Help me find PMC article or any other Guidelines for exercises in Thrid stage of lobour
Help me find PMC article or any other Guidelines for exercises in Thrid stage of labour .
exercise "third stage of labour" postpartum
"third stage of labor" management guidelines active passive
PMC article exercises third stage of labour guidelines physiotherapy
"third stage of labor" management oxytocin uterotonic prevention
pelvic floor exercise immediate postpartum third stage
PMC "third stage of labour" exercises breathing pushing techniques site:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov OR site:pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
PMID: 38186656
PMID: 29409456
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9822559
| Organization | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| WHO | Active management preferred: oxytocin 10 IU IM/IV + delayed cord clamping (≥1 min) + controlled cord traction |
| NICE (UK) | Offer active management to all women; physiological management only for low-risk women who specifically request it |
| ACNM (USA) | Midwifery Care Guideline (2024) - upright positioning, skin-to-skin, early breastfeeding to stimulate natural oxytocin |
| NHS Wales | Swansea Bay Guideline 2024 |
| WNHS (Western Australia) | KEMH Clinical Guideline 2021/2025 |
Help me find evidence for exercises for all stages of labour .
exercise physical therapy "first stage of labor" systematic review
exercise "second stage of labor" pushing breathing systematic review
non-pharmacological interventions labour pain exercise mobilization Cochrane
PMC systematic review exercises all stages of labour first second third evidence guidelines 2020 2025
PMID: 39825901
PMID: 33478303
maternal position upright ambulation labour outcome systematic review
breathing techniques labour pain duration systematic review
PMID: 36896808
PMID: 39043113
PMID: 23959763
physical therapy physiotherapy labour outcomes systematic review
PMID: 30411804
upright position second stage labour perineal outcomes pushing
PMC11804556 physical therapy assistance labour systematic review meta-analysis 2025
| Stage | Best Intervention | Key Evidence | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Stage | Birthing ball exercises | Terres 2025 (PMID 39825901) | -130 min labour, -20% pain, fewer C-sections |
| 1st Stage | Upright positions / walking | Lawrence 2013 Cochrane (PMID 23959763) | -82 min labour, fewer C-sections, less epidural |
| 1st Stage | Physiotherapy protocols | Delgado 2025 (PMC11804556) | -99 min labour, RR 0.52 for C-section (HIGH certainty) |
| 2nd Stage | Breathing exercises | Issac 2023 (PMC9999308) | Shorter 2nd stage, reduced anxiety |
| 2nd Stage | Mind-body (hypnosis/mindfulness) | Wang 2024 (PMID 39043113) | Large pain reduction, fewer C-sections |
| 2nd Stage | Upright positions (with epidural) | Walker 2018 Cochrane (PMC6517130) | Uncertain benefit - low-quality evidence |
| 3rd Stage | Upright position + skin-to-skin | ACNM/NHS Guidelines | Physiological support; no RCT exercise data |
postoperative role of physiotherapy in stress urinary incontinance with recent evidance articles
pelvic floor muscle training postoperative stress urinary incontinence
physiotherapy rehabilitation after prostatectomy urinary incontinence
biofeedback electrical stimulation stress urinary incontinence conservative treatment
postoperative physiotherapy stress urinary incontinence recent evidence PMC 2022 2025 pelvic floor
PMID: 39703522
PMID: 37070660
PMID: 34550846
PMID: 39104234
PMID: 36053030
PMID: 36107210
preoperative pelvic floor training stress urinary incontinence surgery outcomes
postoperative physiotherapy stress urinary incontinence women sling surgery pelvic floor evidence 2023 2024 2025
| Intervention | Evidence Grade | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| PFMT alone | Moderate/High | Better cure/improvement vs. control |
| PFMT + biofeedback | Moderate/High | Better cure/improvement vs. control |
| PFMT + biofeedback | Moderate/High | Better QoL vs. control |
| More-intensive PFMT | Moderate/High | Better than less-intensive PFMT |
| PFMT + adherence strategy | Moderate/High | Better than PFMT alone |
| Continence pessary + PFMT | Moderate/High | Better than pessary alone |
| Intravaginal devices | Moderate | Improved QoL |
| Electrical stimulation | Moderate/High | Cure/improvement + better QoL |
| Timepoint | Continence Recovery (RR) | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month post-op | RR = 3.38 (95% CI 1.83-6.25) | Significant |
| 3 months post-op | RR = 1.99 (95% CI 1.67-2.38) | Significant |
| 6 months post-op | RR = 1.34 (95% CI 1.20-1.49) | Significant |
| 12 months post-op | RR = 1.13 (95% CI 0.99-1.23) | NOT significant |
| Modality | Evidence |
|---|---|
| PFMT (8 studies) | Most evidence; effective short-to-medium term |
| Electrical stimulation (3 studies) | Effective reduction in incontinence |
| Extracorporeal magnetic innervation (ExMI) (1 study) | Promising |
| Vibration therapy (2 studies) | Some benefit |
| Duloxetine (pharmacotherapy) | Effective but side-effect limited |
| Evidence | Source | Year | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cochrane Overview (HIGH certainty) | Todhunter-Brown PMID 36053030 | 2022 | Women, SUI |
| Network Meta-Analysis (Biofeedback+ES = best) | Li PMID 39703522 | 2024 | Women, SUI |
| Cochrane Review | Johnson PMID 37070660 | 2023 | Men, post-prostatectomy |
| Meta-Analysis (supervised > unsupervised) | Baumann PMID 34550846 | 2022 | Men, post-prostatectomy |
| Meta-Analysis (time-course data) | Zeng PMID 39104234 | 2024 | Men, post-prostatectomy |
| Systematic Review (all options) | Canning PMID 36107210 | 2022 | Men, post-prostatectomy |