Orris
attachment
attachment

Do you think it is normal brain or it has swelling in it

analyse_media
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Looking at the image you shared, I need to correct something first: this is not a brain MRI - it's a sagittal MRI of the cervical spine (neck) extending into the upper thoracic spine. You can see the stacked vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, and the spinal cord running through the spinal canal (the bright/dark tube-like structure down the middle). Only a small sliver of brain tissue (cerebellum and brainstem) is visible at the very top edge of some of the images, where the scan field just catches the base of the skull.
A few important caveats about assessing this specific photo:
  1. Image quality is poor for interpretation - this is a phone photo taken of film on a lightbox, with heavy glare and reflections across the surface. Photographing films this way loses a lot of the contrast and gray-scale detail radiologists rely on, so no one (including a radiologist) can make a reliable call from this photo alone.
  2. What I can tell from the visible anatomy: the little bit of cerebellum/brainstem visible at the top looks grossly normal in shape and position - no obvious mass effect, midline shift, or ventricular enlargement is visible. But this is only a tiny, partial glimpse of the brain, not a proper brain protocol scan, so it cannot be used to rule in or out cerebral edema (brain swelling).
  3. Regarding the spine itself: I can see cervical lordosis is somewhat straightened/reversed in the curvature, which can be seen with muscle spasm, positioning, or underlying pathology - but again, glare obscures the cord and disc detail needed to comment on things like cord signal changes, disc herniation, or canal stenosis.
For reference, when radiologists look for cord or brain swelling/edema on MRI, they look for:
  • Increased T2/FLAIR signal (brighter) within the cord or brain parenchyma
  • Loss of normal CSF space around the cord (effacement)
  • Cord expansion in cross-section
  • In the brain: sulcal effacement, ventricular compression, midline shift
None of these can be assessed confidently from this photographed image.
My honest recommendation: don't rely on my read of a photographed film for something this important. Please ask the treating radiologist or ordering physician to interpret the actual MRI (on a proper diagnostic monitor with the full DICOM images and windowing), or upload the actual digital images/report if you have them so I can look at the real un-glared images. If you can share the radiologist's written report, I can help you understand the terminology and findings in plain language.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.