Excellent - I now have all the detail needed. Here is the focused answer on triceps-sparing approaches at the elbow:
Triceps-Sparing Approaches to the Elbow
There are actually two distinct approaches commonly called "triceps-sparing," and they are importantly different - worth knowing both.
1. Paratricipital Approach (True Triceps-Sparing / Triceps-On)
First described by Alonso-Llames (1972) for pediatric supracondylar fractures, now widely used for distal humerus fractures and elbow arthroplasty.
Core Principle
Creates two surgical windows - medial and lateral to the triceps - without ever detaching or incising the triceps tendon or its insertion on the olecranon. The triceps insertion remains completely intact.
Step-by-Step Technique
- Skin incision: Extensive posterior longitudinal midline incision
- Ulnar nerve: Identify and mobilize from the arcade of Struthers through the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) fascia; place a Penrose drain around it for protection throughout the case
- Medial window:
- Develop the interval between the triceps muscle and the medial intermuscular septum
- Elevate the triceps muscle subperiosteally off the posterior humerus
- Excise the medial intermuscular septum for improved access
- Lateral window:
- Elevate the triceps muscle off the lateral intermuscular septum and posterior humerus, in continuity with the anconeus
- The anconeus and triceps are retracted together laterally
- Exposure achieved: Medial and lateral columns, olecranon fossa, and posterior aspect of the trochlea are visible
Optional Third Window (Boyd Interval Modification)
- A third window can be added between the anconeus and the lateral olecranon (Boyd interval)
- This improves visualization of the distal humerus articular surface when needed
Advantages
- No olecranon osteotomy - avoids nonunion and symptomatic hardware
- Triceps insertion is undisturbed - allows immediate active range of motion postoperatively
- Preserves innervation and blood supply of the anconeus (which provides dynamic posterolateral stability)
- Can be converted to olecranon osteotomy if more exposure is needed intraoperatively
- Can be extended proximally using the Gerwin approach (triceps elevated lateral to medial), exposing 95% of the posterior humeral shaft and radial nerve
Disadvantages
- Limited articular visualization - inadequate for highly comminuted articular fractures (OTA/AO type C3)
- More technically demanding than triceps-splitting
Indications
Best for OTA/AO fracture types: A2, A3, B1, B2, C1, C2; also preferred when proceeding directly to total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) for unrepairable distal humerus fractures
Postoperative Care
Unrestricted active range of motion is encouraged immediately after surgery (no restriction needed since triceps insertion is intact)
2. Bryan-Morrey Approach (Commonly Mislabeled "Triceps-Sparing")
Important clarification from Rockwood & Green (2025): "The approach has been termed triceps-sparing, which has led to confusion. The approach does NOT 'spare' the triceps, but rather detaches the triceps tendon in continuity with the ulnar periosteum and anconeus creating a large reflection or sleeve."
So Bryan-Morrey is technically a triceps-reflecting approach, not a true triceps-sparing approach - but it is commonly taught under the "triceps-sparing" label in many curricula.
Step-by-Step Technique
- Posterior longitudinal skin incision
- Identify and protect the ulnar nerve (always transpose in primary and revision TEA)
- Starting medially, sharply reflect the triceps insertion and ulnar periosteum off the proximal ulna in a medial-to-lateral direction as a continuous sleeve
- This sleeve incorporates the anconeus muscle - the entire extensor mechanism is reflected laterally as one unit
- Release the medial and lateral collateral ligaments to allow joint dislocation for implant insertion (in TEA)
Closure
- Repair triceps tendon back to olecranon with transosseous sutures - this is mandatory and critical
- Postoperative triceps protection required for 6 weeks (no active extension against resistance)
Advantages over Paratricipital
- Better visualization of the proximal ulna - important for ulnar component preparation in TEA
- Familiar, widely taught approach
Comparison Summary
| Feature | Paratricipital (True Triceps-On) | Bryan-Morrey ("Triceps-Sparing") |
|---|
| Triceps insertion | Completely intact | Detached and reflected |
| Repair required | No | Yes (transosseous sutures) |
| Postop restriction | None - immediate ROM | 6 weeks triceps protection |
| Articular visualization | Moderate | Good |
| Risk of extensor failure | None | Yes |
| Preferred for | Fractures, direct-to-TEA | TEA, better ulna access |
Application in Chronic Elbow Dislocation
For chronic dislocation specifically, the paratricipital approach is valuable because:
- It preserves the extensor mechanism in a joint that has already undergone significant soft-tissue scarring
- It allows immediate postoperative mobilization, which is paramount after capsular release (re-stiffening is the main enemy)
- The medial window provides direct access for ulnar nerve transposition (almost always needed)
- The lateral window allows access to the radiocapitellar joint and lateral column for release
However, if the triceps is severely contracted (fixed extension deformity), a triceps-lengthening approach (V-Y Speed technique) may still be required as the triceps must be lengthened to achieve reduction - in that case a paratricipital approach alone is insufficient.
Sources: Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults, 10th Ed. 2025 (pp. 1594-1597, 1623); Miller's Review of Orthopaedics, 9th Ed. (p. 171); Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics, 15th Ed. 2026