TRU CUT BIOPSY
Tru-Cut biopsy technique indications procedure complications
| Organ/Site | Notes |
|---|---|
| Breast mass | 14G CNB under US guidance; standard of care for triple assessment |
| Liver | 16G Tru-Cut for liver disease classification; percutaneous or EUS-guided |
| Kidney | 14-16G (Franklin-Silverman or Tru-Cut) at lower pole |
| Soft tissue tumors | Preferred over FNAC for sarcoma (requires architecture) |
| Lymph nodes | When FNAC is non-diagnostic or lymphoma suspected |
| Salivary glands | Supplement to FNAC for high-grade/lymphomatous lesions |
| Synovium | Blind Tru-Cut biopsy for rheumatologic diagnosis |
| Prostate | 18G Tru-Cut; transrectal US-guided, 10-12 systematic cores |
| Pancreas | EUS-guided Tru-Cut (though not recommended for chronic pancreatitis per Sabiston) |
| Muscle | Core needle biopsy as alternative to open muscle biopsy |
| Pelvic tumors | US-guided approach for gynecological masses |
| Feature | FNAC | Tru-Cut CNB |
|---|---|---|
| Tissue yield | Cells only (cytology) | Intact core (histology) |
| Architecture preserved | No | Yes |
| Immunohistochemistry | Limited | Full panel possible |
| Flow cytometry (lymphoma) | Difficult | Feasible |
| Operator dependence | High | Lower |
| Invasiveness | Minimal | Slightly more |
| Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy | Lower sensitivity | Higher sensitivity & specificity |
| Needle | Gauge | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tru-Cut | 16G | Rare fragmentation, large core | Max 17-20 mm per pass, less total tissue |
| Jamshidi | 17G | Long cores, minimal insertion | Fragmented tissue with fibrosis |
| INRAD / BioPince | 16 or 18G | Large core, adjustable throw up to 34 mm | Long throw, more procedural pain |
OSTEOTOME
osteotome surgical instrument types uses orthopedic surgery
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12109620
osteotome types straight curved monobevel bibevel surgical uses maxillofacial orthopedic spinal
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| Blade/working end | Flat steel blade with a sharp cutting edge |
| Bevel | Double bevel (both sides angled) - distinguishes it from a chisel |
| Width | Ranges from 3 mm (narrow/fine) to 25 mm (broad) |
| Shank | Connects blade to handle; may be straight or angled |
| Handle | Octagonal or round metal/plastic handle that accepts mallet blows |
| Material | High-grade stainless steel or chrome-vanadium steel |
| Feature | Osteotome | Chisel |
|---|---|---|
| Bevel | Both sides (bibevel) | One side only (monobevel) |
| Direction of cut | Straight, predictable | Deflects toward unbeveled side |
| Primary use | Bone splitting/shaping | Removing/planing bone surface |
| Cross-section of tip | Symmetric (lenticular) | Asymmetric (wedge) |
| Type | Features | Uses |
|---|---|---|
| Straight | Most common; flat, straight blade | General bone cutting, cortical grafts, laminectomy |
| Curved | Blade curves at tip | Acetabular, pelvic, and spinal osteotomies; areas of limited access |
| Angled/Offset | Handle offset from blade | Better visibility; spinal, vertebral body work |
| Guarded | Has a protective guard | Prevents over-penetration; rhinoplasty, nasal osteotomies |
| Type | Width | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Fine/Mini | 3-5 mm | Corticotomy (Paley technique), fine bone work |
| Medium | 6-15 mm | General orthopedic, nasal, maxillofacial |
| Broad | 18-25 mm | Graft harvesting from iliac crest, cortical peeling |
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| Lambotte osteotome | Classic orthopedic design; straight or curved; fine blade |
| Smith-Petersen osteotome | Used in spinal and hip surgery |
| Stille osteotome | Heavier instrument for major bone division |
| Cottle osteotome | Used in rhinoplasty and nasal septum work |
| Rubin osteotome | Specialized for hump reduction in rhinoplasty |
| Heine chain osteotome | Historical instrument (1830); first device called an osteotome; operated like a chain saw |


| Instrument | Similarities | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Chisel | Similar shape, mallet-driven | Monobevel; deflects to one side |
| Gouge | Mallet-driven bone instrument | Has a U-shaped/concave cutting edge; scoops out bone |
| Curette | Removes cancellous bone | Spoon-shaped; used by scraping, not mallet-driven |
| Rongeur | Removes bone | Scissor/forceps mechanism; bites off small pieces |
| Bone saw (oscillating) | Cuts bone | Power-driven; less periosteal preservation |
| Periosteal elevator (Cobb) | Used alongside osteotome | Lifts periosteum; does not cut bone |
Jaboulays procedure
Jaboulay's procedure hydrocele surgical technique steps
https://www.urology-textbook.com/hydrocelectomy.html
Jaboulay procedure hydrocele eversion tunica vaginalis steps anatomy complications comparison Lord procedure
https://www.ijsurgery.com/index.php/isj/article/view/11751
"Jaboulay" hydrocele "tunica vaginalis" eversion anatomy incision drain postoperative site Bailey Love



| Feature | Jaboulay's (Eversion) | Lord's (Plication) | Von Bergmann (Excision) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Principle | Eversion + suture behind testis | Plication sutures fold sac on itself | Complete/subtotal sac excision + oversewing |
| Sac handling | Partial excision + eversion | No excision; folded with sutures | Excision, raw edges oversewn |
| Best for | Large, thick-walled hydroceles | Small-medium, thin-walled | Very large, multilocular, recurrent |
| Dissection | Moderate | Minimal | Extensive |
| Haematoma risk | Moderate (cut edge bleeding) | Low | High |
| Recurrence | Low (~6%) | Low (~6%) | Low |
| Hospital stay | 7.08 ± 1.6 days | 8.0 ± 1.75 days | Variable |
| Complications | 17% (recent study) | 72% (recent study) | Higher |
| Complication | Notes |
|---|---|
| Scrotal haematoma | Most feared; results from inadequate haemostasis at cut edge; requires evacuation if large |
| Wound infection | Uncommon; treat with antibiotics ± wound opening |
| Scrotal oedema | Common; resolves with scrotal support |
| Recurrence | ~6% overall; occurs if the everted edges are not properly sutured or if a communicating processus vaginalis is missed |
| Damage to vas deferens | Rare; risks infertility if bilateral |
| Testicular atrophy | Very rare; from inadvertent testicular vessel injury |
| Chronic scrotal pain | Unusual |
Bailey and Love note: "Unless great care is taken to stop bleeding after excision of the wall, haemorrhage from the cut edge is liable to cause a large scrotal haematoma. Overrunning stitches at the cut edge can be used to reduce this risk."
| Situation | Preferred Approach |
|---|---|
| Open processus vaginalis / communicating hydrocele | Inguinal approach (ligation of processus) |
| Suspected testicular tumour | Inguinal approach (never aspirate or scrotal approach) |
| Primary vaginal hydrocele (thin-walled, small) | Scrotal + Lord's plication |
| Primary vaginal hydrocele (thick-walled, large) | Scrotal + Jaboulay's eversion |
| Very large or multilocular hydrocele | Scrotal + von Bergmann excision |