ATCOM module 2.2 and 2.3, explain for 5 marks. Okay.
Aetcom
AETCOM module 2.2 2.3 doctor patient relationship medical ethics India NMC
AETCOM module 2 "what does it mean to be a patient" "illness experience" medical curriculum India
https://www.nmc.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/AETCOM_boo…
| Feature | Module 2.2 | Module 2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Topic | Foundations of Bioethics | Health Care as a Right |
| Year | Professional Year 2 | Professional Year 2 |
| Core concept | 4 pillars: Autonomy, Beneficence, Non-maleficence, Justice | Justice, equity, access, doctor's social role |
| Format | Large group session | Participatory seminar / debate |
| Duration | 2 hours | 2 hours |
| Key skill | Ethical reasoning (KH) | Critical thinking + Communication (KH) |
Routrs of drug administration notes for 8 marks

| Route | Absorption | Avoids First-Pass? | Onset | Key Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oral | Variable | No | Slow-moderate | Most common |
| Sublingual | Rapid | Yes | Rapid | Nitroglycerin |
| IV | Immediate | Yes | Fastest | Emergency |
| IM | Rapid/Slow (depot) | Yes | Moderate | Vaccines, depots |
| SC | Slow | Yes | Slow | Insulin, heparin |
| Inhalation | Rapid | Yes | Rapid | Asthma drugs |
| Transdermal | Slow, sustained | Yes | Slow | Nicotine, fentanyl |
| Rectal | Partial | Partial (50%) | Variable | Vomiting/unconscious |
| Intrathecal | Direct CNS | Yes | Rapid (CSF) | CNS emergencies |
Skeletal muscle relaxants
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
├── 1. Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs (NMBDs)
│ ├── A. Non-depolarizing (competitive) blockers
│ └── B. Depolarizing blockers
├── 2. Spasmolytics (for spasticity - upper motor neuron lesions)
│ ├── Baclofen
│ ├── Diazepam
│ └── Tizanidine
└── 3. Antispasmodics (for peripheral muscle spasm)
├── Cyclobenzaprine
├── Methocarbamol
└── Carisoprodol
| Drug | Duration | Family |
|---|---|---|
| Rocuronium | Intermediate | Steroid |
| Vecuronium | Intermediate | Steroid |
| Pancuronium | Long | Steroid |
| Atracurium | Intermediate | Isoquinoline |
| Cisatracurium | Intermediate | Isoquinoline |
| Mivacurium | Short | Isoquinoline |
| Feature | Non-depolarizing (Rocuronium) | Depolarizing Phase I (Succinylcholine) |
|---|---|---|
| Initial fasciculations | None | Present |
| Tetanic response | Fade (unsustained) | Sustained (no fade) |
| Post-tetanic facilitation | Yes | No |
| Effect of neostigmine | Reversed (antagonized) | Augmented (worsened) |
| Effect of tubocurarine | Additive | Antagonistic |
| Recovery time | 30-60 min | 4-8 min |
| Drug | Mechanism | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclobenzaprine | Central (similar to TCAs) | Most commonly used for acute back pain |
| Methocarbamol | Central CNS depression | IV available |
| Carisoprodol | GABA-A modulation | Abuse potential |
| Orphenadrine | Anticholinergic + central | Also analgesic |
| Condition | Drug of Choice |
|---|---|
| Rapid sequence intubation | Succinylcholine (or rocuronium) |
| Spasticity (MS, spinal injury) | Baclofen, diazepam, tizanidine |
| Malignant hyperthermia | Dantrolene (IV, emergency) |
| Cerebral palsy spasticity | Baclofen (intrathecal pump) |
| Acute musculoskeletal spasm | Cyclobenzaprine, diazepam |
| Electroconvulsive therapy | Succinylcholine |
Pharmco vagillance
pharmacovigilance definition objectives WHO ADR reporting India PVPI
https://www.ipc.gov.in/images/news/introduction%20to%20pv-41…
"The science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding and prevention of adverse effects or any other drug-related problems."
| Type | Name | Features | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type A | Augmented | Dose-dependent, predictable, related to pharmacological action, common | Bleeding with warfarin, hypoglycemia with insulin |
| Type B | Bizarre | Dose-independent, unpredictable, not related to pharmacology, rare but severe | Anaphylaxis with penicillin, malignant hyperthermia |
| Type C | Chronic | Related to long-term use, dose and duration dependent | Adrenal suppression with corticosteroids |
| Type D | Delayed | Appear after a delay - teratogenicity, carcinogenicity | Thalidomide teratogenicity, DES-induced vaginal cancer |
| Type E | End-of-use | Withdrawal reactions | Benzodiazepine withdrawal, rebound hypertension with clonidine |
| Type F | Failure of therapy | Unexpected failure of therapy | Antibiotic resistance, contraceptive failure with enzyme inducers |
| Term | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Certain | Plausible time relationship; cannot be explained by disease or other drugs; response to dechallenge (withdrawal); rechallenge positive if performed |
| Probable/Likely | Reasonable time relationship; unlikely due to disease; response to dechallenge; rechallenge not required |
| Possible | Reasonable time relationship; could also be explained by disease or other drugs; unclear dechallenge info |
| Unlikely | Time relationship makes drug causation improbable; disease/other drugs are plausible explanation |
| Conditional/Unclassified | More data needed for assessment |
| Unassessable/Unclassifiable | Report insufficient or contradictory; data cannot be verified |
Information arising from one or multiple sources, including observations and experiments, which suggests a new potentially causal association between an intervention and an event, or a new aspect of a known association, that is judged to be of sufficient likelihood to justify verification.
| Historical Example | Lesson Learned |
|---|---|
| Thalidomide (1950s-60s) | Phocomelia in neonates - birth defects not detected in pre-clinical trials |
| Practolol | Oculomucocutaneous syndrome detected only post-marketing |
| Vioxx (Rofecoxib) | Increased cardiovascular risk → global withdrawal 2004 |
| Chloramphenicol | Gray baby syndrome, aplastic anemia |
Drug Approved (Marketing Authorization)
↓
Post-Marketing Surveillance
↓
ADR Reported (Spontaneous / Active Monitoring)
↓
Signal Detection
↓
Causality Assessment (WHO-UMC Scale)
↓
Benefit-Risk Analysis
↓
Regulatory Action
(Label update / Restriction / Withdrawal)