Based on the search results, I now have the specific information about how root stumps indicated for extraction are classified in the DMFT index.
Root Stump Indicated for Extraction in DMFT (Missing Component)
A root stump that is indicated for extraction is classified as "M" (Missing) in the DMFT index, even though the tooth is still physically present in the mouth.
Key Classification Rules:
According to DMFT recording principles:
"Also included should be those teeth which are so badly decayed that they are indicated for extraction"
Specific Coding:
In modified DMFT protocols, this is designated as:
- Code 10: "To be lost/extracted due to caries" - This applies when more than two-thirds of the crown has been lost or the tooth is abscessed, but there may be no visible sign of decay.
Distinguishing Features:
A root stump indicated for extraction is counted as "M" (Missing) when:
- More than 2/3 of the crown is destroyed/lost
- The tooth is abscessed due to caries
- The tooth is so severely compromised that extraction is clinically indicated
- The destruction/damage is due to caries (not trauma, orthodontics, or other causes)
Important Distinction:
This differs from a simple root stump that remains in the mouth:
- Root stump NOT indicated for extraction = classified as "D" (Decayed) if carious, or remains present
- Root stump INDICATED for extraction = classified as "M" (Missing) in the DMFT score
This classification accounts for the tooth's prognosis and treatment status, recognizing that severely compromised teeth indicated for extraction contribute to the patient's caries experience in the same way as already-extracted teeth.