Major strategies adopted by ministry of health Nepal to eliminate kalaazar

Reading File
Searching the Web

Nepal Ministry of Health kala-azar elimination strategies 2024 2025

Searching PubMed

kala-azar visceral leishmaniasis elimination Nepal

Reading Web Page

https://edcd.gov.np/section/kala-azar-elimination-program

Finding Sources
Reading Article

PMID: 37943733

Finding Sources
Searching the Web

Nepal kala-azar elimination programme strategies IRS indoor residual spraying miltefosine PKDL diagnosis

Now I have comprehensive information from official Nepal government sources, WHO documents, and peer-reviewed literature. Here is the full detailed answer:

Major Strategies of Nepal's Ministry of Health to Eliminate Kala-Azar (Visceral Leishmaniasis)

Background and Elimination Goal

Nepal, along with India and Bangladesh, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in May 2005 at the World Health Assembly, committing to eliminate kala-azar as a public health problem. The elimination target is defined as < 1 case per 10,000 population at the district level. The original deadline of 2015 was not achieved, but case numbers have declined by over 90% compared to 2005 levels, and WHO recently recognized elimination of VL as a public health problem in these three countries. The program is coordinated by Nepal's Epidemiology and Disease Control Division (EDCD) under the Ministry of Health and Population (MoHP).

The 5 Core Elimination Strategies

1. Early Diagnosis and Complete Case Management

This is the cornerstone strategy of the program.
  • Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT): The rK39 rapid diagnostic test was scaled up to peripheral health facilities, enabling diagnosis without referral to higher centres.
  • First-line treatment shift to Liposomal Amphotericin B (L-AmB): The Revised National Guidelines (2019) replaced miltefosine with L-AmB as the first-line treatment for primary kala-azar. L-AmB is donated through WHO and requires only a single-dose or short-course regimen, improving completion rates.
  • Management of PKDL (Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis): PKDL patients act as a parasite reservoir. Guidelines now mandate active detection and treatment of PKDL using miltefosine (12-16 weeks) to break the transmission cycle.
  • HIV-VL co-infection management: The 2019 revised guidelines specifically address HIV-VL co-infection, a growing complication that complicates treatment response.
  • Inclusion of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis (MCL): Both forms are now notifiable and included in the national programme, as their increasing prevalence threatens overall elimination.
  • Passive Case Detection (PCD): All suspected cases presenting to health facilities are tested and notified under a standardized reporting system.

2. Integrated Vector Management (IVM) and Vector Surveillance

The sandfly (Phlebotomus argentipes) is the primary vector, and its control is a major pillar of elimination.
  • Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS): IRS with DDT (historically) and synthetic pyrethroids has been the mainstay of vector control in endemic districts. IRS activities are ongoing in selected endemic districts.
  • Insecticide-Treated Nets (ITNs) and Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs): Distributed to households in high-risk areas.
  • Insecticidal Wall Painting (IWP) and Durable Wall Lining (DWL): Research-informed alternatives to IRS - DWL combined with environmental vector management was shown by TDR-funded studies (Banjara et al., Huda et al.) to offer long-lasting vector control, and has been integrated into the national strategy.
  • Vector surveillance: Entomological monitoring to track insecticide resistance and sandfly density.
  • Environmental management: Addressing housing conditions (mud walls, dark humid interiors) identified as risk factors for VL transmission.

3. Effective Disease Surveillance (Passive and Active Case Detection)

  • Passive Case Detection (PCD): All health facilities in endemic districts are equipped to diagnose and report cases using standardized formats.
  • Active Case Detection (ACD): Systematic house-to-house searches in high-burden areas and contact tracing around index cases. Research informed cost-effective ACD strategies for Nepal's specific settings.
  • DHIS2-based Online Surveillance: The surveillance system was strengthened with online DHIS2-based real-time reporting, replacing paper-based systems and improving data quality and timeliness.
  • Expanded geographic surveillance: Originally focused on 12 endemic districts, the programme has been expanded to 18 districts following verified local transmission in previously non-endemic areas, including the mountainous district of Dolpa (which exceeded elimination threshold in 2017).
  • Updated surveillance indicators aligned with recent WHO global recommendations.

4. Social Mobilization and Building Partnerships

  • IEC/BCC (Information, Education, Communication / Behaviour Change Communication): Community-level awareness campaigns to promote early care-seeking, particularly in rural Terai populations.
  • Training and orientation: Capacity-building of frontline health workers (Female Community Health Volunteers - FCHVs) who play a key role in case referral and IRS support.
  • Regional collaboration: Active participation in the WHO SEARO Regional Kala-Azar Elimination Initiative involving Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka - enabling shared protocols, technical guidance, and supply chain coordination.
  • International partnerships: Collaboration with WHO, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, DNDi (Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative), TDR (WHO/UNDP/World Bank Special Programme), and USAID has been central to capacity building and drug procurement (notably L-AmB through WHO donation).
  • Symposia and stakeholder engagement to maintain national political commitment.

5. Implementation and Operational Research

Nepal's program has been strongly research-driven, with TDR-funded implementation research (IR) directly informing strategic pivots:
  • Establishing the burden of VL and characterizing health-seeking behaviour.
  • Investigating feasibility of new diagnostics (DAT, rK39, PCR).
  • Identifying barriers to early diagnosis and treatment completion.
  • Evaluating IRS versus alternative vector control methods.
  • Exploring environmental determinants (housing as a VL risk factor).
  • Research on miltefosine resistance and noncompliance led to the shift away from miltefosine as first-line treatment.
  • Ongoing evaluation of newer drugs like LXE408 (oral agent in trials) to sustain decentralized care as cases become sporadic.
According to Joshi et al. (2023, PLoS Negl Trop Dis), every major strategic decision in Nepal's VL elimination program - from diagnostic tools to treatment protocols to vector management - was implementation-research informed.

Current Challenges Threatening Elimination

ChallengeDetail
Geographic spreadCases emerging in hilly/mountainous non-endemic districts (e.g., Dolpa)
PKDL burdenPKDL patients are parasite reservoirs; long treatment duration reduces compliance
HIV-VL co-infectionIncreasingly recognized; complicates treatment and surveillance
CL/MCL increaseCutaneous forms rising and not previously tracked
Sustaining gainsAs cases drop, donor funding and programmatic intensity risk declining

Key Outcomes (as of 2025)

  • Over 95% reduction in cases across India-Nepal-Bangladesh since 2007.
  • 98% of endemic areas now meeting the elimination target.
  • WHO formally recognized the elimination of VL as a public health problem in the South-East Asia region in 2025, marking a historic milestone after 20 years of the regional initiative (DNDi, October 2025).

Sources:
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.