Prenatal screening for anomaly

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"prenatal screening" AND "fetal anomaly"

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

prenatal screening fetal anomaly guidelines 2024 2025 ACOG ISUOG

Now I have comprehensive information. Let me compile a thorough answer.

Prenatal Screening for Fetal Anomaly

Prenatal screening aims to identify pregnancies at increased risk for structural, chromosomal, or genetic anomalies before delivery. It is distinct from diagnostic testing — a screen-positive result indicates increased risk, not a definitive diagnosis.

Overview & Principles

All pregnant patients, regardless of age or baseline risk, should be offered counseling about prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic testing options. Screening modalities should not be combined (only one method per pregnancy). A second-trimester ultrasound at 18–22 weeks is recommended for all patients, irrespective of genetic screening choices.

1. First-Trimester Screening (11–13+6 Weeks)

A. Combined First-Trimester Screening

The gold standard first-trimester approach combines:
ComponentMarker
Nuchal Translucency (NT)Ultrasound: fluid collection at back of fetal neck
Free β-hCGSerum
PAPP-APregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A
Performance (5% screen-positive rate):
  • Down syndrome (Trisomy 21) detection: ~88% (95% CI 84–89.4%)
  • Trisomy 18: >90% detection with combined biochemistry + NT
  • In women >35 years: 90–92% detection, but 16–22% false-positive rate
"In practice, screening is performed between 11 and 13 weeks of gestation." — Creasy & Resnik's Maternal-Fetal Medicine

B. Additional Ultrasound Markers (First Trimester)

  • Absent nasal bone: Associated with trisomy 21 in ~73% of affected fetuses (vs 0.5% of euploid). Adding nasal bone to NT + maternal age improves detection to ~93% at 5% FPR.
  • Other soft markers: tricuspid regurgitation, ductus venosus waveform abnormality.

2. Cell-Free DNA Screening (cfDNA / NIPS)

Mechanism

cfDNA (cell-free fetal DNA from placental trophoblasts) circulates in maternal plasma. Next-generation sequencing of these fragments allows quantification of chromosome representation. If the fetus has trisomy 21, chromosome 21 fragments are proportionally increased (~1.05× in a 10% fetal fraction pregnancy).

Performance (vs conventional screening)

ConditionSensitivityPPV (High Risk)PPV (Low Risk)
Trisomy 2197%91%82%
Trisomy 1893%84%37%
Trisomy 1395%87%49%
Key points:
  • cfDNA is the most sensitive and specific screening test for common aneuploidies — superior to all serum/ultrasound screening methods
  • Not diagnostic — positive results require invasive confirmation (CVS or amniocentesis)
  • ACOG now recommends offering cfDNA to ALL pregnant women, not just high-risk
  • Only one screening modality should be used per pregnancy
  • "No-call" results (insufficient fetal fraction) carry higher aneuploidy risk (2.7% vs 0.4% background) and warrant genetic counseling + detailed ultrasound

Platforms

Three main strategies:
  1. Massively parallel shotgun sequencing (MPSS) — most resource-intensive, broadest coverage
  2. SNP allelic ratio — uses single nucleotide polymorphisms to model ploidy scenarios
  3. Non-SNP allelic ratio — targeted enrichment + counting statistics

Limitations

  • False negatives occur; not 100% sensitive
  • Reduced performance for sex chromosome abnormalities
  • Microdeletion syndromes (22q11.2, 5p, 1p36): SMFM does not currently recommend routine screening due to insufficient clinical validation and unknown PPV/NPV
  • Causes of inaccurate results: confined placental mosaicism, fetal mosaicism, maternal sex chromosome abnormalities, organ transplant, co-twin demise, maternal malignancy
  • Unusual/multiple aneuploidies on cfDNA may signal maternal malignancy → oncology referral warranted

cfDNA in Twin Pregnancies

  • Performance for trisomy 21 is similar to singletons (detection rate ~99%, FPR <0.1%)
  • Higher "no-call" rate due to lower fetal fraction per twin
  • Cannot determine which twin is affected → invasive testing required to distinguish
  • Data for trisomies 18 and 13 in twins are limited

3. Second-Trimester Screening

A. Maternal Serum AFP (MSAFP) — Neural Tube Defects

  • Performed at 16–18 weeks (optimally; acceptable 15–20 weeks)
  • AFP is synthesized by fetal yolk sac → GI tract → liver; leaks into amniotic fluid and maternal serum via open neural tube defects
  • Cutoff 2.0–2.5 MoM: Detection rate ~100% for anencephaly, 85–92% for open spina bifida; FPR 2–5%
Factors affecting MSAFP:
FactorEffect
Gestational age (rises 16–18%/week)Must correct with accurate dating
Maternal weightDilution → lower AFP; must adjust
Black ethnicity10–15% higher; correct for lower NTD baseline
IDDMLower AFP values; requires adjustment (10× higher NTD risk!)
Multiple gestationElevated due to multiple placentas
Evaluation of elevated MSAFP (>2.0–2.5 MoM):
  1. Ultrasound to confirm gestational age
  2. Rule out multiple gestation
  3. Identify other causes (fetal demise, etc.)
  4. If unexplained, targeted ultrasound + consider amniocentesis for amniotic fluid AFP

B. Quadruple ("Quad") Screen

Combines AFP + hCG + inhibin A + unconjugated estriol (uE3) for Down syndrome detection in the second trimester. Detection ~80% at 5% FPR. Now largely superseded by cfDNA but still used where cfDNA is unavailable.

4. Structural Anomaly Scan — Second-Trimester Ultrasound (18–22 Weeks)

The anomaly scan remains the cornerstone for structural defect detection and is recommended for all pregnancies:
SystemStructures Evaluated
Brain/CNSVentricles, posterior fossa, corpus callosum, neural tube
FaceNasal bone, lip/palate, orbits
CardiacFour-chamber view, outflow tracts
AbdomenStomach, kidneys, bladder, abdominal wall
SpineVertebral column
LimbsLong bones, hands, feet
Placenta/fluidPlacental location, amniotic fluid volume
A 2024 Cochrane meta-analysis (Buijtendijk et al., Cochrane Database Syst Rev, PMID 38721874) assessed ultrasound accuracy for structural fetal abnormalities in the first and second trimester in low-risk/unselected populations.

5. Invasive Diagnostic Tests (Following Screen-Positive Results)

ProcedureTimingWhat It Provides
Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS)10–13 weeksFull karyotype, microarray, molecular testing
Amniocentesis≥15 weeksFull karyotype, microarray, amniotic AFP for NTD
Both carry a small procedural risk of pregnancy loss (~0.1–0.3%) and are the only definitive diagnostic options.

6. Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) — Pre-Conception

For couples at high risk (known chromosomal/monogenic disorder):
  • PGT-A: Screens embryos for aneuploidies (blastocyst biopsy at day 5–6 + NGS/array CGH)
  • PGT-M: Tests for monogenic conditions
  • PGT-SR: Detects structural chromosome rearrangements

Summary: Screening Pathway

All patients → Offer counseling re: screening options
        ↓
First trimester (11–13 wks)
  ├── cfDNA (preferred, most sensitive) → if positive → CVS
  └── Combined screen (NT + PAPP-A + free β-hCG) → if positive → CVS
        ↓
Second trimester (15–22 wks)
  ├── MSAFP (16–18 wks) → NTD screening
  ├── Anomaly ultrasound (18–22 wks) → ALL patients
  └── Quad screen (if first-trimester screening not done)
        ↓
Screen-positive → Genetic counseling + amniocentesis

Key Clinical Points

  • cfDNA replaced combined screening as first-line — SMFM Consult Series #74 (endorsed ACOG November 2025) confirms cfDNA as the most sensitive test for trisomies 21, 18, 13
  • The 18–22 week anatomy scan is mandatory regardless of genetic screening choices
  • False positives are lower with cfDNA but PPV drops markedly in low-risk populations — pre-test counseling is essential
  • A positive screen is never diagnostic — always confirm with invasive testing before pregnancy management decisions
  • No-call cfDNA results should prompt genetic counseling and detailed ultrasound
Creasy & Resnik's Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 9th ed. | Thompson & Thompson Genetics & Genomics in Medicine, 9th ed.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.