attachment
attachment
attachment
attachment
attachment
attachment

In a 65 yr old male pateint , hypertensive on tab telma 40, with history of diaphoresis and multiple hypotensive episodes with min bp of 84/46 mmhg , concentric lvh on echo what could be reason

analyse_media
analyse_media
analyse_media
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

pheochromocytoma AND "paroxysmal hypertension"

Most likely explanation: catecholamine excess (pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma) until proven otherwise

The combination you're describing - a hypertensive patient with diaphoresis, paroxysmal/episodic hypotension (not just poorly controlled highs, but real drops to 84/46), and concentric LVH on echo - is the classic triad taught for a catecholamine-secreting tumor (pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma):
  • Catecholamine surges cause episodic hypertension, tachycardia, headache, and diaphoresis.
  • Between surges (or after abrupt catecholamine washout, especially if the patient is volume-contracted from chronic vasoconstriction, or has been given an alpha/beta blocker without prior volume expansion), patients can swing into significant hypotension - this paradox of hypertensive-crisis-then-hypotension is well described.
  • Chronic catecholamine excess produces pressure-overload/toxic cardiomyopathy that echoes as concentric LVH, sometimes with associated diastolic dysfunction.
As Rosen's Emergency Medicine puts it: "Clinical features of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma are characteristic of catecholamine excess. Classic symptoms include paroxysms of hypertension, diaphoresis, palpitations, headache, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss." - Rosen's Emergency Medicine. Goldman-Cecil Medicine adds that pheochromocytoma should be suspected with "hyperadrenergic spells... resistant hypertension."
Work-up: plasma free metanephrines (or 24-hour urine fractionated metanephrines/catecholamines), followed by adrenal CT/MRI or MIBG scan if biochemically positive.

Other differentials to actively rule out

  1. Autonomic failure / dysautonomia (diabetic autonomic neuropathy, Parkinson disease, multiple system atrophy/Shy-Drager): a well-recognized pattern is supine hypertension alternating with orthostatic hypotension - "Supine hypertension is common in patients with orthostatic hypotension due to autonomic failure, affecting >50% of patients in some series... orthostatic hypotension may present after initiation of therapy for hypertension" (Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22e). Diaphoresis can occur as a compensatory autonomic response. Longstanding hypertension explains the concentric LVH independently. A tilt-table test and formal autonomic testing would clarify this.
  2. Drug-related hypotension: Telmisartan (ARB) can unmask volume depletion, superimposed diuretic use, or additive effect with other antihypertensives/nitrates - review the full medication list and volume status.
  3. Adrenal insufficiency (Addisonian crisis) - can cause hypotensive episodes with diaphoresis, though it doesn't explain the pre-existing hypertension/LVH; check cortisol/ACTH if suspected, especially if hyponatremia/hyperkalemia coexist (note: your labs actually show Na 148 - high - which argues against classic Addisonian crisis).
  4. Intermittent bradyarrhythmia or heart block causing drop attacks with reflex diaphoresis - your ECGs show sinus rhythm with voltage criteria consistent with LVH (deep S in V1/V2, tall R in V5/V6) but no obvious high-grade block on the strips provided; a 24-48 hour Holter would help capture a transient arrhythmia coinciding with a hypotensive episode.
  5. Baroreflex failure (rare - seen after neck surgery/irradiation or carotid body tumor) - produces labile BP swings with diaphoresis and tachycardia.
  6. Sepsis/vasodilatory shock superimposed on chronic hypertensive heart disease - diaphoresis plus hypotension from an acute infective/inflammatory process, with the pre-existing concentric LVH simply reflecting long-standing hypertension. This is worth actively excluding given the blood gas below.

Important flag from the ABG you shared

The arterial blood gas (pH 7.31, pCO2 60 Torr, pO2 28.6 Torr, SaO2 43.6%, HCO3 29.1) shows a severe combined respiratory acidosis with profound hypoxemia - this is a critical, near-arrest level of oxygenation, not an incidental finding. If this sample was drawn during or right after one of the hypotensive episodes, it raises concern for either:
  • flash pulmonary edema / acute decompensated heart failure precipitated by a hypertensive surge (fits with concentric LVH -> diastolic dysfunction), or
  • a respiratory arrest/severe hypoventilation event (sedation, aspiration, severe pneumonia) that itself caused the hypotension, or
  • a peri-arrest/shock state from sepsis.
This finding needs urgent clinical correlation (was the patient cyanotic, obtunded, or peri-arrest at the time of sampling?) independent of the pheochromocytoma work-up, since it suggests the patient may have had a genuinely critical event rather than a benign vasovagal or autonomic dip.

Bottom line

Given the classic symptom triad (episodic diaphoresis, hypertension history with real hypotensive swings, concentric LVH), pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma is the single best unifying diagnosis to test for first (plasma free metanephrines), while in parallel:
  • reviewing/adjusting the antihypertensive regimen and volume status,
  • screening for autonomic dysfunction if metanephrines are negative,
  • placing a Holter for arrhythmia correlation, and
  • urgently addressing the critical ABG abnormality, which suggests the patient may have been in respiratory failure/shock at the time of one of these episodes and needs immediate bedside reassessment (airway, oxygenation, hemodynamics) if this hasn't already been acted on.
I did not find any recent (2023-2026) systematic reviews that meaningfully change this classic teaching; the top PubMed hits for pheochromocytoma and paroxysmal hypertension were about metastasis patterns and bone density, not diagnostic criteria, so no evidence-based update contradicts the above (PMID 40927285, 40178226).

Hypotensive not hypertensive

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"septic shock" AND "diastolic dysfunction"

Good catch - let me reframe. The core issue is why is this known hypertensive patient (on telmisartan 40, with pre-existing concentric LVH) now having repeated hypotensive episodes with diaphoresis, not paroxysmal hypertensive surges. That changes the differential significantly.

Reframed differential: hypotension + diaphoresis in a patient with hypertensive heart disease (concentric LVH)

Textbooks define this combination directly as a shock picture: "When a patient presents with hypotension, the important question is whether or not the patient is in shock. Shock is present if there is evidence of multisystem organ hypoperfusion. This may manifest itself as tachycardia, tachypnea, diaphoresis, poorly perfused skin..." - Symptom to Diagnosis: An Evidence-Based Guide. So the working framework should be: what is driving a shock/hypoperfusion state in this patient, rather than looking for a catecholamine-excess paroxysm.

1. Septic shock - fits best with your ABG

Your blood gas (pH 7.31, pCO2 60 [high], pO2 28.6 [very low], SaO2 43.6% [very low], HCO3 29) shows severe combined respiratory failure with profound hypoxemia at the time of sampling. That level of derangement, together with diaphoresis and hypotension, is much more consistent with a septic/distributive shock with respiratory compromise (e.g., pneumonia progressing toward ARDS, or severe sepsis from another source) than with a catecholamine-secreting tumor. This needs an urgent sepsis work-up: lactate, blood cultures, CXR, procalcitonin/CRP, and source identification, alongside airway/oxygenation support.

2. Cardiogenic component from his existing concentric LVH

Concentric LVH from chronic hypertension causes a stiff, poorly compliant ventricle with diastolic dysfunction (HFpEF pattern) - "Asymmetric hypertrophy suggests HCM, whereas concentric hypertrophy is more typical of hypertensive heart disease... elevated end-diastolic pressure with associated pulmonary venous hypertension, reduced cardiac output from diastolic dysfunction" (Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography; Frameworks for Internal Medicine). This kind of ventricle is very preload-dependent - any drop in filling (fever, tachycardia, vasodilation from infection, or even the ARB itself) can drop cardiac output sharply and precipitate hypotension. It doesn't need a new coronary event to explain the hypotension, though a silent MI is worth excluding (LVH can mask ischemic ST-T changes on ECG, so serial troponins matter).

3. Relative/absolute adrenal insufficiency

"Relative adrenal insufficiency is a common finding in critically ill... patients with hypotension" (Barash's Clinical Anesthesia), and acute adrenal insufficiency classically causes refractory hypotension with diaphoresis, nausea, and fever (Mulholland & Greenfield's Surgery). Worth a random cortisol if the patient is acutely unwell, especially if there's any history of steroid use or an unexplained hyperkalemia/hyponatremia pattern (your Na was actually high at 148, which argues against classic Addisonian crisis but doesn't fully exclude it).

4. Autonomic dysfunction / orthostatic hypotension

At 65, especially if diabetic, autonomic neuropathy causing orthostatic or postprandial hypotension is common, and can present with compensatory diaphoresis from residual sympathetic activation. This is a diagnosis of exclusion after ruling out shock causes above - consider tilt-table testing.

5. Medication contribution

Telmisartan 40 mg alone rarely causes hypotension this severe, but check for additive effects - other antihypertensives, diuretics with volume depletion, nitrates, or renal impairment increasing drug effect. Review the full medication list and recent fluid balance/intake.

6. Arrhythmia

Patients with LVH have a higher burden of conduction disease. Your ECGs show sinus rhythm with LVH voltage criteria (deep S in V1-V2, tall R in V5-V6) without an obvious high-grade block on the strips provided, but a single strip can miss paroxysmal bradyarrhythmia/heart block - a Holter would help correlate rhythm with the hypotensive episodes.

7. Don't forget hypoglycemia

If diabetic, hypoglycemia produces diaphoresis and can mimic/contribute to hypotensive presyncope - a bedside glucose check is quick and easy to exclude.

Priority actions given your data

  • Treat the ABG as an emergency first - pO2 28.6/SaO2 43.6% with pCO2 60 is critical hypoxemic-hypercapnic respiratory failure; secure oxygenation/ventilation before anything else.
  • Septic screen: lactate, blood cultures, CXR, CBC, CRP/procalcitonin.
  • Cardiac screen: troponin, BNP, repeat/continuous ECG or Holter.
  • Endocrine screen: random cortisol, glucose, TSH.
  • Medication reconciliation and volume status assessment.
A recent (2025) systematic review on echocardiographic phenotypes in sepsis (PMID 40853197) supports that septic patients frequently show diastolic dysfunction patterns similar to what a concentric-LVH heart would already have, reinforcing why an infectious/septic trigger could tip this patient from compensated hypertensive heart disease into hypotensive shock. This doesn't overturn any textbook teaching above, just adds recent evidence context.

Can the vbg be error

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

pre-analytical errors venous blood gas sample delayed analysis leukocyte larceny falsely low pO2

Yes - this pattern is very plausible as an artifact, and even taken at face value a VBG needs different reference ranges than the ABG interpretation I gave earlier. Let me correct both points.

1. VBG vs ABG - different normal ranges (my earlier read assumed arterial)

"Venous blood gas provides an accurate determination of both pH and hypercapnia. A normal PaCO2 on a venous blood gas can exclude hypercapnic respiratory failure. If there is severe hypercapnia or hypoxia, correlation with an arterial blood [gas] is [needed]" - Rosen's Emergency Medicine. And per the Harriet Lane Handbook, "PvCO2 averages 6 to 8 mmHg higher" than arterial, while venous pO2/sO2 are physiologically much lower than arterial (tissue has already extracted oxygen before blood returns to the vein) - typical peripheral venous pO2 is roughly 30-40 mmHg and sO2 roughly 60-75%, versus arterial ~80-100 mmHg and >95%.
So on your report: pH 7.306, pCO2 60, pO2 28.6, sO2 43.6% - if this is truly venous, the pO2/sO2 are still lower than a normal vein (suggesting either real increased peripheral O2 extraction from poor perfusion during a hypotensive episode, or a technical problem), and the pCO2 of 60 is higher than the expected 6-8 mmHg venous-arterial gap, meaning there's likely some genuine hypoventilation/hypercapnia component too, not pure artifact.

2. Can it be a technical/pre-analytical error - yes, quite possibly

The exact pattern you have (low pO2, low sO2, high pCO2, mildly acidotic pH) is the classic signature of a few well-documented pre-analytical errors, not a mixed-air-bubble error:
  • Delayed analysis without icing - red cells and white cells keep metabolizing glucose and consuming oxygen inside the syringe after the draw. If the sample sits at room temperature for more than a few minutes before being run, this "in vitro glycolysis" artificially lowers pO2/sO2 and raises pCO2 - "the rate of in vitro oxygen consumption is so high that it results in spuriously low pO2 unless blood is analyzed immediately... blood should be sampled into a pre-cooled syringe, kept on ice and analyzed within a few minutes if bedside analysis is not feasible" (acutecaretesting.org). This is sometimes called "leukocyte larceny" when white cell counts are high.
  • Prolonged tourniquet time / sluggish draw from a poorly perfused limb - if the sample was drawn from an arm during or right after a hypotensive episode (cold, vasoconstricted, poor flow), the stagnant local blood gets over-extracted of oxygen by the tissue before it's even drawn, giving an exaggerated low saturation that doesn't reflect the patient's true central/systemic status.
  • Air bubble contamination would actually push values the other way (pO2 up toward ~150, pCO2 down, pH up), so that's an unlikely explanation for this particular pattern - you can reasonably rule that one out here.
  • Excess liquid heparin dilution tends to falsely lower pCO2, not raise it, so also doesn't fit.

Bottom line / what I'd do

Given the severity implied (sO2 43.6% would essentially mean a cyanotic, near-moribund patient if truly systemic), the first practical step is to cross-check against the bedside pulse oximeter reading and clinical appearance at the time of the draw. If the patient was not clinically cyanotic/obtunded and the pulse oximeter read reasonably (e.g., >90%), that mismatch strongly supports a sampling/handling artifact (delay, stasis, no icing) rather than true severe hypoxemia, and the sample should be redrawn correctly - arterial if you specifically need to assess oxygenation, analyzed immediately or on ice, from a fresh site without a prolonged tourniquet - before it's used to drive any major clinical decision (like treating this as a life-threatening respiratory failure).
If repeat testing confirms similarly deranged values, then it's real and points back toward the shock/sepsis or cardiogenic picture discussed earlier; if it normalizes, the original report was most likely a pre-analytical error.

How to rule out adrenal insufficiency

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"adrenal insufficiency" AND diagnosis

How to rule out adrenal insufficiency in this patient

Step 1 - Screening test: 8 AM serum cortisol (plus plasma ACTH)

Draw a morning cortisol before giving any steroids. Per evidence-based cutoffs (Symptom to Diagnosis: An Evidence-Based Guide):
  • ≥16.3 mcg/dL rules out adrenal insufficiency (99.2% sensitive)
  • ≤3.6 mcg/dL establishes the diagnosis (98.4% specific)
  • 3.6-16.3 mcg/dL is indeterminate - proceed to a cosyntropin (ACTH) stimulation test
If he's acutely unwell/hypotensive at the time of blood draw, a random cortisol is still useful: "during critical illness a random cortisol of greater than 25 mcg/dL makes it unlikely that the patient is adrenally insufficient, whereas a random cortisol of less than 10 mcg/dL is strongly suggestive" (Henry's Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods).

Step 2 - Confirmatory test if indeterminate: cosyntropin (ACTH) stimulation test

  • Give 250 mcg cosyntropin IM/IV, measure serum cortisol at 0, 30, and 60 minutes.
  • A peak cortisol <18 mcg/dL (cortisol fails to rise appropriately) = positive test, confirms adrenal insufficiency (Tietz Textbook of Laboratory Medicine; Frameworks for Internal Medicine).
  • If he's on any hydrocortisone already, hold the morning dose before testing - it can be given right after the samples are drawn.

Step 3 - Localize with plasma ACTH

  • High ACTH + low cortisol = primary AI (Addison disease - adrenal gland itself failing; look for autoimmune adrenalitis, TB, hemorrhage, metastatic infiltration).
  • Low/normal ACTH + low cortisol = secondary/tertiary AI (pituitary/hypothalamic disease, or - most common in practice - exogenous steroid use/recent steroid withdrawal). Ask specifically about any chronic oral, inhaled, topical, or intra-articular steroid use - this is the single most common cause of secondary AI and easy to miss.

Step 4 - Supportive labs and clues specific to your case

  • Electrolytes: primary AI classically shows hyponatremia + hyperkalemia (aldosterone deficiency) plus sometimes mild hypoglycemia and eosinophilia. Note that his sodium was actually 148 (high), not low - this argues against a classic primary Addisonian crisis, though it doesn't fully exclude secondary AI (which spares aldosterone and may not cause the same electrolyte pattern).
  • If primary AI is suspected on labs: 21-hydroxylase (adrenal) antibodies for autoimmune Addison's, and CT adrenals for hemorrhage/infiltration/TB.
  • If secondary AI is suspected: pituitary MRI and check other pituitary axes (TSH/free T4, LH/FSH, prolactin).

Step 5 - Don't delay treatment for the workup if he's unstable

If he's actively hypotensive/diaphoretic and adrenal crisis is a real concern, draw the random cortisol and ACTH first, then start empiric IV hydrocortisone immediately without waiting for results - the test can be interpreted afterward, but untreated crisis is life-threatening. This is standard practice per Braunwald's Heart Disease: acute adrenal insufficiency "characteristically occurs in the setting of acute stress, infection, or trauma," which fits a shock-prone, hypotension-prone patient like this one.

Practical summary for this patient

  1. 8 AM (or random, given acute instability) cortisol + ACTH - drawn before any steroid.
  2. If indeterminate -> cosyntropin stimulation test.
  3. ACTH level to classify primary vs secondary.
  4. Correlate with Na/K, glucose, and steroid-use history.
  5. Treat empirically with IV hydrocortisone if clinically unstable rather than waiting on results.
I found no recent guideline changes contradicting this approach; the most relevant recent guideline (PMID 38714321/38724043, 2024 ESE/Endocrine Society joint guideline) specifically addresses glucocorticoid-induced (secondary) adrenal insufficiency and is worth pulling if he has any steroid exposure history, since that's the most likely and most overlooked cause in this age group.

How do ipwhat holder should I do 24 hr or 48 hr

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

ambulatory ECG monitoring duration syncope diagnostic yield

24-hour vs 48-hour Holter - how to decide

The choice depends on how frequently his hypotensive/diaphoretic episodes occur, not on a fixed rule:

If he's currently admitted

Since he's already hospitalized (per the ECG/ABG images), continuous inpatient cardiac telemetry is better than either outpatient Holter option - it captures every episode in real time and lets you correlate the exact rhythm with the BP drop and diaphoresis as it happens. Use this while he's in, rather than waiting for an outpatient Holter.

If outpatient monitoring is being planned instead

  • Episodes happening daily or near-daily ("multiple hypotensive episodes" suggests fairly frequent): a 48-hour Holter is the better default over 24-hour. It doubles the capture window for essentially the same logistics/cost, and extended monitoring consistently picks up more arrhythmic events than a single 24-hour run - "a 24- or 48-hour Holter monitor [is] useful for documenting arrhythmias that occur with sufficient frequency" (Washington Manual of Medical Therapeutics).
  • Episodes every few days to weekly: 24-48h Holter will likely miss it. Step up to a 7-14 day event/patch monitor - "event monitoring is at least as effective as Holter monitoring for detection of symptomatic arrhythmias... event monitoring also has the advantage of less frequently recording asymptomatic arrhythmias" (Pfenninger and Fowler's Procedures for Primary Care).
  • Episodes are rare (monthly or less): neither Holter option is adequate. Braunwald's Heart Disease notes "use of an implantable loop recorder for 1 year is more likely to identify the mechanism of syncope than is a conventional approach that uses Holter or event monitors" - so an implantable loop recorder becomes the right tool for infrequent events.

Practical recommendation for this patient

Given he's described as having had multiple episodes already (implying reasonably frequent recurrence), start with a 48-hour Holter with a symptom diary (have him/family note exact times of diaphoresis or dizziness) so you can directly correlate rhythm strips with symptomatic drops in BP. If the 48-hour study is negative but episodes continue, escalate to an extended event/patch monitor (1-2 weeks) rather than repeating another short Holter, since a negative Holter doesn't rule out an intermittent bradyarrhythmia or heart block - it just means it didn't happen to occur in that window.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.