Role of pet ct in obstetrics and gynaecology 10 marks answer
PET CT gynecology obstetrics clinical applications
FDG PET CT cervical cancer staging recurrence
| Feature | Advantage | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | High for metabolically active tumours | False negatives with small (<0.5 cm) or low-FDG tumours |
| Specificity | Better than size-based CT criteria for LN staging | False positives with inflammation, infection, post-op changes |
| Whole-body imaging | Detects unexpected distant metastases in one scan | Radiation dose (~8-10 mSv) |
| Prognostic value | SUVmax correlates with survival | Not routine in early-stage disease |
| Treatment guidance | Alters management in advanced disease | Limited role in early FIGO I-IIa cervical cancer |
Role of mri in obstetrics and gynaecology 10 marks answer
| Sequence | Purpose |
|---|---|
| T1-weighted (axial) | Identify haemorrhage (high signal), fat, lymph nodes, bone marrow |
| T2-weighted (axial + sagittal) | Best soft-tissue contrast; primary sequence for uterus/ovary anatomy |
| T2-weighted fat-suppressed | Distinguish fat from haemorrhage in adnexal masses |
| High-resolution axial oblique T2 (perpendicular to endometrial cavity) | Depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer |
| High-resolution axial oblique T2 (perpendicular to endocervical canal) | Parametrial invasion in cervical cancer |
| Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) post-gadolinium | Endometrial staging; characterise adnexal masses; detect peritoneal implants |
| Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) + ADC map | Myometrial invasion depth; distinguish tumour from fibrosis; detect drop metastases |
| Fetal System | MRI Indication |
|---|---|
| Central nervous system | Ventriculomegaly characterisation; corpus callosum agenesis; cortical malformations (lissencephaly, polymicrogyria); posterior fossa anomalies (Dandy-Walker); brain tumours; prognosis counselling |
| Abdominal wall defects | Distinguish gastroschisis from omphalocele; assess bowel quality |
| Lung pathology | Congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM); congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) - lung volume measurement for postnatal prognosis |
| Genitourinary | Cloacal/urogenital anomalies |
| Neck masses | Cervical teratoma - airway involvement assessment for ex-utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT procedure) |
| Advantage | Limitation |
|---|---|
| No ionising radiation | Expensive and less widely available |
| Superior soft-tissue contrast | Long acquisition time (motion artefact in restless patients) |
| Multiplanar imaging | Contraindicated with certain metallic implants (pacemakers, cochlear implants, some vascular clips) |
| Differentiates tissue composition (fat, blood, water) | Claustrophobia in some patients |
| Safe in pregnancy (2nd/3rd trimester) | Gadolinium contraindicated in pregnancy (Category C) |
| Differentiates tumour recurrence from fibrosis | Lower specificity than histology for lymph node micrometastasis |
| DWI improves staging without contrast | Not suitable for emergency rapid assessment |
Role of AI in obstetrics and gynaecology 10 marks answer
artificial intelligence obstetrics gynaecology clinical applications
role of artificial intelligence in obstetrics and gynaecology 2024 2025 review
PMID: 40726846
PMID: 39924503
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12303583
AI deep learning fetal monitoring CTG preterm birth prediction
machine learning cervical cancer colposcopy ovarian cancer diagnosis
| Technology | Mechanism | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Learning (ML) | Learns patterns from structured data | Risk scoring, outcome prediction |
| Deep Learning / CNN | Multi-layered neural networks for image analysis | Ultrasound, colposcopy, histopathology |
| Natural Language Processing (NLP) | Analyses free text | EHR mining, clinical notes |
| Reinforcement Learning | Learns via feedback loops | Robotic surgery |
| Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) | Combines multiple AI modules with EHR data | Point-of-care alerts, risk stratification |
| Challenge | Detail |
|---|---|
| Data quality and bias | AI trained on non-diverse datasets may underperform in different ethnic/geographic populations |
| Black-box opacity | DL models provide predictions without interpretable reasoning - limits clinician trust |
| Regulatory approval | Most AI tools lack robust prospective trial validation and formal regulatory clearance |
| Liability | Unclear legal responsibility when AI-assisted decisions cause harm |
| Data privacy | Training on patient records raises GDPR and consent concerns |
| Over-reliance | Risk of deskilling clinicians and automation bias |
| Generalisability | Models trained in high-income settings may not transfer to low-resource environments |
| Domain | Key AI Role |
|---|---|
| Obstetrics | Fetal anomaly detection, CTG interpretation, preterm/pre-eclampsia prediction, PPH risk |
| Gynaecological oncology | Cervical screening, ovarian/endometrial cancer diagnosis, pathology classification |
| Reproductive medicine | Embryo selection, stimulation protocol optimisation |
| Surgery | Robotic guidance, tissue recognition, training feedback |
| Emergency O&G | Rapid triage, ectopic risk scoring, endometriosis diagnosis |
Fetal mri 10 marks answer
fetal MRI indications techniques clinical applications
fetal MRI brain ventriculomegaly outcome prediction
PMID: 35794403
| Sequence | Application |
|---|---|
| HASTE / SSFSE (Half-Fourier Acquisition Single-shot Turbo Spin Echo) | Primary sequence - rapid T2-weighted; resistant to fetal motion; provides excellent anatomical detail of brain, lung, abdomen |
| T1-weighted GRE / VIBE | Detects haemorrhage, fat, meconium, calcification (high signal); liver glycogen |
| T2-weighted (TRUFI/FIESTA) | CSF, fluid-filled structures, fetal spine |
| Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) | Detects ischaemia, haemorrhage, restricted diffusion in tumours |
| 3D volumetric sequences | Organ volume measurement (lung, brain) |
| EPI / BOLD | Placental perfusion (research use) |
| Advantage | Detail |
|---|---|
| Unaffected by bony skull vault | No acoustic shadowing - excellent views of both hemispheres |
| Not operator-dependent | Reproducible and standardised |
| Large field of view | Whole-fetal survey in one scan |
| Superior soft-tissue contrast | Differentiates grey matter, white matter, CSF, haemorrhage |
| Oligohydramnios/obesity | Maintains image quality when USS is technically limited |
| Unfavourable fetal position | Multiplanar capability compensates |
| Cortical maturation | Identifies sulcation/gyration abnormalities invisible on USS |
| Limitation | Detail |
|---|---|
| Fetal movement | Motion artefact (mitigated by HASTE/fast sequences); sedation rarely used |
| First-trimester safety | Theoretical risk from radiofrequency heating; avoided <14 weeks |
| Gadolinium contraindicated | Crosses placenta; safety in human fetus not established |
| Limited availability | Requires 1.5T MRI + specialist radiologist with fetal MRI expertise |
| Cost | More expensive than USS |
| Cortical maturation before 20-22 weeks | Limited gyral detail at early gestations |
| False reassurance | A normal fetal MRI does not exclude all neurodevelopmental outcomes |