recent advances in automation in clinical pathology

Reading File
Searching PubMed

automation clinical pathology laboratory

Searching the Web

recent advances automation clinical pathology laboratory 2024 2025

Finding Sources
Reading Article
Reading Article
Reading Web Page

advances automation clinical pathology laboratory robotics AI digital

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

total laboratory automation clinical chemistry robotics

Searching PubMed

digital pathology whole slide imaging artificial intelligence

Reading File
Reading File
Reading Article
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

automated hematology analyzer machine learning CBC morphology

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

laboratory automation preanalytical error reduction turnaround time

Reading Article
Reading File
I now have comprehensive, current material. Let me synthesize a thorough response.

Recent Advances in Automation in Clinical Pathology

Clinical pathology automation has evolved from isolated instrument-specific solutions into integrated, AI-augmented ecosystems spanning every phase of the testing process. Below is an organized overview of the major domains of advance.

1. Total Laboratory Automation (TLA)

TLA remains the backbone of high-volume clinical laboratories. Modern TLA systems connect preanalytical processing directly to analyzers via conveyor belts and robotic modules, managing 1,000-25,000 specimens per day with minimal human intervention.
Core TLA components include:
  • Automated specimen input and bar-code / RFID tracking at every routing decision point
  • Automated centrifuges (self-balancing, refrigerated or ambient)
  • Decapper and recapper stations
  • Level detection and specimen integrity checking (hemolysis, lipemia, icterus - often spectrophotometric at multiple wavelengths)
  • Aliquot modules and automated diluters
  • Refrigerated storage and retrieval units
  • Autoverification middleware using rules-based logic to release results without technologist intervention
  • Autoretrieval for reflex and repeat testing
Key vendors include Abbott (ACCELERATOR a3600), Roche, Siemens Healthineers, Beckman Coulter, Sysmex, Inpeco, and Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics (Tietz Textbook, p. 879-880; Henry's Clinical Diagnosis, p. based on TLA chapter).
A 2026 review (Mukherjee et al., Diagnostics, PMID 41750668) integrating evidence across multiple health systems confirmed that TLA produces substantial reductions in turnaround time, error rates, and labor requirements, and stabilizes operations even during workload peaks. The review noted that large segments of pre- and post-analytical workflows remain manual - a gap now being addressed by the next generation of robotics.

2. Collaborative Robotics (Cobots) and Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)

The most recent advance highlighted in the 2026 Mukherjee et al. review is the shift from fixed-track TLA toward flexible, hybrid automation ecosystems:
  • Cobots (collaborative robots): Work safely alongside humans with sub-millimeter precision for fine-motor tasks such as colony picking, tube manipulation, and bench-level specimen handling - tasks that fixed conveyor lines cannot reach.
  • Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs): Navigate hospital corridors autonomously to transport pathology carts, specimens, and medical supplies. Diligent Robotics' "Moxi" AMR has completed hundreds of thousands of supply deliveries in real hospital settings.
  • Hybrid ecosystems: TLA "islands" are increasingly connected by cobotic workcells and AMRs, orchestrated by AI-enabled middleware, creating a modular rather than monolithic architecture.
This shift addresses the critical shortage of laboratory technologists: automation handles logistics and repetitive manipulation, freeing staff for complex interpretive and troubleshooting work.

3. Digital Pathology and Whole Slide Imaging (WSI)

Digital pathology has transitioned from a research novelty to a routine clinical tool, driven by FDA-cleared whole slide image (WSI) scanners and updated CMS/CLIA policies that now permit pathologists to render diagnoses remotely from digital images.
Key developments (Zhang et al., Lab Invest, 2024, PMID 39053633):
  • Multiple FDA-approved WSI scanners and image management systems (DICOM-based) are now operational
  • New CPT codes for digital pathology facilitate billing and reimbursement
  • Modern LIS platforms must handle DICOM WSI, integrate AI algorithms in an auditable/compliant manner, and support hybrid glass-plus-digital workflows

4. Artificial Intelligence in Pathology

AI is the fastest-moving area of clinical pathology automation, operating across multiple domains:

a) Morphologic Diagnosis Automation

AI algorithms applied to WSIs have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis (McGenity et al., npj Digital Medicine, PMID 38704465) across 100 studies and >152,000 WSIs reported a mean sensitivity of 96.3% and mean specificity of 93.3% for AI-assisted diagnoses. Applications are most mature in:
  • Prostate cancer grading (Gleason scoring)
  • Colorectal cancer detection
  • Cervical cytology screening programs

b) Hematology - Automated Differential and Cell Classification

Automated digital cell analyzers (e.g., Sysmex DI-60, and newer systems like UIMD PBIA) now perform white blood cell classification with performance comparable to manual review for most cell types. Machine learning models are being applied to reflex testing rules on platforms such as Sysmex XN-series to automate decisions about which samples need manual platelet or cell count confirmation (PMID 39099371).

c) Foundation Models and Generative AI

A 2025 review (Brodsky et al., Arch Pathol Lab Med, PMID 39836377) and a 2023 review (Waqas et al., Lab Invest, PMID 37757969) document how foundation models (large self-supervised models trained on massive WSI datasets) and transformer-based deep learning are moving toward generalizable, multi-task AI that doesn't require task-specific training datasets for every cancer type.

d) AI for Oncology Biomarker Discovery

A 2025 ESMO systematic review (Marra et al., Ann Oncol, PMID 40307127) found that AI in digital pathology is improving:
  • Automated tumor detection and classification
  • Identification of prognostic molecular biomarkers from H&E slides (without requiring IHC or molecular testing)
  • Prediction of treatment response and patient outcomes
  • Multi-omics integration for patient stratification
Notably, no AI-based prognostic or predictive biomarker yet has Level IA or IB evidence, and barriers including data privacy, algorithmic bias, and regulatory hurdles persist.

5. Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) - From Records to Action

2025 marked an architectural shift in LIS platforms (LigoLab industry report, 2025):
  • AI-first, cloud-native LIS: Moving from compliance-driven systems to AI-first architectures with cloud deployment and advanced interoperability
  • Embedded AI agents: Clinisys CLS v2025.2 introduced an AI chat support agent (CLS CARE) with multilingual guidance built directly into the LIS environment
  • TEFCA alignment and QHIN integration: Labs connecting to national interoperability networks for value-based care and public health reporting
  • Orchestration layer: The LIS is now the human-plus-AI pathology orchestration hub, managing DICOM images, AI algorithm outputs, audit trails, and hybrid workflows
  • Global LIS market estimated at ~$891 million in 2024, projected to reach ~$1.3 billion by 2032

6. Preanalytical Quality and Error Reduction

Automation has had the most measurable impact on preanalytical errors, which account for 60-70% of all laboratory errors. Automated specimen processing eliminates manual labeling errors, misidentification, and handling variation. A 2025 review (Plebani et al., Clin Chem Lab Med, PMID 40266896) highlighted new insights including automated hemolysis index detection, specimen integrity checks at the TLA level, and RFID-based specimen tracking as the most impactful recent advances in preanalytical quality.

7. Microbiology and Molecular Diagnostics

  • MALDI-TOF MS for rapid microbial identification is now standard
  • Automated blood culture systems (e.g., BD BACTEC, bioMérieux BacT/ALERT) continuously monitor and flag positive cultures
  • COPAN's WASP/WASPLab platforms automate plating, streaking, incubation, and imaging of culture plates - combined with AI for automated colony recognition and presumptive identification
  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflows are increasingly automated, with pool-to-pool testing and bioinformatic pipelines integrated into LIS platforms

Summary Table

DomainKey Advance (2023-2026)
TLA / Physical AutomationCobots + AMRs extending beyond fixed tracks; hybrid ecosystems
Digital PathologyFDA-cleared WSI, CPT reimbursement, remote sign-out
AI - MorphologyFoundation models, >96% sensitivity in meta-analyses
AI - OncologyMolecular biomarker prediction from H&E slides
HematologyAutomated digital differentials, ML-based reflex rules
LIS/MiddlewareAI-first cloud-native, TEFCA interoperability, AI chat agents
PreanalyticalRFID tracking, automated integrity checks, cobot specimen handling
MicrobiologyCOPAN automated culture imaging + AI colony recognition

Key references:

Recent trends in the diagnosis, differential diagnosis of small round cell tumours

Reading File
Searching PubMed

small round cell tumour diagnosis differential molecular classification

Searching the Web

small round cell tumours recent advances diagnosis differential 2024 2025 molecular pathology

Finding Sources
Reading Article
Reading Article
Reading Article
Finding Sources
Reading Article
Reading Article
Reading Article
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

desmoplastic small round cell tumor DSRCT molecular diagnosis EWSR1-WT1

Reading File
Searching PubMed

CIC rearranged sarcoma BCOR sarcoma diagnosis pathology

Searching PubMed

next generation sequencing RNA fusion sarcoma diagnosis bone soft tissue

Reading Article
Reading Article
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

NUT carcinoma SMARCA4 deficient undifferentiated tumor diagnosis immunohistochemistry

Reading File
Reading File
Loading Image
Loading Image
Finding Sources
I now have excellent images and comprehensive content from multiple sources. I have enough to write a thorough, well-structured, well-cited response.

Recent Trends in the Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Small Round Cell Tumours (SRCTs)


Overview

Small round cell tumours (SRCTs) - also called "small blue round cell tumours" - are a heterogeneous group of malignancies sharing overlapping morphology on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E): sheets of small, monotonous cells with high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios, hyperchromatic nuclei, and scant cytoplasm. The challenge lies in distinguishing entities that differ profoundly in prognosis and treatment. The 2020 WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours (5th edition) reorganized this group based on molecular genetics, and subsequent advances in immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have substantially refined diagnosis.

Classic Histology

Ewing sarcoma - sheets of small round cells with minimal clear cytoplasm
Ewing sarcoma: sheets of uniform small round cells with scant clear cytoplasm. (Robbins & Kumar Basic Pathology)

1. The WHO 2020 Framework: Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas (USRCS)

The most important recent conceptual shift is the WHO 5th edition's replacement of the old "Ewing sarcoma family / Ewing-like sarcoma" terminology with four molecularly defined categories of undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas (USRCS) of bone and soft tissue (Dehner et al., Hum Pathol 2024, PMID 38280658; Marcelis & Sciot, Ann Pathol 2025, PMID 39510958):
WHO 5th Ed. EntityMolecular HallmarkKey IHC
Ewing sarcomaEWSR1-ETS fusions (EWSR1-FLI1 ~85%, EWSR1-ERG ~10%)CD99 (diffuse membranous), NKX2.2, FLI1
CIC-rearranged sarcomaCIC-DUX4 (most common), CIC-FOXO4 fusionsWT1, ETV4, DUX4, CD99 (focal/weak)
Sarcoma with BCOR genetic alterationsBCOR-CCNB3 (most common); BCOR ITDBCOR, CCNB3 (in BCOR-CCNB3), CD99 (variable)
Round cell sarcoma with EWSR1-non-ETS fusionsEWSR1/FUS::NFATc2; EWSR1::PATZ1CD99 variable; NFATc2 (nuclear)
  • Robbins & Kumar Basic Pathology, p. 786; Quick Compendium of Clinical Pathology, p. 411

2. Entity-by-Entity Features and Diagnostic Advances

2.1 Ewing Sarcoma

  • Morphology: Sheets of small round cells, slightly larger than lymphocytes, scant clear glycogen-rich cytoplasm; Homer-Wright rosettes (pseudorosettes with a central fibrillary core) in ~10%
  • Molecular: >90% carry EWSR1::FLI1 t(11;22)(q24;q12); rarer partners include ERG, FEV, ETV1, ETV4. EWSR1 is on 22q12, highly prone to rearrangement
  • IHC panel: CD99 (diffuse strong membranous - hallmark but not specific), NKX2.2 (nuclear, more specific than CD99), FLI1 (nuclear), vimentin+; keratin/desmin/S100 negative
  • FISH: EWSR1 break-apart probe (dual-colour) is the standard confirmatory test (see image below); note the separate red and green signals in rearranged nuclei
  • Pitfall: EWSR1 FISH is positive in many non-Ewing tumours (DSRCT, clear cell sarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma); it is a "rule-in for EWSR1 rearrangement," not specific for Ewing
EWSR1 FISH break-apart: normal nucleus (fused red-green) vs. rearranged nucleus (separate red and green signals)
EWSR1 FISH break-apart probes. Left (a): normal nuclei with 2 red-green fusion signals. Right (b): abnormal nuclei with 1 fused + 1 red + 1 green signal, indicating EWSR1 rearrangement. (Quick Compendium of Clinical Pathology)
  • Imaging (2026 update): Lytic "moth-eaten" bone destruction with aggressive periosteal reaction (onion-skin), large extraosseous soft tissue mass (Mori et al., RadioGraphics 2026, PMID 41886300)
  • Prognosis: 75% 5-year survival with neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery ± radiation

2.2 CIC-Rearranged Sarcoma

  • Demographics: Predominantly young adults; predominantly soft tissue (rarely bone)
  • Morphology: Slightly larger cells than Ewing, more irregular nuclei, geographic necrosis, myxoid stroma; sometimes spindled cells
  • Key IHC: WT1 (nuclear - useful), ETV4 (nuclear - highly sensitive), DUX4 (nuclear); CD99 is focal or absent (key distinguishing feature from Ewing)
  • Molecular: CIC-DUX4 rearrangement (CIC on 19q13, DUX4 on 4q35 or 10q26) detected by FISH or RNA-seq fusion panels
  • Prognosis: More aggressive than Ewing sarcoma; poor response to standard Ewing chemotherapy - an important clinical reason to distinguish it (Mori et al., RadioGraphics 2026)
  • Imaging: Well-circumscribed lobulated soft tissue masses with extensive internal necrosis and haemorrhage, no calcification

2.3 Sarcoma with BCOR Genetic Alterations

  • Two main subtypes:
    • BCOR-CCNB3: X-linked inversion (inv X(p11;p13)), predominantly adolescent boys, long bone metaphyses/pelvis
    • BCOR internal tandem duplication (ITD): Overlaps with infantile fibrosarcoma
  • Morphology: Primitive round to spindle cells; myxoid stroma; occasional whorling
  • Key IHC: BCOR (nuclear), CCNB3 (nuclear, specific for BCOR-CCNB3 subtype), CD99 (variable), TLE1 (nuclear)
  • Imaging: Osteolytic or sclerotic lesion in long bones/pelvis, often with calcification in extraosseous component - helps distinguish from Ewing
  • Prognosis: Potentially more favourable than Ewing; still benefits from Ewing-type chemotherapy regimens (Mori et al., 2026)

2.4 EWSR1/FUS::NFATc2 and EWSR1::PATZ1 Sarcomas (Newly Recognised)

A 2025 review (Jennings et al., Arch Pathol Lab Med 2025, PMID 41167264) specifically focused on EWSR1/FUS::NFATc2 sarcomas:
  • EWSR1 or FUS fuses with NFATc2 (transcription factor)
  • Morphologically overlaps with Ewing but shows unique features including lobulated architecture and fibromyxoid stroma
  • NFATc2 IHC (nuclear) serves as a surrogate marker
  • Limited response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with Ewing - critical for management
  • Distinct methylation, transcriptomic, and epigenetic profile from Ewing sarcoma
  • Definitive diagnosis requires NGS-based fusion detection

3. The Broader SRCT Differential

Beyond USRCS, the full differential of SRCTs includes entities from multiple lineages. Clinical context (age, site, serum markers) narrows the differential before IHC and molecular testing.

3.1 Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumour (DSRCT)

  • Hallmark: Growth within strikingly desmoplastic stroma - the most distinctive morphologic clue
  • Demographics: Adolescent/young adult males; intra-abdominal/peritoneal most common; rare sites include head/neck and GI tract
  • Unique IHC profile: Polyphenotypic - expresses epithelial (EMA, cytokeratin), neural (NSE, synaptophysin), and mesenchymal (desmin - dot-like perinuclear) markers simultaneously. WT1 (C-terminal antibody, nuclear) is key
  • Molecular: t(11;22)(p13;q12) fusing EWSR1 with WT1 - highly specific, detectable by RT-PCR or RNA-seq
  • Recent work (2026, Brahmi et al., Curr Opin Oncol) highlights the role of androgen receptor (AR) expression in DSRCT - AR positivity in ~70% of cases, with implications for targeted therapy with AR antagonists. Multi-layered molecular profiling is informing novel treatment strategies in this ultra-rare tumour
  • Prognosis: Poor; median survival ~2-4 years; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) under investigation
(Quick Compendium of Clinical Pathology, p. 411)

3.2 Neuroblastoma

  • Age: Predominantly <5 years; arises from adrenal gland or sympathetic ganglia
  • Morphology: Neuropil background (Homer-Wright rosettes); ranges from undifferentiated to differentiating
  • IHC: Synaptophysin+, chromogranin+, NSE+, CD56+; PHOX2B (nuclear) is highly sensitive/specific
  • Biochemical marker: Elevated urinary catecholamine metabolites (VMA, HVA) and MIBG avidity - unlike other SRCTs
  • Molecular: MYCN amplification (poor prognosis), ALK mutations (targetable), segmental chromosomal aberrations
  • Differential clue: The presence of neuropil is "highly distinctive" and essentially excludes other SRCTs; positive MIBG scan rules out all non-adrenergic SRCTs (Tietz Textbook)

3.3 Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS)

  • Subtypes: Embryonal (most common, children), Alveolar (PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusions, worse prognosis), Pleomorphic (adults), Spindle cell/Sclerosing (MYOD1 mutations)
  • IHC: Desmin+, myogenin+ (nuclear, most specific), MyoD1+ (nuclear), MSA+; these myogenic markers are the diagnostic cornerstone
  • Molecular: Alveolar RMS - t(2;13)(q35;q14) PAX3-FOXO1 or t(1;13)(p36;q14) PAX7-FOXO1; detection by FISH or RT-PCR is prognostically important (PAX3-FOXO1 = worse)
  • Emerging markers: MYOD1 L122R mutation (spindle cell/sclerosing RMS) detectable by sequencing; relevant for targeted PI3K pathway inhibition

3.4 Wilms Tumour (Nephroblastoma)

  • Classically presents in children <5 years as a renal mass; characterised by the classic triphasic pattern (blastema + epithelial + stromal)
  • The blastemal component is the SRCT component
  • IHC: WT1 (nuclear), cyclin D1, CD56; blastemal component is CD99+
  • Molecular: WT1 mutations, WTX mutations, CTNNB1 mutations; anaplastic Wilms - TP53 mutations. Newer: SIX1/SIX2 mutations in blastemal-predominant Wilms

3.5 Lymphoma/Leukaemia

  • Burkitt lymphoma: Extremely rapid proliferation; "starry sky" pattern; MYC rearrangement (8q24)
  • Precursor B/T-ALL: Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)+, CD34+, lineage-specific markers
  • IHC differentiator: LCA (CD45) positivity effectively separates lymphoma from other SRCTs; TdT distinguishes precursor lesions
  • Clinical clue: High WBC count, lymph node enlargement, bone marrow infiltration pattern (Tietz Textbook)

3.6 NUT Carcinoma (Midline Carcinoma)

  • An aggressive carcinoma of midline structures (mediastinum, sinonasal, head/neck) with SRCT morphology; occasional "abrupt squamous differentiation"
  • IHC: NUT IHC (nuclear, speckled pattern) - highly sensitive and specific; a single positive IHC is now considered diagnostic
  • Molecular: BRD4-NUT t(15;19), BRD3-NUT, or NSD3-NUT fusions
  • Bell et al. (Head Neck Pathol 2024, PMID 38315310) reviewed sinonasal SRCTs emphasising NUT IHC as a key "hack" in the IHC panel for poorly differentiated sinonasal SRCTs

3.7 Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Small Cell Carcinoma

  • Merkel cell carcinoma: Neuroendocrine SRCT of skin; CK20+ (dot-like perinuclear), synaptophysin+, chromogranin+; associated with Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) - LT antigen IHC (CM2B4 antibody) positive in ~80%
  • Small cell lung carcinoma: TTF-1+, CK7+, neuroendocrine markers+; rarely metastasises with SRCT morphology to sites that mimic primary SRCTs

4. Emerging and Recently Defined Entities

4.1 EWSR1::ATF1 and FET::CREB Fusion Tumours

These show round cell morphology overlapping with USRCS but occur at specific sites. EWSR1::ATF1 also defines clear cell sarcoma of soft parts. Recent case series (Rekhi et al., Virchows Arch 2024, PMID 39031200) describe extra-abdominal epithelioid and round cell mesenchymal neoplasms with these fusions that overlap morphologically with sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma.

4.2 SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Tumour

  • Highly aggressive SRCT occurring in adults (especially thoracic)
  • Loss of SMARCA4 (BRG1) protein by IHC - now a standard panel member in mediastinal/thoracic SRCTs
  • WHO 2022 thoracic tumour classification recognises this as a distinct entity

4.3 Infantile Fibrosarcoma / Congenital Fibrosarcoma

  • SRCT variant in neonates/infants; ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (targetable with TRK inhibitors - larotrectinib, entrectinib)
  • NTRK IHC pan-Trk (EPR17341) serves as a screening tool before confirming by FISH/NGS

5. Diagnostic Approach: Tiered Algorithm

The 2025 review by Davis & Cheesman (Virchows Arch, PMID 39576278) and the 2025 Marcelis & Sciot review (PMID 39510958) recommend a tiered approach:
Step 1: Morphology + clinical context (age, site, serum markers)
         ↓
Step 2: First-line IHC panel
         • CD99, TdT, LCA, desmin/myogenin, synaptophysin/chromogranin, WT1,
           NKX2.2, S100, pan-keratin, NUT IHC, SMARCA4
         ↓
Step 3: Targeted molecular testing based on IHC
         • EWSR1 FISH (break-apart) → if positive, partner identification needed
         • BCOR IHC + CCNB3 IHC (for BCOR-CCNB3)
         • CIC FISH (break-apart) + ETV4 IHC
         ↓
Step 4: RNA-based NGS fusion panel (if Steps 1-3 inconclusive)
         → Detects all known fusion transcripts in a single assay
         → Identifies rare/novel fusions (EWSR1::NFATc2, EWSR1::PATZ1, etc.)
         ↓
Step 5: Methylation array profiling (in research/reference centres)
         → Can resolve diagnostically challenging cases
         → WHO 5th edition recognises "essential" vs. "desirable" diagnostic criteria
            to allow diagnosis in centres without full molecular capabilities

6. Role of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

NGS - especially RNA sequencing-based fusion panels - has become the most powerful single tool for SRCT diagnosis:
  • Detects known and novel gene fusions simultaneously in one assay
  • Required for definitive classification of EWSR1/FUS::NFATc2 and EWSR1::PATZ1 sarcomas
  • Cytology specimens (FNA smears, cell blocks) yield high-quality nucleic acid and are now validated for NGS in round cell sarcomas (Gajdzis & Klijanienko, Acta Cytol 2026, PMID 41615867)
  • DNA methylation profiling complements fusion detection for borderline/unclassifiable cases
  • The 2025 reviews emphasise that accurate subclassification of EWSR1/FUS fusion variants carries direct therapeutic implications - different chemotherapy sensitivity and prognosis (Jennings et al., 2025)

7. Summary IHC Differential Table

TumourCD99NKX2.2DesminMyogeninSynaptophysinWT1LCAKey Molecular
Ewing sarcoma+++ (membranous)+-----EWSR1-ETS fusions
CIC-rearranged+/- (focal)----+ (nuclear)-CIC-DUX4
BCOR-CCNB3+/-------BCOR-CCNB3, CCNB3+
DSRCT+-+ (dot)-++-EWSR1-WT1
Rhabdomyosarcoma--+++---PAX3/7-FOXO1 (alveolar)
Neuroblastoma----+++--MYCN amp, ALK
Lymphoma/ALL+/------+++Lineage fusions
NUT carcinoma-------BRD4/3/NSD3-NUT
SMARCA4-def.-------SMARCA4 loss (IHC)
Merkel cell ca.----+--CK20 dot, MCPyV

Key Recent References

  • Dehner CA et al. "Updates on WHO classification for small round cell tumors: Ewing sarcoma vs. everything else." Hum Pathol 2024 - PMID 38280658
  • Mori K et al. "Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation for the Updated WHO 5th Ed." RadioGraphics 2026 - PMID 41886300
  • Davis JL & Cheesman E. "Emerging round cell sarcomas in children." Virchows Arch 2025 - PMID 39576278
  • Jennings LJ et al. "EWSR1/FUS::NFATC2 Sarcomas: Clinicopathologic review." Arch Pathol Lab Med 2025 - PMID 41167264
  • Marcelis L & Sciot R. "Undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas of bone and soft tissue." Ann Pathol 2025 - PMID 39510958
  • Makise N & Yoshida A. "Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas of Bone." Surg Pathol Clin 2025 - PMID 40716917
  • Gajdzis P & Klijanienko J. "Cytological, Immunocytochemical, and Molecular Findings of Extraskeletal Round Cell Sarcomas in Paediatric Patients." Acta Cytol 2026 - PMID 41615867
  • Bell D. "Top IHC/ISH Hacks for Sinonasal Small Round Cell Tumors." Head Neck Pathol 2024 - PMID 38315310
  • Robbins & Kumar Basic Pathology, p. 786 (Ewing sarcoma morphology)
  • Quick Compendium of Clinical Pathology 5th Ed., p. 411 (EWSR1 family)
  • Tietz Textbook of Laboratory Medicine 7th Ed. (neuroblastoma differential)
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.