Landmark trial for ICH

Reading File
Searching PubMed

intracerebral hemorrhage landmark clinical trials

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

intracerebral hemorrhage blood pressure INTERACT2 ATACH

Searching PubMed

intracerebral hemorrhage surgery STICH MISTIE evacuation

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

intracerebral hemorrhage ENRICH MISTIE minimally invasive surgery trial

Reading Article

PMID: 41962119

Reading File
Searching PubMed

intracerebral hemorrhage ENRICH trial minimally invasive parafascicular surgery 2023

Reading File
Searching PubMed

intracerebral hemorrhage hematoma expansion hemostasis factor VIIa tranexamic acid trial

Reading File
Searching the Web

ENRICH trial 2023 ICH minimally invasive surgery results NEJM

Reading File
Reading File
I now have comprehensive data from the textbook and PubMed. Let me compile the full answer.

Landmark Trials in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)


A. BLOOD PRESSURE MANAGEMENT

1. INTERACT2 (2013)

  • Full name: Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage Trial 2
  • Design: RCT, ~2,800 patients; acute ICH with SBP 150-220 mmHg within 6 hours of onset
  • Intervention: Intensive BP lowering (target SBP <140 mmHg within 1 hour) vs. standard care (target <180 mmHg)
  • Primary outcome: Death or major disability (mRS 3-6) at 90 days
  • Result: Primary outcome was NOT significantly different (52.0% vs 55.6%; OR 0.87, p=0.06), but ordinal analysis of the full mRS showed a significant improvement in functional outcome with intensive treatment
  • Significance: Established that acute intensive BP lowering is safe and suggested modest functional benefit; shifted practice toward targeting SBP <140 mmHg

2. ATACH-2 (2016)

  • Full name: Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II
  • Design: RCT, ~1,000 patients; acute ICH, SBP ≥180 mmHg within 4.5 hours
  • Intervention: Intensive (SBP 110-139 mmHg) vs. standard (SBP 140-179 mmHg) using IV nicardipine
  • Primary outcome: Death or disability (mRS 4-6) at 3 months
  • Result: No benefit - primary outcome 38.7% vs 37.7% (RR 1.04, p=0.72); trial stopped early for futility
  • Significance: Intensive lowering below 140 mmHg did not further improve outcomes vs. standard <180 mmHg; more renal adverse events in intensive group
Key synthesis (2022 meta-analysis, PMID 34983270): Pooled INTERACT2 + ATACH-2 data revealed a J-shaped relationship - the lowest risk of poor outcome was in patients who achieved SBP 130-150 mmHg; overly aggressive lowering below 120 mmHg worsened outcomes.
2026 Update (PMID 41962119): A meta-analysis of ATACH-2, INTERACT2, and INTERACT3 found intensive BP reduction did not show significant benefit in either deep or lobar ICH when analyzed by location.

3. INTERACT3 (2023)

  • Design: Stepped-wedge cluster RCT in 144 hospitals in 10 countries
  • Intervention: Comprehensive care bundle: intensive BP lowering + glucose management + temperature management + reversal of anticoagulation
  • Result: Significant improvement in functional outcome (mRS shift toward better outcomes) with the bundle
  • Significance: First trial to show benefit of a bundled care protocol rather than a single intervention

B. SURGICAL EVACUATION

4. STICH I (2005)

  • Full name: Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage
  • Design: RCT, 1,033 patients; spontaneous supratentorial ICH
  • Intervention: Early surgery (within 96 hours) vs. initial conservative treatment
  • Primary outcome: Death or disability (extended Glasgow Outcome Scale) at 6 months
  • Result: No benefit - unfavorable outcome 74% surgery vs 76% conservative (p=0.414)
  • Subgroup finding: Hematomas <1 cm from the cortical surface showed a trend toward benefit with surgery
  • Significance: Established that routine early surgery for supratentorial ICH has no proven benefit - Bradley & Daroff's Neurology, p.1029

5. STICH II (2013)

  • Design: RCT, ~600 patients; superficial lobar ICH (<1 cm from cortex), no IVH
  • Intervention: Early surgery vs. initial conservative treatment
  • Result: No significant difference in unfavorable outcome (59% surgery vs 62% conservative; OR 0.86, p=0.367)
  • Post-hoc analysis: Suggested possible benefit in patients with predicted poor prognosis (those already expected to do badly may benefit from surgery)
  • Significance: Confirmed STICH I findings even for the "favorable" subgroup; surgery remains unproven as routine - Bradley & Daroff's Neurology, p.1029

6. MISTIE III (2019)

  • Full name: Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Alteplase for ICH Evacuation III
  • Design: RCT, 506 patients; large ICH (≥30 mL), minimally invasive catheter aspiration + tPA to dissolve clot
  • Primary outcome: Functional independence (mRS 0-3) at 365 days
  • Result: Primary outcome negative (45% vs 41%; adjusted difference 4%, p=0.30); reduced 30-day mortality (9% vs 18%)
  • Exploratory finding: Patients in whom residual hematoma was reduced to ≤15 mL had significantly better outcomes, suggesting a volume-reduction threshold effect
  • Significance: Did not show benefit on the primary outcome, but the mortality signal and volume-reduction relationship prompted further MIS research - Bradley & Daroff's Neurology, p.1029

7. ENRICH Trial (2024 - NEJM) 🔴 Most Recent Positive Trial

  • Full name: Early MiNimally-invasive Removal of ICH
  • Design: Multicenter, adaptive RCT; 300 patients; supratentorial ICH (lobar or anterior basal ganglia), volume 30-80 mL, GCS 5-14
  • Intervention: Early minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) using BrainPath + Myriad device vs. guideline-based medical management; surgery within 24 hours of onset
  • Primary outcome: Utility-weighted mRS (UWmRS) at 180 days
  • Result: POSITIVE - UWmRS 0.458 (MIPS) vs 0.374 (MM); difference 0.084 (95% CI 0.005-0.163); posterior probability of superiority 98.1%
  • By location: Benefit driven by lobar hemorrhages (UWmRS 0.513 vs 0.371; difference 0.127). Anterior basal ganglia: neutral (basal ganglia enrollment halted for futility)
  • Mortality: 30-day mortality 9.3% surgery vs 18.1% control; 180-day mortality 20% vs 23%
  • ICU LOS: Reduced by 2.8 days; hospital LOS reduced by 3.1 days
  • Published: NEJM 2024;390:1277-1289 (DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2308440)
  • Significance: First positive RCT to improve functional outcomes in ICH - a landmark result, specifically for early MIPS in lobar hemorrhages

C. HEMOSTASIS / ANTICOAGULATION REVERSAL

8. FAST Trial (2008) - rFVIIa

  • Design: RCT, ~841 patients; recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) given within 4 hours of ICH onset
  • Result: No benefit in functional outcome despite reducing hematoma growth; increased thromboembolic events
  • Significance: Established that rFVIIa is not recommended for routine spontaneous ICH

9. TICH-2 (2018) - Tranexamic Acid

  • Design: RCT, ~2,325 patients; tranexamic acid 1g IV bolus + 1g IV over 8 hours within 8 hours
  • Result: Reduced early death and hematoma expansion at 24 hours, but no improvement in functional outcome (mRS 0-3) at 90 days
  • Significance: Tranexamic acid not routinely recommended for spontaneous ICH

10. INCH Trial (2016) - PCC vs FFP in Warfarin-ICH

  • Design: RCT; prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) vs fresh frozen plasma in VKA-related ICH
  • Result: PCC was superior to FFP in achieving INR normalization within 3 hours; better hematoma control
  • Significance: Established PCC as the preferred agent for warfarin reversal in ICH; now standard of care - Bradley & Daroff's Neurology, p.1030

D. INTRAVENTRICULAR HEMORRHAGE

11. CLEAR III (2017) - Intraventricular tPA

  • Design: RCT, ~500 patients; IVH with obstructive hydrocephalus; intraventricular alteplase vs saline via EVD
  • Result: No improvement in favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-3) at 180 days; reduced mortality but increased survivors with severe disability
  • Significance: IVH thrombolysis does not improve functional outcomes despite clearing clot

Summary Table

TrialYearFocusKey Result
STICH I2005Early surgeryNo benefit (routine surgery)
STICH II2013Lobar surgeryNo benefit
INTERACT22013BP loweringTrend to benefit; SBP <140 safe
FAST2008rFVIIaNo functional benefit
ATACH-22016Intensive BPNo benefit vs standard target
INCH2016PCC vs FFPPCC superior for VKA-ICH
CLEAR III2017IVH tPANo functional benefit
TICH-22018Tranexamic acidNo functional benefit
MISTIE III2019MIS + tPAPrimary negative; mortality benefit signal
INTERACT32023Care bundleBundle improves outcomes
ENRICH2024Early MIPSPOSITIVE - lobar ICH benefit

Bottom line: ICH has historically been a "trial graveyard" with most interventions failing to show functional benefit. The ENRICH trial (NEJM 2024) is the first truly positive RCT showing functional improvement - specifically for lobar hemorrhages treated with early minimally invasive parafascicular surgery. For BP management, targeting SBP 130-140 mmHg is supported by INTERACT2/INTERACT3 (not below 120). PCC is standard for warfarin reversal (INCH trial).
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.