I now have all the material needed for a comprehensive answer. Let me compile the complete response:
Achalasia Cardia
Source: Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th Edition (Chapter 66) + Sleisenger & Fordtran's GI and Liver Disease
Definition and Aetiology
The term achalasia originates from the Greek "khalasis" meaning "failure to relax." It is an uncommon primary oesophageal motility disorder with a prevalence of 1.8-12.6 per 100,000 persons per year.
Pathophysiology:
- Loss of inhibitory ganglion cells in the myenteric (Auerbach's) plexus of the oesophagus
- Postulated mechanism: virus-induced autoimmune destruction (evidence points to latent HSV-1 infection in genetically susceptible individuals with specific HLA alleles)
- Histology shows reduced ganglion cells with variable chronic inflammatory infiltrate (predominantly cytotoxic T cells)
- Key neurotransmitter deficit: loss of inhibitory neurons (NO and VIP) that mediate LOS relaxation and propagated peristalsis
- The excitatory cholinergic pathway is partially preserved, which explains why botulinum toxin has some effect
Result: Mismatch between excitatory and inhibitory activity → failure of LOS relaxation + absent peristalsis → progressive oesophageal dilatation → oesophagus empties only by hydrostatic pressure (incomplete) → food retention and fermentation
Secondary causes (pseudo-achalasia):
- Chagas disease - Trypanosoma cruzi destroys the myenteric plexus (South America)
- Cancer of the gastric cardia - must always be excluded
- Allgrove syndrome - rare genetic triad of familial adrenal insufficiency, alacrima, and achalasia
Chicago Classification (HRM Types)
Achalasia is classified by High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) using the Chicago Classification 4.0 based on the Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) and oesophageal body pressurisation pattern:
| Type | Manometry Pattern | Clinical Features | Response to Treatment |
|---|
| Type I (Classic) | Elevated IRP + aperistalsis + no pressurisation | Dilated oesophagus, minimal contractions | Moderate response |
| Type II | Elevated IRP + pan-oesophageal pressurisation (>20% swallows) | Best prognosis | Best response to all treatments |
| Type III (Spastic) | Elevated IRP + premature/spastic contractions (>20% swallows) | Chest pain prominent | Poorest response; needs extended myotomy |
- Degree of ganglion cell loss parallels disease duration: likely progression from EGJ outflow obstruction → Type II → Type I → end-stage achalasia (megaoesophagus)
- Type III has unique pathogenesis - myenteric inflammation + altered function, without destruction
Clinical Features
Most commonly diagnosed between 30-60 years of age.
Symptoms
- Dysphagia (to both solids AND liquids - hallmark distinguishing from mechanical obstruction) - gradual onset, often present for years
- Regurgitation - nonbilious, nonacid, mixed with saliva; food from hours/days previously
- Retrosternal chest pain / odynophagia - common early, especially in type III; may improve spontaneously
- Heartburn - paradoxically common; actually due to fermentation of retained food (not true acid reflux)
- Halitosis - from fermentation of food residues
- Weight loss - variable; patients often adapt diet to maintain weight
- Aspiration pneumonia / respiratory symptoms - up to 10% with advanced disease
Eckardt Score (Clinical Severity Scoring)
| Score | Weight Loss (kg) | Dysphagia | Retrosternal Pain | Regurgitation |
|---|
| 0 | None | None | None | None |
| 1 | <5 | Occasionally | Occasionally | Occasionally |
| 2 | 5-10 | Daily | Daily | Daily |
| 3 | >10 | Each meal | Each meal | Each meal |
Total score 0-3 = remission; >3 = treatment failure. Maximum score = 12.
Diagnosis
1. Endoscopy (OGD)
- Frothy saliva pooling in oesophagus
- Food residue in oesophagus
- Oesophagus dilated or tortuous
- OGJ appears tight/spastic but usually allows scope passage with gentle pressure
- 30-40% of endoscopies are normal - does not exclude achalasia
- Critical to exclude pseudo-achalasia (carcinoma of gastric cardia)
2. Barium Contrast Study (Barium Swallow)
Classic findings:
- Dilatation of oesophageal body
- Abnormal/absent peristaltic contractions
- "Bird's beak" / "Rat's tail" appearance - smooth tapering at the distal oesophagus/OGJ
Fig 66.25 - Barium contrast showing the typical "rat's tail" / "bird's beak" appearance at the OGJ
- Timed barium oesophagogram - quantifies contrast column height at fixed time intervals to assess disease severity
- Progressive dilatation leads to sigmoid-shaped / megaoesophagus (end-stage)
- Note: In normal individuals, no air-fluid level is seen in the stomach in achalasia on erect plain X-ray (no air passes through the LOS)
3. High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) - Gold Standard for Definitive Diagnosis
- Elevated Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) across OGJ
- Aperistalsis in smooth muscle oesophagus
- Classifies into Type I, II, III
- Mandatory before any intervention
Complications
- Aspiration pneumonia - from retained food
- Oesophageal carcinoma - chronic retention oesophagitis/fermentation predisposes (squamous cell carcinoma; ~10-33x increased risk)
- Megaoesophagus / sigmoid oesophagus - end-stage with grossly dilated, tortuous oesophagus
- Malnutrition and weight loss
Treatment
Treatment is palliative - there is no therapy to reverse neuronal degeneration. All therapies target LOS reduction.
1. Medical Therapy (Limited Role)
- Calcium channel blockers (nifedipine), nitrates, PDE5 inhibitors - reduce LOS pressure
- Significant side effects (headache, oedema, hypotension)
- Reserved for patients unfit for endoscopic or surgical treatment
2. Botulinum Toxin Injection
- Inhibits presynaptic ACh release, paralyses LOS cholinergic excitatory neurons
- Symptom relief: ~70% at 3 months → ~40% at 1 year
- Effect is temporary - repeated injections required
- Repeated injections may cause scarring, making subsequent treatments more difficult
- Not first-line in patients who are good surgical candidates
- Useful when: diagnosis is in doubt, elderly or high-comorbidity patients
3. Pneumatic Dilatation (PD)
- Non-compliant balloon (30-40 mm) inserted over guidewire to disrupt LOS muscle fibres
- Graded serial dilatation: 30 mm → 35 mm → 40 mm
- Efficacy similar to surgical myotomy in selected patients
- Predictors of good response: age >45 years, female sex, undilated oesophagus, type II achalasia, response to first dilatation
- Complication: perforation (~1.9% average; <0.5% with 30-mm balloon; increases with larger balloons)
- Requires experienced endoscopist and surgical backup
4. Heller's Myotomy (Standard Surgical Treatment)
- Cutting the muscle of the lower oesophagus and gastric cardia (anterior myotomy)
- Extent: ≥6 cm proximally on oesophageal side + 2-3 cm distally into gastric cardia
- Standard approach: laparoscopic (transabdominal)
- Major complication: GORD in up to 40% of patients
- Therefore combined with partial fundoplication:
- Anterior Dor fundoplication or posterior Toupet fundoplication - reduces GORD incidence
- Nissen (360°) fundoplication is CONTRAINDICATED - increases outflow resistance against an aperistaltic oesophagus → postoperative dysphagia
- Laparoscopic myotomy is superior to single pneumatic dilatation in efficacy and durability
- Better outcomes in Type I and II achalasia; Type III needs longer extended proximal myotomy
5. POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy)
- Mucosa opened proximal to intended myotomy site
- Submucosal tunnel extended to ~2-3 cm into gastric cardia
- Circular ± longitudinal muscles cut with ESD instruments
- Myotomy: minimum 6 cm proximally + 2 cm into gastric cardia
- Mucosal entry site closed with endoclips
- Advantages:
- Equivalent efficacy to PD and Heller's myotomy in RCTs for dysphagia relief
- Can extend myotomy proximally - ideal for Type III achalasia (spastic component)
- Can treat distal oesophageal spasm and hypercontractile oesophagus
- Disadvantage: Higher rate of GORD (no antireflux procedure):
- Oesophagitis at 3 months post-POEM: up to 57%
- May require lifelong PPI or subsequent antireflux surgery
6. Oesophagectomy
- Reserved for end-stage achalasia with sigmoid/megaoesophagus not responding to other methods
- High operative risk vs. risk of aspiration complications must be balanced
- Option for surgically fit patients with grossly dilated oesophagus predisposing to aspiration pneumonia
Comparison of Treatment Options
| Treatment | Efficacy | Durability | GORD risk | Perforation/Leak risk | Notes |
|---|
| Medical therapy | Poor | - | Low | None | Last resort only |
| Botulinum toxin | 40% at 1 yr | Short | Low | Minimal | Temporary; elderly/unfit |
| Pneumatic dilatation | ~85% | Moderate | Low | ~1.9% | Graded; good for Type II |
| Heller's (lap) + Dor/Toupet | ~90% | Best | ~10-15% with partial fundoplication | Low | Gold standard surgical Rx |
| POEM | ~90% | Good | Up to 57% oesophagitis | Low mucosal injury | Best for Type III |
| Oesophagectomy | Definitive | Definitive | N/A | Highest | End-stage only |
Follow-up
- Treatment success assessed by Eckardt score (target ≤3)
- Counsel on post-treatment diet - oesophageal body motility remains defective
- Surveillance endoscopy for oesophageal carcinoma risk (long-standing achalasia)
- Patients with POEM require monitoring for GORD and possible acid suppression therapy
Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th Edition, Chapter 66 | Sleisenger & Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease