I have gathered extensive content from Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, Bailey & Love, and Sleisenger & Fordtran (which is co-authored by Doherty and is the closest match). Let me now compile the comprehensive answer.
Peritonitis: A Comprehensive Overview
Sources: Schwartz's Principles of Surgery (11th Ed.), Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery (28th Ed.), Sleisenger & Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease
Classification of Peritonitis
Peritonitis is inflammation of the peritoneum and can be:
- Localised or Diffuse
- Acute or Chronic
- Primary, Secondary, or Tertiary
- Bacterial, Chemical, Granulomatous, or Ischemic
Causes include: bacterial (GI and non-GI), chemical (bile, barium), allergic (starch), traumatic (operative handling), ischemia (strangulated bowel), and miscellaneous (familial Mediterranean fever).
ACUTE SECONDARY BACTERIAL PERITONITIS
Definition
Secondary peritonitis occurs when the peritoneal cavity is contaminated following perforation or severe inflammation and infection of an intra-abdominal organ. Examples include appendicitis, perforated peptic ulcer, diverticulitis, and bowel ischemia.
Pathophysiology
Routes of bacterial entry:
- Transmural inflammation with luminal obstruction
- Perforation of the GI tract
- Bacterial translocation
- Intestinal ischemia
The initial bacterial inoculum is determined by the normal flora of the involved GI segment. The large bowel harbors the richest flora; colonic perforation carries the highest morbidity.
Peritoneal Defense Mechanisms (overwhelmed in peritonitis):
| Category | Mechanism |
|---|
| Removal | Bacterial clearance via diaphragm/thoracic duct |
| Leukocyte-attracting | ICAM-1, VCAM-1, mesothelial microvilli, neutrophil recruitment via omental HEVs |
| Killing | Macrophages (glutamate burst), neutrophils, opsonins (C3b, IgG), fibronectin, mast cell leukotrienes |
| Sequestration | Fibrin trapping, fibrinous adhesions, omental loculation |
Within 6 minutes of intraperitoneal bacterial inoculation, bacteria are cultured in thoracic lymph; within 12 minutes, bacteremia is detectable. This diaphragmatic clearance is why Fowler's position (head-up, pelvis-down) was historically recommended.
Adjuvant substances that worsen outcome by interfering with bacterial killing: devitalized tissue, mucus, bile, hemoglobin, barium.
Peritoneal response:
- The peritoneum becomes reddened, thickened, and velvety
- Plaques of yellow/white fibrin form, causing bowel loops to adhere
- Serous exudate, progressively turbid, eventually forming frank pus
- Reflex ileus occurs
- Bailey & Love, p. 1109
Tertiary peritonitis: When standard therapy fails, patients develop intra-abdominal abscess, anastomotic leak, or tertiary (persistent) peritonitis. This is more common in immunosuppressed patients. Organisms include E. faecalis/faecium, S. epidermidis, C. albicans, and P. aeruginosa - typically in combination. Mortality >50% even with appropriate therapy.
Causative Organisms
The flora of surgical peritonitis rapidly simplifies after contamination. Key organisms:
Aerobes (gram-negative):
- Escherichia coli - most common cause of bacteremia and death in experimental peritonitis
- Klebsiella pneumoniae
- Enterobacter spp.
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa (nosocomial)
Aerobes (gram-positive):
- Enterococcus spp.
- Streptococcus spp.
- Staphylococcus spp. (nosocomial)
Anaerobes:
- Bacteroides fragilis - responsible for abscess formation
- Clostridium spp.
Fungi:
- Candida spp. - treat if septic shock, immunocompromised, or hospital-acquired; can safely observe in hemodynamically stable community-acquired cases
Microbial pattern in ruptured colonic diverticulitis:
- Mixed aerobic + anaerobic flora: 74% of peritonitis, 77% of abscesses
- Anaerobes alone: 18% of abscesses
- Aerobes alone: 5% of abscesses
There is synergy between aerobic and anaerobic bacteria - E. coli drives mortality via bacteremia, while anaerobes (especially B. fragilis) drive abscess formation.
Clinical Findings
Symptoms:
- Abdominal pain - hallmark; sudden onset with perforated viscus, insidious with localized infection
- Character, location, radiation, change over time are diagnostically important
- Nausea and vomiting (due to ileus)
- Anorexia, malaise, lassitude
Signs:
- Patient lies still - movement worsens pain
- Fever 100°F or higher; tachycardia
- Hypotension (late sign of sepsis)
- Localised peritonitis: Involuntary guarding, rebound tenderness at affected area
- Diffuse peritonitis: "Board-like" rigidity, absent bowel sounds, abdominal distension, Hippocratic facies
- Loss of hepatic dullness on percussion = free air (pneumoperitoneum)
- Pelvic peritonitis: deep tenderness on rectal or vaginal examination; referred shoulder tip pain (phrenic irritation, C5 dermatome)
- In obese, elderly, immunosuppressed, CNS-injured, or intoxicated patients: signs may be markedly attenuated
Investigations:
- FBC: leukocytosis (or leukopenia in overwhelming sepsis)
- Serum lactate, electrolytes, LFTs, amylase/lipase
- Erect CXR: Subdiaphragmatic gas = pneumoperitoneum; lateral decubitus film if patient too unwell to stand
- CT abdomen (investigation of choice): Identifies source, free air, fluid collections, abscesses; guides drainage
- Ultrasound: Less specific; useful for pelvic pathology, free fluid
- Laparoscopy: If imaging inconclusive
CT image demonstrating localised sigmoid diverticular perforation (arrow) - Bailey & Love, Fig. 65.7
Differential Diagnosis
Secondary peritonitis has numerous causes:
| Category | Specific Cause |
|---|
| Upper GI | Perforated peptic ulcer (gastric or duodenal) |
| Hepatobiliary | Acute cholecystitis, bile duct perforation, biliary peritonitis |
| Pancreatic | Acute pancreatitis |
| Small bowel | Ischemia, obstruction with strangulation, Crohn's perforation |
| Large bowel | Diverticulitis, colonic perforation (obstructed/ischemic), appendicitis |
| Pelvic | PID, ruptured ectopic pregnancy, tubo-ovarian abscess |
| Post-surgical | Anastomotic leak, iatrogenic perforation |
| Vascular | Ruptured AAA (hemorrhagic peritonitis) |
| Autoimmune | SLE, endometriosis (peritoneal irritation but rarely clinical peritonitis) |
Non-bacterial causes to exclude:
- Hemorrhagic peritonitis - ruptured ectopic pregnancy, ovarian cyst, aneurysm; blood is highly irritating to peritoneum
- Biliary peritonitis - sterile bile can be surprisingly asymptomatic; contaminated bile causes florid peritonitis
- Sleisenger, p. 640
Treatment
The three pillars are: source control + antibiotic therapy + supportive care
1. General/Supportive Care
- IV fluid resuscitation (correct fluid and electrolyte imbalance)
- Urinary catheter + nasogastric drainage
- Analgesia
- Vital system support (ICU if needed)
2. Antibiotic Therapy
Community-acquired peritonitis: Coverage for susceptible gram-negative bacilli, strict anaerobes, and enterococci.
Hospital/healthcare-acquired peritonitis: Broader coverage for resistant organisms (MRSA, multiresistant Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Candida).
Regimen options (shown equivalent in multiple trials):
- Second- or third-generation cephalosporins
- Broad-spectrum beta-lactams (monotherapy as effective as beta-lactam + aminoglycoside)
- Fluoroquinolones + metronidazole
- Carbapenems (for healthcare-associated/resistant)
- Aminoglycosides are now rarely needed given availability of broad-spectrum agents with less nephrotoxicity
Duration: The STOP-IT trial showed 4 ± 1 days post-source-control was equivalent to antibiotics until fever/leukocytosis resolved (~8 days).
Candida: Treat only if: septic shock, immunocompromised state, or hospital-acquired infection.
3. Surgical Intervention (Source Control)
- Antibiotics without source control cannot cure surgical peritonitis
- Requires: Resection or repair of diseased organ; debridement of necrotic tissue; peritoneal lavage
- Intra-abdominal abscesses: Majority drained percutaneously under CT guidance; surgery reserved for multiple abscesses, proximity to vital structures, or ongoing enteric leak
- Catheter left until output <10 mL/day and cavity collapse confirmed; short antibiotic course (3-5 days) during drainage
Outcomes:
- Effective source control + antibiotics: mortality ~5-6%; response rate 70-90%
- Failure of source control: mortality >40%
- Schwartz, p. 199-200
DETOXICATION (PERITONEAL CLEARANCE)
The peritoneum has a remarkable ability to clear bacteria and toxins:
- Diaphragmatic lymphatics: The primary clearance site - bacteria pass through diaphragmatic stomata into the thoracic duct, reaching systemic circulation within 6-12 minutes
- Phagocytosis by peritoneal macrophages and recruited neutrophils, aided by complement (C3b), IgG, and fibronectin as opsonins
- Omental loculation: The "policeman of the abdomen" - the omentum physically walls off infection, limiting spread
- Fibrin deposition traps bacteria but also leads to adhesion formation
Blockade of the thoracic duct in animal models decreases bacteremic episodes but increases mortality (due to liver necrosis from endotoxin accumulation), confirming that systemic clearance via the diaphragm is protective.
PRIMARY PERITONITIS (Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis - SBP)
Definition
Peritonitis without a known surgical source - microbial invasion of the peritoneal cavity via hematogenous dissemination or direct inoculation into pre-existing ascitic fluid.
Who is at risk?
- Cirrhosis with ascites (most common)
- Nephrotic syndrome with ascites
- Patients on peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)
- Children (pneumococcal primary peritonitis - historically, now rare)
Organisms
- Without CAPD: E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. pneumoniae (gram-negatives predominate)
- With CAPD: Gram-positives dominate (S. epidermidis, other skin flora); less commonly gram-negative bacilli, Pseudomonas, fungi, Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- SBP is invariably monomicrobial; polymicrobial infection suggests secondary peritonitis
Diagnosis
- Paracentesis: >250 neutrophils/mL in ascitic fluid
- Culture is negative in up to 60% of cases with clinical SBP
- A floridly positive Gram stain suggests secondary bacterial peritonitis (high bacterial load)
- Runyon criteria used to differentiate SBP from secondary peritonitis (total protein, LDH, glucose on ascitic fluid)
Treatment
- No surgical intervention required
- Empirical antibiotics immediately (before culture results):
- Third-generation cephalosporin (e.g., cefotaxime) - first-line (avoids aminoglycoside renal toxicity)
- Alternatives: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin
- CAPD peritonitis: intraperitoneal route preferred; vancomycin or cephalosporin empirically; catheter removal for fungal or recurrent bacterial infections
- Duration: 14-21 days typically
- Indwelling devices (CAPD catheter) may need removal for recurrent infections
- Bailey & Love, p. 1111; Schwartz, p. 198-199
Primary Pneumococcal Peritonitis
- Incidence has declined greatly; now rare
- Affects children, especially girls (route: vagina → Fallopian tubes) or via blood-borne spread from respiratory/middle-ear infection
- Also in nephrotic syndrome and cirrhosis in children
- Onset: Sudden; pain lower abdomen; temperature ≥39°C; frequent vomiting; after 24-48h, profuse diarrhea (characteristic); increased urinary frequency
- Signs: diffuse peritonism but less prominent than with perforated viscus
- Causative organism confirmed on culture; must exclude secondary cause before labelling as primary peritonitis
- Bailey & Love, p. 1111
GONOCOCCAL PERITONITIS (Fitz-Hugh-Curtis Syndrome)
Pathogenesis
- Pelvic infection via the Fallopian tubes accounts for a high proportion of non-gastrointestinal peritonitis
- Chlamydia spp. and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are the most common offending organisms
- These organisms cause thinning of cervical mucus, allowing bacteria to pass into the uterus and oviducts, causing pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
- Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome: Transperitoneal spread of gonococcal/chlamydial organisms to the liver capsule, causing perihepatitis with formation of violin-string scar tissue on Glisson's capsule
- 10-40% of women with untreated lower-tract gonococcal infection progress to PID (salpingitis, endometritis, oophoritis, peritonitis)
- Bailey & Love, p. 1110; Sleisenger, p. 643 (Box 39.2)
Clinical Features
- Abdominal pain (may mimic acute abdomen)
- Cervical motion tenderness, adnexal tenderness
- In Fitz-Hugh-Curtis: right upper quadrant pain (perihepatitis), pleuritic component
- Vaginal discharge
Treatment
- Antibiotic therapy for PID (dual therapy covering gonorrhea and chlamydia per current guidelines)
- No surgical intervention unless complicated (tubo-ovarian abscess requiring drainage)
TUBERCULOUS PERITONITIS
Epidemiology & Risk Factors
- Uncommon form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- Increased risk in: HIV infection, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, underlying malignancy
- Sleisenger, p. 643
Pathogenesis
- Spread from: tuberculous lymph node, intestinal focus, or infected Fallopian tube
- Haematogenous seeding can also occur
Clinical Forms
- Exudative (wet) type: Ascites predominates (straw-coloured exudate)
- Plastic (dry) type: Dense fibrinous adhesions, omental thickening, bowel obstruction; insidious onset with abdominal pain, weight loss, distension
- Fibrotic/fixed (mixed) type
Clinical Features
- Abdominal pain, night sweats, malaise, weight loss
- Ascites (may be loculated)
- Can present as a pelvic mass mimicking ovarian cancer (elevated CA-125)
- May be clinically indistinguishable from acute bacterial peritonitis in its acute form
- Bailey & Love, p. 1111
Diagnostic Investigations
| Test | Finding |
|---|
| Ascitic fluid protein | High (>25-30 g/L) |
| Ascitic fluid glucose | Low |
| SAAG | Low (<1.1 g/dL) in non-cirrhotic patients |
| Ascitic WBC | Elevated, lymphocytic predominance (>40%) |
| AFB smear | Often negative |
| Culture | May take 4-8 weeks |
| Adenosine deaminase (ADA) | Elevated - high sensitivity and specificity for TB peritonitis; differentiates from carcinomatosis |
| Xpert MTB/RIF (PCR) | Rapid, noninvasive; emerging role |
| ELISPOT | Novel noninvasive test |
| QuantiFERON Gold | Poor specificity for active disease, especially in BCG-vaccinated populations |
| CT/Ultrasound | Ascites, lymphadenopathy, diffuse peritoneal/omental/mesenteric thickening |
| Laparoscopy + biopsy | Near-100% sensitive; couples macroscopic appearances (caseating nodules) with histology |
Distinguishing feature: Afebrile patients with lymphocytic ascites → malignancy (10x more common than TB); febrile patients → TB
Cancer: cytology positive >90% → avoid laparoscopy; if cytology negative → laparoscopy (near 100% sensitive for TB)
Treatment
- Medical (first-line):
- 2 months: Isoniazid + Rifampicin + Pyrazinamide + Ethambutol
- Then 4 months: Isoniazid + Rifampicin
- Total: 6-month course
- Drug-resistant strains may require extended or modified regimens
- Monitor for hepatotoxicity, especially in cirrhotic patients
- Surgical: Only for complications (intestinal obstruction - though may respond to anti-TB therapy without surgery)
- Nutritional and hydration support
- Sleisenger, p. 643-644; Bailey & Love, p. 1111
GRANULOMATOUS PERITONITIS
Definition
Peritoneal inflammation characterized by granuloma formation. Often has a chronic, indolent course.
Causes
- Tuberculous peritonitis (caseating granulomas) - most common infective cause
- Starch/Talc peritonitis: Historically from surgical glove powder (cornstarch or talc)
- Cornstarch potentiates wound infection, forms peritoneal adhesions, induces granulomatous peritonitis, and serves as a carrier of latex allergen
- Glove powder granulomas can mimic peritoneal carcinomatosis on imaging
- Sleisenger, p. 643
- Fungal infections (Histoplasma, Coccidioides, Cryptococcus) - especially in AIDS/immunocompromised
- Sarcoidosis
- Crohn's disease
- Foreign body (suture material, barium from previous contrast studies)
- Parasitic (e.g., schistosomiasis)
Clinical Features
- Abdominal pain (may be sudden or insidious depending on cause)
- Ascites with lymphocytic predominance
- Constitutional symptoms (fever, weight loss)
Diagnosis
- CT: peritoneal thickening, ascites, nodular deposits (indistinguishable from carcinomatosis)
- Laparoscopy + biopsy with histology is definitive
- AFB staining and culture for TB
- Ascitic ADA for TB
Treatment
Directed at the underlying cause:
- TB: anti-tuberculous regimen as above
- Starch peritonitis: supportive; steroids in severe cases
- Fungal: amphotericin B or azole antifungals
- Foreign body: surgical removal when feasible
PERITONEAL ADHESIONS
Definition
Fibrous bands of scar tissue connecting surfaces within the peritoneal cavity that are normally separate.
Pathogenesis
After peritoneal injury (surgical, inflammatory, ischemic), fibrin is deposited as part of the healing response (sequestration mechanism). Normally, fibrin is lysed by peritoneal fibrinolytic activity. When fibrinolysis is inadequate (e.g., due to ongoing ischemia, infection, or foreign material), fibrin organizes into permanent fibrous adhesions.
Factors promoting adhesion formation:
- Peritoneal infection or inflammation
- Surgical trauma (drying, handling, devascularization of peritoneum)
- Foreign bodies (sutures, mesh, glove powder, barium)
- Ischemia
- CAPD peritonitis (repeated infections lead to sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis / "abdominal cocoon")
Clinical Consequences
- Small bowel obstruction (most common consequence; adhesions account for ~60% of all SBO cases)
- Chronic abdominal pain
- Infertility (in females - tubo-ovarian adhesions from PID or pelvic surgery)
- Difficulty at re-operative surgery
- Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (abdominal cocoon): Complication of repeated CAPD peritonitis; loss of surface area for effective dialysis; associated with repeated infections
Prevention
- Gentle tissue handling during surgery
- Use of adhesion barriers (sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose membrane, e.g., Seprafilm) in high-risk cases
- Peritoneal lavage to remove blood, fibrin, and contamination
- Minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery produces fewer adhesions than open surgery
- Heparin addition to dialysis bags in CAPD peritonitis may reduce fibrin and postinfection adhesions (though urokinase showed no benefit)
Treatment of Adhesion-Related SBO
- Conservative: IV fluids, NG decompression, monitoring
- Surgical: Adhesiolysis (open or laparoscopic) for complete obstruction or failure of conservative management; risk of enterotomy and recurrent adhesions
Summary Table: Key Comparisons
| Feature | Primary (SBP) | Secondary Bacterial | Tuberculous | Granulomatous |
|---|
| Source | No surgical source | Viscus perforation/inflammation | M. tuberculosis | TB, fungi, starch, FB |
| Organisms | Monomicrobial | Polymicrobial (aerobes + anaerobes) | M. tuberculosis | Varies |
| Ascites WBC | >250 PMNs | High PMNs | Lymphocytic >40% | Lymphocytic |
| ADA | Normal | Normal | Elevated | Elevated (TB) |
| Gram stain | Negative (low bacterial load) | Positive/florid | Negative | Negative |
| Surgery needed | No | Yes (source control) | Only complications | Only complications |
| Treatment | Antibiotics 14-21d | Source control + antibiotics 4d | 6-month anti-TB | Cause-directed |
Sources:
- Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 11th Ed., pp. 198-200
- Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th Ed., pp. 1109-1113
- Sleisenger & Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, pp. 639-647