attachment

Analysis report

analyse_media
Reading File
Loading Image
Finding Sources
Now I have a clear view of the ECG. Let me carefully analyze what I can see and read all the printed data from the tracing.

ECG Analysis Report

Date/Time: 25/06/2026, 06:18:48 Facility: CMBE Hospitals (NBER) Lead Configuration: 12-Lead, Standard Placement Technical Settings:
  • Speed: 25 mm/sec
  • Limb gain: 10 mm/mV
  • Chest gain: 10.0 mm/mV
  • Filter: F 50 - 0.15-100 Hz
  • Calibration: 100B

Printed Machine Measurements (from left panel)

ParameterValue
Rate~70 bpm (estimated)
PR180 ms
QRS(D)90 ms
QT373 ms
QTc403 ms
Axis~-13° (left axis noted)
PEE
PRS2
T3

Systematic Lead-by-Lead Interpretation

Rhythm & Rate

  • Rate: Approximately 70-75 bpm (regular R-R intervals)
  • Rhythm: Regular sinus rhythm - P waves are upright and consistent in leads I, II, and aVF

Intervals

  • PR interval: 180 ms - at the upper limit of normal (normal: 120-200 ms). Not prolonged enough to diagnose 1st-degree AV block, but borderline.
  • QRS duration: 90 ms - normal (< 120 ms), no bundle branch block
  • QT: 373 ms / QTc: 403 ms - QTc is within normal range (< 440 ms in men, < 460 ms in women)

Axis

  • Axis approximately -13° - borderline left axis deviation (normal: -30° to +90°). Just within or at the edge of normal; no pathological left axis deviation.

P Waves

  • Upright in I, II - consistent with sinus origin
  • No obvious P-wave abnormality noted

QRS Morphology

Limb Leads:
  • Lead I: Upright QRS with reasonable amplitude
  • Lead II: Positive QRS, upright T waves
  • Lead III: Smaller amplitude, variable morphology (consistent with axis)
  • aVR: Negative QRS (as expected)
  • aVL: Small or biphasic - consistent with borderline left axis
  • aVF: Upright QRS
Precordial Leads (V1-V6):
  • V1: rS pattern with relatively small R wave - normal
  • V2: Predominantly negative (rS) - transitioning
  • V3: Transition zone
  • V4: R wave becoming more prominent - normal R-wave progression
  • V5: Tall R wave with upright T wave
  • V6: Tall R wave
R-wave progression appears normal across the precordium (transition occurring around V3-V4), which argues against anterior wall ischemia.

ST Segments

  • No definitive ST elevation or depression is visible at this image resolution
  • ST segments appear isoelectric across limb and precordial leads
  • No obvious acute ischemic changes identified

T Waves

  • T waves appear upright in I, II, V4-V6
  • No obvious T-wave inversion in lateral leads
  • Inverted or flat T waves cannot be confidently excluded in V1-V3 (physiologically normal in V1-V2)

Summary / Interpretation

FindingStatus
RhythmNormal Sinus Rhythm
Rate~70-75 bpm - Normal
PR interval180 ms - High-normal / Borderline prolonged
QRS duration90 ms - Normal
QTc403 ms - Normal
AxisApproximately -13° - Borderline left axis / Normal
R-wave progressionNormal
ST changesNo acute ST elevation or depression identified
T-wave changesNo definitive pathological T-wave inversion seen
Bundle branch blockNot present
Hypertrophy signsCannot confirm LVH or RVH at this resolution

Clinical Impression

This ECG appears to show Normal Sinus Rhythm with:
  1. A borderline PR interval (180 ms) - warrants correlation with symptoms; if symptomatic (e.g., near-syncope, fatigue), 24-hour Holter monitoring may be considered to rule out higher-degree AV blocks
  2. Borderline left axis - a non-specific finding; differential includes left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), inferior MI (old), or normal variant especially in obese or pregnant individuals
  3. No acute ischemic changes identified on this tracing

Important Disclaimer: This is an educational/informational ECG analysis based on the available image. ECG interpretation must always be performed and confirmed by a qualified physician or cardiologist in the context of the patient's clinical presentation, symptoms, history, and other investigations. This report does not constitute a medical diagnosis or replace professional medical advice. If you or the patient are experiencing chest pain, shortness of breath, palpitations, or syncope, seek immediate medical attention.

Is there St elevation

Loading Image

ST Elevation Assessment

Looking carefully at the ST segments across all 12 leads:

Answer: No definitive ST elevation is present on this ECG.

Here is the lead-by-lead ST assessment:
LeadST Finding
IIsoelectric - no elevation
IIIsoelectric - no elevation
IIIIsoelectric - no elevation
aVRIsoelectric (negative deflection as expected)
aVLIsoelectric - no elevation
aVFIsoelectric - no elevation
V1ST appears at baseline - no elevation
V2Possible very slight upward sloping ST, but within normal limits for V1-V2 (up to 2.5 mm is acceptable in men)
V3ST at or near baseline - no significant elevation
V4ST isoelectric - no elevation
V5ST isoelectric - no elevation
V6ST isoelectric - no elevation

Important caveats

  1. Image quality and angle - the ECG is photographed at a slight angle and the resolution limits fine measurement. A dedicated digital trace or physical ruler measurement would be more definitive.
  2. STEMI criteria for reference - ST elevation is considered significant when:
    • ≥ 1 mm in 2 or more contiguous limb leads
    • ≥ 2 mm (men) / ≥ 1.5 mm (women) in V2-V3
    • ≥ 1 mm in 2 or more contiguous precordial leads
  3. No reciprocal ST depression is visible either, which would typically accompany a STEMI in the mirror-image leads.
Bottom line: The ST segments on this tracing appear isoelectric. There is no ST elevation pattern consistent with STEMI or pericarditis visible here. However, this must be confirmed by a physician who can physically measure the tracing and correlate it with the patient's symptoms. If there is any chest pain or clinical suspicion, do not rely on this image-based assessment - seek immediate medical evaluation.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.