I now have comprehensive material across all key areas. Let me compile the full detailed answer.
Neck of Femur (NOF) & Intertrochanteric Fractures
These are the two major categories of proximal femur fractures, distinguished by their anatomical location relative to the hip capsule. This distinction is clinically fundamental because it determines blood supply risk, surgical strategy, and prognosis.
Anatomical Overview & Key Distinction
| Feature | Neck of Femur (NOF) | Intertrochanteric |
|---|
| Location | Intracapsular | Extracapsular |
| Blood supply risk | HIGH - AVN is a major complication | Low - blood supply preserved |
| Typical treatment | Arthroplasty (displaced) or fixation | Internal fixation (DHS or IM nail) |
| Fracture healing | Prone to non-union | Generally heals well |
| Age group | Elderly (low energy) or young (high energy) | Predominantly elderly |
PART 1: Neck of Femur Fracture (Intracapsular)
Blood Supply - The Core Problem
The femoral head receives its blood supply primarily from the medial circumflex femoral artery (MCFA), with contributions from the inferior retinacular artery, the lateral circumflex femoral artery, and the artery of the ligamentum teres (minimal contribution in adults). These vessels run along the femoral neck within the capsule - making them vulnerable to disruption at the time of fracture.
Consequence: Displaced NOF fractures interrupt this blood supply, causing avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head in 15-30% of cases and non-union in up to 30%.
- Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed, p.3432
Classification Systems
1. By Anatomical Location (AO/OTA)
- Subcapital - just below the femoral head (most common; highest AVN risk)
- Transcervical - through the mid-neck
- Basicervical - at the base of the neck (functionally behaves more like intertrochanteric)
2. Garden Classification (most widely used clinically)
Based on the degree of displacement on AP radiograph, using trabecular alignment:
| Stage | Description | Union rate |
|---|
| Garden I | Incomplete fracture - valgus impacted; trabeculae angulated but continuous | ~100% |
| Garden II | Complete fracture; non-displaced; trabeculae still aligned | ~100% |
| Garden III | Complete fracture; partially displaced; trabeculae misaligned but head-neck contact maintained | ~93% |
| Garden IV | Complete fracture; fully displaced; trabeculae between head and acetabulum re-align | ~57% |
Practical simplification: Clinically, most surgeons reliably differentiate only undisplaced (I+II) vs displaced (III+IV) - interobserver reliability for all 4 stages is poor (complete agreement in only 22% of cases). Garden I/II with ≥20 degrees of posterior (sagittal) tilt should NOT be treated as undisplaced.
- Rockwood & Green's Fractures in Adults, 10th ed, p.2638
- Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed, p.3432
3. Pauwels Classification
Based on the angle of the fracture line relative to horizontal - describes shear forces at the fracture site:
| Type | Angle to horizontal | Dominant force | Stability |
|---|
| Type I | 0-30° | Compressive | Stable |
| Type II | 30-50° | Mixed | Moderately unstable |
| Type III | >50° | Shear | Unstable - high fixation failure risk |
Type III Pauwels fractures have high shear forces and require augmented fixation strategies.
- Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed, p.3433
4. Posterior Tilt Classification
More recently, posterior tilt angle on lateral radiograph ≥20 degrees has been identified as a major risk factor for treatment failure:
-
Posterior tilt ≥20°: 24.4% treatment failure rate
-
Posterior tilt <20°: 10.9% treatment failure rate
-
Risk ratio 2.73 (95% CI 1.77-4.21)
-
Rockwood & Green's Fractures in Adults, 10th ed, p.2640
Diagnosis
- Clinical presentation: Shortened, externally rotated leg; inability to weight-bear
- Radiographs: AP pelvis + cross-table lateral; traction internal rotation view is often helpful
- If plain X-ray negative but clinical suspicion high: MRI is the investigation of choice (most sensitive and specific); CT if MRI contraindicated
- ~1% of fractures are initially occult on X-ray; if patient cannot weight-bear at 24h, further imaging is mandatory
Preoperative Traction
No longer routinely recommended - arteriographic studies show traction + internal rotation reduces MCFA perfusion and venous drainage. Nine RCTs showed no benefit in pain control or quality of reduction.
Management
Timing of Surgery
Surgery should not be delayed. Studies show:
- 44.9% 30-day mortality for NOF treated nonoperatively vs. 2.0% operative
- 1-year mortality: 65.3% nonoperative vs. 17.6% operative
- Even nondisplaced fractures treated nonoperatively: 38.7% 30-day mortality
Operative treatment is effectively mandatory except in extreme circumstances.
The Core Treatment Decision Tree
NOF Fracture
|
├── UNDISPLACED (Garden I/II, posterior tilt <20°)
│ └── Internal fixation
│ ├── Cannulated screws (3 screws, inverted triangle)
│ └── Sliding Hip Screw (DHS) - for basicervical/valgus impacted
│
└── DISPLACED (Garden III/IV)
├── YOUNG PATIENT (<65 or physiologically fit)
│ └── Urgent reduction + internal fixation
│ (emergent within 6-12h to preserve head)
│
└── ELDERLY PATIENT (physiologically older)
├── Not independently ambulant / cognitively impaired
│ └── HEMIARTHROPLASTY (cemented)
│
└── Independently ambulant, cognitively intact
└── TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY (THA)
(NICE guidelines)
Internal Fixation (for undisplaced and young displaced)
Cannulated Screws (most common for NOF)
- 3 partially threaded screws (6.5, 7.0, or 7.3 mm) in inverted triangle configuration
- Inferior screw along calcar (most important for stability)
- Aim for center-center screw position in femoral head
- Garden Alignment Index: trabeculae should measure 160-180° on AP; deviation >20° on lateral indicates malreduction
Sliding Hip Screw (DHS)
- Better for basicervical fractures and valgus-impacted fractures
- Basicervical fractures are NOT well treated with cannulated screws (high failure rate)
- Provides dynamic compression along the femoral neck axis
Arthroplasty (for displaced NOF in elderly)
Hemiarthroplasty (HA)
- Standard treatment for most elderly patients with displaced NOF
- Shorter operative time, less blood loss than THA
- Implant types: Unipolar vs Bipolar
- Unipolar: 20% wear rate at 12 months vs. 5% bipolar; however no significant long-term difference
- Acetabular erosion rate: 5.3% conversion to THA for patients <75 vs. 1.4% for patients >75
- Cemented vs. uncemented: Cemented preferred - periprosthetic fracture rate 0.5% cemented vs. 2.1% uncemented; less pain and better mobility
- Risk: Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome (fat embolism) - use second-generation cementing technique
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
-
NICE guidelines: recommended for patients who are cognitively intact AND independently ambulant (walking with at most one stick) AND medically fit
-
Better functional outcomes and quality of life than HA in selected patients
-
Higher dislocation risk than HA (RR 2.02; 95% CI 1.26-3.25) - use anterior/anterolateral approach to minimize this
-
THA with Dual Mobility Components (THA-DMC): dislocation rate 1.5% (lower than standard THA)
-
Head size: increasing from 28 mm to 40 mm reduces dislocation from 2.0% to 0.1%
-
Osteosynthesis/Hemiarthroplasty/THA textbook, p.3-8
-
Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed, p.3434-3448
Complications of NOF Fracture
| Complication | Frequency | Comment |
|---|
| Avascular necrosis (AVN) | 15-30% displaced | Presents 6-24 months post-injury |
| Non-union | 10-30% displaced | Higher with varus malreduction |
| Implant cut-out | 5-10% | TAD >25 mm exponentially increases risk |
| Periprosthetic fracture | 0.5-2.1% | Higher with uncemented stems |
| Dislocation (post-THA) | ~2-4% | Higher posterior approach |
| DVT/PE | Common | Thromboprophylaxis mandatory |
| Mortality (1-year) | 20-30% | Mostly due to pre-existing comorbidities |
PART 2: Intertrochanteric Fractures (Extracapsular)
Key Features
- Fracture line runs between the greater and lesser trochanters, outside the hip capsule
- Blood supply to femoral head is NOT at risk - AVN is extremely rare
- Prognosis for healing is generally good
- Treatment is always internal fixation (arthroplasty reserved for failed fixation or highly comminuted in frail patients)
Classification
AO/OTA Classification (31-A) - most commonly used
| Group | Description | Stability |
|---|
| A1 | Simple two-part fracture along intertrochanteric line | Stable |
| A2 | Comminuted; fracture extends over two or more levels of the medial cortex | Unstable |
| A3 | Reverse oblique pattern; fracture line extends through the lateral cortex distal to the vastus ridge | Very unstable |
Boyd-Griffin Classification (historical)
- Type 1: Fracture along intertrochanteric line (stable)
- Type 2: Comminuted; main fracture along intertrochanteric line
- Type 3: Subtrochanteric extension
- Type 4: Fracture in trochanteric and subtrochanteric regions with at least two fracture planes
Evans Classification
Classifies intertrochanteric fractures as stable vs. unstable based on whether the posteromedial cortex (lesser trochanter) is intact:
- Stable: Posteromedial cortex intact; can be reduced to restore medial cortical support
- Unstable: Posteromedial comminution; medial cortex cannot be restored; higher failure rates
Management
General Principle
All intertrochanteric fractures should be treated surgically (internal fixation) - nonoperative management in the elderly carries prohibitive mortality.
Fixation Choice: DHS vs. IM Nail
| Feature | Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) | Cephalomedullary IM Nail |
|---|
| Best for | Stable (A1, many A2) | Unstable (A3, A2 with lateral wall compromise) |
| Biomechanics | Longer lever arm, more stress on bone | Shorter lever arm, load-sharing |
| Blood loss | More | Less |
| Incision | Larger | Smaller |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Evidence | Cochrane meta-analysis: similar functional outcomes to IM nail in stable fractures | Preferred for unstable/reverse oblique patterns |
Tip-Apex Distance (TAD) - The most important predictor of fixation failure (cut-out):
- TAD = distance from lag screw tip to femoral head apex on AP + same on lateral view
- Target TAD: <25 mm (ideally <20 mm)
- Risk of cut-out increases exponentially when TAD >25 mm
Lateral Wall Integrity:
- Lateral wall thickness <21 mm predicts lateral wall fracture with 95% sensitivity
- Compromised lateral wall → DHS may cause iatrogenic fracture → use IM nail instead
- Preoperative CT may be indicated to assess lateral wall in borderline A2 fractures
Special Pattern: Reverse Oblique & Transverse (A3)
- DHS is contraindicated - the fracture line runs parallel/perpendicular to the screw, allowing medialization of the shaft
- Must be treated with IM nail (95° blade plate or 95° condylar screw are alternatives)
DHS Technique Summary
- Patient supine on fracture table, closed reduction
- Guide wire placed in center of femoral head (center-center position on AP and lateral)
- Lag screw at 130-135° along femoral neck axis
- Sliding compression mechanism allows dynamic collapse and union
- 2-hole vs. 4-hole side plate: 4-hole preferred for most cases
- Weight-bearing as tolerated postoperatively (for stable fractures)
IM Nail Technique Summary
- Fracture table, closed reduction
- Entry point at piriformis fossa or greater trochanter tip (trochanteric entry preferred with modern nails)
- 10 mm diameter nail typically used; 130° nail angle
- Lag screw placed center-center in femoral head; TAD confirmed fluoroscopically
- Nail should not perforate anterior cortex (respect the anterior bow)
- Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed, p.3448-3456
Special Situations
Atypical Femoral Fractures (Bisphosphonate-associated)
- Long-term bisphosphonate use causes subtrochanteric atypical fractures
- Typically transverse, originating at the lateral cortex (tension side)
- Associated with lateral cortical beaking/thickening; often bilateral
- Management: IM nail; stop bisphosphonates; teriparatide may aid healing
Occult Fractures
- ~1% of hip fractures are occult on plain radiograph
- If patient cannot weight-bear at 24h: MRI (investigation of choice)
- A significant proportion of isolated "greater trochanter fractures" on X-ray have intertrochanteric extension on MRI
Lesser Trochanter Avulsion in Adults
- Isolated lesser trochanter fracture in an adult without significant trauma = assume pathological until proven otherwise (metastatic disease, myeloma)
Perioperative Care
| Element | Recommendation |
|---|
| Timing | Within 48 hours of admission (ideal: within 24h) |
| Anaesthesia | Regional (spinal) preferred; reduces blood loss and DVT |
| Thromboprophylaxis | LMWH + TED stockings; extend to 28-35 days post-discharge |
| Osteoporosis workup | DEXA + anti-osteoporotic treatment (bisphosphonates) for patients <75 |
| Orthogeriatric co-management | Reduces mortality and length of stay |
| Rehabilitation | Full weight-bearing postoperatively encouraged; early physiotherapy |
Summary Comparison
PROXIMAL FEMUR FRACTURES
|
├── INTRACAPSULAR (Neck of Femur)
│ ├── Undisplaced (Garden I/II)
│ │ └── Internal fixation
│ │ (cannulated screws / DHS)
│ └── Displaced (Garden III/IV)
│ ├── Young patient → urgent ORIF
│ └── Elderly
│ ├── Active, fit → THA
│ └── Less active → Hemiarthroplasty
│
└── EXTRACAPSULAR (Intertrochanteric, AO 31-A)
├── Stable (A1) → DHS
├── Unstable (A2) → DHS or IM nail (depends on lateral wall)
└── Very unstable/reverse oblique (A3) → IM nail
Key References:
- Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed 2026 - Classification, fixation techniques, arthroplasty
- Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults, 10th ed 2025 - Classification reliability, posterior tilt, outcome data
- Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology - Radiological appearances, occult fractures
- Osteosynthesis, Hemiarthroplasty, Total Hip Arthroplasty (NOF textbook) - HA vs. THA evidence, NICE guidelines