The Endometrial Microbiome and Fertility
Background: is the uterus really "sterile"?
For decades the uterine cavity was assumed to be sterile. Culture-independent techniques (16S rRNA sequencing) have shown that the endometrium harbors a low-biomass but distinct microbial community, separate from the vaginal microbiome, that appears to influence implantation, pregnancy maintenance, and IVF outcomes (Karadbhajne et al., Cureus 2025, PMID 40099081; Moreno et al., Microbiome 2022, PMID 34980280).
Composition: "Lactobacillus-dominant" vs "dysbiotic"
- Eubiotic / Lactobacillus-dominant profile (generally >90% Lactobacillus spp., mirroring a healthy vaginal microbiome) is associated with better reproductive outcomes.
- Dysbiotic profile: a mix of non-Lactobacillus genera - Gardnerella, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Prevotella, Atopobium, and others - is repeatedly linked to:
- Lower implantation and pregnancy rates
- Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) (Gao et al. 2025, PMID 40862108; Zhang et al. 2024, PMID 39469742)
- Recurrent pregnancy loss
- Chronic endometritis
A large multicenter study of 342 infertile patients (Moreno et al., Microbiome 2022) found that endometrial microbiota composition at the time of embryo transfer was a useful predictor of reproductive outcome in patients undergoing assisted reproduction, reinforcing an earlier 2016 report cited in Berek & Novak's Gynecology ("Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure," Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:684-703) - showing this is now considered established enough to appear in mainstream gynecology texts.
Proposed mechanisms linking microbiome to fertility
- Immune tolerance and receptivity: dysbiosis alters local cytokine profiles and immune cell populations (e.g., uterine NK cells, leukemia inhibitory factor signaling), impairing the immune tolerance needed for trophoblast invasion (Inversetti et al., Int J Mol Sci 2023, PMID 36769318; Zhang et al. 2024).
- Chronic endometritis (CE): subclinical inflammation, often driven by Streptococcus, Enterococcus, E. coli, Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma, and Gardnerella, is strongly overrepresented in women with unexplained infertility and RIF. Antibiotic treatment of CE has been shown to restore spontaneous conception rates in several cohort studies (Cicinelli et al., cited in Berek & Novak's Gynecology).
- Direct endometrial receptivity effects: dysbiotic microbiota has been correlated with altered expression of implantation markers in the secretory-phase endometrium.
- Catheter contamination at embryo transfer: bacteria present on the transfer catheter tip have been shown to influence live birth rates after IVF (Moore et al., Fertil Steril 2000).
Clinical relevance / testing
Commercial assays such as EMMA (Endometrial Microbiome Metagenomic Analysis) and ALICE (Analysis of Infectious Chronic Endometritis) are marketed to characterize the endometrial microbiome and detect pathogens associated with CE before embryo transfer, on the premise that correcting dysbiosis (with targeted antibiotics and/or probiotics, particularly oral or vaginal Lactobacillus supplementation) may improve IVF/ICSI success. Evidence for these commercial panels changing live-birth rates is still emerging and not yet definitive - most supporting data come from observational/cohort studies rather than large RCTs.
Bottom line
- A Lactobacillus-dominated endometrial niche correlates with better implantation and pregnancy outcomes; dysbiosis (non-Lactobacillus overgrowth) correlates with implantation failure, RIF, and possibly pregnancy loss.
- Chronic endometritis, frequently identified through the same dysbiotic organisms, is a treatable contributor to unexplained infertility in some women.
- The field is still evolving: sampling contamination (from vaginal/cervical flora during biopsy), low biomass, and variable sequencing methods limit reproducibility across studies, so mechanistic causality (versus association) is not fully established.
Evidence currency check
A recent PubMed search (last 3 years, systematic reviews/meta-analyses) did not return a dedicated systematic review or meta-analysis specifically pooling endometrial microbiome and fertility outcomes - most literature here consists of narrative reviews, cohort, and case-control studies (highest single evidence tier found: a large multicenter observational study, PMID 34980280). No high-level evidence was found that contradicts the above synthesis, but be aware the field currently lacks Cochrane-level meta-analytic confirmation.