Management of reeling sensation in a patient with chronic non healing ulcer on right ankle at lateral malleolus of 9 months duration, bicytopenia with hemoglobin of 6.5 (reduced pcv, normal mcv and normal mchc)and platelets of 90,000. Wbc are 5400. She had stent placed in lca territory 3 years back. She is on aspirin plus clopidogrel plus atorvastatin, pentoxyfylline, cilpstazol

Reading Document
Medical Text Search

vertigo dizziness management causes evaluation

Medical Text Search

chronic non-healing leg ulcer lateral malleolus management vasculopathy

Medical Text Search

normocytic anemia thrombocytopenia bicytopenia causes workup

Medical Text Search

aspirin clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy coronary stent management

GradeResponse
GradeResponse
GradeResponse
GradeResponse
Medical Text Search

drug-induced dizziness vertigo cilostazol pentoxifylline side effects

Medical Text Search

BPPV benign paroxysmal positional vertigo diagnosis Dix-Hallpike Epley maneuver

Medical Text Search

anemia causing dizziness lightheadedness hemoglobin 6.5 treatment transfusion threshold

GradeResponse
Here is a structured clinical analysis and management plan for this complex patient:

Clinical Problem Summary

Patient profile:
  • Elderly female (inferred)
  • Presenting complaint: Reeling sensation (dizziness/vertigo)
  • Chronic non-healing ulcer, right ankle, lateral malleolus, 9 months
  • Bicytopenia: Hb 6.5 g/dL (↓ PCV, normal MCV, normal MCHC → normocytic normochromic anemia) + Platelets 90,000/µL
  • WBC 5,400 (normal)
  • Prior LCA (Left Coronary Artery) territory stent — 3 years ago
  • Medications: Aspirin + Clopidogrel + Atorvastatin + Pentoxifylline + Cilostazol

Step 1: Deconstructing the "Reeling Sensation"

The first priority is determining the etiology of the reeling sensation, as this directly guides management. Multiple causes coexist in this patient:

Differential Diagnosis — Ranked by Likelihood

CauseWhy LikelyKey Features
Severe anemia (Hb 6.5)Most probable primary causeContinuous, postural worsening, pallor, palpitations, exertional
Drug-induced (Cilostazol)Cilostazol = PDE3 inhibitor; headache, dizziness, palpitations are well-documented class effectsPersistent, non-positional
BPPVMost common vestibular cause in elderlyBrief (seconds), positional, Dix-Hallpike positive
Cerebrovascular (TIA/lacunar)Prior coronary stent = systemic atherosclerosis; vertebrobasilar insufficiencyEpisodic, associated neurological symptoms
Orthostatic hypotensionAnemia + vasodilators (pentoxifylline, cilostazol) lower BP furtherPostural, on standing
Drug interaction/vasodilationAspirin + Clopidogrel + Cilostazol + Pentoxifylline = additive vasodilation + antiplatelet loadContinuous

Step 2: Medication Review — Critical Issues

A. Cilostazol Overlap with Clopidogrel

This patient is on three antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents simultaneously:
  • Aspirin (COX-1 inhibitor)
  • Clopidogrel (P2Y12 inhibitor)
  • Cilostazol (PDE3 inhibitor with antiplatelet + vasodilatory effects)
Cilostazol causes headache and dizziness as its most common adverse effects (seen in ~27–34% of patients in trials). In combination with severe anemia, this significantly amplifies the reeling sensation.
Per Harrison's (p. 7770): Cilostazol increases claudication distance by 40–60% but its mechanism is incompletely understood. Pentoxifylline modestly increases exercise duration with unconfirmed efficacy in larger trials.
Action:
  • Consider stopping cilostazol — it is contributing to dizziness and is likely redundant alongside clopidogrel + aspirin for a patient already on DAPT
  • Pentoxifylline may be continued for its rheologic benefits on the ulcer, but monitor BP

B. DAPT Duration

The stent was placed 3 years ago. Standard DAPT (aspirin + clopidogrel) for a stable PCI is 12 months, after which aspirin monotherapy is appropriate in most guidelines (AHA/ACC 2023).
  • At 3 years post-stent, continuing dual antiplatelet therapy indefinitely is not guideline-supported unless there is a compelling indication (high ischemic risk)
  • However, if the stent was for ACS (STEMI/NSTEMI), prolonged DAPT may be justified — but must be weighed against bleeding risk (thrombocytopenia, Hb 6.5)
  • Consult cardiology regarding whether to continue DAPT vs. transition to aspirin monotherapy

Step 3: Bicytopenia Workup

Normocytic normochromic anemia + thrombocytopenia + normal WBC = Bicytopenia
The combination of normocytic anemia (normal MCV, normal MCHC) with thrombocytopenia in an elderly patient on multiple drugs should prompt systematic evaluation:

Priority Differential Diagnoses

CategoryConditions
Bone marrow suppressionMyelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) — top priority in elderly, drug-induced marrow suppression
HypersplenismPortal hypertension, chronic liver disease
AutoimmuneEvans syndrome (AIHA + ITP), SLE
InfiltrativeLymphoma, leukemia (low WBC makes leukemia less likely but not excluded)
Chronic diseaseAnemia of chronic disease + separate thrombocytopenia from ulcer-related chronic inflammation
NutritionalB12/folate deficiency can cause normocytic early or macro; worth excluding
Medication-relatedAspirin/clopidogrel do not cause anemia, but cilostazol rarely can; atorvastatin rarely

Recommended Workup

  1. Peripheral blood smear — morphology (blast cells, schistocytes, hypersegmented neutrophils, dysplastic changes)
  2. Reticulocyte count — to differentiate hypoproliferative vs. hemolytic
  3. Serum B12, folate, iron studies, ferritin, TIBC
  4. LDH, indirect bilirubin, direct Coombs test — rule out hemolysis
  5. Liver function tests, renal function
  6. ANA, anti-dsDNA if autoimmune suspected
  7. Bone marrow biopsy — if peripheral smear and labs suggest MDS or marrow pathology
  8. Flow cytometry if lymphoproliferative disease suspected

Step 4: Management of the Reeling Sensation — Prioritized Approach

Immediate

  1. Correct the anemia:
    • Hb 6.5 g/dL warrants packed red cell transfusion in a symptomatic patient with cardiovascular disease (post-coronary stent — transfusion threshold ≥8 g/dL in cardiac patients per guidelines)
    • Target Hb ≥9–10 g/dL given prior coronary disease
    • Pre-transfusion: check blood group, crossmatch, direct Coombs
  2. Review and rationalize medications:
    • Stop cilostazol (primary contributor to dizziness; redundant with DAPT; thrombocytopenia is a relative contraindication)
    • Reassess DAPT need with cardiology — 3 years post-stent, stable patient
    • Continue pentoxifylline (beneficial for the ulcer)
    • Continue atorvastatin (secondary prevention, beneficial for vasculopathic ulcer)
  3. Assess for BPPV:
    • Perform Dix-Hallpike maneuver
    • If positive → Epley maneuver (canalith repositioning) — highly effective, safe, non-pharmacological
    • If BPPV confirmed, no vestibular suppressants needed
  4. Check orthostatic blood pressure (lying/sitting/standing) — if orthostatic hypotension present:
    • Encourage adequate hydration
    • Slow positional changes
    • Reassess vasodilatory medications
  5. Cardiovascular/neurological assessment:
    • ECG — rule out arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation can cause embolic vertigo)
    • If vertebrobasilar TIA suspected: MRI brain + MRA posterior circulation
    • Carotid Doppler if clinically indicated

Step 5: Management of the Chronic Ulcer

The ulcer at the lateral malleolus for 9 months in a patient with systemic atherosclerosis (coronary stent) and on vasoactive drugs:
  • Lateral malleolus location strongly suggests arterial (ischemic) ulcer rather than venous (venous ulcers are typically medial malleolus/gaiter area)
  • ABI (Ankle-Brachial Index) must be performed to assess arterial supply
    • ABI <0.9 → peripheral arterial disease
    • ABI <0.5 or ankle pressure <50 mmHg → critical limb ischemia
  • If arterial: vascular surgery referral for revascularization assessment
  • Biopsy is mandatory at 9 months to exclude Marjolin's ulcer (squamous cell carcinoma in a chronic ulcer) per Bailey & Love's (p. 55)
  • Wound care: moist wound dressings, debridement of necrotic tissue
  • Compression bandaging is CONTRAINDICATED if ABI <0.6
  • If mixed arterio-venous: modified compression only after vascular assessment

Summary Action Plan

PriorityAction
UrgentPRBC transfusion (Hb 6.5, symptomatic, cardiac history)
UrgentStop cilostazol (dizziness side effect + thrombocytopenia risk)
Same dayDix-Hallpike test; orthostatic BP measurement
Within 48hPeripheral smear, reticulocytes, B12/folate, iron panel, LFT, RFT, LDH, Coombs
This weekCardiology review — duration of DAPT post-stent
This weekABI measurement + vascular surgery referral for ulcer
This weekUlcer biopsy (9 months → mandatory to exclude malignant change)
If smear/labs suggest MDSBone marrow biopsy
If neurological featuresMRI brain + MRA

Key clinical insight: The reeling sensation in this patient is most likely multifactorial — severe symptomatic anemia (Hb 6.5) as the primary driver, compounded by cilostazol-induced dizziness and possible orthostatic hypotension from combined vasodilatory drugs. Correcting the anemia and stopping cilostazol should produce the most rapid symptomatic improvement, while the underlying cause of bicytopenia (especially MDS given age and chronicity) must be urgently excluded.

Treatment of non healing ulcer

Medical Text Search

chronic non-healing ulcer treatment wound management principles

Medical Text Search

arterial ischemic leg ulcer treatment revascularization peripheral arterial disease

GradeResponse
GradeResponse
Medical Text Search

wound bed preparation debridement dressings chronic ulcer TIME framework

Medical Text Search

venous leg ulcer compression therapy management treatment

GradeResponse
GradeResponse
Medical Text Search

chronic limb threatening ischemia lateral malleolus ulcer endovascular bypass revascularization outcomes

GradeResponse
Here is a comprehensive, structured treatment approach for this patient's non-healing ulcer:

Non-Healing Ulcer — Right Lateral Malleolus, 9 Months


Step 1: Establish the Ulcer Type First

The lateral malleolus location is the key anatomical clue:
FeatureArterial UlcerVenous Ulcer
LocationLateral malleolus, toes, pressure pointsMedial malleolus, gaiter area
PainSevere, worse at night/elevationDull aching, relieved by elevation
Wound bedPale/necrotic, punched-outShallow, fibrinous slough, granulating
Surrounding skinAtrophic, hairless, coldLipodermatosclerosis, pigmentation, edema
PulsesAbsent/reducedNormal
This patient's ulcer is almost certainly arterial or mixed arteriovenous, given:
  • Lateral malleolus location
  • Systemic atherosclerosis (coronary stent in LCA territory)
  • Already on medications for peripheral vascular disease (pentoxifylline, cilostazol)

Step 2: Mandatory Initial Assessment

A. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)

The single most important investigation before any local treatment:
ABI ValueInterpretationAction
>0.9NormalLook for other causes
0.7–0.9Mild PADWound care + risk factor control
0.5–0.7Moderate PADVascular referral
<0.5Severe/Critical limb ischemiaUrgent vascular surgery
>1.3Non-compressible vessels (calcification)Proceed to toe pressures / Duplex
Per Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG 2019): Toe pressure is the preferred hemodynamic measure in suspected CLTI. Objective hemodynamic testing is mandatory.

B. Additional Investigations

  • Duplex arterial ultrasound — maps occlusion/stenosis level
  • CT Angiography or MR Angiography — pre-revascularization planning
  • Wound swab/culture — assess for infection (critical colonization vs. overt infection)
  • Ulcer biopsymandatory at 9 months to exclude Marjolin's ulcer (squamous cell carcinoma in a chronic wound) — Bailey & Love's (p. 55)
  • Blood glucose, HbA1c — exclude undiagnosed/uncontrolled diabetes

Step 3: Wound Bed Preparation — TIME Framework

According to Management of Chronic Venous Disease Guidelines (p. 53), wound bed preparation aims to convert the biology of a chronic wound to that of an acute healing wound:

T — Tissue Debridement

  • Remove necrotic, sloughy, or non-viable tissue to expose healthy wound bed
  • Methods:
    • Sharp/surgical debridement — most effective, fastest; do cautiously if ABI <0.5
    • Autolytic debridement — hydrogel/hydrocolloid dressings (gentle, suitable for ischemic ulcers)
    • Enzymatic debridement — collagenase preparations
    • Maggot (larval) therapy — effective for heavily sloughed wounds, excellent evidence
    • Ultrasonic/NPWT-assisted debridement

I — Infection / Inflammation Control

  • Clinical signs: increased pain, erythema, warmth, purulent exudate, malodor, wound breakdown
  • Superficial/critical colonization: Topical antimicrobials (silver-containing dressings, iodine-based e.g., cadexomer iodine, PHMB dressings)
  • Deep/spreading infection: Systemic antibiotics guided by wound culture
  • Biofilm disruption: Mandatory in chronic non-healing wounds — use mechanical cleansing + antimicrobial dressings (biofilm is the primary reason ulcers do not heal)

M — Moisture Balance

  • Wound must be moist but not macerated
  • Exudate management by dressing type:
Exudate LevelDressing Choice
Low/dryHydrogel, hydrocolloid
ModerateFoam dressings, alginate
HighAlginate, hydrofiber (Aquacel), superabsorbent dressings

E — Edge Advancement / Epithelial Progression

  • If edges are rolled, undermined, or non-advancing → re-debride
  • Consider advanced wound therapies if no progress after 4–6 weeks of optimal wound care:
    • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT/VAC) — promotes granulation, reduces edema, draws edges together
    • Skin grafting (split-thickness) — once wound bed is clean and granulating
    • Bioengineered skin substitutes (e.g., Apligraf, Dermagraft)
    • Growth factor therapy (becaplermin/PDGF) — limited evidence outside diabetic foot

Step 4: Revascularization — The Most Critical Intervention

Per GVG 2019 (p. 1): CLTI is defined as PAD + ulceration >2 weeks duration. All patients with suspected CLTI should be referred urgently to a vascular specialist. No wound will heal in ischemic tissue without restoring perfusion.

Revascularization Options

ApproachIndicationNotes
Endovascular (angioplasty ± stenting)Shorter lesions, iliac/femoral disease, high surgical riskLess invasive, preferred in high-risk patients
Surgical bypass (vein graft preferred)Long occlusions, complex anatomy, good surgical riskGreat saphenous vein graft gives best patency
HybridCombined endovascular + openTailored to anatomy
This patient — with prior coronary stent — is already on best medical therapy (DAPT + statin). Revascularization strategy follows the PLAN framework (Patient risk, Limb severity, ANatomic complexity).

Step 5: Compression — With Caution

Per Compression Therapy Guidelines:
  • Compression is beneficial for venous ulcers — improves healing and prevents recurrence (Grade 1B)
  • Mixed arteriovenous ulcer: Compression only if ABI >0.5 or ankle pressure >60 mmHg (Grade 2C)
  • Arterial ulcer with ABI <0.5: Compression is contraindicated — will worsen ischemia
Do NOT apply compression to this patient until ABI is confirmed.

Step 6: Systemic / Adjunctive Medical Management

InterventionRationale
Optimize hemoglobinHb 6.5 — severely impairs oxygen delivery to wound; transfuse to ≥9–10 g/dL
Continue atorvastatinReduces cardiovascular events; may improve limb perfusion
PentoxifyllineRheologic benefits; can continue for wound healing support
Stop cilostazolRedundant, causing dizziness, thrombocytopenia risk
Glycemic controlIf diabetic — HbA1c <7–8% target
Nutritional supportProtein (1.2–1.5 g/kg/day), Vitamin C, Zinc — essential for wound healing
Smoking cessationMandatoryin vasculopathic ulcers

Step 7: Surgical Options for Non-Healing Wounds

When conservative measures fail after adequate revascularization:
  1. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) — after wound bed optimization
  2. Flap reconstruction — if periosteum/tendon exposed (lateral malleolus area)
  3. Amputation — last resort for non-salvageable limbs with gangrene, uncontrolled infection, or unrevascularizable disease

Management Algorithm Summary

Lateral malleolus ulcer (9 months)
            ↓
     Measure ABI + Toe pressure
            ↓
  ABI <0.5 → Urgent vascular surgery referral
  ABI 0.5–0.9 → Wound care + vascular referral
  ABI >0.9 → Exclude other causes
            ↓
   Wound bed preparation (TIME)
   + Biopsy (mandatory at 9 months)
   + Infection control
            ↓
   Revascularization (endovascular/bypass)
            ↓
   Correct anemia (transfuse to Hb ≥9)
   Optimize nutrition
   Best medical therapy
            ↓
   If wound bed clean + granulating
            ↓
      Skin grafting / NPWT / Advanced therapies

The single most important principle: No amount of dressing changes will heal an ischemic ulcer. Restoring blood flow is the therapeutic priority. Wound bed preparation is concurrent but secondary to revascularization in an arterial ulcer.

Lower limb arterial plus venous doppler vs ct angiography vs Mr angiography in this patient?

Medical Text Search

duplex ultrasound arterial venous lower limb peripheral artery disease diagnosis accuracy

Medical Text Search

CT angiography peripheral arterial disease lower limb imaging contrast nephrotoxicity

Medical Text Search

MR angiography peripheral arterial disease gadolinium renal function imaging

GradeResponse
GradeResponse
GradeResponse
Medical Text Search

imaging modalities comparison PAD CLTI duplex CTA MRA digital subtraction angiography selection

GradeResponse
Excellent — now synthesizing a patient-specific, head-to-head comparison.

Imaging Modality Selection for This Patient

Patient-Specific Factors That Influence Choice

FactorImplication
Prior LCA coronary stentSystemic atherosclerosis → likely multilevel PAD
Lateral malleolus ulcer, 9 monthsLikely arterial/mixed → below-knee and pedal vessel imaging critical
Bicytopenia (Hb 6.5, Plt 90,000)Affects tolerance of invasive procedures; no direct imaging contraindication
On DAPT (aspirin + clopidogrel)Important if DSA/intervention planned
Renal function unknownCritical before any contrast-based imaging
Arterial + venous assessment neededTwo distinct questions requiring potentially two modalities

Head-to-Head Comparison

1. Lower Limb Arterial + Venous Duplex Doppler Ultrasound

ParameterDetail
PrincipleB-mode + colour Doppler + spectral waveform analysis
What it answersPresence, level, and severity of arterial stenosis/occlusion; venous reflux, DVT, valvular incompetence
Sensitivity/SpecificityArterial stenosis >50%: sensitivity ~80–90%, specificity ~90–95% for femoropopliteal segment; lower accuracy below the knee
VenousGold standard for chronic venous disease (Class I, Level B — Chronic Venous Disease Guidelines)
Advantages✅ No radiation, No contrast, No nephrotoxicity, Bedside/clinic available, Can be repeated serially, Real-time haemodynamic data (ABI, waveforms), Both arterial and venous in one sitting, Cheap
Limitations❌ Operator-dependent, Poor acoustic window in obese/oedematous patients, Arterial calcification causes acoustic shadowing, Suboptimal for tibial/pedal vessels, Cannot plan complex revascularisation alone
ContrastNone
RadiationNone
Renal safetyCompletely safe
Role in this patientFirst-line investigation — provides haemodynamic data (ABI, toe pressures, waveforms) AND venous assessment together; guides whether advanced imaging is needed

2. CT Angiography (CTA) of Lower Limbs

ParameterDetail
PrincipleMultidetector CT with IV iodinated contrast; 3D reconstruction of arterial tree from aorta to foot
What it answersPrecise anatomical mapping of stenoses, occlusions, calcification burden, collaterals, stent patency
Sensitivity/SpecificitySensitivity ~95–97%, Specificity ~94–97% for significant stenosis (vs. DSA); excellent aortoiliac to popliteal; limited below the knee in heavy calcification
Advantages✅ Fast, widely available, excellent spatial resolution, shows calcification (useful for surgical planning), maps entire aortoiliac-to-foot arterial tree, evaluates stent integrity
LimitationsIodinated contrast → nephrotoxicity risk (must check eGFR), ❌ Radiation exposure, ❌ Heavy arterial calcification (Mönckeberg's) causes "blooming artefact" limiting assessment of tibial vessels, ❌ Cannot assess venous reflux haemodynamically
ContrastYes — iodinated IV contrast (50–150 mL)
RadiationSignificant (~10–20 mSv)
Renal safetyContrast-induced nephropathy risk — check creatinine/eGFR first; withhold metformin if present; pre-hydrate
Role in this patientExcellent for pre-revascularisation anatomical planning once renal function confirmed; particularly good if aortoiliac/femoral disease suspected; less useful if heavy tibial calcification

3. MR Angiography (MRA) of Lower Limbs

ParameterDetail
PrincipleGadolinium-enhanced (CE-MRA) or non-contrast (TOF/quiescent interval MRA); maps arterial lumen
What it answersArterial anatomy from aorta to foot; excellent soft tissue detail
Sensitivity/SpecificitySensitivity ~93–95%, Specificity ~91–94% for lower limb PAD
AdvantagesNo radiation, ✅ No iodinated contrast, ✅ Best modality for tibial and pedal vessels (not affected by calcification), ✅ Excellent soft tissue contrast, Non-contrast MRA available if renal impairment
LimitationsGadolinium → Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) risk in eGFR <30 (use macrocyclic agents or non-contrast MRA), ❌ Long scan time (30–60 min), ❌ Claustrophobia, ❌ Cannot be used if metallic implants (pacemakers, certain stents) — patient's coronary stent must be MRI-compatible (most modern DES are safe after 6 weeks), ❌ Cannot quantify calcification — a limitation for surgical planning, ❌ Less widely available, more expensive
ContrastOptional — non-contrast sequences available
RadiationNone
Renal safetyGadolinium risk if eGFR <30; macrocyclic agents safer; non-contrast MRA is completely safe
Role in this patientBest choice for tibial/pedal vessel mapping especially if CTA is limited by calcification; preferred if renal function is compromised; check stent MRI compatibility first

4. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) — The Gold Standard

Not the initial question but essential context:
  • Gold standard, especially for below-knee and pedal vessels (IWGDF 2023, GVG 2019)
  • Used when MRA/CTA fail to define anatomy adequately, or when endovascular intervention is planned simultaneously
  • Invasive, requires arterial puncture → bleeding risk relevant here given DAPT + thrombocytopenia
  • In most centres, DSA is reserved for the intervention suite

Patient-Specific Recommendation

Recommended Sequence for This Patient:

Step 1 (Always first):
Lower limb ARTERIAL + VENOUS DUPLEX DOPPLER
→ Establishes ABI, toe pressures, venous reflux
→ No contrast, no radiation, safe with any renal function
→ Determines if revascularisation is needed

           ↓ If revascularisation is being planned:

Step 2A: Check eGFR / serum creatinine
           ↓
  eGFR >45 → CT Angiography
  (excellent for aortoiliac-femoral anatomy,
   calcification mapping, pre-op planning)

  eGFR <45 OR heavy tibial calcification on CTA
  OR CTA inconclusive
           ↓
  MR Angiography (non-contrast if eGFR <30)
  Check coronary stent MRI compatibility first

           ↓ If anatomy still unclear OR intervention planned:

Step 3: DSA (diagnostic + therapeutic in same sitting)

Summary Table

FeatureDuplex DopplerCTAMRA
First-line✅ Yes❌ No❌ No
Venous assessment✅ Best❌ No❌ Limited
Contrast required✅ None❌ Iodinated⚠️ Gadolinium (optional)
Radiation✅ None❌ Yes✅ None
Renal safety✅ Completely safe⚠️ Risk if eGFR <45⚠️ NSF risk if eGFR <30
Below-knee vessels⚠️ Limited⚠️ Calcification artefact✅ Best
Calcification mapping✅ (acoustic shadowing limits)✅ Best❌ Cannot quantify
Availability/Cost✅ Cheap, widely available✅ Widely available⚠️ Less available, costlier
Stent compatibility✅ N/A✅ Safe⚠️ Check first
Pre-op planning⚠️ Partial✅ Excellent (proximal)✅ Excellent (distal)
Gold standardDSA (not listed here)

Bottom line for this patient: Start with duplex Doppler (arterial + venous, one session, no risk). If revascularisation is planned, proceed to CTA if eGFR is adequate — it best maps proximal disease and calcification burden. Add or substitute MRA (non-contrast sequences if needed) for tibial/pedal vessels, which are the critical territory for this lateral malleolus ulcer. Confirm coronary stent MRI compatibility before MRA.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.