Types of hernia repair
hernia repair
hernia repair types open laparoscopic robotic mesh guidelines
| Site | Common repairs |
|---|---|
| Inguinal hernia | Herniotomy, Shouldice, Bassini, Lichtenstein mesh, TEP, TAPP |
| Femoral hernia | Open infrainguinal/high approach, preperitoneal mesh, TEP/TAPP |
| Umbilical/epigastric hernia | Primary suture for selected small defects, open mesh, laparoscopic/robotic mesh |
| Incisional/ventral hernia | Open mesh repair, retromuscular/sublay repair, component separation for complex cases, laparoscopic or robotic mesh repair |
| Parastomal hernia | Mesh repair by open, laparoscopic, or robotic approach; technique is individualized |
Herinorhapy
hernia repair
herniorrhaphy definition surgical repair hernia suture
Best technique for each method
inguinal hernia repair guidelines
international guidelines groin hernia management Lichtenstein TEP TAPP recurrent bilateral female recommendation
| Situation | Preferred technique | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Child with inguinal hernia | Herniotomy | The sac is ligated and removed. Posterior-wall strengthening or mesh is usually unnecessary. |
| Adult primary unilateral inguinal hernia, open approach | Lichtenstein tension-free flat mesh repair | Standard, reproducible open mesh repair with low recurrence. |
| Adult primary bilateral inguinal hernia | Laparo-endoscopic repair: TEP or TAPP | Both sides can be repaired through the same small incisions. |
| Recurrent inguinal hernia after an open anterior repair, e.g. Lichtenstein | TEP or TAPP | Uses the posterior plane, avoiding scar tissue from the previous anterior operation. |
| Recurrent inguinal hernia after TEP/TAPP | Open anterior mesh repair, usually Lichtenstein | Avoids re-entering the previously dissected posterior plane. |
| When mesh is refused or contraindicated | Shouldice repair | Best-established pure tissue, non-mesh repair, but technically demanding. |
| Femoral hernia, particularly in women | TEP/TAPP preperitoneal mesh repair, when expertise is available | Gives good access to the entire myopectineal orifice and helps identify/cover occult femoral defects. |
| Small primary umbilical/epigastric defect | Primary suture repair in selected cases | Suitable only for small defects with good surrounding fascia. |
| Larger or recurrent umbilical, ventral, or incisional hernia | Mesh repair, preferably retromuscular/sublay when feasible | Mesh reduces recurrence; the exact plane and approach are individualized. |
| Large complex ventral/incisional hernia | Open or robotic retromuscular mesh repair with component separation if required | Restores fascial continuity and allows wide mesh overlap. |
Compare Lichtenstein, Shouldice, TEP, and TAPP in a table
inguinal hernia TEP TAPP Lichtenstein Shouldice
HerniaSurge guidelines Lichtenstein Shouldice TEP TAPP comparison recovery chronic pain recurrent bilateral
| Feature | Lichtenstein | Shouldice | TEP | TAPP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full name | Lichtenstein tension-free repair | Shouldice tissue repair | Totally Extraperitoneal repair | TransAbdominal PrePeritoneal repair |
| Surgical approach | Open anterior | Open anterior | Laparoscopic posterior | Laparoscopic posterior |
| Mesh | Yes, flat mesh | No | Yes, preperitoneal mesh | Yes, preperitoneal mesh |
| Basic principle | Mesh is placed over the posterior wall of the inguinal canal without tension | Multilayer reconstruction of posterior wall using sutures | Mesh placed in preperitoneal space without entering abdominal cavity | Surgeon enters abdominal cavity, opens peritoneum, places preperitoneal mesh, then closes peritoneum |
| Anaesthesia | Local, regional, or general | Usually regional or general | General | General |
| Best use | Standard open repair for primary unilateral adult inguinal hernia | Patient declines mesh or mesh is unsuitable, with an experienced Shouldice surgeon | Bilateral primary hernia; recurrent hernia after previous open anterior repair | Bilateral/recurrent hernia; useful when intra-abdominal visualization or contralateral inspection is beneficial |
| Major advantage | Reproducible, relatively short learning curve, can be done under local anaesthesia | Avoids foreign material/mesh | Avoids entering peritoneal cavity; less postoperative pain and faster recovery than many open repairs | Excellent internal view, easier anatomic orientation for some surgeons, permits inspection of opposite groin |
| Main limitation | Chronic groin pain or numbness can occur; mesh-related issues are possible | Technically demanding; higher recurrence than mesh repair if not performed expertly | Technically demanding preperitoneal dissection; limited working space | Enters peritoneal cavity, with potential visceral injury, adhesions, port-site hernia, and need for peritoneal closure |
| Recurrence | Low with correct technique | Best non-mesh option, but generally higher than mesh repairs | Low, comparable with TAPP in experienced hands | Low, comparable with TEP in experienced hands |
| Chronic pain tendency | Generally higher than laparo-endoscopic approaches | Variable; depends heavily on technique and tissue tension | Generally lower than open anterior mesh repair | Generally lower than open anterior mesh repair |
| Suitability after failed open repair | Usually not preferred because it re-enters the scarred anterior plane | Not usually preferred for the same reason | Preferred posterior approach | Preferred posterior approach |
| Suitability after failed TEP/TAPP | Preferred anterior approach | Possible if mesh avoidance is necessary and expertise exists | Usually avoid re-entering same posterior plane | Usually avoid re-entering same posterior plane |
| Key learning issue | Easiest of the four to standardize | Most technically demanding open tissue repair | Requires advanced laparoscopic expertise | Requires laparoscopic expertise and safe intraperitoneal access |