Articles and research and thesis on fibular strut graft

Reading File
Searching PubMed

fibular strut graft

Searching the Web

fibular strut graft surgical technique indications outcomes research

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

fibular strut graft femoral neck fracture avascular necrosis

Searching PubMed

fibular strut graft spine vertebral column reconstruction

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Searching PubMed

fibular strut graft proximal humerus fracture locking plate

Searching PubMed

vascularized fibular graft osteonecrosis hip

Reading File
Reading File
Reading Article
Reading Article
I now have rich material across textbooks and literature. Let me compile the comprehensive response.

Fibular Strut Graft: Comprehensive Research & Literature Review

What Is a Fibular Strut Graft?

A fibular strut graft uses a segment of the fibula - either as a free non-vascularized graft, a vascularized free flap with its peroneal artery pedicle, or a pedicled/local graft - as a structural bone support ("strut") across a defect, nonunion, or mechanically compromised skeletal site. The fibula is favored because it is long, tubular, cortical, and expendable without major functional loss, and when vascularized, it retains osteogenic capacity and the ability to hypertrophy under load.

I. Anatomical Basis & Biomechanical Rationale

The fibula offers:
  • Cortical tubular geometry ideal for intramedullary or extramedullary strut positioning
  • Length up to 25-30 cm harvestable
  • Peroneal artery pedicle (when vascularized): allows microvascular anastomosis and living bone transfer
  • Hypertrophy potential: vascularized grafts remodel and strengthen over time under mechanical loading
  • Expendability: the tibia bears ~85% of lower leg load; fibula removal causes minimal functional deficit if the distal 6 cm are preserved

II. Major Clinical Applications

1. Proximal Humerus Fractures (Medial Column Support)

Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics (15th Ed., 2026) describes fibular strut graft use in proximal humerus ORIF as providing medial column support, particularly in:
  • Osteoporotic bone
  • Posteromedial calcar comminution
  • Metadiaphyseal extension
  • 3- and 4-part fractures at risk of varus collapse
"Use of a fibular strut graft to provide medial column support has proven efficacious particularly in patients with osteoporosis, demonstrating improved radiographic outcomes and reduced complications compared with locked plating alone." - Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed.
The graft is inserted endosteally (intramedullary), acting as an internal scaffold to support the humeral head and prevent varus malunion or screw cut-out.
Key literature:
StudyDesignKey Finding
Tang et al. (2022) - PMID 35191274Meta-analysis, 749 patients, 10 cohort studiesLocking plate + fibular strut allograft superior to locking plate alone for humeral head height preservation, neck-shaft angle, Constant-Murley score, ASES score, VAS, varus malunion rate (RR 0.22), and screw penetration rate (RR 0.26)
Cheng et al. (2025) - PMID 40676439Systematic review + meta-analysis, 37,494 patients, 35 studies incl. 6 RCTsAugmentation (including fibular strut) improves pain, function, and radiographic outcomes but did not significantly reduce overall complication risk vs. locking plate alone; no significant difference between strut fibular and non-fibular grafts
Myers et al. (2020) - PMID 32745228Comparative seriesLower complication incidence (coronal collapse 5%, AVN 6.5%, screw breakage/loosening 6.6%, revision surgery 1.7%) with fibular strut vs. without
Tuerxun et al. (2020) - PMID 32882053ComparativeComplication rate 7.3% (fibular allograft group) vs. 27.3% (locking plate alone)
Matassi et al. (2012) - PMID 22921382Evaluation study100% radiographic healing without AVN, head collapse, or screw cut-out in 17 patients
Das SP et al. (2025) - PMID 40450630Four-part fracturesClinico-radiological outcomes of fibular strut augmentation in four-part proximal humerus fractures
Technique (Willis et al., as described in Campbell's 15th Ed.):
  1. Expose and mobilize the nonunion site
  2. Debride devitalized bone; shorten as needed for contact
  3. Open the medullary canal both proximally and distally
  4. Fashion fibular allograft with high-speed burr - length should be 3-4x the humerus diameter at the nonunion site
  5. Insert graft into one fragment, then slide across the nonunion site
  6. Stabilize with DCP/LC-DCP/LCP; at least one screw on each side through the allograft

2. Femoral Neck Fractures

Fibular strut grafting is used in both fresh and neglected femoral neck fractures, typically in combination with cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw (DHS). The graft serves to:
  • Fill the medullary canal, providing structural support and preventing collapse
  • Provide biological stimulus to union
  • Support the posterior calcar in comminuted fractures
Key literature:
StudyPMIDFocus
Zahid et al. (2012)22933677Cannulated screws + fibular strut for fresh fractures with posterior comminution
Pal et al. (2014)25163951Cancellous screws + fibular strut for neglected femoral neck fractures
Elgeidi & El Negery (2017)28730395DHS + fibular strut for fresh femoral neck fractures with posterior comminution
Mehraj et al. (2022)36524782Fibular strut + cannulated screws for fresh femoral neck fractures
Azam et al. (2009)19753182Free fibular strut graft in neglected femoral neck fractures in adults
Elgeidi & El-Negery (2017)28439306Fibular strut for nonunited femoral neck fractures in children
Velmurugesan et al. (2025)40511348DHS + fibular strut vs. Femoral Neck System for comminuted femoral neck fractures

3. Avascular Necrosis (AVN) of the Femoral Head - Vascularized Fibular Graft

This is one of the most technically sophisticated applications. As described in Miller's Review of Orthopaedics (9th Ed.):
"Vascularized fibular strut is placed up against subchondral plate of femoral head to prevent collapse. Microvascular anastomosis with lateral femoral circumflex artery."
Principles:
  • Surgical removal of the necrotic segment through a large core hole
  • VFG placed up against the subchondral plate to mechanically prevent femoral head collapse
  • Anastomosis to the lateral femoral circumflex artery
  • Particulate autogenous bone grafting of adjacent resected bone
Indications: Medium (B) and large (C) lesions; no crescent sign preferred; reasonable success even with crescent sign and minimal head collapse
Complications: Flexor hallucis longus contracture is the most common donor-site complication
StudyPMIDKey Contribution
Eward et al. (2012)22733182Long-term hip preservation with VFG in precollapse osteonecrosis
Richard et al. (2021)34016425Outcomes of VFG for post-traumatic osteonecrosis
Gaskill et al. (2009)19651942Donor and graft site morbidity with free vascularized fibular transfer
Davis et al. (2006)17079376THA after failed VFG - technical considerations
Dean et al. (2001)11347822Pediatric femoral head osteonecrosis treated with free VFG
Khan et al. (2025)41116936Core decompression vs. fibular strut graft in early AVN of the hip

4. Spine - Anterior Column Reconstruction

Fibular strut grafts have a long history in anterior spinal surgery. Campbell's 15th Ed. notes that the anterior retropharyngeal approach (McAfee modification) provides adequate exposure for insertion of iliac or fibular strut grafts without posterior carotid dissection or oral cavity entry.
Applications include:
  • Anterior cervical corpectomy reconstruction
  • Cervicothoracic junction reconstruction
  • Tumor resection (chordoma, chondrosarcoma)
  • Spondylolisthesis salvage
  • Craniocervical junction instability
StudyPMIDContribution
Minami et al. (1997)9020443Free vascularized fibular strut graft for anterior spinal fusion
Yanamadala et al. (2017)28327915Vascularized fibular strut autografts in spinal reconstruction after chordoma/chondrosarcoma resection
Addosooki et al. (2016)27099811Anterior cervical reconstruction using free vascularized fibular graft after corpectomy
Goldman et al. (2020)32795683Cervical spine and craniocervical junction reconstruction with vascularized fibula free flap
Thongtrangan et al. (2003)15347222Management of strut graft failure in anterior cervical spine surgery
Meyers et al. (2001)11493859Salvage reconstruction with vascularized fibular strut fusion for severe spondylolisthesis

5. Ankle Arthrodesis - Transfibular (Transmalleolar) Approach

Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics (15th Ed.) describes the transfibular arthrodesis technique incorporating a vascularized fibular strut graft as a modification of the Mann technique:
"The original technique of Mann has been modified to incorporate, if possible, a vascularized fibular strut graft. This graft brings an added measure of stability and vascular supply to the fusion site. Colman and Pomeroy reported a 96% fusion rate in 48 patients, with an average time to fusion of 82 days."
Additional ankle applications:
  • Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis: Fibular strut graft used as intramedullary bone scaffold, especially in revision cases and Charcot neuroarthropathy
    • Sankey et al. (2023) - PMID 38274151: TTC arthrodesis with intramedullary fibular strut graft and adjuvant hardware fixation
    • Monaco et al. (2016) - PMID 27009078: Fibular strut graft for revisional TTC arthrodesis
    • Desnantyo et al. (2023) - PMID 37399591: Fibular strut graft for primary ankle arthrodesis in diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy

6. Humerus Nonunion / Gap Nonunion

The fibular strut graft acts as a "biological intramedullary nail" (JBJS) in complex nonunions:
  • Gap nonunions of the humeral shaft
  • Oligotrophic nonunions refractory to revision ORIF
  • Provides both structural support and biological stimulus
StudyPMID / SourceKey Finding
Kale et al. (2024)39253680Gap nonunion humerus: fibular strut graft + iliac crest + LCP functional outcomes
Fink Barnes et al. (2020)-Non-vascularized fibular strut allograft for humeral shaft nonunions: postoperative outcomes and surgical technique review
Badman et al. (cited in Campbell's)-Achieved radiographic union in 17/18 (94%) of surgical neck nonunions

7. Elbow, Forearm & Long Bone Defects

Campbell's also documents fibular strut allograft use in revision elbow surgery and free vascularized fibular graft (VFG) for long bone defects >6 cm in the forearm, tibia, and femur. An updated techniques review (Park, Archives of Hand and Microsurgery 2024) summarizes expanded VFG indications:
  • Mid-tibial, humeral, forearm, distal femur, proximal tibia defects
  • Shoulder and knee joint arthrodesis
  • Tumor resection reconstruction

8. Osteoperiosteal Fibular Strut Grafting

A recent technique modification:
  • Venkatadass et al. (2024) - PMID 39066905: Osteoperiosteal fibular strut grafting to improve union rates - preserving the periosteum maximizes the osteogenic potential of the graft

III. Vascularized vs. Non-Vascularized Fibular Strut

FeatureNon-Vascularized (Free Graft)Vascularized (VFG/Free Flap)
MechanismOsteoconductive scaffold; incorporation by creeping substitutionLiving bone; immediate osteogenesis; remodels and hypertrophies
Best forShort defects (<6 cm), medullary canal support, adjunct fixationDefects >6 cm, AVN of femoral head, irradiated fields, tumor resection
Revascularization timeMonths; full strength restored lateImmediate vascular supply
Technical complexityModerateHigh (microsurgery required)
Donor site morbidityLow (FHL contracture uncommon)Low but requires microsurgical expertise
HypertrophyMinimalYes - can double in diameter over years
Key complicationGraft resorption or fracture before incorporationVascular thrombosis, FHL contracture

IV. High-Level Evidence Summary (Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews)

  1. Tang et al. (2022) [PMID 35191274] - Meta-analysis: Locking plate + fibular strut allograft vs. locking plate alone for proximal humerus fractures (749 patients). Fibular strut significantly superior in humeral head height, neck-shaft angle, Constant-Murley, ASES, VAS, varus malunion (RR 0.22), and screw penetration (RR 0.26). No difference in osteonecrosis rate.
  2. Cheng et al. (2025) [PMID 40676439] - Systematic review + meta-analysis: 37,494 patients across 35 studies (6 RCTs). Augmentation (bone grafts + cement) improves pain, function, and radiographic outcomes but does not convincingly reduce complication or screw protrusion risk vs. locking plate alone. No significant difference between fibular and non-fibular strut grafts.
  3. Dasari et al. (2022) (cited in web sources): Improved outcomes for proximal humerus ORIF augmented with fibular allograft in elderly patients - systematic review and meta-analysis (J Shoulder Elbow Surg).

V. Donor Site Considerations

  • Harvest typically from the ipsilateral or contralateral leg, 10-15 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus
  • Distal 6 cm of fibula must be preserved to maintain ankle syndesmosis stability
  • Peroneal nerve at risk proximally
  • For VFG: peroneal artery and venae comitantes harvested with the graft
  • Most common donor morbidity: ankle instability (if too much distal fibula removed), FHL tightness/contracture, peroneal nerve injury

VI. Current Research Gaps & Trends (2024-2026)

  • Osteoperiosteal technique (Venkatadass et al., 2024): Preserving periosteum to enhance biology
  • Optimal insertion angle for proximal humerus: Finite element analysis (MDPI Bioengineering 2025) comparing vertical vs. oblique insertion
  • DHS + fibular strut vs. newer implants (Femoral Neck System) for comminuted femoral neck fractures (Velmurugesan et al., 2025 - PMID 40511348)
  • Fibula strut allograft + biological augmentation (tibial autograft, BMP, PRP) for oligotrophic nonunions
  • TTC arthrodesis outcomes in Charcot neuroarthropathy

Key References

Textbooks:
  • Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics, 15th Ed. (2026) - Chapters on humerus fractures/nonunion, ankle arthrodesis, cervical spine approaches
  • Miller's Review of Orthopaedics, 9th Ed. - Hip osteonecrosis chapter
PubMed - Highest Evidence:
Web Resources:
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.