Explain about DDH

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"developmental dysplasia of the hip"[MeSH Terms] AND diagnosis

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Loading Image
Loading Image
I now have all the information needed to write a comprehensive answer on DDH.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)

DDH describes a spectrum of hip abnormalities ranging from mild acetabular dysplasia to subluxation (partial dislocation) or complete dislocation of the femoral head from the true acetabulum. In a newborn with DDH, the femoral head can often be dislocated and reduced in and out of the acetabulum; in an older child, the head often remains fixed in a dislocated position with secondary bony and soft-tissue changes.
  • Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed 2026, p. 1401
  • Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery 28th Ed, p. 637

Incidence

  • True dislocation: ~1-2 per 1000 live births
  • Neonatal instability (broader): ~20 per 1000 live births
  • Ultrasound screening picks up far more cases, but many resolve spontaneously
  • Left hip is more commonly affected than the right; bilateral > unilateral right involvement

Aetiology and Risk Factors

Risk FactorDetail
Female sex4-5x more common; maternal relaxin increases neonatal ligamentous laxity
Breech presentationParticularly extended breech; abnormal hip flexion forces
FirstbornTight primigravid uterus restricts fetal movement
Family historyRisk increases to ~10% with positive family history
OligohydramniosRestricts fetal movement
Left hip predominanceLOA position places left hip adducted against maternal lumbosacral spine
SwaddlingLegs-together swaddling worsens instability
Associated conditionsCongenital muscular torticollis (coexistence ~8%), metatarsus adductus, talipes calcaneovalgus
Racial variation also exists - higher incidence in Navajo; lower in Chinese populations, partly reflecting carrying practices.

Pathology and Secondary Changes

With persistent dislocation:
  • The capsule becomes permanently elongated
  • The psoas tendon may obstruct reduction anteriorly
  • The limbus acetabuli hypertrophies at the periphery
  • The ligamentum teres hypertrophies and elongates
  • The femoral head becomes reduced in size with posteromedial flattening
  • Coxa valga and excessive anteversion develop
  • The true acetabulum becomes shallow

Clinical Presentation (Age-Dependent)

Neonates (< 6 months)

  • Ortolani test: With the hip flexed and abducted, a palpable clunk is felt as the posteriorly dislocated femoral head relocates into the acetabulum - a positive sign indicates a reducible dislocation.
  • Barlow test: The flexed hip is adducted with posteriorly directed force; a palpable clunk of subluxation/dislocation is felt - a positive sign indicates an unstable hip.
  • Limited hip abduction (most reliable sign after early infancy)
  • Asymmetric skin folds (unreliable alone)
Clinical signs of DDH - decreased abduction (A) and Galeazzi sign (B)
FIGURE: Clinical signs of DDH in a 13-month-old. A - decreased abduction of the right hip. B - positive Galeazzi sign (apparent femoral shortening on the dislocated side)

Infants (6-18 months)

  • Shortened extremity, limited passive abduction
  • Galeazzi sign: Apparent femoral shortening when hips and knees flexed
  • Delayed ossification on X-ray; lateral and proximal displacement of femoral head

Walking-age children

  • Trendelenburg gait - waddling, lurching toward the affected side
  • Difficulty abducting the hip during diaper changes
  • Bilateral dislocation may appear symmetrically abnormal and be missed

Adolescents and adults

  • Exercise-induced hip pain
  • Pain from degenerative arthritis (late complication)

Investigations

Ultrasound (first-line in infants < 6 months)

  • High-frequency linear probe; coronal view with hip flexed and abducted
  • Graf classification based on alpha (α) and beta (β) angles:
    • α angle (acetabular roof angle): Normal ≥ 60°
    • β angle (inclination line): Normal < 55°
    • Graf I = normal; II = immature/mild dysplasia; III/IV = subluxed/dislocated
  • Dynamic stress views assess stability
  • Preferred over X-ray in early infancy (femoral head is cartilaginous)

Radiograph (useful from ~4-6 months when ossification begins)

Key radiographic landmarks:
  • Hilgenreiner line (horizontal through triradiate cartilage)
  • Perkins line (vertical through lateral acetabulum)
  • Femoral head should lie in the lower-inner quadrant of these intersecting lines
  • Shenton's line continuity
  • Acetabular index: Normal < 30° at birth, < 25° by 1 year
  • Center-edge angle (reliable only after age 5)

CT/MRI

  • Used for pre-operative planning or to assess reduction quality after surgery
  • MRI preferred to avoid radiation in young children

Treatment (Age-Based)

Newborn - 6 months: Pavlik Harness (first-line)

The Pavlik harness maintains the hip in 90-100° flexion with gentle abduction, allowing spontaneous reduction.
Properly applied Pavlik harness
Properly applied Pavlik harness. Hips held in flexion-abduction.
  • Worn full-time (23 hours/day) initially, monitored with ultrasound every 2-4 weeks
  • Success rate ~85-95% for reducible hips
  • Contraindications: teratologic dislocations, fixed contractures, irreducible hips
  • Complications: femoral nerve palsy (excessive flexion), osteonecrosis (excessive forced abduction)
  • The Tübingen brace is an alternative with similar efficacy

Infant (6-18 months): Closed or Open Reduction

  • Pavlik harness success drops sharply after crawling age
  • Preoperative traction (2-4 weeks) to bring the femoral head closer to the acetabulum
  • Adductor tenotomy to release contracture
  • Closed reduction under general anesthesia with arthrogram confirmation, followed by hip spica cast
  • Open reduction if closed reduction fails - medial or anterior approach
  • Femoral shortening osteotomy may be needed for high dislocations to reduce neurovascular tension

Toddler (18-36 months) and Child (3-8 years)

  • Open reduction is almost always required
  • Combined with femoral osteotomy (to correct coxa valga/anteversion) and pelvic osteotomy (to redirect or augment the acetabulum)
  • Common pelvic procedures: Salter osteotomy, Pemberton acetabuloplasty, Dega osteotomy

Older child/Adolescent/Adult (> 8 years)

  • Surgical options more complex; outcomes less predictable
  • Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO/Bernese) for symptomatic dysplasia without arthritis
  • Total hip arthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis secondary to DDH

Complications

ComplicationNotes
Avascular necrosis (AVN) of femoral headMost serious complication of treatment; caused by excessive abduction or forceful reduction
RedislocationAfter conservative or surgical treatment
Residual acetabular dysplasiaEven after successful reduction; long-term surveillance needed
Leg length discrepancyPersistent or secondary to treatment
OsteoarthritisLate consequence of untreated/undertreated DDH

Screening Guidelines

  • AAP (USA): Routine clinical screening of all newborns; ultrasound for positive exam or risk factors (breech, family history)
  • UK (NIPE): Hip examination at birth and 6-8 weeks; ultrasound for at-risk infants
  • Universal ultrasound screening is practiced in some countries (e.g., Germany, Austria) but evidence for universal vs. selective screening remains mixed - some studies show earlier treatment and fewer surgeries with universal screening, while others show increased unnecessary referrals

Recent Evidence

A 2025 meta-analysis (PMID 39853978) in JAMA Network Open identified the strongest risk factors for DDH before 3 months of age: breech presentation, female sex, and positive family history - consistent with current clinical practice guidelines. A 2024 systematic review (PMID 39354451) highlighted genetic contributions, with multiple loci associated with acetabular development.

Key takeaway: DDH is a spectrum - not a single diagnosis. Early detection (neonatal screening) and treatment (Pavlik harness) give excellent outcomes. Delayed diagnosis leads to progressively complex surgery with less predictable results and long-term risks of osteoarthritis.

Create a DDH screening and treatment decision algorithm flowchart

Generating Image
DDH Screening and Treatment Decision Algorithm
Here is the DDH screening and treatment decision algorithm. The flowchart covers:
Screening pathway (top)
  • Starting from newborn clinical examination with Ortolani and Barlow tests
  • Three branches: normal exam without risk factors, normal exam with risk factors, and positive exam
  • Ultrasound (Graf classification) drives the next decision point
Ultrasound-guided management (middle)
  • Graf I → routine follow-up, no treatment
  • Graf IIa (< 3 months) → watchful waiting with repeat USS
  • Graf IIb/IIc/D → Pavlik harness
  • Graf III/IV → immediate Pavlik harness with close monitoring
  • Pavlik harness response at 3-4 weeks determines continuation vs. escalation to reduction
Age-based surgical escalation (right column)
  • 0-6 months: Pavlik harness
  • 6-18 months: closed reduction + hip spica cast
  • 18 months - 3 years: open reduction ± femoral osteotomy
  • 3-8 years: triple procedure (open reduction + femoral + pelvic osteotomy)
  • > 8 years/adult: PAO or total hip arthroplasty
Complication monitoring (bottom)
  • Red alert box for AVN, redislocation, and residual dysplasia - the three most clinically significant risks to track throughout treatment.

Take all the references from Campbell and make a ppt with extra pictures and flow charts on Ddh

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Generating Image
Generating Image
Generating Image

Ppt

Generating Image
Generating Image
Generating Image

Take all the references from Campbell and make a ppt with extra pictures and flow charts on Ddh

Generating Image
Generating Image
Generating Image
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.