Bonds chemically to enamel and dentine (no acid etching needed)
Biocompatible with pulp tissue
Thermal expansion coefficient close to natural tooth
Anticariogenic effect due to ion exchange with tooth
Tolerates some moisture during placement
Good for class III/V restorations and luting cements
Disadvantages
Low fracture toughness and tensile strength
Poor wear resistance - not suitable for load-bearing areas (class I/II)
Sensitive to moisture contamination and desiccation during initial setting
Surface can become rough over time
More opaque than composite resin - limited esthetic use in anterior teeth
Short working time in some formulations
Glass ionomer cement is best suited for non-load-bearing restorations, liners/bases, luting crowns/bridges, root surface caries, and pediatric dentistry where fluoride release is a priority.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.