Give me provesional diagnosis differential diagnosis final diagnosis whith pulp examination irreversible pulpits reversible pulpits choric or acute symptomatic or asymptomatic patient has history of pain since 1 year and and both 12 and 13 top positive
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web
irreversible pulpitis diagnosis criteria symptomatic asymptomatic AAE classification periapical radiograph
Now I have sufficient evidence. Let me analyze the radiograph and clinical data thoroughly.
Radiograph Analysis (teeth #12 & #13 — upper right lateral incisor and canine):
From the image I can see:
- Deep radiolucent lesion(s) involving the coronal dentine, appearing to approach or communicate with the pulp space
- Widened periodontal ligament (PDL) space at the apex of at least one tooth
- Periapical radiolucency present at the root apex (dark halo around root tip), indicating periapical involvement
- No obvious previous root canal treatment (no radio-opaque filling material in canals)
- The root structure appears intact without obvious external resorption
Clinical Diagnosis Summary — Teeth #12 & #13
Patient Data Recap
| Parameter | Finding |
|---|---|
| Tooth | #12 (upper lateral incisor) & #13 (upper canine) |
| History of pain | 1 year (chronic duration) |
| Thermal (cold) test | Positive (vital pulp response) |
| Percussion | Not specified, likely positive given radiographic findings |
| Radiograph | Deep caries/lesion approaching pulp, periapical radiolucency, widened PDL |
Provisional Diagnosis
Chronic (Asymptomatic) Irreversible Pulpitis with Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis — teeth #12 and #13.
Reasoning:
- Pain history of 1 year = chronic, not an acute new event
- Both teeth respond positive to cold = pulp is still vital (not necrotic), but inflamed
- The long duration with positive response points to irreversible, chronic pulpal inflammation
- Radiographic periapical radiolucency = apical periodontitis has developed secondary to chronic pulpal disease
- No mention of spontaneous or lingering pain currently — consistent with asymptomatic presentation at the time of examination
Differential Diagnosis
| # | Diagnosis | Supporting Findings | Against |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asymptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis + Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis (most likely) | Positive cold test (vital pulp), chronic 1-year history, periapical radiolucency, deep lesion | — |
| 2 | Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis | 1-year history, positive cold test | Typically presents with lingering/spontaneous/severe pain; not stated here |
| 3 | Reversible Pulpitis | Positive cold test | Pain duration >1 year, periapical radiolucency — both rule this out |
| 4 | Pulp Necrosis + Apical Periodontitis | Periapical radiolucency present | Negative cold test expected in necrosis; both teeth are positive → pulp still vital |
| 5 | Cracked Tooth Syndrome | Deep lesion, pain history | No specific fracture line visible; would need transillumination |
Pulp Examination Interpretation
Cold Test (Thermal Testing) — Positive on Both #12 & #13
- A positive response = vital pulp tissue is present
- In the context of a 1-year history of pain + periapical changes → this is not normal vitality, it represents an inflamed, hyperreactive pulp incapable of healing
- This rules out pulp necrosis
AAE Pulpal Classification Applied
| Category | Definition | Matches This Case? |
|---|---|---|
| Normal pulp | Symptom-free, normal response | ✗ — history of pain |
| Reversible pulpitis | Pain resolves with stimulus; no periapical change; no spontaneous pain | ✗ — 1-year history + periapical radiolucency |
| Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) | Lingering pain ≥30 sec after stimulus, spontaneous pain, referred pain | Possible, but current presentation is quiet |
| Asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis (AIP) | No current symptoms, vital pulp positive response, deep caries/history that indicates pulp is unable to heal | ✓ Best fit |
| Pulp necrosis | Non-responsive to thermal testing | ✗ — both teeth are positive |
Acute vs. Chronic
| Feature | This Case |
|---|---|
| Duration of pain | 1 year → Chronic |
| Current symptoms | Appears quiet at time of exam (asymptomatic presentation) |
| Onset | Gradual, not sudden |
| Radiographic changes | Well-established periapical radiolucency = chronic change |
Conclusion: Chronic, not acute.
Final Diagnosis
| Tooth | Pulpal Diagnosis | Periapical Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| #12 | Asymptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (Chronic) | Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis |
| #13 | Asymptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (Chronic) | Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis |
Treatment Indicated
Both teeth require root canal treatment (RCT / non-surgical endodontic therapy) followed by coronal restoration. The positive thermal response confirms vital pulp tissue is present, making instrumentation and obturation achievable. The periapical lesion should resolve following successful RCT over months of follow-up.
Key rule: Positive thermal test = vital (not necrotic) pulp. Periapical radiolucency in the presence of a vital positive test = chronic irreversible pulpitis has progressed to asymptomatic apical periodontitis — per AAE Diagnostic Terminology.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.