Here are all the answers from standard sources:
QUESTION 7 (a, b, c) — Air Embolism
Source: Miller's Anesthesia 10e, Morgan & Mikhail 7e
Q7a: Factors Leading to Venous Air Embolism and Arterial Air Embolism [4 Marks]
(i) Factors Leading to VENOUS Air Embolism
For VAE to occur, two conditions must coexist:
- An open vein communicating with the atmosphere
- Subatmospheric pressure at the open vessel (wound above the level of the heart)
Surgical / Positional Factors:
- Sitting position for posterior fossa / cervical spine surgery — wound is significantly above the heart; venous pressure in cerebral sinuses becomes subatmospheric
- Degree of head-up tilt — greater elevation = greater negative venous pressure gradient
- Posterior fossa craniotomy (all positions) — exposure of sagittal, transverse, and sigmoid sinuses
- Cervical laminectomy in sitting position — emissary veins of suboccipital muscle opened
- Parasagittal or falcine meningiomas — proximity to sagittal sinus
- Craniosynostosis procedures in children
- Any supratentorial surgery where wound is above the heart
- Spine surgery, hip arthroplasty, hepatic surgery (hepatic venous pressure low or negative with patient tilted)
- Laparoscopic surgery (CO₂ insufflation into opened vessels)
- Obstetric procedures: C-section, hysteroscopy (uterine veins open)
Vascular/Anatomical Factors:
- Non-collapsible cerebral venous sinuses — dural attachments prevent collapse even when pressure falls
- Emissary veins entering occipital bone
- Diploic veins opened by craniotomy or pin fixation
- Cervical epidural veins
Physiological Factors Augmenting VAE:
- Spontaneous ventilation — intermittent negative intrathoracic pressure pulls air in
- Hypovolaemia — reduces central venous pressure further
- Nitrous oxide — diffuses into air bubbles (34× faster than N₂ leaves), expanding them dramatically; lethal volume reduced to 1/3 to 1/2 in animals
Iatrogenic Factors:
- Central venous catheter insertion/removal (especially subclavian)
- Haemodialysis catheter placement
- Penetrating chest trauma
- Mechanical ventilation (barotrauma)
(ii) Factors Leading to ARTERIAL Air Embolism
Direct Entry into Arterial System:
- Cardiac surgery (open-heart) — air entering open cardiac chambers during cardiopulmonary bypass; incomplete de-airing before coming off bypass
- Intravascular sheath/catheter insertion (interventional radiology, femoral/subclavian arterial lines) — greatest source of iatrogenic arterial gas embolism
- Cardiopulmonary bypass circuit — air in circuit entering arterial limb
- Arterial line insertion/removal — particularly during accidental large-volume air injection
- Pulmonary barotrauma (SCUBA diving, mechanical ventilation) — alveolar rupture → air enters pulmonary veins → left heart → systemic arteries
- Thoracic surgery — injury to pulmonary veins allowing air entry
- Bronchoscopy with high-pressure jet ventilation
Indirect — Via Paradoxical Embolism:
- Patent foramen ovale (PFO) present in ~25% of adults
- When RAP > LAP, venous air crosses into left heart → systemic arteries (see Q7b)
Transpulmonary Passage:
- Large volumes of VAE can overwhelm the pulmonary capillary "filter"
- Air traverses pulmonary vasculature to reach pulmonary veins
- Volatile anaesthetics (pulmonary vasodilators) lower this threshold
Q7b: Paradoxical Air Embolism — What It Is and How It Occurs [3 Marks]
Definition
Paradoxical air embolism (PAE) is the passage of venous air (or other embolic material originating in the venous system) into the systemic arterial circulation via an intracardiac communication, most commonly a patent foramen ovale (PFO), despite the embolus originating on the venous side of the circulation.
Anatomical Basis
- PFO is present in approximately 25% of adults (probe-patent foramen)
- Normally, left atrial pressure (LAP) > right atrial pressure (RAP) → PFO remains functionally closed
- During fetal life, the foramen ovale allows right-to-left shunting (bypassing lungs); it closes after birth but remains probe-patent in 25% of people
Mechanism of Occurrence
- VAE occurs → air accumulates in the right atrium and right ventricle
- Pulmonary vascular resistance rises as emboli obstruct pulmonary arterioles
- Right ventricular afterload increases → RV dilates → RAP rises progressively
- When RAP exceeds LAP (gradient as small as 5 mmHg sufficient) → PFO is forced open
- Air passes: Right atrium → Left atrium → Left ventricle → Aorta → Systemic/coronary/cerebral arteries
- Even when mean LAP > mean RAP, transient beat-to-beat reversal of the pressure gradient can occur, allowing PAE even during apparent haemodynamic stability
Factors Predisposing to PAE
- Large VAE events (major volume of air — PAE correlates with magnitude of VAE)
- PEEP — raises intrathoracic pressure → raises pulmonary vascular resistance → raises RAP; can reverse the normal atrial gradient; PEEP was once recommended to prevent air entry but was abandoned for this reason
- Valsalva manoeuvre — transiently reverses right-left atrial pressure gradient; absolutely contraindicated in known PFO
- Hypovolaemia (reduces LAP)
- Pre-existing pulmonary hypertension
- Generous PEEP during sitting craniotomy
Consequences
- Cerebral air embolism → stroke (often apparent only postoperatively on awakening)
- Coronary air embolism → acute MI, ventricular fibrillation
- Spinal cord infarction
- Often clinically silent intraoperatively; presents as focal neurological deficit postoperatively
Detection
- TEE is the gold standard — directly visualises bubbles crossing the interatrial septum and any PFO
- Preoperative bubble study (echocardiography + agitated saline injection / transcranial Doppler) can screen for PFO before positioning
Q7c: Physiological Basis for Capnography in Detection of VAE [3 Marks]
Normal Physiology of EtCO₂
- Exhaled CO₂ (EtCO₂) reflects alveolar CO₂, which in turn reflects pulmonary blood flow (perfusion)
- EtCO₂ ≈ PaCO₂ − 5 mmHg normally (small alveolar dead space gradient)
Physiological Basis for VAE Detection
Step 1: Air enters pulmonary circulation
When air enters the venous system, emboli travel to the pulmonary arterioles and capillaries, mechanically obstructing blood flow.
Step 2: Creation of alveolar dead space
- Affected lung zones continue to be ventilated (air still enters alveoli) but are no longer perfused (pulmonary blood flow is obstructed by air emboli)
- This creates high V/Q ratio segments → functionally dead space (ventilated but not perfused)
Step 3: Fall in EtCO₂
- CO₂-free alveolar gas from the dead space zones dilutes CO₂-rich gas from normally perfused zones
- The net result is a sudden fall in EtCO₂
- The magnitude of the fall is proportional to the volume of air embolised and the degree of pulmonary vascular obstruction
- Simultaneously, PaCO₂ rises (CO₂ is not being eliminated from the obstructed zones) → the (PaCO₂ − EtCO₂) gradient widens
Step 4: Haemodynamic consequences
- With large VAE: cardiac output falls → further fall in EtCO₂ (less CO₂ delivered to lungs)
- Pulmonary artery pressure rises → RV strain → arrhythmias
Sensitivity and Limitations
- EtCO₂ monitoring is less sensitive than TEE or precordial Doppler for small volumes of VAE
- Can detect VAE before overt haemodynamic changes for moderate events
- Not specific: other causes of decreased cardiac output (e.g., haemorrhage, cardiac arrest) also lower EtCO₂
- Increase in expired N₂ can also be detected (nitrogen from entrained air appears in exhaled gas) but requires specialized N₂ analyser
Clinical Utility
- A sudden unexplained fall in EtCO₂ during any procedure with VAE risk should prompt:
- Immediate notification of the surgeon
- Confirmation with precordial Doppler/TEE
- Initiation of the VAE management protocol
QUESTION 8 — EQUATOR Network Reporting Guidelines [4 marks] + CONSORT [6 marks]
Q8a: Reporting Guidelines as per the EQUATOR Network [4 Marks]
What is the EQUATOR Network?
The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network is an international initiative that seeks to improve the reliability and value of published health research literature by promoting transparent and accurate reporting of research studies. It serves as a central repository for health research reporting guidelines.
Core Reporting Guidelines Listed by EQUATOR
| Guideline | Full Name | Study Type |
|---|
| CONSORT | Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials | Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) |
| PRISMA | Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses | Systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
| STROBE | Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology | Cohort, case-control, cross-sectional studies |
| CARE | CAse REport Guidelines | Case reports |
| STARD | Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies | Diagnostic accuracy studies |
| SPIRIT | Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials | Clinical trial protocols |
| ARRIVE | Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments | Animal studies |
| AGREE | Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation | Clinical practice guidelines |
| SQUIRE | Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence | Quality improvement studies |
| CHEERS | Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards | Health economic evaluations |
| GRAPPA / TREND | | Non-randomised behavioural/public health interventions |
Purpose of EQUATOR Guidelines
- Ensure complete, transparent, and accurate reporting of methods and results
- Enable reproducibility — readers should be able to replicate the study from the manuscript
- Allow critical appraisal — reviewers and readers can assess risk of bias
- Reduce selective reporting bias (reporting only positive results)
- Facilitate systematic reviews and meta-analyses (poorly reported studies cannot be included)
How to Use
Each guideline provides:
- A checklist of essential items to report
- A flow diagram (e.g., CONSORT flow diagram, PRISMA flow diagram)
- An explanation and elaboration (E&E) document explaining each item with examples
- Many journals now mandate submission of the appropriate checklist alongside the manuscript
Q8b: CONSORT Guidelines [6 Marks]
Full Name
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials — applies to randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Background
- First published in 1996; revised in 2001 and again in 2010 (CONSORT 2010) — the current standard
- Extension documents available for specific designs: cluster RCTs, crossover trials, non-inferiority trials, pragmatic trials, pilot trials, patient-reported outcomes
The CONSORT 2010 Checklist — 25 Items Under 6 Domains
1. TITLE and ABSTRACT (Items 1a, 1b)
- Title should identify the study as a randomised trial
- Abstract must include: structured summary with trial design, methods, results, and conclusions (CONSORT for Abstracts)
2. INTRODUCTION (Items 2a, 2b)
- 2a: Scientific background and rationale for the trial
- 2b: Specific objectives or hypotheses
3. METHODS
- Trial design (3a): Description of trial design (parallel, crossover, factorial), allocation ratio
- Participants (4a, 4b): Eligibility criteria (inclusion/exclusion); settings and locations
- Interventions (5): Precise details of interventions for each group; how and when administered
- Outcomes (6a, 6b): Primary and secondary outcomes; pre-specified changes after trial commencement
- Sample size (7a, 7b): How sample size was determined; interim analyses and stopping rules
- Randomisation:
- Sequence generation (8a, 8b) — method of random sequence generation (e.g., computer-generated, random number table); type of randomisation (simple, block, stratified)
- Allocation concealment (9) — mechanism used to implement the allocation sequence (e.g., sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes)
- Implementation (10) — who generated the sequence, enrolled participants, and assigned to interventions
- Blinding (11a, 11b): Who was blinded (participants, care providers, outcome assessors); similarity of interventions; unblinding if relevant
- Statistical methods (12a, 12b): Primary and secondary outcome statistical methods; methods for additional analyses (subgroup, adjusted analyses)
4. RESULTS
- Participant flow (13a, 13b): CONSORT flow diagram — numbers screened, allocated, lost to follow-up, analysed in each group; deviations from allocated interventions
- Recruitment (14a, 14b): Dates defining periods of recruitment and follow-up; trial stopped early?
- Baseline data (15): Table of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for each group
- Numbers analysed (16): Participants in each group included in each analysis; whether intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis
- Outcomes and estimation (17a, 17b): Results for each primary/secondary outcome — effect size, confidence intervals, not just P values
- Ancillary analyses (18): Results of other analyses (subgroup, sensitivity analyses)
- Harms (19): All adverse events and unintended effects in each group
5. DISCUSSION
- Limitations (20): Sources of bias, imprecision, multiple comparisons
- Generalisability (21): External validity / applicability
- Interpretation (22): Consistent with results, weighing benefits and harms against other evidence
6. OTHER INFORMATION
- Trial registration (23): Registration number and name of registry
- Protocol (24): Where to access full protocol
- Funding (25): Sources of funding and role of funders
The CONSORT Flow Diagram
A mandatory four-phase diagram showing participant flow:
ENROLMENT → Assessed for eligibility
↓ Excluded (reasons listed)
ALLOCATION → Randomised
↓ Allocated to intervention A / Allocated to intervention B
FOLLOW-UP → Lost to follow-up (reasons)
↓ Discontinued intervention (reasons)
ANALYSIS → Analysed / Excluded from analysis (reasons)
Key Concepts Embedded in CONSORT
- Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis: All randomised participants analysed in their allocated group regardless of protocol deviation
- Allocation concealment vs. blinding: Allocation concealment prevents foreknowledge before assignment; blinding prevents knowledge after assignment
- Effect size with CI: CONSORT emphasises reporting absolute/relative risk differences with 95% confidence intervals, not just P values
QUESTION 9 — Protocols for Breaking Bad News [10 Marks]
Definition
"Breaking bad news" refers to any communication that negatively and seriously alters a patient's or family's view of their future. In the context of anaesthesia and critical care, this includes: death of a patient, unexpected intraoperative complications, awareness under anaesthesia, severe postoperative disability, ICU outcomes, and end-of-life decisions.
The SPIKES Protocol (Buckman, 2000)
The most widely used and evidence-based protocol for breaking bad news. The acronym stands for:
S — SETTING UP the Interview
- Choose a private, quiet environment (a separate room, not in a corridor or public area)
- Ensure the right people are present — include key family members the patient wants present
- Sit down — do not stand over the patient; creates a non-authoritative, respectful atmosphere
- Silence your pager/phone; eliminate interruptions
- Make eye contact; use open body language
- Have a nurse or support person present (to comfort patient afterwards)
- Arrange for an interpreter if needed
P — Assessing the Patient's PERCEPTION
- Before delivering news, assess what the patient already knows or suspects
- Use open questions: "What have you been told about your condition?" or "What is your understanding of why you had this procedure?"
- This identifies misconceptions to correct, avoids shocking the fully informed, and tailors the amount of information to share
- Principle: "Before you tell, ask"
I — Obtaining the Patient's INVITATION
- Assess how much information the patient wants to know
- "Would you like me to explain all the details of your condition?" or "Are you the kind of person who wants to know all the details, or would you prefer I speak to a family member?"
- Respects patient autonomy; some patients may not want full details initially
- Document the patient's preference in the notes
K — Giving KNOWLEDGE and Information to the Patient
- Use a "warning shot": "I'm afraid the news is not as good as we had hoped..." — prepares the patient psychologically
- Deliver news in small chunks using plain language; avoid jargon
- Pause and allow information to be absorbed; check understanding frequently
- Do NOT deliver all information at once; the patient will not retain everything said after hearing "bad" news (information cut-off phenomenon)
- Be honest and clear; avoid false hope but be compassionate
- Do NOT say: "There is nothing more we can do" — there is always something (palliation, comfort, dignity)
E — Addressing EMOTIONS with Empathic Responses
- This is the most important and most difficult step
- Observe and acknowledge the patient's emotional reaction: "I can see this is very difficult to hear..."
- Use the NURSE framework:
- Naming the emotion: "It sounds like you're feeling overwhelmed..."
- Understanding: "This makes complete sense given what you're going through..."
- Respecting: "I can see how strong you've been..."
- Supporting: "We are going to be here for you every step of the way..."
- Exploring: "Can you tell me more about what concerns you most right now?"
- Silence is therapeutic — do not rush to fill pauses
- Avoid statements that minimise emotions ("I know how you feel")
S — STRATEGY and SUMMARY
- Ensure the patient does NOT feel abandoned
- Discuss the plan going forward: further tests, referrals, treatment options, palliative care
- Offer a follow-up meeting; provide written information if available
- Identify a key contact person for future questions
- Summarise what was discussed: "So, to summarise what we've talked about today..."
- Document the conversation in the medical record: what was said, to whom, who was present, patient's response
Other Protocols for Breaking Bad News
ABCDE Protocol (Rabow and McPhee)
- Advance Preparation
- Build a therapeutic environment/relationship
- Communicate well
- Deal with patient/family reactions
- Encourage and validate emotions
CLASS Protocol
- Context (setting)
- Listening skills
- Acknowledge
- Strategy
- Summary
Special Situations in Anaesthesia
Death in the Perioperative Period
- Involve a senior anaesthetist and surgeon
- Inform the family at the earliest, in person, in a private room
- Avoid defensive language or blame
- Offer spiritual/religious support, chaplain involvement
- Explain what happened in plain terms without jargon
- Discuss post-mortem, death certificate, organ donation if appropriate
Intraoperative Awareness
- Patient should be informed by a senior anaesthetist as soon as the problem is suspected/confirmed
- Acknowledge the patient's experience and distress; do not be dismissive
- Refer to psychology/psychiatry for PTSD screening
- Document in detail; complete incident reporting
- Offer follow-up appointment
Legal and Ethical Considerations
- Breaking bad news is not optional — it is a legal obligation under the doctrine of informed consent and the duty of candour (in the UK; equivalent principles apply in India under MCI/NMC guidelines)
- Truth-telling is mandatory; deceiving patients violates autonomy
- Cultural sensitivity: in some cultures, family members request that the patient not be told; the anaesthetist must balance respect for culture with patient autonomy
QUESTION 10 — Research Methodology
Q10a: Primary and Secondary Research [3 Marks]
Primary Research
Primary research involves the collection of original, first-hand data directly from subjects or experiments to answer a specific research question. The researcher generates new data that did not previously exist.
Types of Primary Research:
| Type | Description |
|---|
| Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) | Gold standard; participants randomly assigned to intervention or control |
| Cohort study | Follow a group over time; observe outcomes |
| Case-control study | Compare those with/without outcome; look back for exposure |
| Cross-sectional study | Snapshot at a single point in time |
| Case report / Case series | Detailed description of individual patients |
| Laboratory/experimental study | In vitro, animal studies, Phase I drug trials |
| Survey / Questionnaire study | Collect data from participants via questionnaires |
Characteristics:
- Original data collection
- Time-consuming and expensive
- Subject to bias in design and execution
- Generates new evidence
Secondary Research
Secondary research involves the analysis and synthesis of data that has already been collected by primary studies. The researcher does not collect new data from subjects.
Types of Secondary Research:
| Type | Description |
|---|
| Systematic review | Examines a specific clinical question; explicitly identifies, selects, and critically appraises all relevant primary studies using explicit, reproducible methods; may or may not include meta-analysis |
| Meta-analysis | Statistical pooling of results from multiple primary studies to generate a single combined estimate with greater statistical power |
| Narrative review | Qualitative summary of a topic area; less rigorous than systematic review; subject to author selection bias |
| Clinical practice guideline | Evidence-based recommendations derived from systematic reviews |
| Economic evaluation | Uses published data to model cost-effectiveness |
| Database studies | Re-analysis of existing registries or administrative databases |
Characteristics:
- No new data collected from subjects
- Less expensive and faster than primary research
- Dependent on quality of primary studies (garbage in, garbage out)
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses sit at the top of the evidence hierarchy (Oxford/GRADE evidence pyramid)
Evidence Hierarchy (Pyramid)
Systematic Reviews + Meta-analyses ← Highest
RCTs
Cohort studies
Case-control studies
Cross-sectional studies
Case reports / Expert opinion ← Lowest
Q10b: Components of a Research Question for an Experimental Study [3 Marks]
A well-structured research question ensures the study is focused, feasible, and answerable. The most widely used framework is PICO(T) or PICOT:
PICO(T) Framework
| Component | Stands For | Example (Anaesthesia) |
|---|
| P | Population / Patient | Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia |
| I | Intervention | Dexmedetomidine infusion 0.5 mcg/kg/hr intraoperatively |
| C | Comparison / Control | Normal saline placebo infusion |
| O | Outcome | Postoperative opioid consumption at 24 hours (primary); pain scores, time to first analgesic request (secondary) |
| T | Time frame | During the first 24 hours postoperatively |
FINER Criteria (for evaluating a research question)
A good research question should be:
- F — Feasible: adequate subjects, technical expertise, time, money
- I — Interesting: to the investigator and the scientific community
- N — Novel: confirms, refutes, or extends previous findings
- E — Ethical: can be performed without undue risk to participants
- R — Relevant: to scientific knowledge, clinical policy, future research
Additional Components of a Research Question
1. Null Hypothesis (H₀):
The default assumption — that there is no difference between groups (e.g., "Dexmedetomidine does not reduce postoperative opioid consumption compared to placebo")
2. Alternative Hypothesis (H₁):
The research hypothesis — the expected direction of effect (e.g., "Dexmedetomidine reduces postoperative opioid consumption compared to placebo")
3. Primary Endpoint:
The single most important outcome that the study is powered to detect; defined a priori
4. Secondary Endpoints:
Additional outcomes of interest; exploratory in nature
5. Study Design:
Dictated by the research question — RCT for interventions; cohort for prognosis; case-control for rare diseases with long latency
Q10c: Type I and Type II Errors in Research [4 Marks]
Source: Schwartz's Principles of Surgery 11e, Dermatology 5e
Conceptual Framework
All statistical testing involves declaring a null hypothesis (H₀) — the default assumption of no difference — and then deciding whether to reject or fail to reject it based on the data. This decision can be:
- Correct (matches the truth in the population)
- Erroneous (does not match the truth)
Two types of error are possible:
Type I Error (α Error / False Positive)
Definition: Rejection of the null hypothesis when it is actually true in the population — i.e., concluding there IS a significant difference when in reality there is NONE.
- Denoted by α (alpha)
- Also called a false positive
- The Type I error rate is the significance level of the study
- Conventionally set at α = 0.05 (5%) — meaning there is a 5% chance of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis
- The P value reported in a study is directly related to Type I error: if P < 0.05, there is less than a 5% probability of observing results this extreme if the null hypothesis were true
- Consequences in research: Leads to acceptance and publication of treatments that are actually ineffective; false associations are generated; can mislead clinical practice
Factors increasing Type I error:
- Multiple comparisons (testing many outcomes) — each additional test increases cumulative Type I error (Bonferroni correction applied to adjust)
- Inadequate blinding (performance bias)
- Post-hoc subgroup analyses not pre-specified
Type II Error (β Error / False Negative)
Definition: Failure to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false in the population — i.e., concluding there is NO significant difference when in reality there IS one.
- Denoted by β (beta)
- Also called a false negative
- Related to the power of the study: Power = 1 − β
- Conventionally, power is set at 80% (β = 0.20) or 90% (β = 0.10)
- An underpowered study (too small a sample) is the most common cause of Type II error
Factors increasing Type II error:
- Inadequate sample size — most common cause
- Small effect size that is difficult to detect
- High variability in the outcome measure
- Strict significance criterion (very low α)
Consequences: A genuinely effective treatment appears ineffective; potentially beneficial therapies are abandoned
Summary Table
| H₀ is TRUE (No real difference) | H₀ is FALSE (Real difference exists) |
|---|
| Reject H₀ (Significant result) | Type I Error (α) False Positive | Correct Decision (True Positive) |
| Fail to Reject H₀ (Non-significant) | Correct Decision (True Negative) | Type II Error (β) False Negative |
Relationship Between Type I and Type II Errors
- They have an inverse relationship for a fixed sample size: decreasing α (making it harder to reject H₀) increases β (makes it harder to detect a true effect)
- The only way to simultaneously reduce both errors is to increase the sample size
Power Analysis (Sample Size Calculation)
Power depends on three main factors:
- Significance criterion (α): Usually 0.05
- Effect size: The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) — must be defined a priori
- Sample size: Calculated from the above to achieve 80–90% power
A sample size calculation must be performed and reported in any experimental study (CONSORT Item 7a).
Sources: Miller's Anesthesia 10e, Morgan & Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology 7e, Schwartz's Principles of Surgery 11e, Buckman R (SPIKES Protocol), EQUATOR Network (equator-network.org), CONSORT 2010 Statement, Schulz et al. BMJ 2010