Diagnostic criteria for HFpEF

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

HFpEF AND diagnosis

Searching the Web

2023 ESC focused update heart failure HFpEF diagnostic criteria LVEF 50 evidence raised filling pressures

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading Article

PMID: 37861854

Reading File
Reading File
HFpEF (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction) is diagnosed when all of the following are present:
  1. Symptoms and/or signs of heart failure
    • Typical symptoms: exertional dyspnea, fatigue, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, edema.
    • Signs may include raised JVP, pulmonary crackles, peripheral edema, or congestion.
  2. Preserved LV systolic function
    • LVEF ≥50%.
  3. Objective evidence of raised LV filling pressures or cardiac structural/functional abnormality Evidence may be obtained from one or more of:
    • Natriuretic peptides: raised BNP or NT-proBNP, recognizing that obesity may suppress levels and atrial fibrillation raises them.
    • Resting echocardiography: evidence supporting elevated filling pressure or diastolic dysfunction, such as elevated E/e′, left-atrial enlargement, increased LV mass/concentric remodeling, or elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure.
    • Invasive hemodynamics: elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) or LV end-diastolic pressure. A PCWP ≥15 mmHg at rest or ≥25 mmHg with exercise supports HFpEF.
    • If resting testing is non-diagnostic but suspicion remains high, use diastolic stress echocardiography or exercise right-heart catheterization.
  4. No alternative explanation that better accounts for symptoms Exclude or address mimics such as chronic lung disease, anemia, obesity/deconditioning, renal or liver disease, venous insufficiency, and primary valvular, pericardial, infiltrative, or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
The current American definition is therefore: HF symptoms/signs + LVEF ≥50% + evidence of increased LV filling pressures. The ACC/AHA/HFSA definition uses this formulation.

Useful diagnostic algorithms

  • HFA-PEFF algorithm: Pretest assessment, Echo plus natriuretic peptide scoring, Functional testing, Final etiologic work-up. A score ≥5 supports definite HFpEF; 2-4 is indeterminate and warrants stress or invasive testing; ≤1 makes it unlikely.
  • H₂FPEF score: obesity, use of ≥2 antihypertensives, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, age >60 years, and elevated E/e′. It estimates probability rather than independently proving the diagnosis.
Do not diagnose HFpEF solely from “diastolic dysfunction” on echo. Diastolic indices may be equivocal, and normal resting indices do not exclude exercise-induced elevation in filling pressures. Braunwald’s Heart Disease emphasizes functional or invasive testing where clinical suspicion persists despite inconclusive resting findings. A 2024 systematic review similarly highlights limitations of resting echo and natriuretic peptides.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.