Create a clinical case with a diagnosis of acute or chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis

Reading File
Checking Date & Time
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Searching Images

tubulointerstitial nephritis histology interstitial inflammation eosinophils

Loading Image
Loading Image
I now have all the information needed to create a comprehensive, well-structured clinical case. Here it is:

Clinical Case: Acute Drug-Induced Tubulointerstitial Nephritis


πŸ“‹ Patient Presentation

Patient: M.R., 58-year-old male Chief complaint: Decreased urine output, flank pain, and skin rash for 5 days

🩺 History of Present Illness

M.R. presents to the nephrology clinic with a 5-day history of progressive oliguria, bilateral flank tenderness, and a diffuse maculopapular rash on the trunk and upper extremities. He reports low-grade fever (38.1Β°C) and general malaise. Three weeks prior, he was started on omeprazole (a proton pump inhibitor) for newly diagnosed gastroesophageal reflux disease, and approximately 10 days ago his physician added sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim for a urinary tract infection.
He denies dysuria at this point, flank trauma, or prior kidney disease. He takes no NSAIDs or other nephrotoxic agents.

πŸ—‚οΈ Past Medical History

  • Hypertension (well-controlled on amlodipine)
  • GERD (recently diagnosed)
  • No history of kidney disease, diabetes, or autoimmune disorders

πŸ’Š Medications

MedicationDuration
Amlodipine 5 mg/dayChronic
Omeprazole 20 mg/day3 weeks
Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim10 days

πŸ”¬ Physical Examination

  • Vital signs: T 38.1Β°C, BP 148/90 mmHg, HR 92 bpm, RR 16/min, SpOβ‚‚ 98% on room air
  • General: Alert, mildly distressed
  • Skin: Diffuse maculopapular rash on trunk and arms (present in ~25% of cases)
  • Abdomen: Bilateral costovertebral angle tenderness on palpation (tender kidneys)
  • Cardiovascular/Respiratory: Normal
  • No peripheral edema (glomeruli are spared)

πŸ§ͺ Laboratory Results

TestResultReference
Serum creatinine4.2 mg/dL (↑ from baseline 1.0)0.7–1.2 mg/dL
BUN58 mg/dL7–20 mg/dL
eGFR15 mL/min/1.73mΒ²>60
WBC13,500/Β΅L4,500–11,000
Eosinophils12% (absolute: 1,620/Β΅L)<500/Β΅L
Serum IgEElevatedβ€”
Na⁺ / K⁺138 / 5.6 mEq/Lβ€”
HCO₃⁻17 mEq/L (↓)22–26 mEq/L
Serum Ca²⁺Normalβ€”
Urine output320 mL/day (oliguria)>400 mL/day

🧫 Urinalysis & Urine Sediment

FindingResult
ProteinTrace (non-nephrotic)
Hematuria+ (microscopic)
Leukocyturia (WBC casts)Present
EosinophiluriaPresent (Giemsa-stained cytocentrifuged specimen)
Granular castsAbsent
Urine cultureNegative
Interpretation: The combination of pyuria with WBC casts and eosinophiluria β€” in the absence of bacteriuria β€” is the hallmark of acute allergic tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN). Absence of nephrotic-range proteinuria distinguishes this from glomerular disease.

πŸ–ΌοΈ Renal Biopsy β€” Histopathology

Renal biopsy was performed given the severity of AKI and unclear timeline.
FIG. 1 β€” Drug-Induced Tubulointerstitial Nephritis (H&E stain)
Drug-induced tubulointerstitial nephritis. (A) Chronic inflammatory infiltrate in the interstitium with tubular injury. (B) Prominent eosinophilic infiltrate.
FIG. 1 β€” Drug-induced tubulointerstitial nephritis. (A) Interstitial edema with dense mononuclear infiltrate (lymphocytes and macrophages) and tubular injury. (B) High-power view showing a prominent eosinophilic infiltrate characteristic of hypersensitivity reaction. Glomeruli appear normal. β€” Robbins & Kumar Basic Pathology
Histological findings:
  • Interstitial edema and dense infiltration by lymphocytes, macrophages, and eosinophils
  • Tubulitis (lymphocytes invading tubular epithelium)
  • Normal glomeruli (no nephritic or nephrotic changes)
  • No granuloma formation (granulomas may appear with thiazides or rifampin)
FIG. 2 β€” Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis (H&E stain, renal cortex)
Renal cortex biopsy showing acute tubulointerstitial nephritis with diffuse interstitial infiltrate, tubulitis, and scattered eosinophils, with preserved glomerular architecture.
FIG. 2 β€” Renal cortex biopsy demonstrating diffuse interstitial inflammatory infiltrate (lymphocytes, plasma cells, scattered eosinophils), peritubular inflammation with tubulitis, and relatively preserved glomerular architecture β€” consistent with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis.

πŸ” Pathogenesis

The most likely sequence of events in this patient:
  1. Omeprazole and/or SMX-TMP are secreted by tubular cells and covalently bind to cytoplasmic or extracellular tubular components, creating immunogenic neoantigens
  2. Two concurrent hypersensitivity mechanisms operate:
    • Type I (immediate): Elevated IgE β†’ eosinophilia, rash
    • Type IV (delayed, cell-mediated): T lymphocyte infiltration β†’ tubular injury and interstitial inflammation
  3. The reaction is idiosyncratic (not dose-dependent), explaining why most patients tolerate these drugs
  4. Re-exposure triggers a faster anamnestic response (1 day vs. 1–2 weeks on first exposure)
PPIs are among the most common causes of ATIN and may also potentiate ATIN risk in patients concurrently taking immune checkpoint inhibitors. β€” Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22E

🧠 Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisArgument ForArgument Against
Acute TIN (drug-induced) βœ…Fever, rash, eosinophilia, recent drug exposure, WBC/eosinophil casts, non-nephrotic proteinuria, biopsy findingsβ€”
Acute pyelonephritisFever, flank pain, pyuriaNegative urine culture, no bacteriuria, eosinophiluria
Acute tubular injury (ATI)AKI, oliguriaNo granular casts, no hypotension/nephrotoxin, eosinophiluria present
GlomerulonephritisRising CrAbsent nephritic/nephrotic syndrome, normal glomeruli on biopsy
NSAID-induced minimal changeWBC casts, proteinuriaNo NSAID use, biopsy shows no podocyte effacement

βœ… Final Diagnosis

Acute allergic (drug-induced) tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN), most likely caused by sulfamethoxazole and/or omeprazole, presenting as AKI with oliguria, fever, rash, eosinophilia, and eosinophiluria.

πŸ’Š Management

StepAction
1. Immediate withdrawal of offending drugsDiscontinue SMX-TMP and omeprazole
2. Supportive careFluid management, electrolyte correction (hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis)
3. CorticosteroidsPrednisone 1 mg/kg/day Γ— 2–4 weeks (evidence supports earlier steroid use in severe or unresponsive cases)
4. Renal replacement therapyHemodialysis if severe uremia, refractory hyperkalemia, or fluid overload
5. MonitoringSerial creatinine, urine output, urinalysis weekly until recovery
6. Alternative medicationsSwitch to Hβ‚‚ blocker (e.g., famotidine) for GERD; alternative antibiotic for UTI if needed
Clinical recognition is imperative: withdrawal of the offending drug is followed by recovery, though it may take several months for renal function to return to normal. Recovery is incomplete in approximately 40% of cases, particularly in older patients or when diagnosis is delayed. β€” Robbins & Kumar Basic Pathology

πŸ“Š Expected Clinical Course

  • Creatinine should begin to decline within 1–2 weeks of drug withdrawal
  • Full recovery in ~60% of cases; partial recovery or progression to chronic TIN in ~40%
  • Recurrence is likely if the same or structurally similar drug is reintroduced

πŸ“š Sources

  • Robbins & Kumar Basic Pathology β€” Drug-Induced Tubulointerstitial Nephritis, p. 518
  • Robbins, Cotran & Kumar Pathologic Basis of Disease β€” Tubulointerstitial Nephritis, p. 862
  • Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22E (2025) β€” Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis, Chapter 319

Make a ppt only on case

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Running Command
Running Command
Running Command
!

Your input exceeds the context window of this model. Please adjust your input and try again.

We encountered an error while processing your request. Please try again or reach out to us for help.

βœ‰οΈhi@orris.care
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.