seize |
| 1.0 ms PW | More charge per pulse, easier to seize |
| 140 Hz | Suppresses seizures (what you were using) |
| 70 Hz | Optimal for induction |
in which volume which chapter is ECT explained in kaplan and sadock's
Chapter / Section 33.20a - "Electroconvulsive Therapy" Author: Joan Prudic, M.D.
| Section | Topic |
|---|---|
| 33.20a | Main ECT chapter - full protocol, stimulus parameters, electrode placement, dosing, side effects (this is what we've been using) |
| 33.20b | Magnetic Seizure Therapy |
| 55.4f | ECT and Neurostimulation in special populations |
| Various | ECT mentions in depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar chapters |
Find recent research on frequency optimization in ECT stimulus parameters are ultrabrief pulse which is useful in unilateral placement of electrode but for bilateral placement, brief pulse with width 0.5 to maximum 1 is advisable
electroconvulsive therapy ultrabrief pulse unilateral bilateral stimulus frequency optimization
ECT pulse width brief ultrabrief bilateral electrode placement efficacy cognitive
ECT frequency optimization ultrabrief pulse bilateral unilateral electrode 2023 2024 research
electroconvulsive therapy pulse width bilateral bitemporal efficacy depression
ultrabrief pulse ECT right unilateral depression randomized trial
HTTP 502 for https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgi?tool=orrisai&email=dev%40orris.ai&api_key=***&db=pubmed&id=37353902&retmode=json
We encountered an error while processing your request. Please try again or reach out to us for help.
what i got from reading is that ultrabrief pulse which is useful in unilateral placement of electrode but for bilateral placement, brief pulse with width 0.5 to maximum 1 is advisable
| Electrode Placement | Pulse Width | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Right Unilateral (RUL) | Ultrabrief: 0.25-0.3 ms | Less current spread to dominant hemisphere; fewer cognitive effects; equally effective at 6× seizure threshold |
| Bilateral (BFT/Bifrontal) | Brief: 0.5-1.0 ms | Ultrabrief + bilateral = consistently ineffective in RCTs; bilateral needs the fuller pulse to drive adequate seizure |
Ultrabrief RUL < Brief RUL < Bifrontal Brief < Bitemporal Brief
(least cognitive) (most cognitive)
also is seizure duration important for the efficacy
electroconvulsive therapy seizure duration efficacy depression outcome
"These tenets have been revised in light of observations from modern studies... the antidepressant effects of ECT are dependent on the anatomic specificity of the effects of current density rather than on seizure elicitation alone."
| Seizure Duration | Clinical Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < 15 seconds (motor) | Likely subtherapeutic - insufficient generalization |
| 15-25 seconds | Borderline - acceptable if EEG shows good quality |
| ≥ 25 seconds (motor / EEG) | Target range - generally adequate |
| > 120 seconds (2 minutes) | Prolonged seizure - risk of cognitive harm; terminate with IV benzodiazepine or propofol |
| > 3 minutes | Status epilepticus - emergency |
| Observation | What to Do |
|---|---|
| Seizure < 15 s | Increase charge at next session; consider hyperventilation, switch anesthetic |
| Seizure 15-25 s but good EEG quality | Acceptable; monitor clinical response |
| Seizure ≥ 25 s with good post-ictal suppression | Optimal - do not change parameters |
| Long seizure > 90 s with poor EEG morphology | Not better - consider reducing dose |
| Seizure > 2 min | Give IV diazepam 5-10 mg or propofol to terminate |
Etomidate produces significantly longer motor AND EEG seizure duration than propofol in ECT, with potentially better efficacy outcomes. The authors conclude etomidate should be considered the preferred induction agent in ECT.
| Factor | Importance for Efficacy |
|---|---|
| Seizure occurring at all | Essential (floor requirement) |
| Duration ≥ 25 seconds | Necessary minimum |
| Duration > 25 seconds | NOT linearly linked to better outcomes |
| Seizure quality on EEG | More important than duration |
| Stimulus dose above threshold | Primary driver of efficacy |
| Electrode placement + pulse width | Determines cognitive side effects |
| Anesthetic agent | Significantly affects seizure duration |
so someone said to me we can see the cardiovascular changes on monitor to see efficacy instead of just seizure duration...he was wrong?
| CV finding during stimulus | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Sudden tachycardia + hypertension | Seizure has generalized ✓ |
| No HR change after stimulus | Likely missed seizure - consider restimulation |
| Brief bradycardia then tachycardia | Classic biphasic response - seizure occurred ✓ |
| Monitor | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| ECG / BP | Seizure occurred (yes/no) and patient safety |
| Cuff method (motor) | Seizure duration - motor |
| EEG (2-channel) | Seizure duration + quality + post-ictal suppression |
| EEG quality | Best available proxy for therapeutic adequacy |