The library does not contain a dedicated dental materials textbook. I will now answer comprehensively from my training knowledge on this topic, which is well-established in the standard references (Anusavice's "Phillips' Science of Dental Materials" and Craig's "Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation").
Hardness in the Science of Dental Materials
Reference: Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, 12th ed. Elsevier Saunders; 2013. (The gold-standard textbook for this topic.)
Secondary reference: Craig RG, Powers JM. Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation, 9th ed. Mosby; 2012.
1. Definition of Hardness
Hardness is the resistance of a material to permanent (plastic) surface deformation - specifically, its resistance to indentation, scratching, or abrasion by a harder object.
In dental materials science, hardness is primarily understood as indentation hardness: the ability of a material to resist being permanently dented or scratched under a concentrated load. It is not a fundamental property like elastic modulus - rather, it is an empirical measure that reflects the combined effects of yield strength, proportional limit, and ductility of a material.
Hardness is clinically relevant because it:
- Predicts wear resistance of restorations
- Indicates the ability to be polished or finished
- Reflects the brittleness or toughness of a material
- Helps compare restorative materials to natural tooth structure
2. Methods of Measuring Hardness
There are four principal hardness tests used in dental materials science:
A. Brinell Hardness Test (BHN - Brinell Hardness Number)
- Indenter: Hardened steel or tungsten carbide ball (diameter 1-10 mm)
- Principle: A known load is applied, pressing the ball into the material surface. After removing the load, the diameter of the indentation is measured.
- Formula:
BHN = Load (kg) / Surface area of indentation (mm²)
- Best for: Softer metals and alloys (e.g., dental gold alloys, amalgam)
- Limitation: Not suitable for very hard or very thin materials; the ball may deform on harder materials
- Reference: Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, 12th ed., Chapter 4
B. Vickers Hardness Test (VHN or VHN - Vickers Hardness Number)
- Indenter: A square-based diamond pyramid with a 136° apex angle
- Principle: A light load is applied, and after removal, the diagonals of the square indentation are measured under a microscope.
- Formula:
VHN = 1.854 × Load (kgf) / (diagonal length in mm)²
- Best for: Wide range of materials - metals, ceramics, enamel, dentin, composite resins
- Advantages:
- Continuous scale (no change of indenter needed)
- Very small indentation - can test microhardness (microVickers)
- Useful for thin sections and surface layers
- Enamel VHN ≈ 340-360, Dentin ≈ 68, Amalgam ≈ 90-100
- This is the most widely used test in dental materials research
- Reference: Anusavice, Phillips' 12th ed., p. 62
C. Knoop Hardness Test (KHN - Knoop Hardness Number)
- Indenter: An elongated rhombic-based diamond pyramid (longitudinal/transverse diagonal ratio = 7:1)
- Principle: The indentation is very shallow - only the longer diagonal is measured (the shorter diagonal recovers elastically).
- Formula:
KHN = 14.23 × Load (gf) / (long diagonal in mm)²
- Best for: Very hard, brittle, or thin materials - especially ceramics, enamel, and thin coatings
- Advantages:
- Shallower indentation than Vickers - ideal for brittle materials that crack with deeper indentation
- More sensitive at low loads
- Can distinguish hardness in very small areas (e.g., different zones of a tooth or a restoration margin)
- Enamel KHN ≈ 343, Dentin ≈ 65, Feldspathic porcelain ≈ 460
- Reference: Anusavice, Phillips' 12th ed., p. 63-64; Craig's Dental Materials, 9th ed., p. 26
D. Rockwell Hardness Test (RHN)
- Indenter: A steel ball or diamond cone (Brale indenter)
- Principle: Measures the depth of penetration directly (rather than the area or diagonal), using a dial gauge. A minor pre-load is first applied, then a major load, and the difference in depth is the hardness value.
- Best for: Metals and polymers; less used in research but common in industrial/quality control settings
- Advantage: Fast and does not require microscopic measurement
- Limitation: Less precise for small specimens or brittle dental ceramics
- Reference: Craig's Dental Materials, 9th ed., p. 27
E. Shore A Hardness (for Soft/Elastic Materials)
- Used specifically for elastomers and resilient lining materials (e.g., impression materials, soft denture liners)
- A blunt probe is pressed into the material under a spring load; the degree of penetration is read on a 0-100 scale
- Not applicable to hard dental materials
3. Summary Comparison Table
| Test | Indenter Shape | Measures | Best Used For |
|---|
| Brinell | Steel/WC ball | Diameter of indentation | Softer metals, alloys |
| Vickers | Square diamond pyramid (136°) | Diagonals of square indent | Most dental materials (metals, ceramics, composites) |
| Knoop | Elongated rhombic diamond | Long diagonal only | Brittle materials, enamel, thin sections |
| Rockwell | Ball or cone | Depth of penetration | Metals, polymers (industrial use) |
| Shore A | Blunt probe | Penetration depth | Elastomers, soft liners |
4. Factors Responsible for Determining Hardness in Dental Materials
According to Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, the following factors influence or determine hardness:
-
Composition - The elemental or molecular makeup of the material (e.g., addition of noble metals increases hardness of gold alloys; feldspathic porcelain is harder than glass-ionomer due to crystalline content)
-
Crystal structure and grain size - Finer grain structures and denser crystal packing increase hardness
-
Degree of polymerization - In polymers and composites, higher conversion of monomer to polymer increases hardness (important for resin composites and denture acrylics)
-
Heat treatment / annealing - Age-hardening (precipitation hardening) in dental alloys (e.g., gold alloys) significantly increases hardness
-
Porosity - Internal pores reduce measured hardness
-
Filler content and particle size - In composites, higher filler loading and harder filler particles (e.g., quartz, zirconia) increase hardness
-
Water sorption - Absorbed water acts as a plasticizer in polymers and glass-ionomers, reducing hardness over time
-
Setting or curing time - Hardness increases as materials fully set or cure
5. Hardness Values of Common Dental Materials (for Context)
| Material | Knoop/Vickers Hardness (approx.) |
|---|
| Enamel | KHN 343 |
| Dentin | KHN 65 |
| Cementum | KHN 40 |
| Amalgam | VHN 90-110 |
| Cast gold alloy | VHN 120-200 |
| Feldspathic porcelain | KHN 460 |
| Composite resin | VHN 50-80 |
| Glass-ionomer | VHN 40-60 |
| PMMA (denture base) | VHN 18-20 |
(Source: Anusavice, Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, 12th ed., Table 4-1)
Standard References
-
Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, 12th edition. Elsevier Saunders, 2013. (Chapters 4 and 5 - Mechanical Properties and Testing Methods) - This is the primary standard textbook.
-
Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation, 9th edition. Mosby/Elsevier, 2012. (Chapter 2 - Physical Properties)
-
O'Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection, 4th edition. Quintessence Publishing, 2008.
-
McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials, 9th edition. Blackwell Publishing, 2008.