I now have extensive, rich content from multiple authoritative textbooks. Let me compile the comprehensive notes covering the first three subtopics: (1) Introduction, Epidemiology & Etiology; (2) Pathogenesis, Correa Cascade & Molecular Biology; (3) Classification & Pathology.
CARCINOMA STOMACH (GASTRIC CANCER) - MASTER NOTES FOR SURGERY EXAM
Part 1 of 3: Introduction + Epidemiology + Etiology & Risk Factors
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW
Carcinoma of the stomach is one of the most important and highest-yield topics in surgery exams. It demands integration of pathology, surgery, medicine, and oncology. Mastering this topic means understanding not just facts but the "why" behind each clinical decision.
Definition: Gastric cancer refers to malignant neoplasms arising from the gastric mucosa. The vast majority (>90-95%) are adenocarcinomas arising from the glandular epithelium. The remainder include lymphoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids), and rare types like squamous cell carcinoma, angiosarcoma, and carcinosarcoma.
Why it matters clinically: Despite a declining incidence in Western countries, gastric cancer remains the 3rd leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide (Sleisenger & Fordtran). It is often diagnosed late because early disease is asymptomatic, and late disease carries a dismal prognosis (5-year survival ~27% in the US, much worse globally).
Key exam hook: The stomach is also occasionally involved by secondary malignancies - hematogenous spread from melanoma or breast cancer, direct extension from colon/pancreas, or peritoneal dissemination from ovary/appendix (Schwartz's Surgery, p. 1166).
SECTION 2: EPIDEMIOLOGY
2.1 Global Burden
- Gastric cancer is the 4th most common cancer and the 2nd leading cause of cancer death worldwide (Schwartz's Surgery).
- Over 1 million new cases per year globally; estimated 700,000+ deaths per year.
- The incidence is declining overall due to reduced H. pylori prevalence and better food preservation.
- Most cases (>70%) occur in developing countries.
2.2 Geographic Distribution (HIGH YIELD)
- High incidence regions: East Asia (Japan, Korea, China), Eastern Europe, South America (Chile, Costa Rica), Portugal.
- Low incidence regions: North America, Northern Europe, Africa, Southeast Asia.
- Incidence is up to 20 times higher in Japan, Chile, Costa Rica, and Eastern Europe compared to North America (Robbins Pathology).
- Japan and Korea have implemented national endoscopic screening programs due to high incidence - this leads to early detection and better outcomes there.
Classic Exam Point - Migration Studies: Japanese migrants to the United States have a lower gastric cancer incidence than Japanese natives living in Japan. Their children (second generation) have an even lower incidence approaching that of white Americans. This clearly demonstrates the dominant role of environmental factors (over genetic factors) in the intestinal-type of gastric cancer.
2.3 Age & Sex
- Primarily a disease of the elderly - peak incidence in 6th-7th decade.
- Male > Female (M:F ratio approximately 2:1).
- In younger patients (under 40), tumors are more often of the diffuse type - large, aggressive, poorly differentiated, may involve the entire stomach (linitis plastica). Diffuse type does NOT show the same geographic variation as intestinal type.
- In the United States: approximately 28,000 new cases per year; 10,960 deaths per year (Schwartz's).
2.4 Racial & Socioeconomic Factors
- Twice as common in Blacks compared to Whites in the USA (Schwartz's Surgery).
- Higher incidence in lower socioeconomic groups - linked to H. pylori infection, poor diet, and lack of refrigeration (reliance on preserved/salted food).
- Incidence of gastric cancer in Blacks in the USA is nearly double that of Whites (Sleisenger & Fordtran).
2.5 Changing Trends
- Distal (antral/body) cancers are decreasing in incidence in Western countries.
- Proximal (cardia/gastroesophageal junction - GEJ) cancers are increasing in incidence - linked to rising rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett's esophagus, and obesity (Robbins Pathology).
- Among non-Hispanic whites in the USA, there is an increased incidence of non-cardia gastric cancer among younger persons, particularly women (Fischer's Mastery of Surgery).
SECTION 3: ETIOLOGY & RISK FACTORS
This is one of the most tested areas. Every risk factor must be known with its mechanism.
3.1 Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) - THE MOST IMPORTANT RISK FACTOR
Exam pearl: H. pylori is the single most important and modifiable risk factor for distal (non-cardia) gastric adenocarcinoma.
- H. pylori infects approximately 50% of the world's population, but only a small fraction develop gastric cancer, implying co-factors are necessary.
- H. pylori is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the World Health Organization (WHO/IARC).
- H. pylori causes chronic active gastritis → atrophic gastritis → intestinal metaplasia → dysplasia → carcinoma (the Correa cascade - see Section 2 in next notes).
- CagA (cytotoxin-associated gene A) positive strains are particularly virulent and more strongly associated with cancer. CagA activates the SHP-2 tyrosine phosphatase, acting as an oncogenic signal.
- VacA (vacuolating cytotoxin) is another important virulence factor.
- H. pylori is more strongly associated with intestinal type gastric cancer and antral/body location (distal).
- H. pylori is also causally linked to primary gastric MALT lymphoma (Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue lymphoma).
- Eradication of H. pylori reduces but does not eliminate the risk of gastric cancer.
3.2 Dietary Risk Factors
-
Increased risk:
- Diet high in smoked, salted, pickled, and nitrate-preserved foods (traditional in Japan, Korea, parts of Eastern Europe)
- Nitrates and nitrites in processed meats - converted to carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds (nitrosamines) by bacterial action (promoted by achlorhydria)
- High-salt diet - damages gastric mucosa, promotes H. pylori colonization
- Low intake of fresh fruits and vegetables
-
Decreased risk:
- Antioxidant-rich diet (fresh fruits and vegetables containing Vitamin C, beta-carotene, Vitamin E) - these inhibit nitrosamine formation
- Refrigeration of food (reduced reliance on salt/smoking for preservation) is the main reason for the dramatic 20th-century decline in gastric cancer
3.3 Other Environmental Risk Factors
| Risk Factor | Mechanism / Comment |
|---|
| Cigarette smoking | Directly introduces carcinogens; promotes H. pylori; increases risk ~1.5-2x |
| Alcohol | Weak association; may act as a co-carcinogen |
| Obesity | Particularly associated with cardia/GEJ cancers via GERD/Barrett's |
| Radiation exposure | Increased risk in atomic bomb survivors (Hiroshima/Nagasaki) |
| Occupational | Rubber, coal, tin mining industries |
3.4 Genetic & Hereditary Risk Factors
- Blood group A: Consistently associated with higher risk - exact mechanism unclear, may relate to altered mucin expression or immune response.
- Family history: First-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients have 2-3x increased risk.
- Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC):
- Caused by germline mutations in CDH1 (E-cadherin gene)
- Autosomal dominant inheritance
- Diffuse type gastric cancer, often early onset
- Lifetime risk of gastric cancer: 67-83% in males, 56-83% in females
- Also associated with lobular breast cancer in females
- Management: Prophylactic total gastrectomy is recommended once mutation confirmed
- CDH1 somatic mutations found in ~50% of sporadic diffuse gastric cancers (Robbins)
- Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): Mismatch repair gene mutations; gastric cancer is part of the tumor spectrum (though colon is primary).
- Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): Slightly increased risk.
- BRCA2 mutations: Associated with modestly increased risk.
- Li-Fraumeni syndrome (TP53 mutations): Gastric cancer in spectrum.
3.5 Premalignant Conditions (HIGH YIELD TABLE)
These conditions increase the risk of gastric cancer and require surveillance:
| Condition | Risk Level | Mechanism | Surveillance |
|---|
| Chronic atrophic gastritis | High | Loss of parietal/chief cells → achlorhydria → bacterial overgrowth → nitrosamines; may progress to metaplasia | Endoscopy every 3 years (OLGA/OLGIM stage 3-4) |
| Intestinal metaplasia | High | Goblet cell replacement of gastric epithelium; type III (incomplete) most worrisome | Regular endoscopic surveillance |
| Gastric dysplasia | Very High | Architectural and cytological atypia; high-grade dysplasia treated as early cancer | Endoscopic resection or gastrectomy for high-grade |
| Adenomatous gastric polyps | Moderate | Adenomas (not hyperplastic polyps) are premalignant; risk correlates with size (>2cm) and villous architecture | Endoscopic polypectomy + biopsy |
| Pernicious anemia (autoimmune atrophic gastritis) | Moderate (3-18x) | Achlorhydria, high gastrin, type A gastritis (corpus-predominant) | Surveillance endoscopy every 3 years |
| Post-gastrectomy stomach (gastric stump) | Moderate (2-4x) | After partial gastrectomy for PUD - onset typically 15-20 years later; bile reflux, hypochlorhydria, chronic gastritis are responsible | Surveillance after 15-20 years |
| Ménétrier disease | Low-moderate | Giant rugal hypertrophy; protein-losing gastropathy; mechanism unclear | Clinical monitoring |
| Gastric ulcer | Low | Must always biopsy and recheck at 6-8 weeks to exclude malignancy | |
Note: Duodenal ulcer does NOT carry increased risk. Peptic ulcer disease per se does not increase risk, but the post-gastrectomy state does (Robbins Pathology, Schwartz's Surgery).
3.6 The OLGA and OLGIM Staging Systems
- OLGA (Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment) - grades atrophic gastritis based on histology from ≥5 biopsies (antrum lesser/greater curve, corpus lesser/greater curve, angularis incisura)
- OLGIM (Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia) - grades intestinal metaplasia instead; more reproducible between pathologists
- Stage 3-4 in either system = high risk → surveillance endoscopy every 3 years
- Serum markers in atrophic gastritis: ↑ serum gastrin + ↓ pepsinogen I ratio (due to corpus atrophy) + ↓ B12 (loss of intrinsic factor) + iron deficiency (loss of acid for iron absorption) (Schwartz's Surgery)
3.7 EBV-Associated Gastric Cancer
- Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is found in approximately 10% of gastric adenocarcinomas (Robbins Pathology)
- EBV infects gastric epithelial cells → latent infection → promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes (PIK3CA mutations common)
- Tends to occur in the proximal stomach/cardia, in males
- Better prognosis compared to H. pylori-associated or diffuse type
- Molecularly distinct subtype recognized by TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas)
QUICK RECALL MNEMONICS & EXAM TRICKS
Risk factors - "ABCDE + GHI":
- A - Atrophic gastritis, Adenomatous polyps, Blood group A
- B - Barrett's (for cardia), Blood group A
- C - Cigarettes, CDH1 (E-cadherin mutation)
- D - Diet (smoked/salted/pickled), H. pylori (Developing countries)
- E - EBV, Environmental factors
- G - Genetics (family history, Lynch, FAP)
- H - H. pylori (most important modifiable risk factor)
- I - Intestinal metaplasia
The 3 "WHOs" of H. pylori:
- WHO Group 1 carcinogen
- Nobel Prize 2005 to Barry Marshall and Robin Warren
- ~50% world population infected but only small % get cancer (co-factors needed)
EXAM-STYLE QUESTIONS (PAST PAPER PATTERN)
Q1. Most important risk factor for carcinoma stomach?
→ H. pylori infection (for distal/non-cardia type)
Q2. What is the significance of migration studies in gastric cancer?
→ Japanese migrants to USA develop lower rates of gastric cancer (approaching US rates), and their children even lower. This proves environmental factors dominate over genetic in intestinal-type gastric cancer.
Q3. A patient with pernicious anemia asks about cancer surveillance. What do you advise?
→ Endoscopic surveillance every 3 years due to chronic atrophic gastritis (autoimmune type A gastritis) and associated increased risk.
Q4. Why is blood group A associated with gastric cancer?
→ Exact mechanism unclear; may relate to altered surface glycoproteins, immune surveillance differences, or susceptibility to H. pylori infection/virulence.
Q5. Which type of gastric cancer is increasing in Western countries?
→ Proximal/cardia gastric cancer (GEJ tumors) - related to GERD, Barrett's esophagus, and rising obesity rates.
Sources: Schwartz's Principles of Surgery 11e; Robbins & Kumar Basic Pathology; Sleisenger & Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease 11e; Fischer's Mastery of Surgery 8e
Now here are the next two subtopics as promised (Subtopics 2 and 3):
SECTION 4: PATHOGENESIS & THE CORREA CASCADE (SUBTOPIC 2)
4.1 The Two Main Histological Types: Lauren Classification
The Lauren Classification (1965) divides gastric adenocarcinoma into two main types with completely different biology, behavior, and epidemiology. This is one of the most tested classifications in exams.
| Feature | Intestinal Type | Diffuse Type |
|---|
| Also called | Epidemic type, expanding type | Endemic type, infiltrative type |
| Incidence trend | Declining (esp. in West) | Stable or increasing |
| Geographic association | High-risk areas (Japan, Korea, E. Europe) | More uniform worldwide |
| Age | Older adults | Younger patients |
| Sex | M > F | M = F (slightly more equal) |
| Location | Antrum and lesser curvature, then cardia | Body of stomach, entire stomach |
| Gross appearance | Ulcerated or polypoid mass | Diffuse infiltration (linitis plastica) |
| Histology | Gland-forming, cohesive cells, resembles intestinal glands | Signet ring cells, non-cohesive, infiltrative |
| Molecular marker | Intestinal metaplasia precursor | Loss of E-cadherin (CDH1 mutation) |
| H. pylori role | Strong association | Less associated |
| Prognosis | Relatively better | Worse |
| Environmental factors | Dominant role | Genetic/molecular role more prominent |
| Spread | More often hematogenous | More often transcoelomic/peritoneal |
Third type - Indeterminate/Mixed: ~15% cases cannot be classified.
4.2 WHO 2019 Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma
The WHO classifies gastric adenocarcinoma by histological pattern:
- Tubular - most common; tubular or acinar structures
- Papillary - papillary projections; aggressive; hepatic metastases common
- Mucinous (colloid) - >50% extracellular mucin pools; worse prognosis
- Poorly cohesive carcinoma (including signet ring cell) - isolated cells or small groups; signet ring cells have mucin displacing the nucleus to periphery
- Mixed adenocarcinoma
4.3 The Correa Cascade (MUST KNOW)
The Correa cascade (named after Pelayo Correa) describes the stepwise progression from normal gastric mucosa to intestinal-type gastric carcinoma, driven primarily by H. pylori infection:
Normal gastric mucosa
↓ (H. pylori infection → chronic inflammation)
Chronic superficial gastritis
↓ (decades of persistent inflammation)
Chronic atrophic gastritis
↓ (loss of native glandular tissue)
Intestinal metaplasia (type I → type II → type III/incomplete)
↓ (progressive molecular changes)
Dysplasia (low-grade → high-grade)
↓ (final genetic events)
Invasive intestinal-type adenocarcinoma
Key details of each step:
-
Chronic superficial gastritis - H. pylori colonizes the antrum first (antral-predominant gastritis); peptic ulcer disease may result from this pattern (increased acid secretion)
-
Chronic atrophic gastritis - Progresses over years/decades; loss of specialized cells (parietal cells and chief cells); achlorhydria develops; bacteria can now colonize the stomach (normally killed by acid) → convert dietary nitrates to carcinogenic nitrosamines; H. pylori may or may not be detectable at this stage (may have been cleared by the hostile environment)
-
Intestinal metaplasia (IM) - Gastric mucosa replaced by cells resembling intestinal epithelium with goblet cells:
- Type I (complete): Resembles small intestinal mucosa; SI-type mucins (sialomucins); lower risk
- Type II (incomplete): Mixed gastric and intestinal features; gastric-type mucins
- Type III (incomplete, colonic type): Expresses sulphomucins (sulphated mucins) + colonic-type antigens; HIGHEST malignant potential
-
Dysplasia - Cytological and architectural atypia without invasion:
- Low-grade dysplasia (LGD): May regress; endoscopic surveillance
- High-grade dysplasia (HGD): Treated as early cancer; requires endoscopic or surgical resection
-
Carcinoma - Final stage; invasion through basement membrane
Why the Correa cascade matters clinically: It explains why H. pylori eradication early in the cascade can prevent cancer, but eradication after atrophic gastritis/IM may not fully reverse the risk (the "point of no return").
4.4 Molecular Pathogenesis
For Intestinal-Type Gastric Cancer (step-by-step molecular events):
- Wnt/APC pathway activation - rare somatic APC mutations in gastric cancer (unlike colon cancer where APC is an early event)
- Microsatellite instability (MSI) - ~20% of gastric cancers; associated with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (epigenetic silencing); better prognosis; responds to immunotherapy
- TP53 mutations - very common in gastric cancer (~50%)
- KRAS mutations - less common than in colorectal cancer
- Epigenetic changes (promoter hypermethylation) - CDH1, MLH1, RUNX3, CDKN2A (p16) silenced
For Diffuse-Type Gastric Cancer:
- CDH1 (E-cadherin) loss is the central event:
- Germline mutations → Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC)
- Somatic mutations or promoter methylation → Sporadic diffuse gastric cancer
- E-cadherin is essential for epithelial intercellular adhesion; its loss leads to cell-cell detachment, individual cell infiltration (signet ring pattern), and early peritoneal spread
- RHOA mutations - found in ~15% of diffuse type
- Loss of other cell adhesion molecules
TCGA Molecular Classification (4 Subtypes - increasingly asked in PG exams):
-
EBV-associated (EBVaGC) - ~9%:
- PIK3CA mutations, extreme DNA hypermethylation (CIMP-high), PD-L1/L2 amplification
- Proximal stomach; male predominance; best prognosis
- Amenable to immunotherapy (high PD-L1 expression)
-
Microsatellite Instable (MSI) - ~22%:
- MLH1 hypermethylation; high mutation burden; MSI-High
- Antrum/pylorus predominant; older female patients
- Best prognosis; responds to immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab approved)
-
Genomically Stable (GS) - ~20%:
- RHOA mutations; CDH1 loss; corresponds to diffuse Lauren type
- Younger patients; worst prognosis; early peritoneal dissemination
-
Chromosomal Instable (CIN) - ~50%:
- Most common; TP53 mutations; receptor tyrosine kinase amplifications (ERBB2/HER2, EGFR, VEGFR2)
- GEJ/cardia predominant; intestinal Lauren type
- HER2 amplification (~20%) - target for trastuzumab therapy
4.5 Spread of Gastric Cancer
Understanding routes of spread is essential for staging and treatment decisions:
1. Direct Extension (Local Spread)
- Into the gastric wall layers (mucosa → submucosa → muscularis propria → serosa)
- Once serosa is breached: spreads to adjacent organs
- Anteriorly: Left lobe of liver, anterior abdominal wall
- Posteriorly: Pancreas (most common), transverse colon, spleen, left kidney, adrenal
- Superiorly: Esophagus (cardia tumors)
- Inferiorly: Duodenum (pyloric tumors)
2. Lymphatic Spread (most important route for surgical planning)
- First to regional lymph nodes: Perigastric nodes (N1)
- Then to more distant nodes: Celiac axis, splenic hilum, hepatoduodenal ligament, para-aortic nodes (N2-N3)
- Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer classification: D1, D2, D3 lymph node dissection based on nodal stations
- Virchow's node (Troisier's sign): Left supraclavicular node involvement - indicates distant spread via thoracic duct; a palpable left supraclavicular node = M1 disease
3. Hematogenous Spread
- Via portal vein → liver (most common hematogenous site)
- Then lungs (via systemic circulation)
- Bones, adrenals, brain (less common)
4. Transcoelomic (Peritoneal) Spread
- Once serosa is breached, tumor cells shed into peritoneal cavity
- Krukenberg tumors: Transcoelomic spread to ovaries - bilateral ovarian masses composed of mucin-secreting signet ring cells; more common with diffuse type
- Sister Mary Joseph's nodule: Umbilical metastasis via falciform ligament; indicates peritoneal dissemination
- Blumer's shelf: Deposits in rectovesical/rectouterine pouch (pouch of Douglas) palpable on rectal examination as a shelf-like mass
- Malignant ascites with positive peritoneal cytology (M1 stage)
5. Implantation
- During surgical manipulation
EXAM MNEMONIC for distant spread signs:
- Virchow's node = Left supraclavicular (V for supraclaVicular)
- Krukenberg = oVaries (K for Krukenberg)
- Blumer's shelf = Bottom (rectovesical pouch)
- Sister Mary Joseph = Surface of umbilicus
SECTION 5: CLASSIFICATION & PATHOLOGY OF GASTRIC CANCER (SUBTOPIC 3)
5.1 Macroscopic/Gross Classification
Borrmann Classification (for ADVANCED Gastric Cancer - most commonly used by surgeons)
| Type | Description | Features |
|---|
| Type I - Polypoid (Fungating) | Well-defined polypoid/exophytic mass; does NOT ulcerate | Best prognosis; sharp margin |
| Type II - Ulcerated with raised edges | Ulcer with distinct raised everted margins; no infiltration beyond ulcer | Relatively better prognosis |
| Type III - Ulcerated with infiltration | Ulcer with ill-defined margins that merge into surrounding tissue | Intermediate prognosis |
| Type IV - Diffuse infiltrating | No distinct ulcer or mass; diffuse infiltration of gastric wall → Linitis plastica ("leather bottle stomach") | Worst prognosis |
Linitis plastica (Borrmann IV):
- Diffuse submucosal/muscularis infiltration by signet ring cells
- Stomach loses its normal distensibility - becomes stiff like a "leather bottle"
- Mostly diffuse-type (Lauren) adenocarcinoma
- Associated with peritoneal dissemination and very poor prognosis
- On imaging: Non-distensible, rigid stomach with thickened walls
Japanese Classification of Early Gastric Cancer (EGC):
Early gastric cancer = confined to mucosa and submucosa regardless of lymph node status (this is the Japanese definition - very important!):
- Type I - Protruded: Elevated above mucosal surface >5mm
- Type II - Superficial:
- IIa - Superficial elevated (<5mm elevation)
- IIb - Flat
- IIc - Superficial depressed (most common EGC type)
- Type III - Excavated: Deep ulcer formation
- Mixed types also occur (e.g., IIc + III most common mixed type)
Why EGC is important: 5-year survival is >90% in Japan when detected at early stage; treatment can be endoscopic resection (EMR/ESD) for selected cases.
5.2 Histological Features
Intestinal Type
- Malignant glands closely packed, resembling intestinal mucosa
- Cohesive cells forming tubular or papillary structures
- Preceded by intestinal metaplasia (background atrophic gastritis)
- Well-to-moderately differentiated usually
Diffuse Type
- Signet ring cells: Large mucin vacuole displaces nucleus to periphery (crescent shape)
- Cells infiltrate individually or in small clusters - NO gland formation
- Intense desmoplastic reaction (fibrosis) → rigid stomach wall
- Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain highlights the intracellular mucin in signet ring cells
Mucinous Adenocarcinoma
-
50% of tumor composed of extracellular mucin pools with floating clusters of malignant cells
- Associated with microsatellite instability
5.3 Anatomical Location (Distribution)
- Antrum and pylorus: ~35-40% (most common location overall)
- Lesser curvature: Common (the "maggot" or "saddle" ulcer on lesser curve)
- Cardia/GEJ: ~25-30% (increasing in Western countries)
- Body (fundus): ~15-20%
- Greater curvature: Least common for cancer (but common for benign conditions)
- Diffuse (entire stomach): Linitis plastica type
5.4 Grading
| Grade | Description |
|---|
| G1 - Well differentiated | >95% gland formation |
| G2 - Moderately differentiated | 50-95% gland formation |
| G3 - Poorly differentiated | <50% gland formation |
| G4 - Undifferentiated | No gland formation |
Poor differentiation = worse prognosis. Diffuse type is usually G3/G4.
5.5 TNM Staging System (AJCC 8th Edition)
T - Primary Tumor:
| Stage | Description |
|---|
| Tis | Carcinoma in situ; intraepithelial tumor without lamina propria invasion |
| T1a | Invades lamina propria or muscularis mucosae |
| T1b | Invades submucosa |
| T2 | Invades muscularis propria |
| T3 | Invades subserosa (through muscularis propria into subserosal CT without serosa penetration) |
| T4a | Perforates serosa (visceral peritoneum) |
| T4b | Invades adjacent structures (spleen, transverse colon, liver, diaphragm, pancreas, abdominal wall, adrenal, kidney, small intestine, retroperitoneum) |
N - Regional Lymph Nodes:
| Stage | Description |
|---|
| N0 | No regional LN metastasis |
| N1 | 1-2 regional LN involved |
| N2 | 3-6 regional LN involved |
| N3a | 7-15 regional LN involved |
| N3b | 16 or more regional LN involved |
Minimum 16 lymph nodes must be examined for adequate staging (AJCC recommendation; some sources say 15).
M - Distant Metastasis:
- M0: No distant metastasis
- M1: Distant metastasis (including positive peritoneal cytology)
Overall Stage Grouping (simplified for exam):
| Stage | T | N | M | 5-Year Survival |
|---|
| IA | T1 | N0 | M0 | ~94% |
| IB | T1N1 or T2N0 | | M0 | ~88% |
| IIA | T1N2, T2N1, T3N0 | | M0 | ~68% |
| IIB | T1N3a, T2N2, T3N1, T4aN0 | | M0 | ~46% |
| IIIA | T2N3a, T3N2, T4aN1, T4aN2, T4bN0/N1 | | M0 | ~20% |
| IIIB-C | Various advanced T and N | | M0 | 8-14% |
| IV | Any T, Any N | M1 | | <5% |
5.6 Japanese Lymph Node Stations (for D2 Surgery - Exam High Yield)
Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer numbered the perigastric and regional lymph nodes (stations 1-16):
-
Group 1 (N1) nodes: Stations 1-6 - immediately perigastric
- 1: Right cardiac nodes
- 2: Left cardiac nodes
- 3: Lesser curvature nodes
- 4: Greater curvature nodes (4sa, 4sb, 4d)
- 5: Suprapyloric nodes
- 6: Infrapyloric nodes
-
Group 2 (N2) nodes: Stations 7-11 - along named vessels
- 7: Left gastric artery nodes
- 8: Common hepatic artery nodes
- 9: Celiac axis nodes
- 10: Splenic hilum nodes
- 11: Splenic artery nodes
-
Group 3 (N3) nodes: Stations 12-16 - distant
- 12: Hepatoduodenal ligament
- 13: Posterior pancreaticoduodenal
- 14: Superior mesenteric vessel nodes
- 15: Middle colic vessel nodes
- 16: Para-aortic nodes
D1 dissection = removal of Group 1 (perigastric) nodes
D2 dissection = removal of Group 1 + Group 2 nodes (standard in Japan; recommended by Western guidelines for curative resection)
D3 dissection = extends to Group 3 nodes (controversial; no survival benefit demonstrated)
SUMMARY REVISION TABLE - PART 1 TOPICS
| Topic | Key Point |
|---|
| Most common gastric malignancy | Adenocarcinoma (90-95%) |
| Most common cause of cancer death rank | 3rd worldwide (Sleisenger) / 2nd (Schwartz) |
| Most important risk factor | H. pylori (Group 1 carcinogen, Nobel 2005) |
| Most aggressive type | Diffuse (linitis plastica) |
| Geographic hotspot | Japan, Korea, Chile, Costa Rica, E. Europe |
| Migration study teaches | Environmental factors dominate in intestinal type |
| Blood group | A (increased risk) |
| CDH1 mutation → | Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer |
| Krukenberg tumor | Ovarian metastasis (signet ring cells, bilateral) |
| Virchow's node | Left supraclavicular - poor prognosis sign |
| Most common site in stomach | Antrum (35-40%) |
| Correa cascade final step | Normal → superficial gastritis → atrophic → IM → dysplasia → cancer |
| EGC 5-year survival | >90% in Japan |
| Borrmann IV | Linitis plastica - worst prognosis |
| Minimum LN for staging | 16 nodes |
Coming up in Part 2/3: Clinical Features, Diagnosis (Endoscopy, CT, EUS, Staging Laparoscopy), Serum Markers, Surgical Management (D2 gastrectomy, types of gastrectomy, reconstruction), Chemotherapy protocols, and Prognosis.