attachment
attachment

Interpret this uroflow metry

Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Here is a detailed interpretation of this uroflowmetry report:

Patient Details

  • Name: Hajarabanu Ansaree
  • Age: 39-year-old female
  • Date: 10/04/2026
  • Institution: SVP – Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Institute of Medicine, Urology Department

Measured Parameters

ParameterValueNormal (Female)
Voiding time130 s
Flow time98.2 s
Time to maximum flow9.3 s
Maximum flow rate (Qmax)22 ml/s20–36 ml/s ✅
Volume at maximum flow104 ml
Mean flow rate (Qavg)2.9 ml/s
Total voided volume (Vura)374 ml>150 ml ✅
Residual volume0 ml0 ✅

Flow Curve Interpretation

Pattern: Irregular / Staccato-like with multiple peaks
The flow curve shows multiple sharp peaks rather than a single smooth bell-shaped curve. This is a staccato or interrupted pattern, characterized by:
  • Repeated spikes in flow rate (the jagged Qura curve)
  • Flow intermittently dropping but not necessarily reaching zero (staccato) or reaching zero (interrupted)
  • Prolonged voiding time (130 s) relative to actual flow time (98.2 s)
A normal uroflow should produce a smooth, single bell-shaped curveCampbell-Walsh Wein Urology.

Nomogram Interpretation

Gutierrez-Segura Nomogram (Qmax): The plotted point (orange circle) appears to fall in the lower-normal or borderline range for voided volume ~374 ml.
Liverpool Nomogram (1989): The plotted point (blue cross) appears to fall within normal limits for a female of this age/voided volume — Qmax 22 ml/s is acceptable.

Key Clinical Observations

  1. Qmax of 22 ml/s — within normal range for a 39-year-old female (normal: 20–36 ml/s)
  2. Voided volume 374 ml — adequate (>150 ml required for valid interpretation)
  3. Zero residual volume — complete bladder emptying, no retention
  4. Prolonged voiding time vs. flow time — a gap of ~32 seconds suggests hesitancy or intermittent flow
  5. Staccato/irregular curve — suggests intermittent detrusor contraction or intermittent pelvic floor relaxation during voiding, which may indicate:
    • Dysfunctional voiding (pelvic floor overactivity during micturition)
    • Bladder outlet dysfunction
    • Possible Valsalva/abdominal straining assistance to void

Summary

FindingInterpretation
Qmax 22 ml/sNormal
Voided volume 374 mlAdequate
Residual volume 0 mlNormal — complete emptying
Flow curve shapeAbnormal — staccato/irregular pattern
Voiding time >> Flow timeSuggests hesitancy/intermittent flow
Overall impression: The quantitative parameters (Qmax, voided volume, residual) are within acceptable limits, but the qualitative flow pattern is abnormal (staccato/irregular), suggesting dysfunctional voiding — likely intermittent pelvic floor overactivity or detrusor-sphincter incoordination.
This pattern in a 39-year-old female warrants clinical correlation with symptoms (urgency, frequency, incomplete voiding sensation, UTIs) and may benefit from video-urodynamics or pressure-flow studies for further characterisation if clinically indicated.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.