Is there any condition in which we have to give anti D injection in early pregnancy in rh negative mother
| Indication | Notes |
|---|---|
| Spontaneous miscarriage / threatened abortion | Risk of fetomaternal bleed at any gestation |
| Induced / therapeutic abortion | Termination of pregnancy at any stage |
| Ectopic pregnancy | Fallopian tube rupture or surgical/medical management |
| Molar pregnancy (hydatidiform mole) | Though there is no true fetus, anti-D is still recommended |
| Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) | Invasive procedure causing potential mixing |
| Amniocentesis | Also applies in mid-trimester |
| Abdominal trauma | E.g., road traffic accident, domestic violence |
| Antepartum hemorrhage | Placental abruption, placenta praevia |
| External cephalic version (ECV) | Typically later in pregnancy but same principle |
| Any invasive procedure | Cordocentesis, fetal blood sampling |
Should we give antenatal if the patient is 8 weeks 5 days of gestation and has a subchorionic hematoma?
| Point | Detail |
|---|---|
| Already sensitized? | Check antibody screen first. If anti-D already present → do NOT give (no benefit) |
| Father Rh-negative? | If father confirmed Rh-negative, anti-D is not strictly necessary (fetus cannot be Rh+) |
| Kleihauer-Betke test | Not needed at this gestation — risk of large FMH is very low in early first trimester; standard dose is sufficient |
| Ongoing vs. resolved hematoma | Even if the hematoma appears stable on ultrasound, the current/recent bleeding is still grounds for prophylaxis |
Should we give anti-D injection if the patient is 8 weeks 5 days of gestation and has a subchorionic hematoma?