PATHOLOGY AND HISTOGENESIS OF SALIVARY GLAND TUMOURS
With Immunohistochemistry of Each Lesion
(25 Marks Answer)
INTRODUCTION
Salivary gland neoplasms (SGN) are among the most complex and heterogeneous group of lesions in oral and maxillofacial pathology. They constitute less than 1% of all tumours and 3-5% of head and neck tumours. Their diverse histomorphological appearance results from the varied cellular mechanisms and differentiation into multiple histopathological subtypes with overlapping features - both within individual tumours and in different regions of the same tumour - posing a significant diagnostic challenge.
Understanding the histogenesis (origin of the neoplastic cell) and morphogenesis (how that cell differentiates and shapes the tumour architecture) provides the scientific framework for classifying these lesions.
PART I: HISTOGENESIS OF SALIVARY GLAND NEOPLASMS
A. Normal Architecture of Salivary Glands - The Foundation
Before understanding histogenesis, knowledge of normal salivary gland architecture is essential. The ducto-acinar unit is organized in two tiers:
- Luminal (inner) cells: Acinar cells (serous/mucous) and ductal epithelial cells
- Abluminal (outer) cells: Myoepithelial cells (wrapping acini and intercalated ducts) and basal cells (supporting striated and excretory ducts)
The secretory acini form the functional end units. Intercalated ducts lead to striated ducts, which drain into the excretory duct, and finally into the oral cavity. This bilayered architecture directly informs histogenetic theories of tumour origin.
B. Histogenetic Theories
Four major histogenetic theories have been proposed to explain from which cell population salivary gland neoplasms arise:
1. Basal Reserve Cell Theory (Eversole, 1971)
- Also called the Progenitor Cell Theory
- States that the basal cells of both the excretory ducts AND the intercalated ducts function as reserve (stem) cells for all more highly differentiated components of the salivary gland
- Based on histological observations of embryonic palatal minor salivary glands and bilayered major ducts in the human fetal salivary gland
- Tumours arising from this theory: Pleomorphic adenoma, basal cell adenoma, canalicular adenoma
2. Pluripotent Unicellular Reserve Cell Theory (Batsakis, 1977)
- States that only the basal cells of the excretory duct are responsible for the development of ALL other salivary gland units
- Eliminates any role for intercalated duct reserve cells
- A single undifferentiated cell type with pluripotency gives rise to all neoplasms
- This theory is now largely discredited as it oversimplifies the biology
3. Semi-Pluripotent Bicellular Reserve Cell Theory (Dardick, 1981) - MOST WIDELY ACCEPTED
- A refined version: Two distinct reserve cell populations are implicated:
- Excretory duct reserve cells - give rise to squamous cell carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and salivary duct carcinoma
- Intercalated duct reserve cells - give rise to all other salivary gland tumours (pleomorphic adenoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, polymorphous adenocarcinoma, basal cell adenocarcinoma)
- Myoepithelial cells are recognized as important contributors to the morphologic diversity of neoplasms
- The separation of two cells of origin explains why MEC and SCC differ so fundamentally from adenoid cystic carcinoma
| Cell of Origin | Tumours |
|---|
| Excretory duct reserve cells | Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, Squamous cell carcinoma, Salivary duct carcinoma |
| Intercalated duct reserve cells | Pleomorphic adenoma, Adenoid cystic carcinoma, Acinic cell carcinoma, Basal cell adenoma/adenocarcinoma, Polymorphous adenocarcinoma |
4. Multicellular Theory (Dardick et al., 1989)
- Proposes that all mature, differentiated cell types - including acinar cells, ductal cells, and basal cells - are capable of cell division and neoplastic transformation
- Supported by autoradiographic studies showing tritiated thymidine uptake in:
- Duct basal cells
- Luminal cells at all levels of the duct system
- Even acinar cells
- In adult rat salivary gland hyperplasia studies, more acinar cells than intercalated duct cells were found in the S-phase of the cell cycle
- This theory challenges the exclusive role of reserve cells and supports that any differentiated salivary cell can undergo neoplastic induction
- Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma, intercalated duct adenoma, and striated duct adenoma are most appropriately explained by this theory
C. Stem Cell Hypothesis
In a continually renewing cell population, stem cells act as a reservoir with high self-renewal capacity that gives rise to all differentiated progeny. Neoplasms manifest differentiation pathways similar to those in normal tissue development. This serves as the basis for classification, with an inverse correlation between proliferative capacity and differentiation within the neoplasm.
PART II: MORPHOGENESIS OF SALIVARY GLAND NEOPLASMS
A. The Morphogenic Concept
Introduced by Dardick, the morphogenic approach moves away from debating "which cell started it" and instead focuses on:
- What the tumour cell differentiates into
- How cells are arranged within the tumour
- What extracellular matrix (ECM) material is produced
Dardick emphasized that cellular morphology and differential gene expression from a stem cell, in conjunction with tumour ECM production, are better predictors of SGN behaviour compared to any proposed specific cell of origin.
B. The Ducto-Acinar (Bicellular) Concept in Morphogenesis
The salivary gland's two-tiered architecture (luminal + abluminal) is recapitulated in tumour development. Every salivary gland tumour can be understood as a permutation of:
- Luminal/acinar cell differentiation
- Abluminal (myoepithelial/basal) cell differentiation
- The presence or absence of extracellular matrix (proteoglycans, basal lamina, collagen, elastin)
C. Three Basic Cell Differentiation Models in SGN
Model 1 - Bidirectional differentiation:
Tumour cells form a dual population combining luminal/acinar cells with myoepithelial/basal cells. Examples: pleomorphic adenoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma.
Model 2 - Primarily luminal/acinar:
Tumour consists predominantly of cells resembling normal duct epithelium or acinar cells. Examples: acinic cell carcinoma, salivary duct carcinoma, oncocytoma, canalicular adenoma.
Model 3 - Primarily myoepithelial/basal:
Tumour is almost entirely composed of myoepithelial or basal-type cells. Examples: myoepithelioma, myoepithelial carcinoma.
D. Taxonomic (Morphogenetic) Classification of SGN
| Category | Sub-category | Benign | Malignant |
|---|
| Luminal + myoepithelial cells | With ECM (proteoglycan + basal lamina) | Pleomorphic adenoma, Basal cell adenoma | Carcinoma ex PA, Adenoid cystic carcinoma, Polymorphous adenocarcinoma, MEC, Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma, BCA |
| Without ECM | Cellular PA, Warthin's tumour, Solid BCA | - |
| Primarily myoepithelial/basal | - | Myoepithelioma | Myoepithelial carcinoma |
| Primarily luminal/acinar | - | Canalicular adenoma, Ductal papilloma, Cystadenoma, Oncocytoma | Acinic cell carcinoma, SDC, Adenocarcinoma NOS, Oncocytic carcinoma |
| Undifferentiated | - | - | Undifferentiated carcinoma |
E. Role of Myoepithelial Cells in Morphogenesis
Myoepithelial cells are physiologically and functionally modified epithelial cells between luminal cells and the basement membrane. They:
- Are stellate-shaped around acini and spindle-shaped around intercalated ducts
- Possess a dual epithelial-smooth muscle phenotype
- Produce extracellular matrix - basement membrane materials and myxoid substances
- May exert an anti-invasive effect by secreting proteinase inhibitors and suppressing angiogenesis
In neoplastic conditions, myoepithelial cells exhibit morphological variations:
- Spindle cells
- Plasmacytoid (hyaline) cells
- Epithelioid cells
- Clear cells (glycogen-rich)
The production of extracellular matrix by neoplastic myoepithelial cells accounts for the myxochondroid stroma in pleomorphic adenoma and the pseudo-cystic spaces in adenoid cystic carcinoma.
PART III: PATHOLOGY AND IHC OF INDIVIDUAL SALIVARY GLAND TUMOURS
1. PLEOMORPHIC ADENOMA (PA)
Histogenesis: Intercalated duct reserve cells are the cell of origin. These cells differentiate into both epithelial (luminal) and myoepithelial (abluminal) components.
Morphogenesis: Bidirectional differentiation WITH extracellular matrix production. Excessive ECM production forces separation of adjacent tumour cells, eventually creating myxochondroid zones - the hallmark of this tumour. This explains the "mixed" appearance (epithelial + mesenchymal-like tissue).
Pathology:
- Most common salivary gland tumour (parotid >> submandibular >> minor)
- Encapsulated but the capsule is often incomplete
- Histology shows: ductal/tubular structures (luminal cells), myoepithelial cells in various forms, myxoid stroma, chondroid areas, and occasionally ossification
- Neoplastic myoepithelial cells produce fibrous, mucinous, chondroid, and osseous tissue - accounting for histomorphological diversity
- Genetic markers: PLAG1 (chromosome 8q12) and HMGA2 (chromosome 12q14) alterations
IHC of Pleomorphic Adenoma:
- Luminal cells: CK7, CK8, CK13, CK18, CEA, EMA - positive
- Myoepithelial cells: SMA (smooth muscle actin), MSA (muscle-specific actin), calponin, CK14, p63, S-100, vimentin, GFAP, SOX10 - positive
- PLAG1: Strongly positive (highly sensitive and specific for PA; overexpression helps differentiate from ACC and other SGN)
- HMGA2: Highly specific marker for PA compared to histologically mimicking tumours (Mito et al., 2017)
- WT1 (Wilms Tumour 1): Sensitive marker for neoplastic myoepithelial cells in PA; not expressed in normal myoepithelium
- GFAP: Intensely positive - most advantageous in PA and myoepitheliomas; helps differentiate from polymorphous adenocarcinoma (GFAP negative) and ACC (GFAP negative)
- Ki-67: Low, generally <5% (supports benign nature)
- HER2/neu: Negative to weakly positive in normal ductal cells; overexpression in salivary duct carcinoma helps exclude PA
2. WARTHIN'S TUMOUR (Papillary Cystadenoma Lymphomatosum)
Histogenesis: Arises from salivary gland ductal epithelium entrapped within paraparotid or intraparotid lymph nodes during embryogenesis - this is the currently accepted theory. Both luminal and basal cells in Warthin's tumour show oncocytic differentiation (packed with mitochondria).
Morphogenesis: Bidirectional differentiation WITHOUT significant ECM production. Both cell types are packed with mitochondria (oncocytic change). The lymphoid stroma may represent an exaggerated secretory immune response (supported by IHC studies).
Pathology:
- Second most common salivary gland tumour
- Almost exclusively in the parotid gland; bilateral in ~10% cases
- Cystic spaces lined by characteristic double-layered oncocytic epithelium (inner tall columnar with palisaded nuclei, outer basaloid) in a background of lymphoid tissue with germinal centres
- Bilayered epithelium reflects differentiation of both luminal and basal cells
IHC of Warthin's Tumour:
- Anti-mitochondria antibodies (AMA): Strongly positive in oncocytic cells
- Pan-cytokeratin: Positive in epithelial component
- CD20/CD3: Positive in lymphoid component
- Ki-67: Low (<5%)
- S100: Variable
3. ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA (ACC)
Histogenesis: Derived from intercalated duct reserve cells. The neoplasm differentiates along both ductal (luminal) and myoepithelial (abluminal) lines.
Morphogenesis: Bidirectional differentiation WITH tightly controlled ECM production. The three growth patterns reflect varying balance of luminal and abluminal differentiation:
- Cribriform (most common): Balance between luminal ductal structures and basal/myoepithelial cells; pseudocysts contain glycosaminoglycans (ECM)
- Tubular: Luminal cells forming ducts surrounded by few layers of basal/myoepithelial cells without significant intercellular material accumulation
- Solid (worst prognosis): Exuberant proliferation of neoplastic basal/myoepithelial cells with minimal luminal formation
Key genetic alteration: MYB-NFIB gene fusion (chromosome 6q - chromosome 9q translocation) is the hallmark. MYB overexpression regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis. NOTCH1 mutations indicate more aggressive disease with bone and liver metastasis.
Pathology:
- Slow-growing, highly recurrent malignant tumour
- Classic "Swiss cheese" cribriform pattern on histology
- Perineural invasion is characteristic and diagnostically significant
- Poor prognosis despite slow growth due to high recurrence and late metastases (especially lung)
- Small, uniform, angulated cells with hyperchromatic nuclei
- Pseudocystic spaces contain basophilic glycosaminoglycans
IHC of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma:
- CD117 (c-Kit): Strongly positive in the inner (luminal) cell layer - >50% positivity; this is a KEY differentiating marker from PAC (which shows <50% or none)
- CK7: Positive in luminal cells
- Calponin, SMA, SMMHC, p63, SOX10, S100: Positive - highlighting myoepithelial differentiation around pseudocysts
- Type IV collagen and Laminin: Positive within pseudocyst lumens (basement membrane components)
- GFAP: Usually NEGATIVE (distinguishes from PA, where GFAP is strongly positive)
- PLAG1: Not overexpressed (does not play a role in ACC tumorigenesis; helps differentiate from PA)
- MYB overexpression: Detected by IHC but not entirely specific to ACC
- Ki-67: >10%, particularly high in solid variant (indicates poorer prognosis)
- p53: Increased expression indicates poor prognosis
4. MUCOEPIDERMOID CARCINOMA (MEC)
Histogenesis: Arises from excretory duct reserve cells. Differentiation along both luminal and abluminal lines produces the characteristic cell variety.
Morphogenesis: The differentiation potential of luminal cells produces: goblet (mucous) cells, non-specific cuboidal/columnar cells, glycogen-laden clear cells, and squamous cells. Abluminal cell differentiation produces: myoepithelial cells, intermediate cells, squamous cells. Mixing these cell types produces the wide histological spectrum across grades.
Pathology:
- Most common malignant salivary gland tumour; most common in children
- Three cell types: mucous cells, epidermoid (squamoid) cells, intermediate cells
- Graded as low, intermediate, or high grade
- Genetic alteration: CRTC1-MAML2 or CRTC3-MAML2 chromosomal fusion (chromosome 9-11 translocation) - activates CREB target genes
- High-grade tumours may lack obvious mucous cells
IHC of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma:
- CK7: Positive in mucinous cells
- CK14, CK5/6, p63: Positive in intermediate, squamoid, and basaloid cells - KEY feature
- p63: Strongly expressed in epidermoid component of MEC (unlike acinic cell carcinoma which is p63-negative - very useful differential!)
- MUC1, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC5B: Expressed in varying proportions; high MUC1 = high grade, increased recurrence; MUC5AC helps differentiate high-grade MEC from SCC
- EGFR and AREG (amphiregulin): Overexpression detected by IHC, contributing to tumour growth and survival (CRTC1-MAML2 fusion is downstream target of EGFR ligand)
- PCNA, p53, TNF-alpha: Strong expression seen
- pAKT: Positive
- Ki-67: Low grade ~2.2%; High grade ~8% (useful in grading)
- p63 positivity distinguishes MEC from retention cysts and papillary cystadenomas (where p63 is limited to basal layers only)
5. ACINIC CELL CARCINOMA (AciCC)
Histogenesis: Derived from intercalated duct reserve cells with differentiation towards acinar (serous) cell lineage. Neoplastic acinar cells constitute the integral component.
Morphogenesis: Primarily luminal/acinar cell differentiation (Model 2). In the microcystic variant, what appear as vacuoles are actually smaller versions of true intercellular lumens.
Pathology:
- Third most common salivary gland malignancy; predominantly parotid
- Low-grade malignancy with slow progression but capacity for local and distant metastasis
- Cells show serous acinar differentiation with basophilic, granular (zymogen-containing) cytoplasm
- Growth patterns: solid, microcystic, papillary-cystic, follicular
- Genetic alteration: NR4A3 rearrangements (SCPP-NR4A3 translocation; NR4A3 on chromosome 9q31)
- Rare variant: MSANTD3-HTN3 translocation (more serous nature)
IHC of Acinic Cell Carcinoma:
- DOG1 (Discovered On GAIST 1): Diffuse, strong positivity on the luminal aspect of acini - KEY MARKER; membrane channel protein highly specific for AciCC
- SOX10: Diffuse strong positivity
- alpha-Amylase: Positive (low sensitivity; not always detected)
- NR4A3 (nuclear immunostaining): Specific and sensitive novel marker - IHC has proven more specific than FISH for NR4A3 expression
- S100, Mammaglobin: Largely NEGATIVE (distinguishes AciCC from secretory carcinoma, which is strongly S100+ and mammaglobin+)
- p63: NEGATIVE - very useful! All MEC are p63 strongly positive, while AciCC is negative
- Maspin: Negative
- MSANTD3: Relatively high specificity but requires further validation
6. POLYMORPHOUS ADENOCARCINOMA (PAC)
Histogenesis: Also called "terminal duct carcinoma" - putative cell of origin is from terminal excretory ducts (minor salivary glands). Found almost exclusively in minor salivary glands (~60% in palate).
Morphogenesis: Shows myriad histologic patterns due to controlled development of tumour cells with varying arrangements - some regions composed exclusively of luminal cells, others as combination of luminal + abluminal cells, and some as basal/myoepithelial cells. Depending on ECM distribution, may show myxoid stroma and cribriform patterns. Cytologically uniform but architecturally diverse.
Pathology:
- Renamed from "polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma" (WHO 2017) due to unpredictable behaviour
- Characteristic: cytological uniformity but architectural diversity (hence "polymorphous")
- Prominent perineural invasion
- Infiltrative growth pattern
- Genetic alteration: PRKD1 mutation (especially E710D hotspot mutation on chromosome 14)
IHC of Polymorphous Adenocarcinoma:
- S100: Positive (97%) - helpful but not specific
- Vimentin: Positive (92.5%)
- Pan-CK: Positive (97.3%)
- CK7: Positive (96.8%)
- E-cadherin: Positive (90%)
- p63: Positive (91.7%) - however, p40 (isotype of p63) is uniformly NEGATIVE, indicating lack of true myoepithelial differentiation
- SOX10: 100% positive
- GFAP: Largely NEGATIVE (5% only) - differentiates from PA (GFAP strongly positive) and helps differentiate from ACC
- CK20: Negative (0%)
- C-kit (CD117): Negative or <50% positivity - differentiates from ADCC (which shows >50%)
- Ki-67: Usually <10%; elevated >10% in 10-20% of cases
- Immunophenotype summary for PAC: CK7+/CK20-, p63+/p40-, S100+, Vimentin+, GFAP-
7. MYOEPITHELIOMA
Histogenesis: Derived from myoepithelial cells of the salivary gland.
Morphogenesis: Tumours primarily of myoepithelial/basal cells (Model 3) - without ECM production.
Pathology:
- Benign; composed exclusively or predominantly of myoepithelial cells
- Cell forms: spindle, plasmacytoid (hyaline), epithelioid, clear
- Lacks ductal structures (differentiates from PA, which always has ductal elements)
- No myxochondroid matrix (unlike PA)
IHC of Myoepithelioma:
- Calponin: High specificity; very useful diagnostic marker
- SMA (smooth muscle actin): High specificity; very useful
- p63: Positive (myoepithelial + basal cells)
- S100, SOX10, GFAP: Positive
- Vimentin: Positive (good for screening, low specificity)
- Luminal markers (CEA, EMA): NEGATIVE - key distinction from PA (which has positive luminal cells)
- Pan-CK: Positive (confirms epithelial nature; differentiates from non-epithelial spindle cell tumours)
- Ki-67: Low
8. EPITHELIAL-MYOEPITHELIAL CARCINOMA (EMC)
Histogenesis: Derived from intercalated duct cells; the tumour exhibits bidirectional differentiation.
Morphogenesis: Bidirectional differentiation WITHOUT significant ECM. Classic "inverse ductal" arrangement - inner small eosinophilic epithelial cells surrounded by outer glycogen-rich clear myoepithelial cells forming double-layered tubular structures.
Pathology:
- Rare, biphasic, low malignant potential
- Inner layer: small cuboidal eosinophilic epithelial cells (ductal)
- Outer layer: clear cells (myoepithelial, rich in glycogen)
- Solid, tubular, cribriform, papillary architectural variants
- HRAS mutations are characteristic
IHC of Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma:
- Inner luminal cells: CK AE1/AE3, CK7 - positive
- Outer myoepithelial cells: p63, SMA, vimentin, S-100 - strongly positive
- PAS stain: Highlights glycogen in clear cells
- The biphasic IHC pattern (inner CK7+, outer p63+/SMA+) is diagnostically characteristic
9. SALIVARY DUCT CARCINOMA (SDC)
Histogenesis: Derived from excretory duct reserve cells (salivary duct proper). De novo or arising from malignant transformation of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.
Morphogenesis: Primarily luminal/ductal cell differentiation resembling ductal breast carcinoma.
Pathology:
- High-grade malignant neoplasm; most aggressive SGN
- Almost exclusively in the parotid gland
- Mimics ductal breast carcinoma: intraductal and invasive components with comedo necrosis
- Locoregional metastasis is common
- Genetic: AR (androgen receptor) gene on Xq11-12; ERBB2 amplification; TP53, PTEN, HRAS mutations
IHC of Salivary Duct Carcinoma:
- Androgen Receptor (AR): Strongly positive (similar to ductal breast carcinoma and prostate cancer) - diagnostic and predictive marker; guides androgen deprivation therapy
- HER2/neu (ERBB2): >20% show diffuse strong membranous staining - diagnostic, prognostic; guides targeted therapy
- Gross Cystic Disease Fluid Protein-15 (GCDFP-15): Positive in luminal cells (low specificity)
- ER, PR (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor): Usually negative - helps differentiate from breast metastasis
- TP53: Positive with IHC; associated with poor prognosis
- Ki-67: >10%; often significantly elevated
- PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen): Can be positive (related to AR expression)
10. BASAL CELL ADENOMA
Histogenesis: Excretory duct reserve cells; inner ductal and outer basaloid cells.
Pathology:
- Benign; monotonous small basaloid cells with dense chromatin, scant cytoplasm
- Distinct basement membrane-like structure
- Lacks the myxochondroid stroma of PA
- Patterns: solid, tubular, trabecular, membranous
IHC of Basal Cell Adenoma:
- Basal-myoepithelial cells: CK14, p63, SOX10 - positive
- Ductules: CK7, EMA - positive
- S100: Positive spindle-shaped stromal cells
- Ki-67: <2% (distinguishes from basal cell adenocarcinoma)
11. ONCOCYTOMA / ONCOCYTIC ADENOCARCINOMA
Histogenesis: Arises from oncocytic metaplasia of ductal (striated duct) cells. "Oncocytosis" results from aberrant increase in mitochondrial number - may be age-related or due to increased metabolic activity.
Pathology:
- Oncocytes: large epithelial cells with abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, central pyknotic nucleus
- Ultrastructurally: increased number of abnormal mitochondria
IHC of Oncocytoma:
- Anti-mitochondria antibodies (AMA): Strongly positive
- CD117/c-Kit: Strongly positive in striated duct cells
- E-cadherin: Positive
- S100: Positive
- PAX8: Positive
- Pancytokeratin: Positive
PART IV: GENERAL IHC MARKERS IN SGN - SUMMARY
A. Markers for Cellular Differentiation
Luminal Cell Markers:
| Antigen | Acinar | Ductal |
|---|
| Pan-CK (AE1/AE3) | Positive | Positive |
| EMA | Positive | Positive (weak) |
| CEA | Positive | Positive (weak) |
| CK14 | Negative | Negative |
| p63 | Negative | Negative |
Abluminal/Myoepithelial Cell Markers:
| Antigen | Myoepithelial | Basal |
|---|
| CK14 | Positive | Positive |
| p63 | Positive | Positive |
| Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA) | Positive | Negative |
| Calponin | Positive | Negative |
| Muscle-Specific Actin (MSA) | Positive | Negative |
| Vimentin | Positive | Negative |
| GFAP | Positive | Negative |
| S100 | Variable | Variable |
Notes on specific markers:
- Calponin and SMA = most specific for myoepithelial cells. Spindle cells stain diffusely; epithelioid and clear cells stain focally; plasmacytoid cells are calponin-positive but SMA-negative
- GFAP = low sensitivity overall but intensely positive in PA and myoepitheliomas; negative in PAC and ACC (very useful discriminator)
- CD117/c-Kit = negative in normal salivary gland; positive in luminal cells of various SGN; >50% in ACC (key differential from PAC)
- WT1 = sensitive marker for neoplastic myoepithelial cells in PA; negative in normal myoepithelium
B. Markers for Benign vs. Malignant Distinction
| Marker | Benign | Malignant |
|---|
| Ki-67 | Mostly <5% | Always >10% (except low-grade MEC: 2.2%; high-grade MEC: 8%) |
| MCM2 | <10% | >10% |
| BCL-2 | Expressed | Lost |
| p53 | Weak/absent | Strong expression |
| EGFR | Absent | Strong expression |
| Apoptotic index (TUNEL) | <0.4% | >0.4% |
PART V: ROLE OF IHC IN SPECIFIC DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
| Differential Problem | Key IHC Findings |
|---|
| PA vs. ACC | PA: GFAP+, PLAG1+; ACC: GFAP-, PLAG1-, CD117++ |
| PA vs. PAC | PA: GFAP++, p40+; PAC: GFAP-, p40- |
| ACC vs. PAC | ACC: CD117 >50%, GFAP-; PAC: CD117 <50%, GFAP- |
| AciCC vs. Secretory Carcinoma | AciCC: DOG1+, S100-, mammaglobin-; SC: DOG1-, S100++, mammaglobin++ |
| MEC vs. AciCC | MEC: p63+; AciCC: p63- |
| MEC vs. SCC/metastasis | MEC: MUC5AC+, CK7+ |
| Myoepithelioma vs. PA | Myoepithelioma: no luminal markers (EMA-, CEA-); PA: EMA+, CEA+ |
| SDC vs. Breast metastasis | SDC: AR+, ER/PR usually negative; Breast: ER/PR+, AR variable |
| Benign vs. Malignant BCA | Ki-67 <2% (BCA) vs. higher; invasion pattern most important |
CONCLUSION
The pathology and histogenesis of salivary gland neoplasms represents one of the most intellectually challenging areas in oral and maxillofacial pathology. The histogenetic theories, particularly the semi-pluripotent bicellular reserve cell theory, provide a conceptual framework for understanding cell of origin, while the morphogenic theory of Dardick provides the practical pathological classification based on cellular differentiation, ECM production, and architectural arrangement.
The advent of IHC has validated and refined these theoretical frameworks. A panel-based approach is always recommended - no single marker is diagnostic in isolation. Key IHC markers - PLAG1/GFAP for PA, CD117 for ACC vs. PAC, DOG1/SOX10 for AciCC, AR/HER2 for SDC, p63 for MEC, and calponin/SMA for myoepithelial differentiation - form the backbone of modern salivary gland tumour diagnosis. Combined with Ki-67 for proliferative assessment and BCL-2/p53 for malignant potential, IHC provides indispensable adjunct information that complements the gold standard of H&E morphology.
Sources: Iyer et al., Cancers 2021; Sonawane et al., J Global Oral Health 2023; Dwivedi et al., Indian J Cancer 2013; Akalya et al., Oral Maxillofac Pathol J 2025.