I now have rich, detailed content from Kanski's across all key domains. Here is the comprehensive 20-mark answer:
Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) — 20-Mark Answer
1. Definition (1 mark)
Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), also called scatter laser photocoagulation, is a laser treatment in which 1,500–7,000 burns are applied to the peripheral retina (outside the temporal vascular arcades), deliberately destroying ischaemic peripheral retinal tissue to cause regression of retinal and iris neovascularisation. It remains the mainstay of treatment for proliferative retinopathy in most healthcare systems.
2. Mechanism of Action (2 marks)
Thermal laser energy is absorbed by melanin in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and haemoglobin in retinal vessels, converting it to heat that destroys the outer retinal layers (photoreceptors + RPE).
This produces its beneficial effect through:
- Destruction of ischaemic peripheral photoreceptors — the most metabolically demanding cells in the retina — reducing total retinal oxygen demand
- Improved oxygenation of inner retina — by eliminating the oxygen-consuming outer layers, oxygen from the choroid can diffuse further inward, reducing inner retinal hypoxia
- Reduction of VEGF production — the ischaemic peripheral retina is the major source of VEGF; ablating this tissue dramatically reduces VEGF secretion
- Regression of neovascularisation — lowered VEGF leads to closure and fibrosis of new vessels (NVD, NVE, NVI)
- Possible RPE scar-mediated effects — laser scars may directly alter cytokine production from the RPE
The net result: ischaemic drive for neovascularisation is eliminated → existing new vessels regress → risk of vitreous haemorrhage and tractional retinal detachment is reduced.
3. Indications (3 marks)
Primary Indication: Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
The Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) established PRP's benefit in high-risk PDR:
- Severe NVD (new vessels at disc) without haemorrhage: 26% risk of severe visual loss at 2 years → reduced to 9% with PRP
- NVD with haemorrhage, or NVE > ½ disc area with haemorrhage: high-risk characteristics requiring prompt PRP
High-risk PDR characteristics (DRS criteria):
- NVD ≥ ¼–⅓ disc area
- Any NVD with preretinal or vitreous haemorrhage
- NVE ≥ ½ disc area with preretinal or vitreous haemorrhage
Other Indications:
| Condition | When to Apply PRP |
|---|
| Retinal vein occlusion (CRVO, BRVO) | When neovascularisation of iris/angle/retina develops |
| Sickle cell retinopathy | Proliferative sickle cell retinopathy ("sea fan" NV) |
| Eales disease | Peripheral retinal neovascularisation |
| Retinal vasculitis | With neovascularisation |
| Rubeosis iridis (neovascular glaucoma) | Combined with other treatment |
| Before cataract surgery in PDR | To reduce perioperative risk |
| Intraoperative during pars plana vitrectomy | Combined with endolaser during surgery |
4. Pre-Treatment Evaluation (1 mark)
- Dilated fundus examination (indirect ophthalmoscopy + slit-lamp biomicroscopy)
- Fluorescein angiography (FA): delineates extent of NV, identifies areas of capillary non-perfusion, guides treatment boundaries
- Wide-field FA: accurately maps peripheral capillary non-perfusion for targeted/selective treatment
- OCT: assess for co-existing diabetic macular oedema (DMO) before PRP
- IOP measurement; iris neovascularisation check (undilated slit-lamp)
Key principle: If co-existing clinically significant macular oedema (CSMO) or central-involving DMO is present, treat the oedema first (with anti-VEGF or focal/grid laser), then perform PRP — to avoid exacerbation by PRP.
5. Informed Consent (1 mark)
Patients must be counselled about:
- Visual field loss: PRP reduces peripheral field; may be severe enough to legally preclude driving — though most patients with initially good vision maintain the binocular field standard required
- Risk to central vision: PRP can worsen or precipitate macular oedema — reduced by fractionating treatment over 2–3 sessions
- Night vision impairment: destruction of peripheral rod photoreceptors
- Colour vision changes
- Alternative: Anti-VEGF therapy (DRCR.net Protocol S, CLARITY studies) is as effective as PRP at 5 years for PDR; patient may choose this route, but must understand the need for repeated injections and shorter-term follow-up data
6. Equipment and Setup (1 mark)
Laser Sources
- Argon green (514 nm): historically standard
- Diode (810 nm): penetrates media opacity better; absorbed by melanin preferentially
- Frequency-doubled Nd:YAG (532 nm): common in modern systems
- Pattern scan laser (PASCAL): delivers pre-programmed multispot arrays with very short pulses, allowing rapid delivery of large numbers of burns
Contact Lenses
- Panfundoscopic lens (e.g. Volk SuperField, Mainster PRP 165): preferred; provides wide-field view of peripheral retina
- ⚠️ With panfundoscopic lenses: actual retinal burn diameter is twice the interface setting (200 μm selected → 400 μm retinal burn)
- Three-mirror (Goldmann) lens: alternative; requires more repositioning
- High-magnification lens (Mainster, Area Centralis): for posterior component of treatment near arcades
Anaesthesia
- Topical (proxymetacaine drops): adequate in most cases
- Sub-Tenon or peribulbar block: for patients with severe discomfort, especially peripheral/horizontal meridian treatment
7. Laser Parameters (3 marks)
| Parameter | Standard Setting |
|---|
| Spot size | 400 μm retinal diameter (200 μm on interface with panfundoscopic lens) |
| Duration | 0.05–0.1 s (argon); 0.01–0.05 s (10–50 ms) with modern/pattern scan lasers |
| Power | Titrated to produce light grey/white burn (mild intensity); just above threshold |
| Spacing | Burns separated by 1–1.5 burn widths |
| Total burns | 1,500 per session initially; 2,500–3,500 total for mild PDR; 4,000 for moderate; 7,000 for severe PDR |
| Sessions | Fractionated over 2–3 sessions to reduce complications |
Burn intensity: only a light (grey-white) burn is desired — heavy/intense burns increase complication risk without additional benefit.
8. Treatment Pattern and Extent (2 marks)
Boundaries of Treatment
- Posteriorly: outside the temporal macular vascular arcades (approximately 2 disc diameters from the foveal centre)
- Nasally: usually 2 disc diameters nasal to the optic disc are left untreated (to preserve paracentral field)
- Anteriorly: extends to ora serrata
Technique
- Apply a "barrier" row of laser burns just temporal to the macula early in the procedure — protects against accidental macular damage
- In severe PDR: treat the inferior fundus first — any subsequent vitreous haemorrhage gravitates inferiorly and would otherwise obscure this area
- Avoid areas of vitreoretinal traction — laser over traction sites can precipitate haemorrhage or tractional detachment
- Review at 4–6 weeks after completing adequate burns; additional sessions applied as needed
Multispot / Pattern Scan (PASCAL)
- Short pulses (e.g. 20 ms), very short intervals, pre-programmed arrays
- Delivers large number of burns rapidly
- Shorter pulse duration may require a greater total number of burns for equivalent response
Targeted Retinal Photocoagulation (TRP)
- Wide-field FA guides selective treatment of only the ischaemic/non-perfused peripheral zones
- Achieves NV regression while minimising collateral damage to perfused retina
- Reduces side effects compared to conventional full PRP
9. Indicators of Successful Regression (1 mark)
- Blunting of neovascular vessel tips
- Shrinking and disappearance of NV — leaving "ghost" vessels or fibrosis
- Regression of intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA)
- Decreased venous beading and dilation
- Absorption of retinal haemorrhages
- Disc pallor (in some cases)
Wide-field fundus photograph: established PRP scars in the mid-periphery with sparing of the posterior pole and macula
Regression of disc neovascularisation and fibrovascular membrane 10 days after PRP
10. Complications (2 marks)
Immediate / Short-term
| Complication | Mechanism |
|---|
| Pain | Especially peripheral/horizontal meridian treatment; limits burns per session |
| Vitreous haemorrhage | Contraction of regressing vessels or vitreous separation induced by treatment |
| Macular oedema (DMO) | Treatment-induced breakdown of blood-retinal barrier; exacerbated by large single sessions — reduced by fractionating |
| Choroidal effusion | Extensive single-session treatment |
| Exudative retinal detachment | With very extensive burns in one session |
| Corneal burn | With improper technique or contact lens coupling |
Long-term / Chronic
| Complication | Notes |
|---|
| Visual field constriction | Tunnel vision in extensive treatment; may affect driving |
| Night blindness | Loss of peripheral rod photoreceptors |
| Colour vision changes | |
| Decreased contrast sensitivity | |
| Tractional retinal detachment | Contraction of residual fibrovascular tissue post-regression |
| Epiretinal membrane (ERM) | Recognised complication of PRP |
| Inadvertent foveal burn | If technique is poor or lens orientation confused (inverted/reversed image) |
| Choroidal neovascular membrane | Rare; if burns extend subfoveal |
| Accommodative paresis | Ciliary body involvement |
11. PRP vs. Anti-VEGF — Current Evidence (2 marks)
| Study | Key Finding |
|---|
| DRCR.net Protocol S (5 years) | Intravitreal ranibizumab non-inferior to PRP for PDR at 5 years; fewer VH episodes; better macular oedema profile; slightly better visual field preservation with anti-VEGF |
| CLARITY study (1 year) | Intravitreal aflibercept as effective as PRP in PDR |
| DRCR.net Protocol AB | For VH from PDR: early vitrectomy + PRP gives faster visual recovery than initial aflibercept; 2-year outcomes similar — both acceptable |
| YOSEMITE / RHINE (2 years) | Faricimab (bispecific VEGF/Ang-2 inhibitor) shows promise |
Clinical implications:
- PRP remains preferred when anti-VEGF compliance is uncertain (single treatment course)
- Anti-VEGF preferred when co-existing DMO is present (DRCR Protocol S: 28% vs 42% DMO rate with anti-VEGF vs PRP)
- Anti-VEGF does not replace PRP in patients lost to follow-up — PRP provides more durable protection
- PRP + anti-VEGF combined may be used in severe PDR with co-existing DMO
12. Special Situations (1 mark)
- With co-existing DMO: treat macular oedema first with anti-VEGF (or focal/grid laser for non-central CSMO) before PRP. If focal laser to macula is needed, apply it before PRP in the same session.
- Before cataract surgery in PDR: PRP reduces risk of post-operative rubeosis and NVG
- Intraoperative (endolaser): applied during PPV via intraocular probe, allowing treatment despite media opacity
- Terson syndrome / vitreous haemorrhage: if PRP cannot be completed due to VH → proceed to early vitrectomy + intraoperative endolaser
- Rubeosis/NVG: PRP combined with anti-VEGF injection (intravitreal) for rapid NVI regression; PRP for long-term stability
Sources: Kanski's Clinical Ophthalmology: A Systematic Approach, 10th Edition · Wills Eye Manual, 8th Edition