I now have comprehensive content from Harrison's on APACHE and ICU scoring. Let me compile a thorough answer.
APACHE Score in Critical Care
What is APACHE?
APACHE stands for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation. It is a severity-of-illness (SOI) scoring system developed to quantify the degree of physiological derangement in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. It has gone through four major iterations: APACHE I → II → III → IV, with APACHE II being the most widely used in clinical practice.
Purpose & Utility
SOI scoring systems like APACHE are validated for:
- Predicting population-level mortality (not reliably individual outcomes)
- Stratifying patients for clinical trials and epidemiologic research
- Guiding hospital administrative decisions — resource allocation, nursing ratios
- Benchmarking ICU quality over time
- Defining disease severity (e.g., acute pancreatitis, sepsis, ARDS)
Scoring system validations are based on the premise that age, chronic medical illness, and derangements from normal physiology are associated with increased mortality. — Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22e
APACHE II — Components
APACHE II scores are calculated from 12 acute physiological variables measured in the first 24 hours of ICU admission, plus age and chronic health status.
A. Acute Physiology Score (APS) — 12 Variables
| Variable | Scored Parameter |
|---|
| 1. Temperature | Rectal (°C) |
| 2. Mean arterial pressure | mmHg |
| 3. Heart rate | beats/min |
| 4. Respiratory rate | breaths/min |
| 5. Oxygenation | PaO₂ or A-aDO₂ depending on FiO₂ |
| 6. Arterial pH | |
| 7. Serum sodium | mEq/L |
| 8. Serum potassium | mEq/L |
| 9. Serum creatinine | mg/dL |
| 10. Haematocrit | % |
| 11. White blood cell count | ×10³/mm³ |
| 12. Glasgow Coma Scale | Score (15 − actual GCS) |
Each variable is scored 0–4 based on how far it deviates from normal (in either direction). The worst value in the first 24 hours is used.
B. Age Score
| Age (years) | Points |
|---|
| < 44 | 0 |
| 45–54 | 2 |
| 55–64 | 3 |
| 65–74 | 5 |
| ≥ 75 | 6 |
C. Chronic Health Score
Patients with severe organ system insufficiency or immunocompromise receive additional points:
- +5 points if non-operative or emergency postoperative admission
- +2 points if elective postoperative admission
Qualifying conditions include:
- Liver: cirrhosis with portal hypertension, encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding
- Cardiovascular: NYHA Class IV heart failure
- Respiratory: chronic hypoxia, hypercapnia, polycythaemia, severe pulmonary hypertension, or ventilator dependence
- Renal: chronic dialysis
- Immunocompromise: receiving immunosuppressive therapy, chemotherapy, steroids, or having haematologic malignancy/AIDS
APACHE II Total Score
APACHE II = APS + Age Score + Chronic Health Score
Maximum possible score = 71
Score Interpretation & Mortality
| APACHE II Score | Approximate ICU Mortality |
|---|
| 0–4 | ~4% |
| 5–9 | ~8% |
| 10–14 | ~15% |
| 15–19 | ~25% |
| 20–24 | ~40% |
| 25–29 | ~55% |
| 30–34 | ~73% |
| ≥ 35 | ~85% |
Exact mortality varies by diagnosis and institution.
Disease-Specific Thresholds
Acute Pancreatitis:
- APACHE II ≥ 8 at 24 hours → associated with ICU need, pancreatic necrosis, secondary infection, and increased mortality. — Swanson's Family Medicine Review
General Critical Care:
- Rising scores over time correlate with worsening prognosis
- Used alongside other systems (SOFA, Ranson, BISAP depending on context)
APACHE Versions
| Version | Key Features |
|---|
| APACHE I | Original 34-variable system (1981) |
| APACHE II | Simplified to 12 variables + age + chronic health (1985); most widely adopted |
| APACHE III | Added 5 more variables; developed proprietary prediction equations (1991) |
| APACHE IV | Updated equations using more recent data; improved discrimination (2006) |
APACHE vs. Other ICU Scoring Systems
| Score | Focus | Key Difference |
|---|
| APACHE II | Overall severity; mortality prediction | Single 24-hr snapshot; chronic health included |
| SOFA | Organ failure assessment | Repeated daily; tracks trajectory; used for sepsis diagnosis |
| qSOFA | Rapid bedside sepsis screen | 3 criteria: RR ≥22, altered mentation, SBP ≤100 |
| SAPS II | Simplified acute physiology | European equivalent; 17 variables |
| BISAP | Acute pancreatitis severity | 5 bedside criteria; simpler than APACHE |
| Ranson | Acute pancreatitis | 11 criteria over 48 hours; no repeated use |
Limitations
- Not validated for individual prediction — a high score does not mandate withdrawal of care
- Requires 24 hours of data — not useful for immediate triage
- Does not capture trajectory of illness (unlike SOFA)
- Worst-value rule may over-penalise transient derangements
- Chronic health scoring is subjective in borderline cases
- Originally validated on 1980s patient populations — may not reflect modern ICU outcomes
Key Clinical Takeaway
APACHE II remains the most commonly used critical care scoring tool worldwide. Its primary value lies in population-level risk stratification, benchmarking, and clinical research — not at-the-bedside individual prognostication. For dynamic, real-time assessment of organ failure trajectory (especially in sepsis), the SOFA score is preferred.
— Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22e; Swanson's Family Medicine Review; Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 20e