Phasic and non phasic tendon transfers
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed
phasic non-phasic tendon transfer
Searching the Web
phasic vs non-phasic tendon transfer orthopedics surgery classification
Based on what I've gathered from the textbooks and my medical knowledge, here is a comprehensive answer on phasic vs. non-phasic tendon transfers.
Phasic and Non-Phasic Tendon Transfers
This classification describes the normal firing pattern of the donor muscle relative to the function it will be asked to perform after transfer. It is one of the key principles guiding donor muscle selection in tendon transfer surgery.
Definitions
| Type | Definition |
|---|---|
| Phasic transfer | The donor muscle normally fires during the same phase of motion as the function it is being transferred to restore |
| Non-phasic (antagonistic) transfer | The donor muscle normally fires during the opposite phase of motion — i.e., it is an antagonist to the movement being restored |
Phasic Transfers
The transferred muscle contracts at the correct time in the gait/movement cycle without extensive re-education. The nervous system already "knows" when to fire it.
Examples:
- Tibialis posterior → peroneus brevis: both are phase-active during stance — tibialis posterior (invertor) is transferred to restore eversion in peroneal nerve palsy. This is a phasic transfer and re-education is relatively straightforward.
- Flexor carpi radialis (FCR) → extensor digitorum communis (EDC): In posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) palsy, wrist flexors are synergistic with finger extension (they co-contract to stabilize the wrist during finger extension), making them good phasic donors. — Rockwood & Green's Fractures in Adults, 10th ed., p. 784
- Palmaris longus → extensor pollicis longus (EPL): for the same reason as above.
Re-education: Easier — the patient's motor cortex does not need to fundamentally reprogram firing.
Non-Phasic (Antagonistic) Transfers
The donor muscle normally fires in the opposite phase of movement to the function being restored. After transfer, the muscle must be reprogrammed by the cortex to fire at a different time.
Example:
- Tibialis anterior → tibialis posterior in cases of spastic drop foot: this is a non-phasic transfer because tibialis anterior fires during swing phase (dorsiflexion), not stance (inversion/plantarflexion).
- Extensor → flexor transfers: e.g., extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) transferred to flexor digitorum profundus in high median/ulnar palsy — the extensor must now fire during a flexion phase.
Re-education: Harder — requires intensive physiotherapy and biofeedback. Some patients (especially adults) may never fully re-educate the transfer.
Why Phase Matters
- Retraining burden: Phasic transfers require less intensive post-operative physiotherapy. Non-phasic transfers demand concentrated neurological re-education.
- Outcome quality: Phasic transfers generally produce more automatic and coordinated movements. Non-phasic transfers may produce functional but less natural patterns.
- Synergism: A related (but distinct) concept — muscles that co-contract (synergists) are also easier to re-educate than true antagonists. For instance, wrist flexors and finger extensors are functional synergists (both active during grip release), making FCR an excellent donor for finger extension. — Rockwood & Green's Fractures in Adults, 10th ed., p. 784
Summary of Other Key Tendon Transfer Principles (Context)
For completeness, phasic/non-phasic selection sits alongside these principles:
- Full passive range of motion at target joint before transfer
- Donor muscle expendable (redundant function)
- Donor strength ≥ MRC grade 4–5 (one grade lost post-transfer)
- Amplitude and excursion of donor must match requirement
- Straight line of action where possible
- Healthy, pliable soft-tissue bed
- One tendon = one function
— Rockwood & Green's Fractures in Adults, 10th ed., p. 784
Clinical Pearl
In children with cerebral palsy or polio, non-phasic transfers can sometimes be more effectively re-educated than in adults due to greater cortical neuroplasticity. In adults, surgeons generally prefer phasic donors whenever anatomically feasible to maximize spontaneous re-education and reduce rehabilitation burden.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.