Here is a comprehensive, evidence-based overview of immunotherapy in carcinoma of the vulva, synthesized from the latest 2024-2026 literature.
-
Modest but real efficacy - Pooled ORR of 21% across 6 trials (181 patients), rising to ~46% with combination strategies vs ~11% with monotherapy alone (Maiorano et al., 2025 meta-analysis).
-
No dedicated FDA approval exists for vulvar cancer specifically - clinical use is guided by tumor-agnostic approvals (MSI-H/dMMR, TMB-H) and extrapolation from cervical cancer data (KEYNOTE-826).
-
All VSCC tumors express PD-L1 (median CPS = 66 in a 2026 study of 108 cases), meaning virtually all patients are technically biomarker-eligible - but CPS does not reliably predict response.
-
Both HPV+ and HPV- subtypes may benefit - HPV-independent tumors paradoxically show higher immune infiltration (CD8+ TILs, CD68+ macrophages, PD-L1), supporting ICI trials across both subtypes.
-
Combination approaches are superior - ICI + chemotherapy, dual ICI (nivo + ipi), and ICI + HDAC inhibitors (pembrolizumab + vorinostat: ORR 19%, OS 11.1 months in PEVOsq Phase II basket trial, Nature Cancer 2025) all outperform monotherapy.
-
The biggest gap is the absence of randomized controlled trials specific to VSCC due to disease rarity. Biomarker-driven, molecularly stratified trials are the top research priority.