Here is a thorough, evidence-based answer on using pre- and postoperative K1/K2 keratometry readings to guide phacoemulsification incision placement for astigmatism management.
Pre- and Postoperative K1/K2 Readings in Phacoemulsification: Incision Placement to Manage Astigmatism
Understanding K1 and K2
| Term | Definition | Meridian |
|---|
| K1 | Flat keratometry value (lower diopter number) | Flat meridian |
| K2 | Steep keratometry value (higher diopter number) | Steep meridian |
| K2 - K1 | Magnitude of corneal astigmatism (in diopters) | -- |
The axis of K2 = the steep meridian = where the incision goes if you want to reduce astigmatism.
Core Principle: Incision on the Steep Meridian
A clear corneal incision (CCI) in phacoemulsification flattens the cornea in the meridian where it is placed. Placing the incision on the steepest meridian (K2 axis) therefore flattens the steep meridian and reduces pre-existing corneal astigmatism. This is the basis of steep-axis surgery / on-axis surgery.
Clinical evidence: In a prospective study of 50 eyes with regular astigmatism, placing the CCI keratometrically on the steep axis (mean steep axis 108.6° ± 34.9°) reduced corneal astigmatism from
1.24 ± 0.7 D pre-op to 0.83 ± 0.58 D post-op - a statistically significant reduction of 0.41 D (p<0.001). Mean steep K dropped from 44.24 D to 43.84 D, while flat K remained stable (42.98 vs. 42.99 D), confirming selective flattening at the incision meridian. (
European Eye Research, Ozen et al.)
Decision Framework Based on K1/K2 Difference
1. If K2 - K1 ≤ 1.00 D (minimal astigmatism)
- Standard temporal incision (superotemporal in right eye, superonasal in left)
- No need to modify for astigmatism
- Temporal CCI induces minimal surgically induced astigmatism (SIA)
2. If K2 - K1 > 1.00 D (significant astigmatism)
Place the incision on the steeper axis (K2 axis):
| K reading situation | Incision position |
|---|
| K1 > K2 by >1.00 D (K1 is steeper - rare notation) | Superior incision |
| K2 > K1 by >1.00 D and steep axis is vertical (~90°) | Superior incision (with-the-rule) |
| K2 > K1 by >1.00 D and steep axis is horizontal (~180°) | Temporal incision (against-the-rule) |
| Steep axis is oblique | Incision at that oblique meridian |
Astigmatism Type and Incision Location
With-the-Rule (WTR) Astigmatism
- Steep axis is vertical (60°-120°, typically ~90°)
- K2 is at 90°
- Recommendation: Superior incision
-
1.5 D WTR: Superior incision strongly preferred (directly on steep axis)
- <1.5 D WTR: Temporal incision acceptable (less SIA, slight under-correction)
Against-the-Rule (ATR) Astigmatism
- Steep axis is horizontal (0°-30° or 150°-180°, typically ~180°)
- K2 is at 180°
- Recommendation: Temporal or nasal incision
-
0.75 D ATR: Nasal incision on the 180° steep axis
-
0.75 D ATR: Temporal incision also used (at the same meridian)
Oblique Astigmatism
- Steep axis between 31°-59° or 121°-149°
- Incision placed at that oblique meridian
Pre-Operative Work-Up: What to Measure
- Automated keratometry or corneal topography - obtain K1, K2, and the axis of K2
- Confirm regularity - ensure astigmatism is regular (two principal meridians 90° apart); irregular astigmatism needs separate management
- Classify astigmatism type: WTR, ATR, or oblique
- Quantify magnitude: K2 - K1 in diopters
- Note the steep axis angle precisely - this is where your incision goes
Preferred instruments: IOLMaster, Pentacam, or Lenstar for biometry + keratometry.
Post-Operative Assessment of K1/K2
After phacoemulsification, keratometry readings are taken (typically at 1 month, when corneal healing is complete) to assess:
| Parameter | What you're looking for |
|---|
| Post-op K2 vs Pre-op K2 | Has the steep meridian flattened? |
| Post-op K1 vs Pre-op K1 | Is the flat meridian stable? |
| Residual astigmatism | K2 - K1 postoperatively |
| Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA) | Vector analysis of change |
Expected result: If the incision was placed correctly on the steep axis, the post-op K2 should be reduced compared to pre-op K2, while K1 remains largely unchanged. Residual astigmatism (K2 - K1) should be lower.
In the Ozen et al. study: K2 dropped from 44.24 D to 43.84 D (Δ = 0.40 D), K1 stayed stable (42.98 → 42.99 D), confirming selective flattening.
Additional Strategies for Higher Astigmatism
When the K2 - K1 difference is large (>1.5-2.0 D) and a single CCI is insufficient:
| Magnitude | Strategy |
|---|
| 1.0-2.5 D | Steep-axis CCI ± Limbal Relaxing Incisions (LRI) |
| >1.5-2.0 D | Paired opposite CCIs (temporal + nasal on steep axis) |
| >2.0-2.5 D | Toric IOL implantation (most precise, most effective) |
| Any magnitude | Toric IOL if available - superior to incision-based methods |
A 2025 RCT (
PMID 40330970) compared
toric IOL vs. opposite clear corneal incisions in phacoemulsification for pre-existing astigmatism, confirming toric IOLs give more predictable outcomes, while opposite CCIs are a useful alternative when toric lenses are unavailable.
Summary: How to Use K1/K2 to Direct the Incision
1. Measure K1 (flat) and K2 (steep) preoperatively
2. Note the axis of K2 (steep meridian, in degrees)
3. If K2 - K1 ≤ 1.0 D → temporal incision (standard)
4. If K2 - K1 > 1.0 D → place incision ON the K2 axis (steep meridian)
- K2 axis near 90° → Superior incision
- K2 axis near 180° → Temporal/nasal incision
- K2 axis oblique → Incision at that oblique angle
5. Postoperatively: recheck K1, K2 at 1 month
- Expect K2 to decrease, K1 to be stable
- Calculate residual astigmatism and SIA
- If residual >1.0 D, consider enhancement with LRI or glasses/contact lens
Key references: