All key images and content secured. Here is the complete updated answer with stoma marking and parastomal hernia sections added:
Stoma Marking, Classification, Colostomy, and Parastomal Hernia
(Sources: Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery 28th Edition, Fischer's Mastery of Surgery 8th Edition)
SECTION A: STOMA SITING AND MARKING
Preoperative stoma marking is one of the most important steps in stoma surgery. A poorly sited stoma leads to appliance leakage, skin excoriation, and severe quality-of-life impairment - complications that are almost entirely preventable.
Who Marks the Stoma?
- Ideally performed by a trained enterostomal therapy (ET) / stoma care nurse preoperatively
- In the absence of an ET nurse, the operating surgeon must perform siting (Fischer's Mastery of Surgery)
- Every gastrointestinal surgeon should be familiar with stoma siting principles
Principles of Stoma Siting
FIGURE 95.17 (Sabiston) - Stoma siting methodology: (A) Avoid areas not visible to the patient; (B) Identify abdominal folds and creases; (C) Locate rectus abdominis muscle; (D) Final stoma sites within patient's line of sight, avoiding folds
Step-by-Step Stoma Marking
1. Assess the patient in three positions: supine, sitting, and standing/bending - the abdomen changes shape significantly between positions
2. Identify areas to AVOID:
- Skin creases and folds (especially in obese patients)
- Bony prominences (anterior superior iliac spine, costal margin)
- Previous scars or skin grafts
- The belt line and waistband area
- The umbilicus
- Areas not visible to the patient when they look down (patient must be able to see and manage the stoma)
3. Identify the ideal zone:
- Within the rectus abdominis muscle - reduces risk of parastomal hernia
- On the infraumbilical fat mound - provides a flat, broad surface for bag adherence (see Sabiston Fig. 95.15 below)
- For ileostomy: right iliac fossa, right paramedian infraumbilical
- For end colostomy: left iliac fossa, left paramedian infraumbilical
- General landmark: midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and umbilicus, adjusted for body habitus
4. Mark the site with a permanent marker. At the time of surgery, a needle scratch is made on the skin to prevent the mark being washed off during skin preparation.
FIGURE 95.15 (Sabiston) - Infraumbilical fat mound: the ideal stoma site, shown here marked for a descending colostomy
FIGURE 95.16 (Sabiston) - Consequence of no preoperative marking: colostomy "disappears" in abdominal fold when patient sits up, making pouching extremely difficult
Preoperative ileostomy site marking photo (Fischer's Mastery of Surgery):
Special Considerations
- In obese patients: creases may shift dramatically with position; marking while seated is particularly important
- Clothing preferences (belts, waistbands, religious garments) should be discussed with the patient - stoma must not be under the belt line
- In emergency surgery where marking is not possible: standard landmark of 5 cm lateral to the midline and 4 cm below the umbilicus within the rectus muscle is generally suitable
SECTION B: CLASSIFICATION OF STOMAS
By Organ/Content
| Type | Effluent | Site |
|---|
| Ileostomy | Liquid, green, caustic | Right iliac fossa |
| Colostomy | Semi-formed to solid | Left iliac fossa (end); variable (loop) |
| Urostomy/Ileal conduit | Urine | Right iliac fossa |
By Duration
| Temporary | Permanent |
|---|
| Protect anastomosis | APR for low rectal cancer |
| Trauma | Ulcerative colitis / FAP |
| Diverticulitis | Severe incontinence |
| Downstaging CRT | Bedridden patients |
By Configuration (Sabiston Fig. 95.18)
| Configuration | Description |
|---|
| End stoma | Single limb; distal bowel removed or closed (Hartmann's) |
| Loop stoma | Loop brought out over a rod; two openings (proximal = functional) |
| End-loop stoma | End of bowel with adjacent loop sutured to it |
| Double-barrel | Both cut ends brought out side-by-side (Paul-Mikulicz) |
| Continent stoma | Internal pouch with valve; emptied by catheter |
SECTION C: COLOSTOMY - TYPES, THERAPEUTIC USES AND TECHNIQUE
(Covered in full in the previous response - see above. Summary:)
| Type | Use | Site |
|---|
| Loop colostomy | Temporary diversion, protect anastomosis, trauma | Sigmoid or transverse |
| End colostomy | After APR, Hartmann's; permanent | Left iliac fossa |
| Double-barrel | Emergency resection, too ill for anastomosis | Variable |
| Palliative colostomy | Unresectable rectal cancer, obstruction | Sigmoid |
SECTION D: PARASTOMAL HERNIA
Definition
A parastomal hernia is a hernia of the abdominal wall adjacent to a stoma. When a stoma is created, a defect is deliberately made in all layers of the abdominal wall - this is effectively a hernia by design. The fascial defect tends to enlarge over time, allowing loops of bowel or intra-abdominal fat to protrude around the stoma. The rate is over 50% in long-term follow-up. (Bailey & Love)
Causes and Risk Factors
Technical / Surgical Factors:
- Aperture made too large at the time of creation - the most preventable cause
- Stoma placed outside the rectus abdominis muscle (lateral placement dramatically increases hernia risk)
- Tension on the bowel - causes stomal retraction and subsequent enlargement of the defect
- Failure to anchor the bowel to the abdominal wall
Patient Factors: (Fischer's Mastery)
- Obesity / high BMI - increases intra-abdominal pressure and makes tissue weaker
- Smoking - impairs collagen synthesis and wound healing
- Poorly controlled medical comorbidities (diabetes, malnutrition, immunosuppression, steroids)
- Weight gain after surgery
- Chronic cough or straining (raised intra-abdominal pressure)
- Previous abdominal wall surgery / scarring
Time-related:
- Risk is directly proportional to length of time the patient has the stoma (Fischer's)
- Rate can reach 50% or more at 5 years
Clinical Presentation
- A bulge or swelling around the stoma, most visible when the patient coughs or strains
- Difficulty fitting / maintaining the stoma appliance - most common functional complaint
- Appliance bags fit poorly, leading to leakage and peristomal skin excoriation
- Intermittent obstruction of the stoma
- Pain or discomfort around the stoma
- Rarely: acute obstruction or strangulation (surgical emergency)
Management
Conservative (Non-operative)
- Hernia support belt - reduces symptoms and aids appliance adherence
- Revision of pouching system to accommodate the changed stoma morphology
- Weight loss, smoking cessation, optimisation of comorbidities
- In temporary stomas: conservative management until the stoma can be reversed, with simultaneous repair of the fascial defect at the time of reversal (Fischer's)
Surgical - Indications for Repair
Surgery is reserved for:
- Significant symptoms (pain, difficulty with appliance)
- Inability to adequately pouch the stoma
- Obstruction, ischaemia, or incarceration of the hernia (emergency)
Surgical Options
1. Primary Suture Repair
- Simple fascial repair around the stoma
- Associated with near 100% recurrence rate - rarely used alone (Bailey & Love)
- Appropriate only as a bridge or in emergency settings
2. Stoma Relocation / Re-siting
- Stoma is moved to the opposite side of the abdomen
- Previously common, now no longer recommended as parastomal hernia occurs at the same rate at the new site (Bailey & Love)
- The original defect still requires closure
3. Mesh Repair - Preferred Surgical Option
Mesh repair is associated with significantly lower recurrence rates than suture repair alone. Three mesh repair techniques exist:
| Technique | Description | Recurrence |
|---|
| Keyhole / Slit mesh | Mesh placed with central aperture to accommodate bowel; mesh can be placed in onlay, retromuscular, or intraperitoneal positions | 21-73% |
| Sugarbaker technique | Large underlay mesh placed intraperitoneally; stoma limb exits the mesh lateral to the fascial defect (no central hole); bowel is sandwiched between mesh and abdominal wall | 7-15% - best results |
| Modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker | Laparoscopic version of Sugarbaker; equivalent recurrence to open repair | 7-15% |
- Mesh infection rate in reported series: only 2-2.6%, and only one case of bowel erosion in 16 studies - much lower than historically feared (Fischer's)
- Retromuscular (sublay) mesh placement is generally preferred over onlay to reduce infection risk
- No RCT has directly compared laparoscopic vs. open repair
4. Stoma Reversal
- The ideal solution - remove the stoma and restore bowel continuity
- Obliterates the hernia defect and removes the problem entirely
- Not always possible (e.g., permanent colostomy after APR, sphincter deficiency)
Prophylaxis of Parastomal Hernia
Correct technique at creation is the most important preventive measure:
- Place stoma through the rectus abdominis muscle
- Appropriate aperture size (admit two fingers, but no larger)
- Ensure bowel reaches skin without tension
Prophylactic mesh at time of stoma creation:
- Large-pore polypropylene mesh placed in the retromuscular space with bowel passing through central hole
- A meta-analysis of 12 RCTs (cited in Sabiston): prophylactic mesh reduces parastomal hernia risk by ~40%
- However, RCTs from the past 5 years show no significant advantage, with comparable complication and mortality rates
- Decision to use prophylactic mesh should be individualised (Sabiston)
Summary: Parastomal Hernia at a Glance
| Feature | Detail |
|---|
| Incidence | >50% at 5 years |
| Most common symptom | Appliance leakage / difficulty pouching |
| Best investigation | CT abdomen (defines anatomy, detects obstruction) |
| Conservative | Hernia belt, appliance revision |
| Best surgical option | Sugarbaker mesh (lowest recurrence 7-15%) |
| Avoid | Simple suture repair alone (~100% recurrence) |
| Prevent | Correct siting + rectus passage + mesh at creation |
Sources:
- Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, Chapter 95 (Stoma siting, Fig. 95.15, 95.16, 95.17, 95.18, 95.19, 95.20)
- Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th Edition, Chapter 64 (Parastomal hernia), Chapter 77 (Types of colostomy)
- Fischer's Mastery of Surgery, 8th Edition (Ostomy Marking, Parastomal Hernia)