Hemolytic uremic syndrome

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching Images

hemolytic uremic syndrome pathology blood smear

Now let me read the most comprehensive sources — Robbins Pathology (for pathology/mechanisms) and Tintinalli (for emergency/clinical management):
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Let me get the Robbins pathology section and Tintinalli treatment continuation:
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Loading Image
I now have comprehensive information from multiple authoritative sources. Let me compile the full answer.

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)

Definition

HUS is a thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) characterized by the clinical triad of:
  1. Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA)
  2. Thrombocytopenia
  3. Acute kidney injury (AKI)
It is the most common cause of AKI requiring dialysis/transplantation in children aged 1–5 years, with an annual incidence of ~6.1 cases per 100,000 population.
Andrews' Diseases of the Skin, p. 3327; Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine, p. 2112

Classification

Typical HUS (Epidemic, Diarrhea-Positive, STEC-HUS)

  • ~90% of pediatric cases
  • Caused by Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), most commonly O157:H7
  • Preceded by a prodrome of bloody diarrhea
  • Source: undercooked meat, unpasteurized milk, contaminated produce
  • 10–15% of children with STEC infection develop HUS

Atypical HUS (aHUS, Diarrhea-Negative, Nonepidemic)

  • Complement dysregulation is the dominant mechanism
  • Triggers include: S. pneumoniae infection (~5%), pregnancy/postpartum, OCP use, antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic sclerosis, genetic mutations
  • Worse prognosis than typical HUS
Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine, p. 2113; Robbins, Cotran & Kumar, p. 853–854

Pathophysiology

Typical HUS (Shiga Toxin-Mediated)

Shiga-like toxins (resembling Shigella dysenteriae toxins) are absorbed from the gut into the circulation and:
  • Activate endothelial cells → increased leukocyte adhesion molecules and endothelin, decreased nitric oxide
  • Cause endothelial apoptosis (facilitated by cytokines such as TNF)
  • Inhibit Factor H (a complement regulatory protein) → possible complement hyperactivation
  • Net result: platelet activation, vasoconstriction, microthrombus formation in renal vessels → glomerular ischemia, oliguria, AKI
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar, p. 853–854

Atypical HUS (Complement-Mediated)

Mutations in alternative complement pathway regulatory proteins allow uncontrolled C3b activity and complement activation on endothelial surfaces:
MutationProtein FunctionPrognosis
Factor H (CFH) — most commonDegrades C3b; major downregulator of alternative pathwayDeath/ESRD >50%; recurrence >75%
Factor I (CFI)Cleaves C3b and C4bDeath/ESRD >50%; recurrence >75%
Membrane Cofactor Protein (CD46/MCP)Cofactor for CFIBetter prognosis
Complement Factor BComponent of C3 convertaseSevere
ThrombomodulinActivates complement regulatorsDeath/ESRD >50%
C3 itselfDirect gain-of-functionSevere
Anti-CFH autoantibodies (~6%)Block CFH activityAutoimmune HUS
Heterozygous CFH mutations are most common; abnormal CFH complexes with normal CFH, inactivating it. Compound heterozygotes (mutations in two genes) present earlier.
Andrews' Diseases of the Skin, p. 3333–3334

S. pneumoniae-Associated HUS

Pneumococcal neuraminidase cleaves N-acetylneuraminic acid from RBC and endothelial cell surfaces, exposing the Thomsen-Friedenreich (T) antigen → immune response → TMA. Higher mortality than STEC-HUS.
Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine, p. 2117

Renal Pathology (Morphology)

In acute disease:
  • Patchy or diffuse cortical necrosis and subcapsular hemorrhages (grossly)
  • Glomeruli: thickened capillary walls, mesangiolysis, microthrombi (fibrin/platelet) in capillary loops
  • Arterioles and small arteries: endothelial swelling and detachment, subendothelial accumulation of fluffy material, RBC fragmentation ("onion-skin" lesions in chronic/recurrent disease)
  • Renal vessels are especially vulnerable because the exposed subendothelial membrane is susceptible to complement-mediated damage
The morphologic findings of typical HUS, atypical HUS, and TTP are indistinguishable from each other on biopsy alone.
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar, p. 853–855; Andrews' Diseases of the Skin, p. 3331

Clinical Features

FeatureTypical HUSAtypical HUS
AgeChildren <10 y (most common)Any age; 67% childhood
ProdromeBloody diarrhea (1 week prior)Variable; no diarrhea
FeverUsually absentVariable
Renal involvementUniversal; hallmarkUniversal; often severe
Neurologic symptoms<50%Possible
SkinUnusual; petechiae/retiform purpuraSimilar
RecurrenceLowHigh (CFH/CFI >75%)
Symptoms after GI prodrome resolves (~1 week): pallor, edema, oliguria, shortness of breath, seizures/encephalopathy. Other complications: hypertension, heart failure, intussusception, DM, metabolic acidosis, colitis.
Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine, p. 2119; Andrews' Diseases of the Skin, p. 3329

Laboratory Evaluation

TestFinding
Hemoglobin5–9 g/dL (severe MAHA)
Peripheral smearSchistocytes, helmet cells, burr cells (fragmented RBCs)
Platelet count<150,000/mm³
WBCMay be elevated (poor prognosis)
Coombs testNegative (mechanical/non-immune hemolysis)
ElectrolytesHyponatremia, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis
BilirubinElevated (hemolysis)
Renal functionElevated creatinine, BUN
UrinalysisHematuria (gross or micro), granular/hyaline casts, proteinuria
Stool cultureFor STEC; test for Shiga toxin
ADAMTS13Normal (distinguishes from TTP)
Peripheral smear showing schistocytes — a hallmark of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia:
Peripheral blood smear in HUS showing schistocytes and helmet cells consistent with MAHA
Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine, p. 2121–2123

HUS vs. TTP

FeatureHUSTTP
Dominant organKidney (severe AKI)Brain (neurologic symptoms)
ADAMTS13NormalVery low (<10%)
MechanismShiga toxin / complementADAMTS13 deficiency → vWF multimers
FeverUsually absentPresent (part of pentad)
Renal failureCommon, severeUncommon
Treatment response to plasma exchangeModerateExcellent (>80% response)
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar, p. 854

Treatment

Typical HUS (STEC-HUS)

  • Supportive care is the primary approach
  • IV fluids (early aggressive volume expansion, 10–20 mL/kg NS) may improve outcomes in the absence of fluid overload
  • Correct electrolyte disturbances (hyperkalemia, hyponatremia)
  • Blood transfusion for severe anemia
  • Platelet transfusion: contraindicated — worsens thrombotic process
  • Antibiotics: contraindicated in diarrheal illness — increase risk of HUS (possibly by releasing more toxin)
  • Antiperistaltic agents: contraindicated
  • Renal replacement therapy required in ~50% of acute cases
  • Eculizumab or plasma exchange may be helpful (evidence remains limited for STEC-HUS)
  • ~95% of children survive the acute phase; most regain normal renal function

Atypical HUS (aHUS)

  • Eculizumab (humanized anti-C5 monoclonal antibody): FDA-approved for complement-mediated aHUS; proven effective for CFH and CFI mutations — removes terminal complement activation
    • Cost: ~$400,000/year (a practical consideration)
  • Plasma exchange: removes autoantibodies and provides functional complement factors, but less effective than in TTP
  • Immunosuppressants (corticosteroids, azathioprine, MMF, rituximab, vincristine): used in atypical/autoimmune HUS
  • Kidney transplantation: role is unclear — high recurrence risk; success depends on mutation type (MCP mutations have best outcomes post-transplant)
  • OCP use should be avoided — can trigger aHUS in patients with CFH (8%) and CFI (20%) mutations

Disposition

  • All HUS patients require hospitalization
  • Neurologic symptoms + oliguric renal failure → ICU admission
Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine, p. 2129–2132; Andrews' Diseases of the Skin, p. 3337–3339

Prognosis

TypeAcute mortalityLong-term
Typical (STEC-HUS)~5% in childrenOnly 40% normal renal function at 15–25 years
S. pneumoniae-HUSHigher than STECWorse renal outcomes
aHUS (CFH/CFI mutations)High>50% death or ESRD; recurrence >75%
aHUS (MCP mutations)LowerBetter prognosis
Despite surviving the acute phase, long-term renal outcomes in typical HUS are more guarded than often assumed — in one study, only 10 of 25 patients had normal renal function at 15–25 year follow-up.
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar, p. 853–854; Andrews' Diseases of the Skin, p. 3333–3335
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.