Antibiotic stewardship

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"antibiotic stewardship" AND outcomes

Searching the Web

antibiotic stewardship programs 2025 guidelines WHO CDC key principles

Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
I now have comprehensive content from multiple authoritative sources. Here is a thorough overview of antibiotic stewardship:

Antibiotic Stewardship

Definition and Goals

Antimicrobial stewardship refers to coordinated interventions designed to improve the appropriateness of antimicrobial use - promoting selection of the optimal drug, dose, route, and duration of therapy for a specific patient and infection. Programs pursue four simultaneous goals:
  1. Optimize clinical outcomes - cure infection, minimize toxicity and adverse events
  2. Preserve antimicrobials - curb the development of resistance within patient populations by limiting selection pressure that drives resistant strains
  3. Reduce harm - decrease adverse effects such as C. difficile infection, drug toxicity, and drug-drug interactions
  4. Control costs - reduce hospital antimicrobial expenditure and length of stay
Multidisciplinary stewardship programs have demonstrated significant reductions in antimicrobial use, lower rates of healthcare-associated resistant pathogens, improved clinical outcomes, and meaningful cost savings.
  • Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22E, p. 1222; Goldman-Cecil Medicine, p. 261

The CDC Core Elements Framework

For Hospitals (7 Core Elements)

ElementDescription
Leadership CommitmentHospital administration provides dedicated time for a program leader and pharmacist co-leader, plus financial and technological resources
AccountabilityA physician program leader works with a pharmacy leader and a multidisciplinary team (ID specialists, clinical pharmacists, microbiologists, hospital epidemiologists, infection preventionists, informatics specialists)
Pharmacy ExpertiseA pharmacy leader collaborates on implementing key stewardship actions
ActionInterventions including prospective audit with feedback, preauthorization, guideline implementation, IV-to-oral conversion, and dose optimization
TrackingMonitor antibiotic use data (days of therapy per 1,000 patient-days), C. difficile rates, resistant pathogen rates, adverse drug events, and costs via the CDC's NHSN Antimicrobial Use and Resistance (AUR) module
ReportingRegular updates on prescribing metrics shared with prescribers, pharmacists, nurses, and administrators
EducationAnnual education for all healthcare workers; patient and family education on appropriate antibiotic use

For Outpatient Settings (4 Core Elements, CDC 2016)

  1. Commitment to improving antibiotic prescribing
  2. Action - implement at least one policy/practice to improve prescribing and assess its effectiveness
  3. Tracking and Reporting - monitor prescribing and feed data back to clinicians
  4. Education and Expertise - provide clinician education and access to stewardship experts

Key Stewardship Strategies

1. Prospective Audit with Feedback

Orders for broad-spectrum agents (carbapenems, daptomycin, ceftazidime-avibactam) are reviewed regularly for appropriateness. The stewardship team recommends alternatives when optimization is possible. "Handshake stewardship" (direct prescriber-to-stewardship team dialogue) has been particularly effective. This approach has led to declines in broad-spectrum drug use and reductions in C. difficile infection rates.

2. Formulary Restriction and Preauthorization

  • Formulary restriction: limits indiscriminate use of selected antimicrobials absent demonstrated benefit; controls costs
  • Preauthorization: clinicians must obtain approval before using certain agents (broad-spectrum, highly toxic, or expensive drugs). This is one of the most commonly used and most effective strategies.

3. De-escalation

Once culture and susceptibility results are available, empirical broad-spectrum therapy should be narrowed to targeted therapy. De-escalation:
  • Selects the narrowest effective agent based on susceptibility data and PK/PD properties
  • Is guided by inflammatory biomarkers - procalcitonin (PCT) has been validated in randomized trials and meta-analyses as an effective adjunct for safe de-escalation, reducing antibiotic days without adverse effects on mortality
  • Has been shown safe and may improve survival outcomes in sepsis and VAP
  • Murray & Nadel's Respiratory Medicine, p. 1133; Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases, p. 3159

4. Duration Optimization

Shorter courses have been validated as equivalent to longer courses for many infections. For hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), 7 days of therapy is recommended for most patients, including those with non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria such as P. aeruginosa, with no significant differences in mortality, clinical cure, or recurrence compared with 8-15 day courses.

5. IV-to-Oral (IV-to-PO) Conversion

Converting patients from parenteral to oral antibiotics when clinically appropriate reduces line-related complications, hospital length of stay, and costs while maintaining efficacy.

6. Clinical Decision Support (CDS)

Computer-assisted CDS tools integrated into electronic health records can flag inappropriate prescribing, prompt dose adjustments for renal/hepatic impairment, and support de-escalation at predefined timepoints.

7. Education and Communication Training

Particularly effective for outpatient settings. Key components include:
  • Making a clear diagnosis and communicating it to the patient
  • Focusing on positive actions patients can take to feel better
  • Reviewing the expected course of illness
  • Describing red-flag symptoms warranting return to care

Ambulatory Antibiotic Stewardship

Ambulatory settings account for ~85% of all antibiotic use in most developed countries, making outpatient stewardship the highest-impact target. Evidence-based interventions include:
  • Peer comparison - showing clinicians their prescribing rates vs. peers
  • Accountable justification - requiring prescribers to document reasoning for antibiotic use
  • Precommitment - asking clinicians to commit in advance to evidence-based prescribing
  • Patient education materials explaining when antibiotics are and are not needed
  • Telemedicine (phone, video, or electronic messaging) - potential to improve convenience and reduce inappropriate prescribing
Practices to avoid:
  • Delayed prescribing (giving a prescription and asking patients not to fill it unless symptoms don't improve) is conceptually flawed, ignores the natural history of self-limited respiratory infections (5-14 days), shifts clinical decision-making to patients, and sends a mixed message about antibiotic appropriateness.
  • Procalcitonin and CRP testing remain unproven or non-durable for outpatient antibiotic reduction.
  • Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22E, p. 296

Choosing Wisely: AAP/PIDS Recommendations

The AAP and Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society published five key stewardship principles:
  1. Always obtain blood, urine, or appropriate cultures before initiating empiric antibiotic therapy for suspected invasive bacterial infection (except in exceptional cases)
  2. Do not use broad-spectrum agents for perioperative prophylaxis, and do not continue prophylaxis after incision closure for clean/clean-contaminated procedures
  3. Do not treat uncomplicated CAP in otherwise healthy, immunized hospitalized patients with therapy broader than ampicillin
  4. Avoid treating asymptomatic bacteriuria (except in pregnancy or pre-urologic procedure)
  5. Do not use antibiotics for uncomplicated acute otitis media in children ≥2 years with mild disease
  • Red Book 2021, p. 1329

Outcomes of Stewardship Programs

Well-implemented multidisciplinary stewardship programs consistently demonstrate:
  • Significant reductions in total antimicrobial use
  • Reduced rates of antimicrobial resistance among healthcare-associated pathogens
  • Reduced C. difficile infection incidence
  • Improved clinical outcomes
  • Significant cost savings in hospital antimicrobial expenditure

Recent Developments (2025-2026)

  • AI-driven stewardship: A 2025 systematic review (PMID: 39955846) examined artificial intelligence approaches in antibiotic stewardship programs, showing promise for optimizing prescription practices through decision support algorithms.
  • CDC 2026 Outpatient Core Elements Update: The CDC is updating outpatient Core Elements in 2026 to focus specifically on the role of health system leadership in supporting and expanding outpatient ASP programs across networks, standardizing implementation for more consistent quality of care. (CDC 2025 Stewardship Report)
  • Dental stewardship: A 2025 systematic review (PMID: 39400429) specifically examined dental antibiotic stewardship interventions, reflecting the growing recognition that dentistry is a major contributor to outpatient antibiotic use.

Stewardship Team Composition

Effective programs are multidisciplinary and typically include:
  • Infectious disease physician (program leader)
  • Clinical pharmacist with ID training (co-leader)
  • Clinical microbiologist
  • Hospital epidemiologist / infection preventionist
  • Information systems / informatics specialist
As Sherris & Ryan's Medical Microbiology notes: "As a future prescriber, you bear a professional responsibility to become an antimicrobial steward for the benefit of the individual patient, and for the benefit of society. The mantra is: 'Together, we can reduce antimicrobial resistance.'"

Teach Opioid free anaesthesia- from millers anaesthesia book

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Searching PubMed

"opioid-free anesthesia" AND outcomes

Reading File
I now have comprehensive material from Miller's Anesthesia 10e, plus supporting context. Here is a thorough teaching summary:

Opioid-Free Anaesthesia (OFA)

Based on Miller's Anesthesia, 10th Edition (2-Volume Set)


1. Concept and Rationale

Definition: Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) is the complete avoidance of opioid analgesics during the perioperative period, replaced by a combination of non-opioid analgesics and adjuvants acting through different mechanisms to control pain, blunt surgical stress responses, and maintain haemodynamic stability.
Why OFA? The perioperative routine use of opioids is being actively reconsidered due to:
  • The opioid crisis and risks of prescription opioid misuse and dependence
  • Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) - a major cause of unplanned hospital admission after ambulatory surgery
  • Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) - paradoxical increased pain sensitivity with opioid use
  • Respiratory depression - particularly dangerous in obese patients, OSA, elderly
  • Postoperative delirium and neurocognitive dysfunction
  • Immunosuppression - opioids may suppress natural killer cell activity and affect cancer recurrence
OFA is considered most strongly for:
  • Obese patients and those with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)
  • Patients at high risk for PONV
  • Patients with chronic pain or opioid use disorder
  • Patients undergoing ambulatory/day-case surgery
  • Bariatric surgery
"OFA seems not to be the solution but, by using a multimodal pharmacologic and technical approach, the anesthesiologist can still make important contributions to ameliorate the prescription opioid crisis."
  • Miller's Anesthesia 10e, p. 6868

2. The Multimodal Analgesic Foundation

OFA relies on multimodal analgesia - combining drugs that act at different points along the pain pathway for additive or synergistic effects, thereby reducing each drug's required dose and side-effect burden.
"Multimodal analgesia relies on the additive or synergistic combination of drugs acting at various points on the pain pathway. Typical combinations include local anesthetic wound infiltration or regional techniques and routine NSAIDs."
  • Miller's Anesthesia 10e, p. 10023

3. Pharmacological Pillars of OFA

A. Ketamine (NMDA Receptor Antagonist)

Mechanism:
  • Antagonises the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor - the excitatory glutamatergic receptor central to central sensitisation and hyperalgesia
  • Inhibits nociceptive central hypersensitisation
  • Reduces the release of pronociceptive transmitters from the dorsal horn
  • Also occupies mu-opioid receptors in brain and spinal cord - contributing to some of its analgesic effect
  • Has antidepressant properties
Key pharmacology from Miller's:
  • Plasma level ≥0.1 mcg/mL elevates pain thresholds (subanesthetic analgesic dose)
  • Short duration due to rapid redistribution from brain to tissues
  • Prevents opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) - the NMDA receptor mediates both hyperalgesia and antinociceptive tolerance induced by opioids; preventive ketamine blocks this
  • S(+) enantiomer (esketamine) offers 10% faster hepatic biotransformation and quicker recovery
Clinical use in OFA:
  • Low-dose boluses (0.1-0.5 mg/kg IV) intraoperatively
  • Infusion continued postoperatively: common postoperative infusion doses are 0.1-0.2 mg/kg/hr
  • Analgesic, opioid-sparing, and antidepressant effects
  • Does NOT cause or prevent postoperative delirium (large multicenter trial)
  • Particular value in thoracotomy - used as part of multimodal therapy combining regional analgesia and anti-inflammatories

B. Dexmedetomidine (Selective α2-Agonist)

Mechanism:
  • Highly selective α2A/α2C-adrenoceptor agonist (α2:α1 selectivity ratio 1620:1 vs. clonidine's 220:1)
  • Analgesic mechanism: Stimulates α2C- and α2A-receptors in the dorsal horn, directly suppressing pain transmission by:
    • Reducing release of substance P and glutamate
    • Hyperpolarising inhibitory interneurons
  • Sedation mechanism: Activates locus coeruleus → releases inhibition of VLPO → VLPO releases GABA onto TMN → inhibits histamine release → induces NREM-like sleep
  • Provides sedation without significant respiratory depression (key advantage)
Clinical use in OFA:
  • Systemic infusion provides significant opioid-sparing effect intraoperatively and postoperatively
  • In the ICU/postoperative setting: reduces narcotic requirements by ~50% compared with placebo
  • When used as part of an anaesthetic regimen: reduces MAC of inhaled anaesthetics
  • Useful in OSA patients - minimal effects on pharyngeal tone unlike opioids and benzodiazepines
  • Also used as adjuvant to regional blocks: prolongs sensory block duration (e.g., 1 mcg/kg added to bupivacaine) by prolonged hyperpolarisation of unmyelinated C-fibres

C. NSAIDs and COX-2 Inhibitors

Mechanism: Anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, antithrombotic, and analgesic via COX inhibition, reducing prostaglandin synthesis at peripheral and central sites.
  • Non-selective NSAIDs (naproxen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, ketorolac): inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2
  • Selective COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib): spare platelet COX-1, lower GI bleeding risk
  • Can be given orally, rectally, intramuscularly, or intravenously
  • IV diclofenac and ketorolac: well-evidenced for acute postoperative pain
Precautions: Use with caution or avoid in peptic ulcer disease, bleeding risk, cardiovascular disease, chronic renal/hepatic disease.
Notable: NSAIDs do NOT increase perioperative bleeding risk (recent meta-analysis) and have no clinically significant effect on long-term renal function when used short-term.

D. Paracetamol (Acetaminophen)

  • Often underestimated - has equivalent and sustained analgesic effects compared with other perioperative analgesics
  • Routes: oral, rectal, or IV
  • Opioid-sparing effect is inconsistent in the literature - some RCTs and meta-analyses show reduction in opioid consumption; others do not
  • Given its high safety profile, its use as a routine analgesic adjuvant is considered reasonable
  • Best given preoperatively or at the start of surgery for preemptive effect

E. IV Lidocaine Infusion (Systemic Local Anaesthetic)

Mechanism: Sodium channel blockade at central and peripheral levels; anti-inflammatory, antihyperalgesic, and antinociceptive effects at subanaesthetic doses.
  • Reduces postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and accelerates return of bowel function (particularly in abdominal surgery)
  • Typical dose: 1.5 mg/kg bolus → 1.5-2 mg/kg/hr infusion intraoperatively
  • Can be continued into the postoperative period

F. Dexamethasone

  • Used in higher doses than antiemetic doses as part of multimodal analgesia
  • Onset of action: 1-2 hours → administer BEFORE surgical trauma
  • Meta-analyses show: less postoperative pain, fewer opioids required, shorter PACU stays
  • Most effective at intermediate doses (6.4-10 mg IV); given preoperatively
  • A large RCT confirmed 8 mg intraoperative dexamethasone does NOT increase surgical site infection rates

G. Gabapentinoids (Gabapentin, Pregabalin)

  • Initially anticonvulsants, gained popularity for acute perioperative pain
  • However, routine use is NOT justified per current evidence:
    • No clinically significant difference in acute or chronic postoperative pain at multiple time points
    • Lower PONV risk (benefit)
    • BUT: increased length of stay, increased dizziness and visual disturbance
    • Risk of neurological and respiratory adverse reactions, especially in ambulatory patients where they delay discharge

4. Regional and Neuraxial Techniques

A critical component of OFA. Eliminating systemic opioids is only feasible when regional anaesthesia can reliably cover the operative field.
Techniques:
  • Neuraxial analgesia (epidural, spinal): local anaesthetic-based regimen; intrathecal local anaesthetics provide potent, long-lasting analgesia at subanesthetic doses
  • Peripheral nerve blocks: brachial plexus, femoral, sciatic, TAP blocks, paravertebral blocks
  • Local infiltration analgesia (LIA): wound infiltration with local anaesthetic
  • Topical local anaesthetics: lidocaine patches and glyceryl trinitrate patches have been found effective for some ambulatory procedures
ASA Task Force on OSA: Recommended regional techniques rather than systemic opioids to reduce perioperative risk. Also recommended excluding opioids from neuraxial analgesia in OSA patients.

5. OFA vs. Opioid-Sparing Anaesthesia (OSA)

It is important to distinguish between the two terms:
FeatureOpioid-Sparing AnaesthesiaOpioid-Free Anaesthesia (OFA)
Opioid useReduced (minimised)Completely eliminated
Multimodal drugsYesYes (more rigorous combination)
Regional techniquesRecommendedEssential
Evidence baseStronger, broaderGrowing but more limited
A 2025 network meta-analysis (PMID: 38578868) comparing OFA vs. opioid-sparing anaesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery found OFA reduced PONV, while both approaches had comparable analgesic efficacy.

6. Limitations and Cautions of OFA

Miller's Anesthesia is candid about the limitations:
  • Haemodynamic instability: Studies on OFA showed increased demand for vasopressors, hypotensive and bradycardic phases
  • Postoperative sedation and falls reported
  • Safety concerns: A large proof-of-concept study had to be terminated prematurely due to high incidences of hypoxia and bradycardia
  • OFA is not universally applicable - patients with severe uncontrolled pain, those on chronic opioids, and those with opioid use disorder still require individualised management
  • Chronic pain patients on long-term opioids must have their preoperative analgesics continued to prevent withdrawal
  • The "delayed prescription" strategy (give a prescription but ask the patient not to fill it) is conceptually flawed and should be avoided

7. Special Populations Where OFA is Particularly Valuable

Obese Patients and OSA

  • Avoiding respiratory depressants (opioids, benzodiazepines) is paramount
  • Full OFA/opioid-sparing with NSAIDs, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, epidural LA, peripheral nerve blocks minimises postoperative respiratory arrest risk
  • Benzodiazepines actually have a greater effect on pharyngeal tone than opioids and should be avoided in OSA patients

Bariatric Surgery

  • High PONV risk
  • Respiratory vulnerability due to morbid obesity
  • 2025 RCT (PMID: 40269993) confirmed OFA feasibility and benefits in bariatric surgery

Elderly/Cognitive Impairment

  • Opioids (especially meperidine and normeperidine), benzodiazepines, and gabapentinoids are associated with delirium
  • Ketamine, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and COX-2 inhibitors may reduce postoperative cognitive dysfunction through opioid-sparing effects
  • Processed EEG (bispectral index) guides titration of inhalational agents to age-adjusted MAC

8. Practical OFA Protocol (Miller's Synthesis)

PhaseInterventions
PreoperativeAcetaminophen PO, celecoxib PO, patient education on pain expectations, screen for chronic pain/opioid use, gabapentinoids (selectively, not routine)
InductionPropofol TIVA, dexmedetomidine loading infusion, IV lidocaine bolus
IntraoperativeDexmedetomidine infusion, IV lidocaine infusion, low-dose ketamine bolus or infusion, IV dexamethasone (6.4-10 mg), regional/neuraxial block
Emergence/PACUContinue IV lidocaine ± ketamine, IV/oral NSAIDs and acetaminophen, regional analgesia, reassess every 15 min
PostoperativeScheduled acetaminophen + NSAIDs (oral), oral adjuvants, rescue fentanyl small boluses (20-25 mcg) only if needed for breakthrough

9. Recent Evidence (2023-2025)

  • A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis (PMID: 37515877, J Clin Anesth) on OFA: reduced PONV, but with trade-offs including haemodynamic effects - consistent with Miller's cautionary statements
  • A 2025 network meta-analysis (PMID: 38578868, Anesth Analg) in bariatric surgery: OFA superior to conventional analgesia for PONV prevention; opioid-sparing and OFA had comparable analgesic outcomes
  • A 2025 RCT in bariatric surgery (PMID: 40269993): OFA was safe and effective, with better PONV profile

Key Take-Home Messages from Miller's

  1. OFA is not "the solution" - it is part of a broader multimodal strategy, not a universal replacement for opioids
  2. The evidence base is still evolving - some well-designed trials have been terminated early due to haemodynamic complications
  3. Dexmedetomidine is the cornerstone α2-agonist - provides sedation without respiratory compromise, reduces MAC, and cuts opioid requirements by ~50%
  4. Ketamine is essential - its NMDA antagonism directly blocks central sensitisation and prevents OIH
  5. Regional techniques are non-negotiable - OFA without reliable regional anaesthesia is not safe for most surgical procedures
  6. Patient selection matters - OFA is particularly valuable in OSA, bariatric, ambulatory, and high-PONV-risk patients
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.