attachment

Interpret ECG

Checking Date & Time
Reading File
Finding Sources
Loading Image
Based on careful analysis of the ECG image provided, here is a structured interpretation:

ECG Interpretation

Technical Details (from paper header):
  • Date: 22-04-2026, Time: 10:23:22
  • Paper speed: 25 mm/s
  • Gain: 10 mm/mV
  • Heart rate: 79 bpm (shown as ♥79)
  • Patient: Шугунова Х.Т.Т., Age 26

Rhythm & Rate

  • Heart rate: 79 bpm — normal
  • Rhythm: Regular sinus rhythm (P waves are visible and upright in I, II, and aVF)
  • P wave axis: Normal (upright in II, inverted in aVR) — confirms sinus origin

Intervals

  • PR interval: Appears normal (~160–180 ms) — no first-degree AV block
  • QRS duration: Appears narrow (<120 ms) — no bundle branch block
  • QT/QTc: Appears within normal limits for rate of 79 bpm

Axis

  • Lead I: positive QRS
  • Lead aVF: appears positive or isoelectric
  • Electrical axis: Normal (approximately 0° to +60°)

P Waves

  • Upright and normal morphology in leads I, II, aVF
  • Inverted in aVR — as expected
  • No signs of left or right atrial enlargement

QRS Complex

  • No pathological Q waves identified in inferior (II, III, aVF) or lateral (I, aVL, V4–V6) leads
  • R wave progression in precordial leads appears appropriate (R waves increasing V1→V5/V6)
  • No left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) criteria evident

ST Segment & T Waves

  • No significant ST elevation or depression in any lead
  • T waves appear upright in lateral and inferior leads
  • T wave in V1–V2 may be slightly flat/biphasic — a common normal variant
  • No acute ischemic changes identified

Overall Interpretation

Normal sinus rhythm at 79 bpm. No acute ST-T changes. No conduction abnormality. Normal ECG for a 26-year-old patient.

Clinical Notes

  • This appears to be a routine ECG in a young (26-year-old) patient
  • No evidence of:
    • Acute myocardial ischemia or infarction
    • Bundle branch block
    • Pre-excitation (no delta waves)
    • Long QT syndrome
    • Arrhythmia
  • Clinical correlation is always recommended — if the patient has symptoms (chest pain, palpitations, syncope), targeted repeat evaluation may be warranted

⚠️ Disclaimer: This interpretation is based on visual analysis of a photographed ECG and is intended as educational support only. It does not replace formal interpretation by a licensed cardiologist or physician in a clinical setting.
attachment

Interpret ECG

Checking Date & Time
Analyzing this ECG carefully from the image:

ECG Interpretation

Technical Details:
  • ID: 40001066
  • Date: 21-04-2026, Time: 04:20:38
  • Paper speed: 25 mm/s
  • Gain: 10 mm/mV
  • Heart rate: 84 bpm
  • Algorithm: SEMIP V1.7

Rhythm & Rate

  • Heart rate: 84 bpm — normal
  • Rhythm: Regular sinus rhythm — P waves visible, consistent morphology, regular R-R intervals
  • P waves upright in II, aVF → sinus origin confirmed

Intervals

  • PR interval: Appears normal (~160–200 ms)
  • QRS duration: Appears narrow — no bundle branch block pattern
  • QT interval: Appears within normal limits for HR 84 bpm

Electrical Axis

  • QRS positive in I and aVF → Normal axis (~+60°)

Key Findings by Region

⚠️ Precordial Leads (V1–V4) — Most Notable Finding

  • V1–V3: Deep, wide QS or rS pattern — poor R wave progression or absent R waves in early precordial leads
  • V1: Predominantly negative (QS pattern)
  • V2–V3: Very deep S waves / QS morphology
  • V4: QS or very small r with deep S
  • This pattern of absent R wave progression V1–V4 raises concern for:
    • Anterior wall myocardial infarction (AMI) — either acute or old/established
    • The deep negative deflections in V1–V3 are significant

ST Segments

  • V1–V3: Possible ST elevation — the baseline appears elevated above the isoelectric line in V1–V3, which combined with QS morphology is consistent with acute anterior STEMI pattern
  • V4–V6: ST segments appear to return toward baseline; T waves may be upright
  • Inferior leads (II, III, aVF): No clear ST elevation; morphology appears relatively preserved

Lateral Leads (I, aVL)

  • QRS appears small; possible reciprocal changes or low voltage
  • aVL: small complex, no obvious ST elevation

🔴 Summary / Impression

⚠️ ABNORMAL ECG — Findings consistent with Anterior Myocardial Infarction
FeatureFinding
RhythmSinus rhythm, 84 bpm
QRSNarrow
R wave progressionAbsent / Poor V1–V4 (QS pattern)
ST changesPossible ST elevation V1–V3
Inferior leadsNo obvious ST changes
Lateral leadsNo clear ST elevation
Differential diagnosis:
  1. Acute anterior STEMI (LAD territory) — ST elevation + QS in V1–V3 → urgent concern
  2. Old anterior MI with persistent ST elevation (LV aneurysm pattern)
  3. LBBB — less likely given narrow QRS
  4. Normal variant — less likely given the degree of changes

🚨 Clinical Recommendation

This ECG pattern — QS complexes in V1–V3 with ST elevation — is a medical emergency until proven otherwise.
Immediate actions required:
  • Serial ECGs and continuous monitoring
  • Troponin I/T (stat and repeat at 3h)
  • Clinical correlation: chest pain, dyspnea, diaphoresis?
  • If acute STEMI confirmed → activate catheterization lab immediately
  • Cardiology consultation urgent

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is a visual analysis of a photographed ECG for educational/supportive purposes only. Formal interpretation by a cardiologist in the clinical context is mandatory before any treatment decision.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.